The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

[Higgs Bonbon]

Whats maddening to me is that. While the loli artwork argument is going on all over Twitter. No one seems to give a fuck PornHub still has no legal age verification to become a creator. Despite the story coming out recently, that a missing underage girl was identified in videos on Pornhub by authorities.

So do these anti-lolicon artwork people really give a fuck about kids? I really don't think so.

Of course they don't. It's either clout chasing (and seething when they're rebuffed by every single CSA agency) or projection in an attempt to distract people from actual pedophiles (as in the Dr Pizza effect).

Spoiler: schizoposting

Going schizo for a moment but I feel there's some glowops to it—especially with how CNN, the UN etc lambast lolisho while being caught abusing children repeatedly. Keep fundies and normies outraged about drawn CP while they continue to produce and consume the real stuff.

TAX:

https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1652500910457917441?s=19

"Why won't young people vote conservative?"

 

[Antenna7]

Going schizo for a moment but I feel there's some glowops to it—especially with how CNN, the UN etc lambast lolisho while being caught abusing children repeatedly. Keep fundies and normies outraged about drawn CP while they continue to produce and consume the real stuff.

Take the Lolita Express for example. One of the pilots of it was Nadia Marcinko. She is the CEO of the private flight company that manages that fleet. Probably was trafficked herself at a young age since shes from Slovakia.





She was never charged, or investigated. She still runs the company. She still runs things. But no one says anything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadia_Marcinko​

 

[The Demon Pimp of Razgriz]

Lolicons think loli is a loophole to CP.

Real lolicons don't think loli is a loophole to anything. They just don't think its CP. The real kicker is that the anti-lolicon crusaders don't think its CP either. They are either clout chasing, or projecting their own pedophilia fetishes and desperately trying to hide their own sins, like a closeted gay man who is extremely anti-gay.

 

[Antenna7]

Real lolicons don't think loli is a loophole to anything. They just don't think its CP. The real kicker is that the anti-lolicon crusaders don't think its CP either. They are either clout chasing, or projecting their own pedophilia fetishes and desperately trying to hide their own sins, like a closeted gay man who is extremely anti-gay.

The whole problem with the Lolicon art thing is that it's just a replication of the "FPS's create school shooters" argument. And that was debunked 20 years ago. Sure, theres a correlation. But there no causal link.

So it seems we are stuck where the media and other institutions are distracting us from attempting to identify the real causes of these problems in society. School shootings, Mental Illness, and Pedophilia. It's like they don't want us to know.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

You can argue about the morality and creepiness of it until the end of time, but when it comes right down to it loli shit isn't technically child porn since no real children are represented in those images. If it's lewd art of a real kid then it's cp, at least in the United States.

Again, this is putting aside the morality and perversion of loli, no matter your personal stance on it. This is just the legal aspect that these Twitter losers flat-out ignore.

That's what i meant by it.

Whats maddening to me is that. While the loli artwork argument is going on all over Twitter. No one seems to give a fuck PornHub still has no legal age verification to become a creator. Despite the story coming out recently, that a missing underage girl was identified in videos on Pornhub by authorities.

So do these anti-lolicon artwork people really give a fuck about kids? I really don't think so.

How does pornhub not have that after they purged non-verified videos?

 

[Antenna7]

How does pornhub not have that after they purged non-verified videos?

They activated age verification...... wait for it........ a few hours ago.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

They activated age verification...... wait for it........ a few hours ago.

View attachment 5101596

What a coincidence

 

[Higgs Bonbon]

Oh he's doubling down and falling for bait. At least he doesn't have far to fall.

this reads like satire

 

[Spud]

View attachment 5104181

4'11. They never learn do they?

 

[Alessonincrippliningdepre]

So I stumbled upon this weird ass callous post about some age play degenerate

Link to the original thread


Now you'll think that CulltOfAo's friends and followers would bring up a good defense, but...

Some of qrts were not having it either

CultOfAo response, but their account was unfortunately suspended and my dumbass didn't screenshot, so here a some of their followers jacking them off.

Sorry if the thread was to long and messy, I thought it was a interesting read

 

[beepbopisuckcock]

The irony in Clay Claym-I mean, ISWV Losers shaming lolicons as pedophiles while also implying "her" support for surgical castration of kids

 

[Sekirodiealot]

Oh he's doubling down and falling for bait. At least he doesn't have far to fall.View attachment 5104180View attachment 5104181
this reads like satire

I bet he's the type to think child marriage is okay

 

[Sekirodiealot]

Look who's back

 

[New Bromantics]

I don't know if I'm going to follow this thread or not but I think it reams of hypocrisy when the loli-crusader niche on twitter go absolutely apeshit over drawings of characters they claim are canonically <18 but then call me racist when I don't think Ariel should be a nigger, or tell me that the Raise of Reysism trilogy is justified in making Luke an attempted nephew murdering deranged teet suckling hobo.

It seems to me like characters are plastic when it's convenient for them, but then set in canonical stone when it is similarly convenient for them. I wouldn't care one way or the other if it actually was one way or the other, but it isn't.

If THIS is 100% justified because "lol they're just characters, they're not real, they can be any race, why do you care"

Then "The cartoon girl is just a million year old maid from another dimension with A cups, why do you care, it's not real, it's just artistic liberty" is a similarly valid argument for lolifags, or neither argument is valid but they won't concede that nigrofying red-heads is wrong, so I don't see any reason why lolifags should concede that their faggy weebshit is wrong either.



I am not a lolifag, this was just a random thought I had while reading this thread.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

I wonder what clay has against youngrippa

 

[Chuck McGill]

I don't know who to hell this Britney venti lady is but she's been doing this anti-loli shtick lately.
View attachment 5066584
View attachment 5066593
Btw i heard that on her recent stream attacking Gura, she showed toddlercon for the world to see ans she doesn't get by her logic, she could get in trouble for distributing CP and youtube took it down, rejected her appeal, and she has a victim complex to the point of making two videos going woo is me.

Aging roastie mad that men would literally rather give attention to drawings of children than her stinky, mulatto ass. Sad. Many such cases.

 

[74164978231]

The whole problem with the Lolicon art thing is that it's just a replication of the "FPS's create school shooters" argument. And that was debunked 20 years ago. Sure, theres a correlation. But there no causal link.

I cant quite put it into words but theres a fundamental difference between playing cod, and jerking it to loli.

 

[Antenna7]

I cant quite put it into words but theres a fundamental difference between playing cod, and jerking it to loli.

Well, let me put it this way. It seems that this is the prevailing sentiment online about lolicon art. If you can cite some academic studies or papers to back all this up. I'd be glad to look at them.

 

[74164978231]

Well, let me put it this way. It seems that this is the prevailing sentiment online about lolicon art. If you can cite some academic studies or papers to back all this up. I'd be glad to look at them.

Sex and sex related acts are routine activities humans engage in and extensively fantasize about every single day. Murder and mayhem(what you do in cod) are not(fantasize to some degree sure, but actually act out or try and act out? No).

So when you are someone who happily expresses their enjoyment of sexualized children albeit fictional children, its a bit telling.

 

[Antenna7]

So when you are someone who happily expresses their enjoyment of sexualized children albeit fictional children, its a bit telling.

Sure that makes sense. So in the last 20 years, the more mainstream internet has been around, I'm surprised I haven't been bombarded by studies. You'd think it would be a layup. But I've literally never seen one.