The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

It's why pedophilia has so little research done into it. Because researchers don't want to labeled as pedos.

I agree, actual abuse happens on apps such as tiktok but instead these crusaders who want to portray themselves as the Guardian Angel of all things sacred go after lolicon on twitter instead of actively fighting predators on TikTok.
Like that one predator, howard who wants young boys to bathe in the shower with their clothes on. Has he ever been caught yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Linking
It's why pedophilia has so little research done into it. Because researchers don't want to labeled as pedos.

I agree, actual abuse happens on apps such as tiktok but instead these crusaders who want to portray themselves as the Guardian Angel of all things sacred go after lolicon on twitter instead of actively fighting predators on TikTok.
You seem very emotionally invested in people “going after lolicon” lol. I came into this thread knowing what type of people were gonna post in it and wasn’t surprised.

I fully approve of people bullying and harassing pedophiles, even if those pedophiles are jerking off to drawings. If we didn’t live in a society where cops protected scum, they’d get more than just internet bullying.
 
You seem very emotionally invested in people “going after lolicon” lol. I came into this thread knowing what type of people were gonna post in it and wasn’t surprised.
I've literally been arguing with Boxy about why actual pedophilia is wrong in another thread for like two days now. I make two posts in this thread saying why I think people go after lolicon so often and how it's a misdirected effort to defend drawings (I have not even said once how I support it, if I even like it, or anything of the sort.) and now I'm "very emotionally invested." and you allude to me being a lolicon. Sure buddy, get off my dick.

You are prime material for this thread though, I wonder if you the ever so vigilant loli crusader who alludes to a person who makes two posts not even supporting loli but discussing the meta around it being a pedo will eventually be outted as an actual pedo too.
 
I've literally been arguing with Boxy about why actual pedophilia is wrong in another thread for like two days now. I make two posts in this thread saying why I think people go after lolicon so often and how it's a misdirected effort to defend drawings (I have not even said once how I support it, if I even like it, or anything of the sort.) and now I'm "very emotionally invested." and you allude to me being a lolicon. Sure buddy, get off my dick.

You are prime material for this thread though, I wonder if you the ever so vigilant loli crusader who alludes to a person who makes two posts not even supporting loli but discussing the meta around it being a pedo will eventually be outted as an actual pedo too.
The one and only defence lolicons give for their pedophilia is that “it’s just a drawing bro” and that’s all I saw you saying in this thread.

“you’re a pedophile because you hate people who masturbate to children” is a pretty weird thing to say. If you’re not a pedo, fine, I really don’t understand the urge to defend “artists” who draw this sick shit though.
 
The one and only defence lolicons give for their pedophilia is that “it’s just a drawing bro” and that’s all I saw you saying in this thread.
I said their efforts are misdirected. If they really cared about the children as they claim they should try to bust actual predators instead of seething about drawings that will kept being drawn anyways. I haven't even told my official stance on lolicon and my own feelings towards it, you just assumed it for me.
I really don’t understand the urge to defend “artists” who draw this sick shit though.
Did I say I was defending anything? Let me repeat what I said, people tend to go after loli rather than actual predators and I think that's misguided effort, and many people don't even want to say this because they are afraid of being labeled a pedo, and in general avoid the topic of pedophilia as a whole to avoid being labeled pedo. You also proved my earlier point. So thank you Ted.
 
I said their efforts are misdirected. If they really cared about the children as they claim they should try to bust actual predators instead of seething about drawings that will kept being drawn anyways. I haven't even told my official stance on lolicon and my own feelings towards it, you just assumed it for me.

Did I say I was defending anything? Let me repeat what I said, people tend to go after loli rather than actual predators and I think that's misguided effort, and many people don't even want to say this because they are afraid of being labeled a pedo, and in general avoid the topic of pedophilia as a whole to avoid being labeled pedo. You also proved my earlier point. So thank you Ted.
Tons of people do bust physical predators, more than people go after lolicon. There are countries where pedophiles get dragged into the street and killed.

The notion that pedophilic drawings being spread in communities with a lot of children in them is “non-predatory” is just plain wrong. Fictional representations don’t exist in a vacuum, they effect the world and are a product of it. The idea that we should tolerate people who promote fantasies about having sex with children is absurd. It’s not just about protecting children, it’s about punishing and destroying sick people, and hopefully driving them off the internet.

When you say “it’s just a drawing” or “you’re misdirecting your anger” you are literally offering a defence of lolicon, no matter how you try to frame it.
 
Fictional representations don’t exist in a vacuum, they effect the world and are a product of it.
You're one of those videogames cause violence characters aren't you?
pedophilic drawings being spread in communities with a lot of children in them is “non-predatory” is just plain wrong
Again, when did I say this is ok? I'm talking about misguided efforts and how nobody likes to talk about pedophilia in general because they get labeled. Those who post it are called pedos, those who go after it are called pedos who try to make up for the fact they are pedos.
Tons of people do bust physical predators, more than people go after lolicon.
I know that. Once again, I'm saying these people's (THE TWITTER CROWD'S) efforts are misdirected and pointless.
When you say “it’s just a drawing” or “you’re misdirecting your anger” you are literally offering a defence of lolicon
Again, I'm not saying it's JUST A DRAWING I'm saying these people waste their time going after something that isnt real, and won't ever end. I don't like loli shit, but I know complaining about it will do absolutely nothing. It's like if you wanted to go somewhere so you go on a stationary bike, no matter how hard you pedal you won't move. That's my point Ted.

I hate to keep shitting up the thread with this bickering. I've repeated myself multiple times, so I'll leave it at that. I have a feeling this will just be endless back and forward and that's boring.
 
This is a thread for making fun of people who a-log lolicons. These people are inherently funny due to their total lack of self-awareness and frequent hypocrisy, not to mention often calling things that are 100% not lolicon "lolicon".

If you want to call lolicon horrible and demand it to be banned, go ahead. I agree with you on that, too. But doing that here is off-topic.
 
Update: The event has gone through and barely anyone turned up
View attachment 2873006
This is unfortunately the only recording of the event we have but there were several photos taken of the slides that are worth a good laugh
View attachment 2873032View attachment 2873033View attachment 2873026View attachment 2873027View attachment 2873028View attachment 2873029View attachment 2873030View attachment 2873031
Tweet where images were gathered:
https://twitter.com/possumsticks/status/1479345513249980416
Archive:
https://archive.md/eieVs

Why was I not surprised this received no visibility. This is what I love about these moral self righteous types is that have no one to either mock or praise them. The best kind of treatment you can give to this type of people.
 
When you say “it’s just a drawing” or “you’re misdirecting your anger” you are literally offering a defence of lolicon, no matter how you try to frame it.
nigga there's been a higher track record of people who go after lolicons getting outted as predators that have like five minors they've groomed or solicited nudes from, the "anti-lolicons" also have no problem editing bikinis on actual children to win some internet argument and you got dumbasses calling a 15 year old a pedophile because they're attracted to a 14 year old anime character or alternatively calling shit with big ass cow tits "lolicon" like Uzaki-chan who is expressly stated to be 21 and even drinks in the damn show, or threatening to send around someone's csem because they're pro-shippers

these motherfuckers and your autistic ass ain't doing shit. Niggas no shit make threads about how it is pedophilic for a cosplayer to have a "child like body" even though she's like fucking 30 or dating a woman under 5'4 is creepy and not realize how fucking insane and terminally online it sounds.

if nothing else, by ignoring the fact that it really is misdirected anger you basically are offering a defense for these "anti-lolicons" to threaten to send CSEM to people or spread around someone's CSEm and be like "it's just a joke" or "its okay because they're a lolicon/proshipper/whatever the fuck else I don't like." you cannot argue that actively spreading around or even so much as threatening to do while calling lolicons pedophiles is autistically hypocritical.

no one gives a fuck you don't like lolicons when you got these "anti-lolicons" out here having no problem spreading actual child porn despite hating pedos so much and even admitting to collecting stuff they consider child porn for "evidence". You can't say that shit ain't fishy and shady as hell. You got these fucking "anti-pedo" niggas getting outted as fucking child predators and you still can't settle the autism enough to think that maybe its a problem that these niggas tryna hide skeletons in their closet by trying to direct the fact that they solicited nudes from minors on the weekends to some incel jacking it to kanna.
 
Meanwhile, the 17-year old these same people love to draw gay porn of so much...

View attachment 2886516

Golly. Is is possible manga stylizes shit?
Stylization and artist drawing their own way all go out the window when you have raging weebs that think a character other weebs jack off to must be a minor. Even then, this shit is all drawings that makes the groups look more unhinged than they would already be

Why do people equate loli and shota with real children?
Because it's all kids. Won't deny it, people jacking off to loli and shota would no doubt be creepy since it means "hey you like seeing this little anime girl take it up the ass sick fuck?" Even then, that shit isn't really going to be like actual CP unless you traced actual kids or CP over it. And then when you see them rage over a character, it's something done in a stylized way like any character from that My Hero Academia anime that seems to get some people on a high horse before they turn out to be hypocritical in wanting to fuck some 16-17 year old anime character that has big tits.

All of this being on Twitter just makes it more of a circus since you get anime avatars wanting someone they don't like reported because how dare this person drew some pornographic MHA art or someone loves sperging over Uzaki-Chan or Dragon Maid or some other cartoon.
 
I think people are fully aware of how weird loli and shota are (along with other hentai categories) but are mostly making fun of people who get way too invested in condemning people who happen to like it. They're often performative hypocrites who either liked it in the past, keep it a secret from their friends, or have other weird fetishes they don't want to be judged for. There are people who will have no issue watching the Monogotari series, but if you like Dragon Maid you deserve the electric chair for some reason.

I don't agree with criminalizing art that's obcene, it leads to a weird slippery slope of censorship. A lot of the people who want lolisho to be banned, don't even bring up cub/babyfur stuff. It seems like a lot of weirdos just have it out for Japan because they can't shame them over what they draw, but they can try to control the distribution of their products and attempt to arrest people who have it. Plus the people who try to report it to the authorities are just clogging up reports that could be used to help real children. The more people who spread misnformation about how grooming actually happens or what pedophiles actually are; the more that kids are put in danger.
 

Also the archive https://archive.md/AqdAI

Imagine calling people who like lolis freaks and trying to imply something is wrong with it because you won't publically simp for them (cause who randomly tells people their porn preferences publically unless you run an account for that/close enough to someone to comfortably talk about that and this really shows how little they're involved in the vtuber community despite being one cause people simp for loli vtubers constantly), or just calling them pedos and how wrong it is to sexualize children
...
...
Only to be outted for grooming and apparently soliciting nudes from minors. They try to damage control and say they've gotten medical help to no longer be attracted to characters that aren't real but try to brush off the fact that they've groomed a real person as "I'm not that person anymore. I was gross back then." like it is the same as spouting and ignorant take about race relations.

this really only furthers my argument that lolishotacons may we weird but the vehement anti-lolicons are just hiding skeletons in the closet, are trying to blame loli/shota for their actions or because they used it to groom someone in the past then it must mean every other lolishotacon is the same.

for some context: Arrty was one of the people vehemently against a vtuber known as Kyutto and heavily criticized her for (then) having a sexualized chibi-loli avatar because Kyutto was a loli succubus. Arrty made tweets about how she wanted anyone who supported loli shit to unfollow her and that she didn't condone it around her community along with the typical anti-lolicon tweets (calling freaks, pedos, etc.).

Now this is just a personal spurg from me: Given that this is the vtuber community, it is incredibly ironic that anti-lolicons are in it and go on about how people wouldn't publically simp for lolis but the community is filled with lolicon/shota vtubers and supporters such as Matsuri, Gura, Marine and others who have millions of followers. EnVtubers go on about how the community "has no place" for lolicons but the space for vtubers has always had them. Many popular vtubers are loli/shotacons themselves and the irony is that many of these EnVtubers follow popular vtubers who have either liked NSFW art of their loli/shota avatars or admitted to being into it. People also pretty publically simp for them as do the vtubers themselves.

On another note, why do antis always go for "If you wouldn't do it publicly that means you know its bad or wouldn't have friends"? Because "publically" means a few different things and there is such thing as boundaries. On your own twitter where no one knows you and all you do is horny post? Yeah, you'll have people talking about how they like it. On your personal one where ya nosey grandma follows you? Probably not. To your equally weeb friends? Yes. To people, you know in college and only use them for weed connects? Probably not.

There are certain things you put out publically that you don't do put out otherwise depending on the situation or context... like a healthy adult?
 
Last edited:
On another note, why do antis always go for "If you wouldn't do it publicly that means you know its bad or wouldn't have friends"? Because "publically" means a few different things and there is such thing as boundaries. On your own twitter where no one knows you and all you do is horny post? Yeah, you'll have people talking about how they like it. On your personal one where ya nosey grandma follows you? Probably not. To your equally weeb friends? Yes. To people, you know in college and only use them for weed connects? Probably not.

There are certain things you put out publically that you don't do put out otherwise depending on the situation or context... like a healthy adult?
This part is especially strange to me because it implies that these people just talk about what kinds of pornography they're into with people they're close to or even random strangers, even people like DuncanCantDie seem to think it's just something people do.

They don't seem to think that secrets exist and that some things don't need to be aired out to people and ESPECIALLY not on the internet, otherwise you'll just turn yourself into a lolcow.
 
They don't seem to think that secrets exist and that some things don't need to be aired out to people and ESPECIALLY not on the internet, otherwise you'll just turn yourself into a lolcow.
My theory, from the testimonies of people who have been in anti spaces and talked about it, is that antis have no concept of boundaries or secrets. If something is a secret, it is clearly because it is bad. If it is bad, then you are a bad person. It's why they curate who can follow them so heavily because they want to be mutuals with almost everyone they follow or have the potential to be mutuals. If you like something they don't, you can't be mutuals because friends/moots all have the same exact interests, tastes, and opinions.

even when it comes to sexual stuff, they have almost no concept of boundaries. It's why a lot of them tend to get outted as general sex pests or groomers. You have to be able to share nudes with them if you are dating and if you don't then you're just upsetting their bpd. You can't do that, otherwise, you're a bad person. What do you mean you don't want to talk about something with me? Either its because its problematic and gross in which case I don't want to ever talk to you ever again and will tell everyone else you talk to to never talk to you again or it is because you don't like/trust me in which case why are we even friends/mutuals if you can't talk to me about stuff? Obviously, if you can trust me then it is the first one.

even though ironically according to people who have left anti-spaces, antis are incredibly secretive because they don't want to be chewed out or lose their friends because they god forbid ship something "problematic". Ironic considering depending on the size of the anti, many of them still have friends or an online space despite getting outted as sex pests because "they've changed" and will have friends defend them but good gods you had better not look at anything problematic or else you don't deserve your platform. If they aren't getting outted for actually doing something problematic, they're trauma dumping or sharing every little detail about their lives because the concept of privacy doesn't exist. Or rather, it does exist but you don't need privacy unless you are trying to hide something.
 
My theory, from the testimonies of people who have been in anti spaces and talked about it, is that antis have no concept of boundaries or secrets. If something is a secret, it is clearly because it is bad. If it is bad, then you are a bad person. It's why they curate who can follow them so heavily because they want to be mutuals with almost everyone they follow or have the potential to be mutuals. If you like something they don't, you can't be mutuals because friends/moots all have the same exact interests, tastes, and opinions.

even when it comes to sexual stuff, they have almost no concept of boundaries. It's why a lot of them tend to get outted as general sex pests or groomers. You have to be able to share nudes with them if you are dating and if you don't then you're just upsetting their bpd. You can't do that, otherwise, you're a bad person. What do you mean you don't want to talk about something with me? Either its because its problematic and gross in which case I don't want to ever talk to you ever again and will tell everyone else you talk to to never talk to you again or it is because you don't like/trust me in which case why are we even friends/mutuals if you can't talk to me about stuff? Obviously, if you can trust me then it is the first one.

even though ironically according to people who have left anti-spaces, antis are incredibly secretive because they don't want to be chewed out or lose their friends because they god forbid ship something "problematic". Ironic considering depending on the size of the anti, many of them still have friends or an online space despite getting outted as sex pests because "they've changed" and will have friends defend them but good gods you had better not look at anything problematic or else you don't deserve your platform. If they aren't getting outted for actually doing something problematic, they're trauma dumping or sharing every little detail about their lives because the concept of privacy doesn't exist. Or rather, it does exist but you don't need privacy unless you are trying to hide something.
Not to get political about it, but antis tend to suffer from the same issues as the woke. Or any extremist group, for that matter.

For one, everything is based around a dogma. Questioning that dogma is bad and will get you expelled from the group. You may then find another group with similar dogma that will take you, but you'll be persona non grata among the original group. If you look closely, you'll see that even antis go at each other's throats over what, exactly, they're against. That's what happens when you have a purity spiral: as you circle around it people get thrown out and then coalesce into their own groups.

For two, they al have a very deep need to belong somewhere. If it weren't being anti-whatever, they'd be part of some other ultimately inconsequential group that's obsessed with some other random thing. It's a similar situation with lolisho themselves: the ones that quietly enjoy their favorite content (no matter how morally or legally questionable it may or may not be) usually keep a low profile. The ones who make lolisho their identity and talk about it being some sort of lifestyle or community are almost universally lolcows in their own right, and they themselves often get into fights with other lolisho over what they should and should not be allowed to like (the flame wars between "flat" loli and "oppai" loli, for example).

They're two manifestations of the same phenomenon: people with nothing better to do with their lives, trying to find fulfillment in being part of some group. Some people channel it positively, becoming part of groups dedicated to benign things. Others channel it negatively, and that's where we get cancel mobs like this thread's subjects.
 

Also the archive https://archive.md/AqdAI

Imagine calling people who like lolis freaks and trying to imply something is wrong with it because you won't publically simp for them (cause who randomly tells people their porn preferences publically unless you run an account for that/close enough to someone to comfortably talk about that and this really shows how little they're involved in the vtuber community despite being one cause people simp for loli vtubers constantly), or just calling them pedos and how wrong it is to sexualize children
...
...
Only to be outted for grooming and apparently soliciting nudes from minors. They try to damage control and say they've gotten medical help to no longer be attracted to characters that aren't real but try to brush off the fact that they've groomed a real person as "I'm not that person anymore. I was gross back then." like it is the same as spouting and ignorant take about race relations.

this really only furthers my argument that lolishotacons may we weird but the vehement anti-lolicons are just hiding skeletons in the closet, are trying to blame loli/shota for their actions or because they used it to groom someone in the past then it must mean every other lolishotacon is the same.

for some context: Arrty was one of the people vehemently against a vtuber known as Kyutto and heavily criticized her for (then) having a sexualized chibi-loli avatar because Kyutto was a loli succubus. Arrty made tweets about how she wanted anyone who supported loli shit to unfollow her and that she didn't condone it around her community along with the typical anti-lolicon tweets (calling freaks, pedos, etc.).

Now this is just a personal spurg from me: Given that this is the vtuber community, it is incredibly ironic that anti-lolicons are in it and go on about how people wouldn't publically simp for lolis but the community is filled with lolicon/shota vtubers and supporters such as Matsuri, Gura, Marine and others who have millions of followers. EnVtubers go on about how the community "has no place" for lolicons but the space for vtubers has always had them. Many popular vtubers are loli/shotacons themselves and the irony is that many of these EnVtubers follow popular vtubers who have either liked NSFW art of their loli/shota avatars or admitted to being into it. People also pretty publically simp for them as do the vtubers themselves.

On another note, why do antis always go for "If you wouldn't do it publicly that means you know its bad or wouldn't have friends"? Because "publically" means a few different things and there is such thing as boundaries. On your own twitter where no one knows you and all you do is horny post? Yeah, you'll have people talking about how they like it. On your personal one where ya nosey grandma follows you? Probably not. To your equally weeb friends? Yes. To people, you know in college and only use them for weed connects? Probably not.

There are certain things you put out publically that you don't do put out otherwise depending on the situation or context... like a healthy adult?

With how public social media is and the reality that we live in a surveillance state no matter where we live meant being shamed is supposedly easier than ever. Given how desperate some of the more vocal antis try to pine for the opinions of block heavy industry trannies who will block you if you have liked nsfw art because they had gotten ratioed for shit takes with anime pfps. This means attacking lolisho fandoms is even more encouraged. Unless you are a cishet male like Frost who comes off more as a pathetic failure of a rehab outpatient who still has a bottle of cheap booze somewhere to sate his urges like what happened with Frost and his failed attempt to set up Lolisho Anonymous.

Outside of the Vtuber fandom you also have the stigma of ostracization in the local anime community and having interest in taboo stuff outs you as a creep these days rather than the cool uncle/cousin who brought you the latest copy of a porno mag.
 
Last edited:
Back