The Wayback Machine is run by tranny pedophiles

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Have you read archive.md's tumblr? He's an eastern European and I don't think the troons will be able to convince him to censor anything.

He ignores DMCAs (which archive.org has obeyed for years):
View attachment 3689429

He's also been dropped by registrars after someone made false reports of the site hosting child porn:
View attachment 3689440
So he's likely sympathetic to the Farms for that reason alone.

His statement on the censoring of the "alt-right":
View attachment 3689447
While I agree it's unlikely, we've already experienced firsthand that with alternatives like our own .ru domain, if retards can capitulate to the mob they may. Always keep local archives if you can. Always find additional alternatives online if they exist.
 
Have you read archive.md's tumblr? He's an eastern European and I don't think the troons will be able to convince him to censor anything.
I have no doubt the owner of archive.md is based. The trouble is that almost every other link in the chain is pozzed to some degree.

We've already seen this with the Farms: the server is perfectly fine, and runs great when one is lucky enough to be on a decent Tor circuit. It's just the infrastructure linking the server to the end user that's full of cancer.

Be that as it may, even if archive.md is banished to Tor along with the Farms, an onion archive is better than no archive at all.
 
Internet Archive hasn't been as useful it was before about 2012 or so due to so many java heavy websites - try to use it for It also always sucked for archiving most forums. And while archive.is is pretty nice (except for the stupid feud he had with Brave browser for a couple months), it isn't automatic, and not as comprehensive as Internet Archive.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Aidan and Toolbox
I knew the site was compromised when a black MSNBC anchor's old blog resurfaced a few years ago. She held some interesting opinions for someone working at a left-wing news outlet. Most notably, I remember her calling LGBT alliances at schools a form of child grooming. This became a news story. She lied and said the archives were hacked. Eventually, she admitted they weren't but only after she got Archive.org to delete the entirety of her website's history.
I remember that story whenever I use the site and get a "They're trying to change history" donation banner. Who's trying to change history? You?
 
I knew the site was compromised when a black MSNBC anchor's old blog resurfaced a few years ago. She held some interesting opinions for someone working at a left-wing news outlet. Most notably, I remember her calling LGBT alliances at schools a form of child grooming. This became a news story. She lied and said the archives were hacked. Eventually, she admitted they weren't but only after she got Archive.org to delete the entirety of her website's history.
I remember that story whenever I use the site and get a "They're trying to change history" donation banner. Who's trying to change history? You?
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

One blessing in disguise from all the bullshit over the past couple of years is the masks are off and the intentions of these fascist entities are now clear and undeniable.
 
Does this guy google himself? How the hell did he run into this? Did someone send it to him? very strange.
Forgive me saying "clueless" but I gotta, because I guess it's gotta be said to far more people here than you -- I thought everyone was already of this understanding:
due to the current war going on, you can bet there are a dozen or more trannies etc. at any given time [most logged into old accounts, even ones in good standing, don't forget they're long since terminally online & deep in e-drama too], scouring these forums for everything posted that they possibly can weaponize.
None of them have jobs.
 
I knew the site was compromised when a black MSNBC anchor's old blog resurfaced a few years ago. She held some interesting opinions for someone working at a left-wing news outlet. Most notably, I remember her calling LGBT alliances at schools a form of child grooming. This became a news story. She lied and said the archives were hacked. Eventually, she admitted they weren't but only after she got Archive.org to delete the entirety of her website's history.
I remember that story whenever I use the site and get a "They're trying to change history" donation banner. Who's trying to change history? You?
As you'd be aware if you looked back to the stories about that, those pages were marked 'removed due to robots.txt'.

Should Wayback ignore robots.txt? Yes. Did Reid get special treatment? No.
 
As you'd be aware if you looked back to the stories about that, those pages were marked 'removed due to robots.txt'.

Should Wayback ignore robots.txt? Yes. Did Reid get special treatment? No.
You're right. It's been years and I misremembered what happened. Her lawyers did ask them to remove it under the claim the posts were "hacked" but it only got taken down after the robots.txt inclusion.

I guess there was nothing they did wrong beyond their overall policy. Seems kind of insane to let someone add robots.txt years after publication and have those archives vanish. Joy Reid still won in the end.
 
I have no idea what taking the farms off the way back does to help trannies when we archive all there tweets. All they did was remove our commentary but they still have the greatest hits like “I want cis women to be breed against their will by trans women” and “Hecking gosh my vag stinks, I’m such a beautiful woman”

I wonder if the way back will start un-archiving any and all trans peoples posts because “uwu they we’re just heckking ditzy like real woman and we shouldn’t archive their horrific tweets uwu”
 
I'm a little bummed that these shiftless assholes will dump KF over troon tantrums but have no problem ignoring what by now must be thousands of DMCA requests to take down the many hollywood movies they have up for quick easy streaming/DDL.
Not that I'm complaining. It's nostalgic being able to search a movie title + archive.org and be able to watch something without a hundred attempts to serve ad scripts.
 
Funny, the anti-Farms crowd wants us to be erased but without us there isn't proof that we're the bad guys.

Short sighted of "them" to think that their version of events will always be believed.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pee Cola
i'm not sure where else to post this ...
the response that i've gotten while trying to use the wayback machine since the kf.net domain returned:

1665351934900.png
 
The way back machine will delete archives if all you do is fuck with the current robots.txt.

However, they keep them in their secret offline archives.
As shitty as not having an outward archive I hoped they had done that just from seeing them sperg about archives. When I heard them say “we don’t know what will be important in the future so we archive everything” I was pretty happy with that. this info is pretty early in the New Zealand happening thread, but where archive.org altered the archive of 8chan to remove post made by legit feds. Also, afaik archive.org is the only archive of websites recognized in us court. Hope I’m wrong about that, but something I recall seeing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pissmaster
i tried to use internet archive to archive the fact that internet archive is now pleading for money.
apparently, i was not alone ...

View attachment 3788580
About 6 months ago I was seriously considering giving IA some money because they provide a valuable service with the preservation of stuff like vintage electronics books and computer documentation, along with vintage magazines. Since learning that one of IA's big wigs is related to Taylor Lorenz and that the Wayback Machine was purged due to Keffals' personal army screeching at IA, I no longer have the desire to give them any financial support.
 
Back