The Windows OS Thread - Formerly THE OS for gamers and normies, now sadly ruined by Pajeets

He is just a linux tranny, all they do is lie. The worst think about linux is the users, they make it very hard for anyone to give the OS's a fair shot. I wonder if they are employed by microshit or applefags. At least we know our OS has problems.
Didn't Susanne agree with me by saying you don't need to compile shit on either platforms? In fact I'd say rat lied about suggesting that you have to compile everything on Linux.
If you're a Linux power user like you pretend, then try compiling a normal piece of software like a web browser and see how long it takes.
You'd only do that because you want to compile a normal web browser. Not because you have to.
Check for an identical package suffixed by "-bin" as this is the typical convention for pre-compiled binaries.
Exactly. No one's forcing you to get the 'git' version.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: N Space
Dynamic recompilation has been a thing since the late 80s, it was how you ran DOS software on Sun workstations.
Only if you were poor. The rest of us used SunPC Accelerator and SunPCi cards. I think SunPC could only handle a 80286 without the hardware anyway.
 
Windows has to enable legacy support by default because it is a consumer product and 95% of their userbase has 0 computer literacy. Its the blessing and curse of using a product aimed at non-technical users. If Windows didn't enable all of these things by default then businesses would flip their shit, and they are the primary customer. Karen from HR would flip out that her computer is broken because some legacy service was using WebDAV and she cant connect anymore. Microsoft decided early on that they would strive to support legacy software to appease end users, to the point where they were having their own developers place patches for Sim city into Windows 95 to ensure it would work. It allowed them to gain a better foothold with normal users at the cost of reducing quality within the OS itself.

Back in the day, Microsoft sent out an update to Windows (98? 2000? XP?) that caused catastrophic problems at a major American manufacturer. It's not just that people are stupid (they are), it's that when IT systems break, millions of dollars walk out the door. IIRC, they had to keep using Windows XP longer than planned because there was a major CAD software package that wouldn't work on Win 7, and no, you're not going to put a billion-dollar design project on hold because the fancy new OS doesn't support your modeling software.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WelperHelper99
This is certainly ironic when considering the fact that it breaks new software, but I think its 2 competing philosophies. Part of MS is used to legacy support because it got them this far, while another part of MS is aggressively pushing product no matter the cost. I'd imagine MS would be more willing to retire legacy protocols if they thought it could push copilot or sell ad-space.
Could Microsoft find a way to move legacy support into "modules" that are preinstalled be default, but over time become optional or a paid feature? That would help solve some of the issues even if there was a slight performance overhead
 
Back in the day, Microsoft sent out an update to Windows (98? 2000? XP?) that caused catastrophic problems at a major American manufacturer. It's not just that people are stupid (they are), it's that when IT systems break, millions of dollars walk out the door. IIRC, they had to keep using Windows XP longer than planned because there was a major CAD software package that wouldn't work on Win 7, and no, you're not going to put a billion-dollar design project on hold because the fancy new OS doesn't support your modeling software.
Yep, One high impact outage can lose so much outage can lose billions. MS has little viable competition in their primary market but if they started patching out features on a whim that could change pretty damn fast. Businesses don't care about benefits to software quality as unfortunate as it may be. Not unless its their core product. If your inconvenience means Walmart can run business normally for 1 more week its an easy choice for Microsoft.
Could Microsoft find a way to move legacy support into "modules" that are preinstalled be default, but over time become optional or a paid feature? That would help solve some of the issues even if there was a slight performance overhead
They do this to an extent, look up "Turn Windows Features On and Off". They are simply conservative with these decisions. The features tend to be protocols that have been replaced and have security vulnerabilities. If there isn't a suitable replacement and it isn't losing them money then they aren't going to try and retire it. There is little benefit to them to try and encourage the retirement of these features because they can largely ignore them. Retiring them takes resources, and will piss off certain customers. Its important to remember that there are many small businesses making terrible decisions, and those small businesses will throw a fit if something stops working. Lots of small businesses hire the owners son whose main technical skill is gaming to manage their networks. Many businesses will insist on keeping around a 20+ year old server that hasn't gotten security patches in 10 years because they definitely need to have immediate access to an old invoice for 15 years ago. MS has to accommodate these people because it is a part of the business model. I'd love for them to be more aggressive and save these morons from their mistakes, but it wouldn't be profitable for them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 419 and crowabunga
MS has little viable competition in their primary market but if they started patching out features on a whim that could change pretty damn fast.

The original plan for Win 10 was mandatory rolling updates for everyone. Enterprise customers told them to fuck right off with that plan, and that's how we got LTSC and the twice-a-year release cycle. That and the Win XP life extensions are the two major OS policy changes forced on MS by their customers.

The #1 thing businesses care about is that you do not fuck up their operations. It does not matter if the new software is better in some abstract sense, if switching to it causes my inventory system to become unusable, resulting in me losing half a billion dollars, it's actually worse for me.
 
The original plan for Win 10 was mandatory rolling updates for everyone. Enterprise customers told them to fuck right off with that plan, and that's how we got LTSC and the twice-a-year release cycle. That and the Win XP life extensions are the two major OS policy changes forced on MS by their customers.

The #1 thing businesses care about is that you do not fuck up their operations. It does not matter if the new software is better in some abstract sense, if switching to it causes my inventory system to become unusable, resulting in me losing half a billion dollars, it's actually worse for me.
I hope windows 11 is finished by 2032 because LTSC IoT support runs out then.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Moths
got the end of support screen warning for win10 thats basically "you should upgrade to win11 but your not eligible lmao"

so
>Be windows
>require new OS to have some esoteric component that only newer parts or machines have
>end support for most machines ever made
>lose free support money for being the default os for most machines on earth
>???
>Profits

I hope windows 11 is finished by 2032 because LTSC IoT support runs out then.
When even your OS is stuck in Early Access hell forever now
 
So, all of my image thumbnails were showing up just fine until very recently. Now, only the most recent ones show up:

Screenshot 2024-05-21 222023.png

Bizarrely, all of the images in my other image folders (like the screenshots) show up in thumbnails just fine, regardless of how old they are.

I tried everything listed here and nothing has worked. What should I do?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Moths
So, all of my image thumbnails were showing up just fine until very recently. Now, only the most recent ones show up:

View attachment 6009176

Bizarrely, all of the images in my other image folders (like the screenshots) show up in thumbnails just fine, regardless of how old they are.

I tried everything listed here and nothing has worked. What should I do?
Based on the checkmark I'm guessing this is a OneDrive managed folder and somehow the files aren't really here but are only on OneDrive?
Maybe:
If File Explorer/Finder thumbnails still don't show, enable "Always keep on this device" for the file.
 
So, all of my image thumbnails were showing up just fine until very recently. Now, only the most recent ones show up:

View attachment 6009176

Bizarrely, all of the images in my other image folders (like the screenshots) show up in thumbnails just fine, regardless of how old they are.

I tried everything listed here and nothing has worked. What should I do?
Did you change your default app for opening pictures? Sometimes third party apps seem to break thumbnails
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Moths
Okay, I didn't do anything, but now, all of a sudden, my thumbnails are showing again.

Any idea what happened? And how I can prevent it from happening again?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Miller
Okay, I didn't do anything, but now, all of a sudden, my thumbnails are showing again.

Any idea what happened? And how I can prevent it from happening again?
I personally use Icaros for thumbnails
 
I dual boot windows and Linux, and I have to say that windows 11 truly hates grub. Wiped that shit out of existence instantly, and wrote over it on the drive I booted from. After playing around with 11 pro. I have to say it's not as bad as people say it is. Just run a debloater script and it's good.
 
I dual boot windows and Linux, and I have to say that windows 11 truly hates grub. Wiped that shit out of existence instantly, and wrote over it on the drive I booted from. After playing around with 11 pro. I have to say it's not as bad as people say it is. Just run a debloater script and it's good.
It's been a long time since I've done it (it was back when Windows Vista was relevant) but isn't there a way to have bootmgr give an option for Linux? I used to prefer that for a variety of reasons.
 
Back