After RA did all that Tim's response was to make a 30 minute video talking about himself and his family instead of reporting the news. Nothing saying "serious journalist" like taking any chance you get to talk about yourself instead of literally anything else going on.
Actually tbf that is how the majority of journos are these days so Tim isn't any different.
Is he leaving the show or just doing his own channel more? He claims on his channel he made a bunch of videos where he confessed everything from every gay thought he has ever had to everything he's ever done wrong. The Tim compound is littered with loonies.
What a half truth, Tim has spoken out over cancel culture being bullshit and that forgiveness should be extended because putting people on a blacklist forces them to side against you.
You don't have to actively participate in canceling anyone, just let them get their just desserts and laugh as they reap what they've sown, and I don't give a fuck if Tim is consistent in his retarded ideology. It's his deontological worldview that fucks him up into adopting retarded takes. Hence the revelation to him that, "hey, maybe it's NOT a great idea to give gun rights back to a murderer or rapist as soon as they get out of prison." Extending aid to those who want to destroy you and would never extend the same curtesy to you, is outright fucking stupid.
While I agree, I don't think it's just the government that's the issue, because despite my absolute hatred of the government at some point the black community has to take responsibility and realize that they're just fucking farm animals at this point which is in part why they're allowed to chimp out and burn shit down, as no one expects them to be able to control themselves and just treats it like a dog ripping up the couch again.
Power leveling here, but English is not my first language though I learned it early, and I'm from a poor family growing up as we were immigrants that didn't have much after the move. When I was trying to get scholarships, I would have gotten every single one if I was black or Hispanic but I wasn't and that was a requirement for the programs I was eligible for, so it's not like they don't have a large advantage in that regard. It's bullshit that one group can have all this shit handed to them and still fuck up on every level.
At some point you have to ask why is it that everyone seems to do just fine, even if they come here with nothing, but the blacks who have all of this shit handed to them still can't overcome something that happened almost 200 years ago at this point despite having all this shit slanted in their favor. And fuck anyone who goes on about all the legacy bullshit, you see people coming here from concentration camps in North Korea in their life time and still being successful, so if large groups of people can come with nothing, not even the language of the country, and succeed a person born here should be able to as well. The only two communities that seem to have this massive problem are the blacks and wiggers, oh and Reddit Mods.
"It's clearly not just the gov't, but the gov't has created a perfect storm for perpetual grievance and a "gimme dat!" mentality that subsists on handouts. If you look at black immigrants, even they do better than black Americans."
Nothing really important. I think we mostly agree and I just don't want to drag this topic out in this thread.
Long time lurker, first time poster. We know SCNR was funded via hundreds of investors through crowdsource and raised over a million dollars in a day. Listen to how Barrett Brown lies about who funded Subverse and why Rocco & Emily took the job and what they used the funds for. Looks like Tim's lawsuit is spot on. The video below is interesting, but I timestamped it to the point of interest.
VERY interesting. I'll delve into this a bit more later today or maybe tomorrow. I'm shit when it comes to the technical aspects of IT and programming, but this crumb trail has peaked my interest.
Is he leaving the show or just doing his own channel more? He claims on his channel he made a bunch of videos where he confessed everything from every gay thought he has ever had to everything he's ever done wrong. The Tim compound is littered with loonies.
he keeps saying to be principled and his stupid bullboard nobody who doesn't keep up will not know what any of those words mean. Says you need to say what needs to be said.
Still stands by his criticism of Andy gno. denies his self censorship.
Its becoming more and more in your face. There was a time when he never advertised "tim cast dot com", but it seems that he has to shill it in every video. Its equally funny when he uses his own website as his source.
To be specific he's planning to drop 100-200k$ on a Time Square billboard to shill his website, because he made a commitment to himself to get as many people to join his website as possible because for some reason that wasn't already the intended goal?
That's always something that weirded me out, it's fine to use your own site to display things or read out a story from your site as a visual version of the article, but to use it as a source is just strange.
So this is how democracy dies. To thunderous applause.
I don't give a shit about Musk or about monopolies, but I'm not a leftist. I can acknowledge that one company owning multiple aspects of peoples' lives at once creates some unhealthy interactions, and I have no problem with anti-trust regulation because I think capitalism needs competition to thrive.
But Tim is so eager for a win against the leftists that he doesn't care at all.
I don't give a shit about Musk or about monopolies, but I'm not a leftist. I can acknowledge that one company owning multiple aspects of peoples' lives at once creates some unhealthy interactions, and I have no problem with anti-trust regulation because I think capitalism needs competition to thrive.
Started building a file on Rocco. Like all good files, I started with where he was born, who his family is and where he went to school. Below are some tidbits.
Rocco Carl Castoro looks quite a bit like his namesake, his grandfather Rocco Victor Castoro.
Also found out this 1337 h4x faggot was one of the two VICE niggers that fucked over John McAfee after they uploaded a pic with metadata of McAfee's location.
McAfee's location was exposed after he agreed to let two reporters from Vice Magazine tag along with him. Proud to finally be in the thick of a story rife with vices -- drugs, murder, prostitutes, guns, vicious dogs, a fugitive millionaire and his inappropriately young girlfriend -- they proudly posted an iPhone photo to their blog of Vice editor-in-chief Rocco Castoro standing with the source of the mayhem in front of a jungly background, saying, "We are with John McAfee right now, suckers."
Strangely, this noteworthy event is missing from Rocco's Wikipedia entry.
Rocco later begged McAfee to let him tag along and sent a dumbass video claiming that only he, Rocco, was fellow-genius enough to understand how important McAfee's 2020 POTUS troll announcement was.
Ian is legit fun to hang out with. At least from what I've gathered. When Adam Crigler still lived in the compound, Ian would come on his show fairly regularly and they would do Twitch streams after TimcastIRL wrapped. (Ian is, after all, Adam's friend that Tim borrowed so he could make guests uncomfortable when he literally yells at Ian for minutes on end while live on air) I would usually go to Ian's channel and he was always very cordial and loved chatting with people. He has some dumb hippy crystal beliefs and shit, but he's not a righteous asshole about any of it.
That's always something that weirded me out, it's fine to use your own site to display things or read out a story from your site as a visual version of the article, but to use it as a source is just strange.
Ben Shapiro does this often. Which is kind of shit. TimcastNews (or whatever)
and Daily Wire both heavily engage in churnalism - regurgitating other stories and putting their spin on it. So, you're basically getting spin of spin, which is retarded. Promote your site, sure, but pull from and cite primary sources.
Started building a file on Rocco. Like all good files, I started with where he was born, who his family is and where he went to school. Below are some tidbits.
Rocco Carl Castoro looks quite a bit like his namesake, his grandfather Rocco Victor Castoro.
Also found out this 1337 h4x faggot was one of the two VICE niggers that fucked over John McAfee after they uploaded a pic with metadata of McAfee's location.
Strangely, this noteworthy event is missing from Rocco's Wikipedia entry.
Rocco later begged McAfee to let him tag along and sent a dumbass video claiming that only he, Rocco, was fellow-genius enough to understand how important McAfee's 2020 POTUS troll announcement was.
Ian is legit fun to hang out with. At least from what I've gathered. When Adam Crigler still lived in the compound, Ian would come on his show fairly regularly and they would do Twitch streams after TimcastIRL wrapped. (Ian is, after all, Adam's friend that Tim borrowed so he could make guests uncomfortable when he literally yells at Ian for minutes on end while live on air) I would usually go to Ian's channel and he was always very cordial and loved chatting with people. He has some dumb hippy crystal beliefs and shit, but he's not a righteous asshole about any of it.
Ben Shapiro does this often. Which is kind of shit. TimcastNews (or whatever)
and Daily Wire both heavily engage in churnalism - regurgitating other stories and putting their spin on it. So, you're basically getting spin of spin, which is retarded. Promote your site, sure, but pull from and cite primary sources.
Shaun King (aka Talcum X) has deleted his account from Twitter.
These assholes have 30 days to reactivate their accounts before its permanently deleted. Most of these assholes will be back before then. They're just doing this as a virtue signalling publicity stunt and their comeback will be masked with more virtue signalling how "They can't let Hate win" or some such tripe.
So this is how democracy dies. To thunderous applause.
I don't give a shit about Musk or about monopolies, but I'm not a leftist. I can acknowledge that one company owning multiple aspects of peoples' lives at once creates some unhealthy interactions, and I have no problem with anti-trust regulation because I think capitalism needs competition to thrive.
But Tim is so eager for a win against the leftists that he doesn't care at all.
I think there's a lot of misunderstanding about what transpired, as I understand. Elon Musk doesn't own Twitter. A private holding company, that he has heavy stakes in, owns Twitter.
(even this is untrue; BOD of Twitter approved the sale, but there's still a ton of red tape to cut through before the sale is finalized; expectations are the sale to be finalized towards the end of this year)
What happens Nov 2022? Why is BlueAnon upset about this business transaction? hunter biden
At least, that's my understanding. Musk had to secure loans and I believe he has a few other investors on board with him.
To borrow the Voxsplain, This Is a Good Move for Tim and Here Is Why.
I've been off of forums for so fucking long I've nearly forgotten how they work, so forgive me when my OCD compels me to edit for clarity, organization, etc. I try not to ever censor or misrepresent my view and own my mistakes. If I edit anything significantly out, it's usually because I think it's superfluous/unproductive, not to be malicious/deceitful
Tim's biggest issue (from an ethics standpoint) is that he is very rigid. Deontology is basically just setting and following rules. Most famous is Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative, one example being that it is unethical to lie. (this is PHI 101 stuff, tons of resources to learn more if you want) Seems fine at first glance, right? However, to immediately invoke Godwin's law, "is it wrong to lie to Nazi soldiers that you're hiding Jews under your floorboards?"
Having a moral/ethical mooring is vital, such as that murdering innocent people for no reason is wrong, otherwise you drift to wherever. But is murder wrong? Nope. Does that mean it's okay to indiscriminately murder? Nope. Because we're not bots in a video game designed in 1992. Most people operate on a case basis that tends to be a sliding scale beyond the capability of advanced algorithms.
EX: You have a local gang of 10 people show up to a neighborhood party. A gang member, notoriously hotheaded, starts an argument and then shoots someone. The entire gang flees in the ensuing chaos.
Q: In absence of a formal legal framework, how do you (and/or do you not) met out punishment?
You could say the whole gang bears the burden and they all suffer. Maybe the party guest was an asshole and nobody really cares. Maybe just the shooter suffers. Maybe the shooter plus any gang member who doesn't agree with an ultimatum to disavow.
That's the problem with setting ethical and moral arguments on a rigid deontological framework. A lot of conservatives hate the term "moral relativism" (deservedly when taken to absurd extremes), but it's how we all operate. It's why no two murder trials are ever the exact same. You're never dealing with a list of binary facts of absolute certainty. You're dealing with a list of binary and float-value facts, plus assertions that are varying degrees of certainty.