Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

[Johnny Salami]

Why? Is he saying that the sugar industry is a Jewish conspiracy?

Look at 1:12:25 to 1:15
Cant seem to partially download

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

"Elements everyday chemicals at my reach
Household bleach to extract the potassium
Chlorate Boiling on a hotplate with hate
recipe for disaster plastic bomb blaster
I mix up 5 parts wax to Vaseline
slowly ... dissolve in gasoline
add to potassium in a large metal bowl
knead like dough so they bleed real slow
Gasoline evaporates... cool dry place
I'm strapped up cross my chest bomb belt attached
deeply satisfied with the plan I hatched
electrodes connected to a gas cooker lighter
switch in my hand the situation demands
self sacrifice hitting back at vice with a £50 price"

Retarded sand nigger left out required voltage for ignition. No mention of other weights and portions. Perhaps for legal reasons or, most likely the case, because none of these wannabe fucktard faggots know anything about anything other being a useless piece of shit. There's a reason these inbred aren't trusted with making their own bombs and farm it out to a few select individuals. Select individuals that sometimes wind up being covert informants.

 

[Automaton Type 2B]

Ian's sperg outs make me question how Tim goes about hiring co-hosts

I don't think it's fair to say Tim is "controlled opposition" more as he knows who butters his bread.

I'd believe nick fuentes is controlled opposition before Tim, despite how his pussy ass keeps saying "I'm a liberal and mixed race from Chicago".

Tim appeals too much to moderates to be "controlled".

 

[Ostertoasted]

Been listening to a few shows recently because I can get away with it at my second job, but one thing that has always been an issue for me is that Lydia is an RN, right? First thing you do as an RN is introduce yourself to your patients, yet Lydia routinely fails top ever introduce herself. I've also noticed she is quiet or unsure on a lot of other things that she should be clearly aware of.


Demonetization and possible flagging. YT doesn't care about intent and Tim is well aware of this. There are many things Tim is ignorant of, the working of YouTube is not one of those things.


Look, even if you had 100 ovens baking 10 cookies per hour, every hours, from 1941 to 1945, you still wouldn't be able to bake 6 million cookies, Tim, especially if you're not using graphene-powered ovens because the vibrations are too small!

I think Lydia was a CNA, not a RN. IIRC she said this on a Chrissie Mayr episode. If I come across it I' ll link it.
*Edited to add the video.

Irrelevant to your post, but interesting tid-bit

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

I think Lydia was a CNA, not a RN. IIRC she said this on a Chrissie Mayr episode. If I come across it I' ll link it.
*Edited to add the video.

Irrelevant to your post, but interesting tid-bit

TY for that. Damn dude, you got some deep dives.

It's weird to explain, but being a Nursing Assistant is kind of saying you're a cook. It's a really broad term that encompasses a lot of specifics. CNA is the most basic bitch shit. You are literally cleaning people (in all the glory that your imagination entails with that), assisting/engagin basic shit like eating and bathing and cleaning equipment. A lot of providers won't even hire CNAs because they are so restricted in capacity and with just another semester you can operate as an LPN. You can get CNA cert training in `3 months. LPN takes `1 year and has expanded scope of practice. RN takes at least 2 years (although most providers are moving to mandatory BSN, so 4 years) and then there's NP which is 6 years and means you can prescribe anything not schedule 1 and do non-invasive surgeries. Particulars vary from state to state, but not by too much. And this does not include any prior classes needed for admittance into programs.

Burnout in nursing, especially in longterm care positions (primarily oncology and geriatrics), is very real. The problem that a lot of people have in these roles, and this isn't some tea leaves "men are from Mars and women are from Venus" shit, is that it's hard not to get some level of attachment to your patient. And sometimes, if you're really lucky, you get to be your patient's first provider and then also the one to wipe them down for the coroner when they die.

The amount of literal shit that CNAs deal with is pretty amazing and most are being paid less than a manager at McDs at $15/hour.

ALFs tend to be hellholes. Asides from all the normal horrible shit of being a care provider, you also often work with total shitbags that don't give a fuck about their job. If you want a good indicator of how good a ward is, look to see how many nurses are sitting down at the station or lounging about and how many are fat as fuck. You should have 3-5 patients (some do as much 8-10, such as in the UK) and be rounding every 2-4 hours, outside of other measures that may require increased rounding, like administering reg insulin (sliding scale) 0.5-1h before a meal. Hospitals get all the ALF horror stories. I remember hearing about how a woman had a cantaloupe-sized abscess from a stage-4 pressure ulcer that went all the way to expose the bones of her spine and pelvis. This was entirely due to longterm neglect of ALF staff not turning the patient and not doing proper rounding procedures.

-edit I should add that there is also the possibility Lyds was in a program for RN and worked as a CNA. Many states allow an RN student in good standing to practice as an LPN or CNA after they have met a threshold, be it clinical hours or semesters completed.

 

[Ostertoasted]

TY for that. Damn dude, you got some deep dives.

It's weird to explain, but being a Nursing Assistant is kind of saying you're a cook. It's a really broad term that encompasses a lot of specifics. CNA is the most basic bitch shit. You are literally cleaning people (in all the glory that your imagination entails with that), assisting/engagin basic shit like eating and bathing and cleaning equipment. A lot of providers won't even hire CNAs because they are so restricted in capacity and with just another semester you can operate as an LPN. You can get CNA cert training in `3 months. LPN takes `1 year and has expanded scope of practice. RN takes at least 2 years (although most providers are moving to mandatory BSN, so 4 years) and then there's NP which is 6 years and means you can prescribe anything not schedule 1 and do non-invasive surgeries. Particulars vary from state to state, but not by too much. And this does not include any prior classes needed for admittance into programs.

Burnout in nursing, especially in longterm care positions (primarily oncology and geriatrics), is very real. The problem that a lot of people have in these roles, and this isn't some tea leaves "men are from Mars and women are from Venus" shit, is that it's hard not to get some level of attachment to your patient. And sometimes, if you're really lucky, you get to be your patient's first provider and then also the one to wipe them down for the coroner when they die.

The amount of literal shit that CNAs deal with is pretty amazing and most are being paid less than a manager at McDs at $15/hour.

ALFs tend to be hellholes. Asides from all the normal horrible shit of being a care provider, you also often work with total shitbags that don't give a fuck about their job. If you want a good indicator of how good a ward is, look to see how many nurses are sitting down at the station or lounging about and how many are fat as fuck. You should have 3-5 patients (some do as much 8-10, such as in the UK) and be rounding every 2-4 hours, outside of other measures that may require increased rounding, like administering reg insulin (sliding scale) 0.5-1h before a meal. Hospitals get all the ALF horror stories. I remember hearing about how a woman had a cantaloupe-sized abscess from a stage-4 pressure ulcer that went all the way to expose the bones of her spine and pelvis. This was entirely due to longterm neglect of ALF staff not turning the patient and not doing proper rounding procedures.

Agree with everything you say. These ALF's / Re-habs also always smell like piss. I used to make deliveries to some of these places. I also know a guy whose Mom broke her hip and ended up in a Re-hab/ALF. She almost fucking died from her bedsores becoming infected she became septic. She also suffered a ruptured bowel, ended up with a colostomy bag that can't be reversed. He moved her into his home and is now her personal CNA when he is not working. He pays someone who is similar to Lydia, not in it for the money, but for the satisfaction of helping old people have dignity. His mom is bed ridden, but has not had any issues with her stoma or a bed sore since. I think he finally broke down and rented a lift to move her around. Then there are the ones in these places on hospice cause' there is nowhere else available, left to just fucking wither away in their own shit, piss and sores since they are dying anyway. Majority of these people have no friends or family that come visit them and these shit holes get away with murder, literally.

 

[Retink]

Look at 1:12:25 to 1:15
Cant seem to partially download

Tim is such a midwit.

Just because a quote is from a Nazi or whatever doesn't make it any less valid if it's true, and the whole Reddit thing of "well you can't make fun of kids with leukemia" is bullshit as well. If some kid with leukemia raped someone I'd have no issue criticizing them and I'd hope others would find that reprehensible as well. The other thing is, if someone went online and started making jokes about kids with leukemia, people would find it in bad taste and bitch about it, but I don't think they'd be banned like they would for daring to criticize the gays or troons, and if they do it does mean kids with leukemia have special protections and treatments than normal people, which does mean society has given them some power over others.

The point isn't whether you should make fun of someone, it's whether you can and not be banned/canceled/whatever. Then there's the question of whether or not you can mock them when they do something reprehensible, as troons and gays seem to have extreme protection even when they're victimizing children.

Ian's sperg outs make me question how Tim goes about hiring co-hosts

I don't think it's fair to say Tim is "controlled opposition" more as he knows who butters his bread.

He just tries to hire the most retarded person he can find to make himself look good.

As for the controlled opposition, well if he's dependent on an entity and knows who that entity as well as what that entity wants of him, I'd say he's controlled. Maybe not in that he's getting a direct marching order, but he's still very aware of what he needs to do to be paid.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Tim posting today about how he wants to have a gentlemanly race with The Daily Wire.

Please, you are not in the same league at all with your "dozens" of employees and your self-swatting.

Ladies and gentlemen, gather around and take a gander at 25:00 here, for the Amazing Bearded Narcissist! You have never seen a man suck his own dick like this!

 

[Johnny Salami]

Tim posting today about how he wants to have a gentlemanly race with The Daily Wire.

Please, you are not in the same league at all with your "dozens" of employees and your self-swatting.

Ladies and gentlemen, gather around and take a gander at 25:00 here, for the Amazing Bearded Narcissist! You have never seen a man suck his own dick like this!

"yall were laughing at me"
Still are you bald cuck

 

[Retink]

Tim posting today about how he wants to have a gentlemanly race with The Daily Wire.

I'm sure Klaven and Knowles are terrified of Pop Culture Crisis beating them.

 

[Claptrap Alex]

Tim posting today about how he wants to have a gentlemanly race with The Daily Wire.

Please, you are not in the same league at all with your "dozens" of employees and your self-swatting.

Ladies and gentlemen, gather around and take a gander at 25:00 here, for the Amazing Bearded Narcissist! You have never seen a man suck his own dick like this!

Fucking hell, I think he almost choked on his own dingdong.

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

With Luke gone and Seamus leaving who will be the new second wheel before one of them inevitably comes back? Is this our time, Ianchads?

Adam surprise return.

 

[The-Patriarchy]

Tim is such a midwit.

Just because a quote is from a Nazi or whatever doesn't make it any less valid if it's true, and the whole Reddit thing of "well you can't make fun of kids with leukemia" is bullshit as well. If some kid with leukemia raped someone I'd have no issue criticizing them and I'd hope others would find that reprehensible as well. The other thing is, if someone went online and started making jokes about kids with leukemia, people would find it in bad taste and bitch about it, but I don't think they'd be banned like they would for daring to criticize the gays or troons, and if they do it does mean kids with leukemia have special protections and treatments than normal people, which does mean society has given them some power over others.

The point isn't whether you should make fun of someone, it's whether you can and not be banned/canceled/whatever. Then there's the question of whether or not you can mock them when they do something reprehensible, as troons and gays seem to have extreme protection even when they're victimizing children.



He just tries to hire the most retarded person he can find to make himself look good.

As for the controlled opposition, well if he's dependent on an entity and knows who that entity as well as what that entity wants of him, I'd say he's controlled. Maybe not in that he's getting a direct marching order, but he's still very aware of what he needs to do to be paid.

I agree that the quote is not nearly as egregious as Tim makes it out to be. I also agree that the quote is not 100% accurate since there are situations where you'll be culturally enforced not to criticise people or groups that hold no real power, but it is probably more correct to say that not allowing critique of a person or group in power is a sign a tyranny.

..and in current year, those playing the victim narrative are using immunity from criticism as a weapon to enforce an ideology.

In a broad sense the quote isn't completely accurate- but it does capture the idea that if you see someone or something you are not allowed to criticize, you may have found tyranny does seem to hold true. Doesn't matter if the quote came from a neo-nazi- at the risk of tripping on godwin's law- it was very obvious that even in light of that quote, the Nazis themselves would fit the profile of a tyrannical power.

 

[Retink]

I agree that the quote is not nearly as egregious as Tim makes it out to be. I also agree that the quote is not 100% accurate since there are situations where you'll be culturally enforced not to criticise people or groups that hold no real power, but it is probably more correct to say that not allowing critique of a person or group in power is a sign a tyranny.

..and in current year, those playing the victim narrative are using immunity from criticism as a weapon to enforce an ideology.

In a broad sense the quote isn't completely accurate- but it does capture the idea that if you see someone or something you are not allowed to criticize, you may have found tyranny does seem to hold true. Doesn't matter if the quote came from a neo-nazi- at the risk of tripping on godwin's law- it was very obvious that even in light of that quote, the Nazis themselves would fit the profile of a tyrannical power.

That's probably a more refined way to think about it, but I do want to nitpick a little bit as the quote doesn't say tyranny, just power.

So yes, a group like children with leukemia doesn't hold power in themselves, they do hold power indirectly because of those societal norms. That doesn't mean them holding that power is inherently bad, nor that they'd abuse that power, it just means that certain privileges of power have been granted to them because of circumstance.

Additionally they can just as easily abuse that power by being awful people and using that negative attribute as a crutch. A good example was some dude I knew who was diagnosed autistic and would act like an asshole and then use his autism as an excuse, and sure he's awarded some level of leeway due to his inability to process certain things, but at some point people did have to acknowledge the continued repetition of negative behavior was no longer just the result of his autism. In the same sense a kid with leukemia could go out there, be a dick, and use their leukemia as a shield to some degree because they have been granted some level of power indirectly.

It's a bit abstract, but think of it this way, if I have a hired goon and I say I won't do anything to you but the goon would, it doesn't mean I have the power to physically hurt you myself but neither do I really need to if the goon can. You can argue that's different because I hired this goon to hurt you, but the response is that there's nothing wrong with hiring a bodyguard as it doesn't give me power against it, just protection, and I feel threatened by your noncompliance. Extreme and reductionist example but power is power regardless of source.

So I guess that's what it comes down to, the following when it comes to kid's with leukemia:

A.) If they behave in a reprehensible way you can criticize them for their reprehensible behavior.
B.) Or you can't and they have the power to behave in ways others can't without criticism. It might not be extraordinary power but it's still some degree of power.

 

[The-Patriarchy]

That's probably a more refined way to think about it, but I do want to nitpick a little bit as the quote doesn't say tyranny, just power.

So yes, a group like children with leukemia doesn't hold power in themselves, they do hold power indirectly because of those societal norms. That doesn't mean them holding that power is inherently bad, nor that they'd abuse that power, it just means that certain privileges of power have been granted to them because of circumstance.

Additionally they can just as easily abuse that power by being awful people and using that negative attribute as a crutch. A good example was some dude I knew who was diagnosed autistic and would act like an asshole and then use his autism as an excuse, and sure he's awarded some level of leeway due to his inability to process certain things, but at some point people did have to acknowledge the continued repetition of negative behavior was no longer just the result of his autism. In the same sense a kid with leukemia could go out there, be a dick, and use their leukemia as a shield to some degree because they have been granted some level of power indirectly.

It's a bit abstract, but think of it this way, if I have a hired goon and I say I won't do anything to you but the goon would, it doesn't mean I have the power to physically hurt you myself but neither do I really need to if the goon can. You can argue that's different because I hired this goon to hurt you, but the response is that there's nothing wrong with hiring a bodyguard as it doesn't give me power against it, just protection, and I feel threatened by your noncompliance. Extreme and reductionist example but power is power regardless of source.

So I guess that's what it comes down to, the following when it comes to kid's with leukemia:

A.) If they behave in a reprehensible way you can criticize them for their reprehensible behavior.
B.) Or you can't and they have the power to behave in ways others can't without criticism. It might not be extraordinary power but it's still some degree of power.

Yeah, that is the weakness in the quote. It's not the complete disaster Tim makes it out to be, but it's not completely correct either. I can give someone as mentally challenged as Ian a pass for not getting this level of nuance though.

 

[Retink]

Yeah, that is the weakness in the quote. It's not the complete disaster Tim makes it out to be, but it's not completely correct either. I can give someone as mentally challenged as Ian a pass for not getting this level of nuance though.

I pretty much give Ian a pass on everything, he's too much of a space cadet from frying his brain with drugs and he's funny. Tim is the one that annoys me with his pseudo intellectual Reddit takes.

 

[Value Size]

I don't think it's fair to say Tim is "controlled opposition" more as he knows who butters his bread.

My view on this is Tim isn't like legit puppet strings controlled, but the tech companies and such seem to have figured him out well and know he wont go too far out of bounds. He also actively goes against the completely banned talking points (like the 2020 election and saying anything positive about Ivermctin)

 

[Chocolate Wombat]

Holy fuck, what is wrong with Ian?

I'm watching the Timcast from 6/29/22 and that graphene fetishist launched into a retarded screed about what makes a Christian and how most people who claim to be aren't based on his own made up, half-formed idea of what a Christian is. For fuck's sake all Tim said is that he sees the US leaning more towards Christian conservatism because that is who is having most of the babies, and Ian derails the entire conversation to babble about things he clearly doesn't understand.

Is he just permanently stoned or is just truly, spectacularly stupid?

 

[Internet War Criminal]

truly, spectacularly stupid

which is exactly why Tim brought him in to replace Adam, since he couldn't take not being the smartest guy in the room and having someone on the show not doing everything to make him look good

 

[Value Size]

which is exactly why Tim brought him in to replace Adam, since he couldn't take not being the smartest guy in the room and having someone on the show not doing everything to make him look good

Tim didn't want to have another Adam; someone who started off ill-informed but grew as time went on and developed a spine against Tim. Ian is basically start of the podcast Adam with arrested development.