Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

[Retink Retunk]

What is with his obsession lately of blaming the entirety of far-leftist ideology and its popularity on internet algorithms that weren't even around until many decades after second wave feminism, postmodernism, marxism and co. came about and got popular?

He seems incapable of understanding that a trend can have several causes at once. Internet algorithms feed people more of what they have consumed thus far, sometimes leading to radicalization. But Marxism and the general ideas behind it have been a mind virus that keeps spreading. Increasing comfortability has led some people to now demand lives so comfortable, they are just handed everything they want for nothing in return. Western society has never left people more aimless, now that religion is becoming less and less popular, culture and art only tell you to consume more, and schools and universities tell you that discipline and moderation are evil and something only nazis engage in. Many of the effects of social revolutions like feminism have left many men and women confused as to how to engage with one another, leading them to either engage in unhealthy types of relationships or outright avoid each other. "Anti-racists" have led to a rise in hatred between races.

Anonymously accessible 24/7 internet porn, the normalization of fetishes, sky-high percentages of kids growing up in single-parent households, the increasing politicization of science, people radicalized in school growing up and entering the workforce, the hidden agendas of billionaires wanting to lower the average person's QoL to increase their own margins even further. There are countless reasons why companies would turn far-leftist, why people like Dylan Mulvaney would come about, and why they would be pushed by companies. For him, it all seems to start and end at algorithms.

He's on the algorithm thing so hard because he probably thinks he's a genius for coming up with it, that and he probably isn't getting as many clicks now so it's at the front of his mind all the time.

The problem is that he thinks algorithms changed how people think, which might be true for some people, but the algorithms only exist because the people who made them already believed what they wanted to push. His Jack Dorsey example is also stupid as he claims Jack was a libertarian and wanted to push freedom of speech, and at no point does he consider that Jack was just full of shit, instead he claims Jack was mind broken by the algorithm, which is amazingly stupid. Fuck, another Jack, Jack Conti was on the Rubin Report talking about how he wants to make Patreon more fair and give people chances are redemption, and the next week he bans a shit ton of right wing people for dubious reasons, and it's not because of algorithms, it's because they're all lying shitheads.

The reason the Internet was more libertarian original was because there were no rules, and there weren't good ways to control things, as well as people who were on it early on were more business minded people. Then the swarms of normies came in, who already had this shit drilled into their heads from schools and media, and they demanded someone step in and build rules so that they didn't have to be called out on their retarded shit. Seeing this the people who wormed their way into these platforms tuned them to be more favorable to the commies, as they aligned with them.

And Tim's whole thing about anti-police, pro-Ukraine war, whatever being a contradiction isn't relevant either, as people hold contradicting beliefs and the left is notorious for this. After all, they have the Anti-Fascist Fascists known as AntiFa, because it's not about stopping injustice, it's about them being in power and having their own way. I think it was Chi Guevara who is applauded for his humility of saying "I don't care if I'm in charge, as long as I live in the world i want." which when you think about it, just means he's in charge but there's a puppet dictator on the throne instead of him. It's not noble, it's just a way to trick you.

They're all for free speech, until it's speech they don't like.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

Chi Guevara who is applauded for his humility of saying "I don't care if I'm in charge, as long as I live in the world i want."

There was a quote I can't find sadly but it goes along the lines of.
"I'd be the best king - as I'd do exactly what is best for me."
I think its true for a lot of us. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. This is why good leaders are few. There were more when some actually had to be held accountable though. Tis better to live under a benevolent tyrant than an incompetent, greedy, corrupt democracy / republic. But you seldom ever find the former in existence.

I hate to harp so much on it or repeat it so much, but yes Tim is a naïve child. He thinks by sitting down and talking with someone he can get to know the real person. And that a sociopath still wont lie directly to his face on a show with a smile on - for the most part. He figured this out with the twitter lawyer at least but man does he really fall for this shit far too often. All he'd have to do is look at how these people treat others around them and not just himself and he'd see its clear as day they're pieces of shit.
"Jack was polite and told me he was a good guy! He must be good!"
[watches Jack ban decent people left and right, immediately before saying this and right after saying it.]

Same shit with Elon Musk. He has a hardon for a guy who is a lying sack of shit. Which is funny cause Elon wont even give Tim the time of day he so DESPERATELY wants.
E: Alright lads gonna check back in on Friday to see what's new in griftland hope you all have a good week.

 

[Nicole E. Eggert]

What is with his obsession lately of blaming the entirety of far-leftist ideology and its popularity on internet algorithms that weren't even around until many decades after second wave feminism, postmodernism, marxism and co. came about and got popular?

He seems incapable of understanding that a trend can have several causes at once. Internet algorithms feed people more of what they have consumed thus far, sometimes leading to radicalization. But Marxism and the general ideas behind it have been a mind virus that keeps spreading. Increasing comfortability has led some people to now demand lives so comfortable, they are just handed everything they want for nothing in return. Western society has never left people more aimless, now that religion is becoming less and less popular, culture and art only tell you to consume more, and schools and universities tell you that discipline and moderation are evil and something only nazis engage in. Many of the effects of social revolutions like feminism have left many men and women confused as to how to engage with one another, leading them to either engage in unhealthy types of relationships or outright avoid each other. "Anti-racists" have led to a rise in hatred between races.

Anonymously accessible 24/7 internet porn, the normalization of fetishes, sky-high percentages of kids growing up in single-parent households, the increasing politicization of science, people radicalized in school growing up and entering the workforce, the hidden agendas of billionaires wanting to lower the average person's QoL to increase their own margins even further. There are countless reasons why companies would turn far-leftist, why people like Dylan Mulvaney would come about, and why they would be pushed by companies. For him, it all seems to start and end at algorithms.

Tim's obsession with the algorithm might be a result of his personal experience with manipulating it. I remember during Adam's long Airing of Grievances stream, he praised Tim's work ethic, making specific references to how hard Tim worked to figure out the algorithm and exploit it. I can imagine after years of doing this, and then getting feedback from idiots telling him that Timcast has changed their lives, he's arrived at the conclusion that he'd still be a nobody with 1K viewers per stream, and that no one's life would have been affected, if it weren't for him figuring out the algorithm.

Which, the more the you think about it, would say a lot about what Tim believes about his own content, and about his audience. He knows, deep down, the content he puts out is nothing special, and yet people still show up for it and give him money. He realizes the algorithm is what deserves credit for his success, because he knows no one would tune in if he wasn't popping up on their front page. He thinks people will just mindlessly believe whatever garbage YouTube suggests for them; whether its his own content, or The Young Turks, or Alex Jones, it doesn't matter at all if the information is correct, or presented persuasively, the mere act of viewing it will make a person believe it.

Hence he's now begun arguing that support for Antifa, support for troons, and support for Ukraine can all be attributed to the almighty algorithm controlling people by suggesting videos to them.

 

[Retink Retunk]

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

I disagree with this, I don't think power corrupts, I think it just reveals who the person really is and most people aren't necessarily evil but they're so convinced that their ideas are great and right that they don't account for the reality that their ideas are probably shit and will never work.

A good way to dig into it, is to ask someone what they think should be illegal, and then to ask how they'd enforce it. Usually you'll get something like "oh, it should just be a fine." because that seems like a light punishment that's mostly harmless, but then ask what if the fine isn't a deterrent to that behavior it's just a minor tax and won't stop people from doing it, well then they'll increase the fine. Alright, what happens when someone refuses to pay the fine? Fine them again? Well that doesn't work as they just won't pay that either. Going down this chain you eventually get to people being put into prison for incredibly stupid shit like smoking [pot].

It's very hard to people to take that step back and think of their ideas in this kind of way, and not just in terms of governing but most things. It's also why almost everything seems obvious in hindsight.

I hate to harp so much on it or repeat it so much, but yes Tim is a naïve child. He thinks by sitting down and talking with someone he can get to know the real person. And that a sociopath still wont lie directly to his face on a show with a smile on - for the most part. He figured this out with the twitter lawyer at least but man does he really fall for this shit far too often. All he'd have to do is look at how these people treat others around them and not just himself and he'd see its clear as day they're pieces of shit.
"Jack was polite and told me he was a good guy! He must be good!"
[watches Jack ban decent people left and right, immediately before saying this and right after saying it.]

You might be onto something here though, as Tim was easily duped by another Jack that did 69 for 69 and then a Blue Haired thot who swore she was human trafficked because someone used photos of her to catfish people on Twitter. There was also Rocco, his stripper sister, his wigger brother, and so on.

Tim seems to not be able to understand that people will lie to him.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

I disagree with this, I don't think power corrupts, I think it just reveals who the person really is and most people aren't necessarily evil but they're so convinced that their ideas are great and right that they don't account for the reality that their ideas are probably shit and will never work.

Power definitely corrupts. The most obvious example of this is feminists, who probably started out as actual oppressed women who were trying their hardest to just get some representation, better working conditions, and an end to domestic violence. But as soon as they got a taste of power they warped into resentful, man-hating cunts who want to use their status to punish the descendants of those who oppressed them.

Anyway, site was down for me yesterday so I have not had a chance to say that Tim is a faggot for a solid few days. Let the record show that I truly believe Tim is a faggot.

Tim quickly found that people were calling him out for trying to fuck over Dylan Mulvaney and not anyone else, and Tim had to come up with a reason why he doesn't want to rail against all troons, just this specific one. He decided to claim it was because Dylan Mulvaney is "targeting" kids. He has so far offered no evidence for this until, I think last night, when he said that most people who use Tik Tok are under 18 years old. That doesn't mean Dylan or Annheiser Busch is targeting kids. He also claims that Bud Light has stated they are aiming for a younger audience and this is somehow creepy. Younger than what, though? If Bud Light sees their numbers and has determined most people that drink it are in their 40s now, then it's totally reasonable for them to say "hey, we need to get people who are 23 to start drinking our product, then we have lifetime consumers".

Fence-sitting positions are weak positions. If Tim is not willing to go against troons in general he is toothless against Mulvaney. He said today "multiple trans people online have said Dylan Mulvaney isn't trans". No sources given. Didn't Tim rail against the mainstream media for using "anonymous sources" before? Who is claiming this, Tim? Why are they credible, just because they are troons? Are they MTFs? Or are you getting advice from FTMs, assuming all troons are the same?

Guaranteed if we look at sheer numbers there will be more people harassing everyone for misgendering Dylan than there will be people saying he's not trans. Because there are people saying that about mass shooters and mother rapists. If most people are willing to believe Christian Weston Chandler is trans just because he says he is, then most people are going to trust Mulvaney too.

 

[Retink Retunk]

Power definitely corrupts. The most obvious example of this is feminists, who probably started out as actual oppressed women who were trying their hardest to just get some representation, better working conditions, and an end to domestic violence. But as soon as they got a taste of power they warped into resentful, man-hating cunts who want to use their status to punish the descendants of those who oppressed them.

Why couldn't they have been both at the same time? The only thing power would have changed was their ability to act upon the latter. That would be the same shit we see with the left all the time, and I'm sure there are people on the left who believe in free speech, but now that their party is in power, the elements that don't are able to exercise their ability to stifle others. Those people were probably always part of the left, and ten or twenty years ago they were probably promoting free speech because it benefited them, and they didn't become corrupt, they just were always being opportunistic.

Hell, how many dictatorships, end with the people in charge offing the people who put them into power? Whether it's Trotsky or the Night of Long Knives, these things don't happen because power corrupted the dictator, they happen because the revolutionaries are no longer useful.

 

[JamesWebbSlinger]

Tim had on Joel Pollak, senior editor of Breitbart News.
Ian is back, & as barmy as ever.

Clip Collection:
-Ian adds on to the list of historic Harper's Ferry facts. There is a billboard carved into a mountain. I had to check that, & it was real. It is for bathroom-use talcum powder:

-Joel pops Tim's joy at the Rasmussen Bud Light boycott poll, with criticism of their methodology. Ian only likes HARD polls, 1,000 people is rather "ehhh" to him. Also, Ian tries to avoid confirmation bias, unlike Tim:

-Tim calls Jazz Jenning's axe wound, "a wound", & asks how we got here:

-Ian says he likes Dylan Mulvaney, because he reminds him of people he went to acting school with. Ian, also, has been using he/him pronouns for Dylan:

-Tim wonders why no conservatives were protesting the attack on the white woman in Chicago. Then, a few minutes later, explains why conservatives would not protest: the people of Chicago voted for this. Only to then go back, later in the stream, & criticize the lack of attention to the story:

-Ian claims to have had a similar experience to the black teen shot in Kansas City, says this teen was technically burglarizing the house. Tim says you can enter someone's house, if the door is unlocked, then goes back on that legal analysis...:

-Ian & Tim get into a back & forth over how much responsibility a voter bears for acts of politicians. Ian asks Tim why he voted for Trump in 2020, after he pushed an expanded drone program, all while condemning Obama's drone strikes to the point of calling for murder charges:

-Ian points out a possible reason why leftists can be anti-war, but back supporting Ukraine, as preventing a repeat of the 1930's appeasement policy. Tim responds that the only way that works is if you want an American world empire/interventionism:

-Tim says people can call in, if they are a member for 6 months, or pay $25, via their Discord. & as a finale, may you all be as energized as Ian is to talk about graphene, today.

 

[Nicole E. Eggert]

This was definitely one of the worst episodes I've listened to in a while.

The best parts were definitely Ian's attempts to be honestly introspective and ask hard questions. And of course whenever I glanced at the stream chat it was just full of people saying Ian should be fired immediately. Whoever was dumb enough to keep being a fan of Tim after both Jack Murphy and Eliza Bleu really are beyond help.

-Tim wonders why no conservatives were protesting the attack on the white woman in Chicago. Then, a few minutes later, explains why conservatives would not protest: the people of Chicago voted for this. Only to then go back, later in the stream, & criticize the lack of attention to the story:

At the beginning of that clip, he also claims that things only become part of the "national conversation" when there are protestors for the news to cover. This, despite it being well known that the mainstream media hates covering the March for Life, and downplays the number of people who show up for it? Not just that, he really wants to make this claim so soon after the pandemic, when people protested the lockdowns (not just in America, but around the world) and the media also tried to downplay those? Tim really can't be bothered to think things through logically, he just pretends to be outraged, and goddamn it gets tiring having to listen to this shit without anyone there to push back on him.

 

[Blacklight]

"Tim Pool calls for criminal charges"

The ego has gotten so large at this point he's demanding prosecutors listen to him for ideas to charge people with. Thank god Tim never got any real power, or we would quickly see how badly he would abuse it.

 

[Retink Retunk]

Decided to pop in and watch a little IRL tonight, and first thing I hear is "Do you think it's gay? Do you think it's gay to eat the nuts?" from Sleepless accusing Tim of being gay for eating the nuts. Good timing, never change Sleepless.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

"Tim Pool calls for criminal charges"

The ego has gotten so large at this point he's demanding prosecutors listen to him for ideas to charge people with. Thank god Tim never got any real power, or we would quickly see how badly he would abuse it.

Tim is such a moron. He's encouraging other people to engage in lolsuits.

We need Tim to just join KiwiFarms. Then he can learn how to properly alog and stop pozloading my neghole all the fucking time. Ron DeSantis will crash and burn without you sticking your nose in it.

Edit: Apparently Josh still has a censor for a certain phrase that became popular on Something Awful for interfering with a lolcow you are observing.

 

[Nicole E. Eggert]

Michael Knowles was tonight's guest. When I saw him on the thumbnail I was honestly hoping that the ex-singer guy would be on the show too; he LARPs as a "based rightwing" type, but I've noticed that whenever the trans topic comes up he spergs pretty hard and comes to their defense (there was a moment from a while ago where someone suggested that Blair White was part of the problem by normalizing this shit, and he got pretty angry). Instead we got Ian and Sleepless, and the longer I listened, the more convinced I became that Tim absolutely wanted Ian to be there, and for ex-singer to be missing.

Everyone knows that Ian is only on the show because he makes Tim seem smart by comparison, and that he relishes in getting chances to talk down to him. Ian has some kind of bizarre PTSD from Christianity, and has a long history of sperging out whenever a Christian tries to explain theology to him; Tim knew that Knowles would make Ian freak out. At multiple points throughout the show, Ian and Knowles would try to debate a specific topic, and despite describing himself as non-religious, Tim would always rush in and interrupt Knowles and explain religion to Ian by comparing it to video games.

Recently, ex-singer has had a tendency to push back on Ian a lot, and if he'd been there tonight it would have given Tim less opportunity to reign Ian in. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe ex-singer hates Daily Wire people and asked to not be there, but his absence seemed like a calculated decision by Tim the longer I thought about it.

Also, a much more minor point, but I remember a while back Tim described something as "demonic," then quickly reassured his audience that he doesn't believe demons are real. But tonight, with a Christian guest who repeatedly brought up demons and how they mess with humans, Tim is totally on board with it, and talked about people taking DMT and seeing supernatural beings like demons.

Tim is rightly called a fence sitter, but damn, he will just shamelessly lean forward or backward and change his position on that fence depending on who his guest is.

 

[Retink Retunk]

I'm wrong, maybe ex-singer hates Daily Wire people and asked to not be there, but his absence seemed like a calculated decision by Tim the longer I thought about it.

I checked his Twitter when reading your post out of curiosity and it's rather normal conservative-light stuff, very pro gun, criticizes Jazz Jennings being trooned, and similar stuff. He did retweet DW's statement on the Walsh hack so I'm guessing it's something else, unless he's really sensitive about how DW handles the troon topic.

Ian has some kind of bizarre PTSD from Christianity, and has a long history of sperging out whenever a Christian tries to explain theology to him

I don't get Ian's take on Christianity or Trump. I'm not religious but I very easily get where people like Michael Knowles are coming from, even for the bit I saw today where it's easy to say "The belief of the virgin birth does not challenge reality except for one specific instance that is defined as miracle and specifically noted to be beyond that of reality, but otherwise affirms reality in all other instances. Troons and abortion challenge reality on a fundamental basis that harms society and makes demands of you to accept what's factually impossible and changes from person to person to the point that there's no possibility of communicating with one another."

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Oh! Maybe one of you guys knows which video, but while the site was offline, Tim posted a video complaining about degeneracy and he said "how do we get around this? Maybe...religion. Maybe some kind of consistent moral framework."

I am taking that as a personal W. That is mine. I repeatedly said in this thread that Tim's arguments about people moving away from hedonism required faith, and there was no other way to transmit a grounded moral framework to a large portion of the population, and Tim has resisted this idea from the beginning because he is not religious. Too bad.

 

[Frosted Snowflakes]

Tim Pool is getting involved with Tara Jay who wants all trans women to pick up a gun and kill anyone (including children) in their way. All over a women's bathroom.

Fun Facts: Tara Jay is also into diapers, and has a "gayming" channel.

 

[JamesWebbSlinger]

Tim brought on Michael Knowles as a guest, & had Mary Morgan alongside Ian to co-host. A great many theological discussions about God are had.

Mary had few moments to talk at length, but got in some good one-liners.

21:38-34:55, 1:08:54-1:39:00: the panel discusses the existence of God, miracles, transgenderism, etc. Peppered freely with Ian-ism, & Tim referencing the Sims, but it does get Michael to explain a lot of his idea on how to derive intent, meaning, etc. Gets very round-&-round, a fair bit.

Clip Collection:

-Tim & Ian love nuts...:

-Ian contemplates ways to make a woman's womb vibrate:

-Ian channels some Xenogears-level philosophy with a God from the wave form of the universe:

-Tim discusses a new lawsuit, on top of the one against California, is going to be against Bandcamp for de-platforming him & several other content creators:

-Ian channels a Tusken Raider, makes Mary choke:

-Ian believes in speak softy, but carry a big sword & do not mess around:

-Did Ian out Michael Malice as an AGP aficionado at the end of this clip?:

-Tim pitches his Daily Wire show:

-Michael explains how he became more religious:

-Tim explains his position on the Universe via The Sims & Grand Theft Auto. Ian claims that he used to think he lived in a constant state of Schrodinger's Cat:

Bonus Bit:
-Tim just wants someone to come along, & get rid of all this madness. From transgenderism, to leftist political violence, to John Fetterman being disabled, but still can be a Senator. Who can Tim count on to LEAD us through this furor?:

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Who can Tim count on to LEAD us through this?

And Tim will finally step down from the fence, having clearly chosen a side... in support of the antichrist.

 

[gayberouse]

-Tim & Phil Labonte talk about how terrible whites developing a racial consciousness would be:

Ah yes, so terrible that whites are starting to racially collectivize. The media might call us racist guis

 

[Johnny Salami]

Tim Pool is getting involved with Tara Jay who wants all trans women to pick up a gun and kill anyone (including children) in their way. All over a women's bathroom.

Fun Facts: Tara Jay is also into diapers, and has a "gayming" channel.
View attachment 5072824

https://twitter.com/jonesville/status/1648918313928630279

Jason Jones on Twitter: "“I dare you to try and stop me from going in…

archived 20 Apr 2023 17:10:03 UTC

archive.md

This is the video Tim reacted to today. He can't show all of it because of shekels

 

[Nicole E. Eggert]

Tim: "In base reality, Ian is a tech billionaire, who's like 6'3'', chiseled and ripped, and he was just like, 'I have everything and want for nothing, I'm bored, I want to go into a reality with some real struggle and some real strife,' and now he's Ian."

Ian: "And that's why you're here with me."