Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

sorry for multipost

still no Beanie-with-Bibi photos, but Pool trending on various news lists today.

From Jewish Insider, "Netanyahu pushes back on anti-Israel trends in meeting with podcasters":
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tried to push back against anti-Israel trends in the right-wing media world by holding a briefing in the Blair House for podcasters and other media figures, sources in the meeting told Jewish Insider on Tuesday.

Among those in attendance were podcasters including Dave Rubin, Tim Pool and former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, writers Bethany Mandel and David J. Harris Jr., influencer Jessica Kraus, Commentary senior editor Seth Mandel and Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway.

In addition to Netanyahu, his diplomatic advisor Ophir Falk and Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter were present on the Israeli side.

Pool expressed concerns about increased antisemitism and anti-Zionism in the pro-Trump podcasting space, according to sources in the room. Pool famously had Kanye West on his podcast, and the rapper walked out mid-interview after Pool pushed back against antisemitic comments.

Responding to Pool, Netanyahu said that is the reason he invited the group to meet with him.

Pool argued that there is a Qatari "op" to manipulate social media algorithms to make antisemitic and anti-Israel episodes appear to receive far more views than, say, tips for picking up women, in order to incentivize podcasters and YouTubers to produce more antisemitic content.


Netanyahu, however, was noncommittal in his response, saying only that "it's possible."
 

1744231551627.png


Isnt he supposed to be meeting with Putin?
 
Except Tim has had numerous anti-Semites on his podcast, not caring in the slightest. He pretends he didn't know better, but the reason Kanye West became as controversial as he did, is because he was being overtly anti-Semitic in the first place. Which means Tim invited him on anyway, only hoping he wouldn't be on the nose about it, but if Kanye had been dogwhistling, he would have been completely ok.

Tim is so full of shit, it's infuriating he even gets away with it.

-Tim says 3 May shall be the first episode of The Culture War with audience participation. If you pay to be a member of Tim's Discord, you may have the chance to join the panel for a bit, in front of a live audience of your fellow Discordians:
Somebody should confront him on Lauren Southern's rape at the hands of Tate and watch him make excuses in real time.
 
Isn't Phil fifty and Sleepless 25?
Phil is turning 50, a few weeks from now. & that age sounds about right for Mary, I could not recall a specific birth year, but she mentioned being in her teens during the first Trump administration.




Tim had Cameron Higby, a conservative social media personality, as the guest.
Mary & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-During the opening, Tim confirms that he attended a meeting with Netanyahu, along with other social media personalities, but takes pains to say how incorrect the news was that he said Qatar was funding the anti-Israel push on social media. The beanie boy claims it was supposed be under "Chatham House Rules", which are supposed to mask whom attended & said what:


-As noted by @Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc, Mary revealed that she & Phil went to Washington D.C., over the weekend, to see the cherry blossoms. The petals were blighted by pro-Palestine protests:


-Tim says the news was incorrect, as he did not state Qatar was funding the anti-Israel online fervour. The beanie boy claims he asked Netanyahu about a pro-Israeli think tank's report of Qatar funding the anti-Israel online fervour & if it was accurate. He does admit the Israelis are too consumed with the war in Gaza to know how much Israel's support has declined in the United States, & said that to the prime minister's people. Tim says he does not think anyone is being funded by Qatar, but still holds to thinking most of the anti-Israel content online is being boosted by bots:


Whoever Tim's handler is from AIPAC, he chose tonight's guest to be a good foil. Cameron is a self-declared "raging zionist", so he makes Tim's kid gloves approach on the Jewish State seem like sand-paper, by comparison. Cameron argues that Israel is the greatest U.S. ally. When Phil contends that no one can formulate a persuasive argument for the younger generations to like Israel, Cameron responds it is due to poor advocates in the United States & on the right. Cameron tries to bring up Steve Bonnell as a good defender of Israel, for his "debate skills". Everyone else on the panel rightly laughs at the idea of a jaw-clacking sex pest being your best advocate. The clip ends with Tim asking Cameron what the case for Israel is. Not surprised Tim chose not steam-roll a pro-Israel guest, actually asking him what he thinks:


Cameron lays out how military aid to Israel generates American jobs, & how they battle-test weapons systems, like the F-15 & F-35, by flying them in combat situations; petroleum exploitation off their coast; tech innovation, etc. Cameron claims that Israel only gets $3 billion a year, but Tim pulls up the 2024 numbers & shows it is over double that. However, it was at $3 billion, in 2023. But, instead of questioning this, Tim pivots to criticising all foreign aid, pointing out how Malawi received 1/10 of what Israel did. & going back to 2023, Tim gawps at the amount Ukraine was granted, but fails to realise that Israel has taken in far more. When adjusted for inflation, Ukraine has only taken in one-third of Israel's total:


-Tim received a super-chat, starting with "I bet you won't read this", & declares how saying that shall not trick him into reading it. Only for him to read it, anyway:


-Tim gets a super-chat asking if he would approve of AIPAC being made to register as a foreign agent. He argues this would change nothing, & does his level best to mock the idea, stammering his way through it. When Phil jokingly brings up how "they buy elections", Tim still says he does not care if they do, or do not. This might upset one of Tim's favourite congressman, Thomas Massie, whom is in AIPAC's sights to unseat in 2026. Cameron claims that "the rich Jews in Los Angeles & New York" in AIPAC do not want money from Israel, anyway, so becoming a foreign agent would not affect their finances:


-When a super-chatter asks Cameron's opinion on a recent attack that killed Palestinian medics, he gives the usual spiel about how careful Israel is in its targeted strikes, whilst challenging them to condemn the bombing of Berlin, in World War II, & the United States' modern airstrikes. Tim manages to make this into a whataboutism where he calls out the anti-Israel crowd for not condemning a litany of other international tragedies. He simply does not care any more about Israeli malfeasance than any other. I must have missed when the United States supplied the weapons to Sudan to perform the attack upon the aid workers in el-Fasher. Or placed two carrier strike groups in the region, to deter retaliation against the Sudanese for this action. Or Sudan moving to use bots & AI-generated content to push their narrative, online, to justify their actions, with no condemnation by the United States. Phil argues that because there was no declaration of war after killing Qassem Soleimaini was killed, there is not likely to be a wider war if they strike the Iranian nuclear programme, either. Cameron agrees, & thinks that because Iran cannot reach the United States, it is not a threat. Which is funny, because Tim argued the exact opposite, last year. At least Tim checks this bravado by reminding Cameron & Phil that Iranians may have infiltrated the U.S., already, & a response could come from within the nation:


-Amrou Fudl (Myron Gaines) sends in a super-chat to insult Cameron's intelligence. The guest responds in kind, & promotes his upcoming debate with a survivor of the USS Liberty. My reocrding had an issue when Cameron was going over terror plots Israel helped foil, but nothing major was lost. Tim asks why people claim it has such power if criticism of Israel is running rampant, online. Cameron does claim that despite there being some incidents, such as the Lavon affair, it is not close to what the United States has gotten up to, but people like Amrou do not complain about that. Tim also gets a second chance to complain about how anti-Israel people do not advocate against atrocities in nations. The beanie boy complains that their "singular focus", & inability to emulate Dave Smith's style of opposing the Jewish State, only makes him want to support it. Tim claims he doesn't care what Israel does, & thinks they should be defunded, alongside all other nations. He tries to strawman the opposition as critiquing him for not denying Israel's existence. The only reasonable bit he says is that "Woke right" is a ridiculous term, when Phil brings it up:
 
Last edited:
Tim is too boring to even hate-watch.
"Uh yeeah I be posting shit on tik tawk an gettin banned"
"Well China bad so we need to ban"
"Yeah and it's NOT because of Israel'
... RIVETING
I have been tim pool free for about 3 years now. I get my updates mostly from here and it feels good. Tim Pool is not good for one's brain or blood pressure.
 
Tim is too boring to even hate-watch.
"Uh yeeah I be posting shit on tik tawk an gettin banned"
"Well China bad so we need to ban"
"Yeah and it's NOT because of Israel'
... RIVETING
It's theater. Tim Pool accuses Nick Fuentes of being an Israeli OP. Despite him meeting with Netanyatu. But then also after seeing Nick Fuentes encouraging people into the capitol and getting to meet Trump, they are all controlled OPs. Every major person you think is anti-establishment, is paid for by the establishment.

How are these people on major platforms if they are against the establishment? If they were truly against it they'd be de-banked immediately, not living in a mansion frathouse banging random visitor girls and doing drugs.
 
Tim's argument is void; both are minors. In a school. A high school. This isn't college, which self defense laws vary state to state. This is HIGH SCHOOL. That kid isn't allowed to have a knife in there you beanie faggot.
 
Tim is genuinely an Israeli shill and it's quite sad. That USS liberty clip is gold since Tim knows the story but actively tries to shut it down even though Ian brought up a good point (Israel would bomb us and try to get us involved directly). Maybe it was Isreal that pushed Tim on YouTube. He used to talk about having direct contact with someone who worked for Google
 

Tim had Kory Yeshua, a social media personality, as the guest.
Ian & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim's main issue with vetting people coming to the United States for "antisemitism" is that is should be cloaked in a general claim of opposing U.S. foreign policy:


-Tim argues for Donald Trump playing chess against leftists that cannot understand more than a single move ahead. He claims that Trump making the tariff metrics follow trade deficits was simply a big ask which was always meant to be reduced. This does discount how Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made clear, in an interview, that the bond market would be the main metric of success for Trump. The idea was to have the tariffs provoke purchases of bonds as a secure investment, but once the bond market did not rise, as expected, the tariffs were rolled back. Ian rightly questions what authority Trump has do to all this, under an alleged emergency, when none seems applicable to this situation. Phil agrees that this is executive overreach:


-Not content to be the defender of the Jewish State, Tim defends the right of Karmelo Anthony to raise money for his legal defence on GiveSendGo. The beanie boy brings up a post by the co-founder, Jacob Wells, defending his platform as a neutral one that is doing this to protect the rights of conservatives to raise money for their own defence funds. Ian agrees that the fund is not for violence, but legal defence. Tim lays out the events, & argues that Karmelo's case is unadjudicated, so he cannot have an opinion on it. & when people note Karmelo brought a knife, Tim opines that it could have been any time of knife, like "fine Japanese blades for cutting cucumbers" & "you are not allowed to grab people". This gives Tim the opportunity to puff out his chest, call out Jacob & say he would have not been as diplomatic, simply mock his detractors:


Unsurprisingly, Kory comes out to condemn the racist attacks upon Karmello. Likewise, he degrades people insulting the father of Austin Metcalf forgiving Karmelo as being un-Christians. Tim tries to argue this murder is not unsual, because he "sees twelve stories, like this". Kory recounts how his initial claim to fame was opposing Critical Race Theory, which hurts Whites & blacks, when racism "was on life support". This does seem like revisionist history, because one need only look at the 1991 Civil Rights Act codifying disparate impact into law, the Los Angeles race riots, the Community Relations Service pushing victims' families to only show compassion to offenders, or the O.J. Simpson trial, to show how racial tensions were just as present then, as now, merely hidden better. After pumping out this false bravado about standing up to the mob, Tim's chat reminds him that bringing a weapon to a school invalidates the self-defence claim, under Texas law, which counts knives among prohibited items in weapon-free zones:


-Ian makes up for his prior statements by stating there are genetic differences between the races, which is "cool" & we need to be aware of this. This is why I appreciate Our Graphene Guy. He is a real one, specifically a race realist one, in this case:


-Tim becomes petulant, arguing that because schools are weapon-free zones, the 2nd Amendment is now null & void. The beanie boy complains "go back two hundred years", American households has firearms in their homes accessible to young children, as in Confederate General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson's household. As if the current populations is remotely similar to the founding stock. & atop being a race realist, Ian says he is a big fan of Jackson:


-During super-chats, Tim asks Phil whether you can use lethal force against someone that pushes you. Phil gives it a "yes", but with qualifications. When Tim gets challenged over his understanding of Austin's death, he then asks Phil if you can use lethal force to resist being ejected from the backstage of another band's show. Phil says that scenario does not lend itself to self-defence, which sees Tim shift to make it a public space, instead. Phil continues to say it is unclear, because you went into an area you are not permitted. Tim becomes incensed as the super-chatter used the phrase "smuggled in a blade, over six inches long", as "biased language". Tim claims that bearing arms means "all weapons", & the 2nd Amendment does not include exemptions for schools. The beanie boy posits that the reason the story went viral is due to a White person being killed by a black one, & wanting to apply the same standards BLM did unto that community. However, Tim does not want to do this:


Tim believes if he does not defend Karmelo, it could mean he loses the right to defend himself. Tim tries to create a scenario where he enters a school, where he is barred entry, but cuts this off because it sounds indefensible. Then, he returns to saying no one knows what went on, but still defends the black boy's right to respond with lethal force. Ian asks if Karmello entered the tent, & Tim says "It was a gazebo", as if that makes entering it alright. The beanie boy claims that because people are calling for boycotting GiveSendGo over platforming Karmello's fundraiser, that makes them wrong. Tim even tries to compare Karmello to Kyle Rittenhouse, someone that was chased into a corner before responding with lethal force. The crux of Tim's defence is that the state cannot make any prohibitions on where one can carry weapons, of any type, because it violates the 2nd Amendment:


-Tim ends the episode weaving increasingly bizarre scenarios to justify his position to the chat. From being invited into a location, which Karmello was not. The attacked party says not to come closer in a de-escalatory manner, which Karmello did not. Tim says it does not matter if Karmello was not supposed to be there, but then says you can defend yourself if you are invited in. Only to turn back to the party comparison, saying if you are told you are unwelcome, you apologise before being attacked, which Karmello did not do. But do not worry, Tim is not trying to make a one-to-one comparison with these, & he does not know the specifics of this case, anyway. He used the tried & true, "It's complicated":
 
Last edited:
Back