Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

On 27 May, Tim had Steve Baker, a Blaze contributor & reporter, as the guest.
Elad & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Phil brings up the noted pattern of pop culture presenting inept male authority figures (husbands, fathers, etc.), but Tim objects, because Homer Simpson & Peter Griffin are morons that magically succeed at things, holding many different jobs. Which does not invalidate Phil's observation, because they are still examples of an incompetent father figure. The irony of this being that Tim, as the self-professed guy who yells at a camera all day, is reliant upon his wife to run the day-to-day operations of his business, thereby fulfilling that stereotype of the dullard husband dependent upon a competent spouse to survive. In a prior episode, Tim even admitted to not know how to cook, or operate a washing machine, whilst Allison was away, & could not make whipped cream, without messing up the kitchen:


-Elad brings up the interview Tucker Carlson had with Sheikh Mohammed, the Prime Minister of Qatar, as an example of people trying to buy influence & push their positions on the right. In this case, Qatar doing this to promote their policies, with Elad claiming they paid "$180,000, per month" to an organisation which arranged the interview. Tim opposes this framing, stating it is normal for foreign governments to try & set up interviews to promote their values. Elad brings up Pam Bondi & Kashyap Patel taking money from Qatar, as well, implying this was for ulterior motives. Phil says that plenty of nations do that:


Tim finds no fault with a foreign nation hiring a consulting firm to facilitate interviews, only if there is something illicit going on, with it. Phil asks Elad to explain what he may find objectionable about Qatar. Elad alleges hypocricy in Qatari-based Al Jazeera's news coverage, failing to report upon the Gulf state's own failings, whilst highlighting that of others. Tim says he would not expect a state-run news agency to be honest in coverage about its owner, despite Elad's demands that they do so. Tim does question Donald Trump accepting a jet from Qatar, on security grounds, or Theo Von taking a stance upon Gaza, after visiting there. The beanie boy says the acts of Israel & Qatar are similar, being small states trying to sway public opinion their way, but Elad tries to make the latter sound far more influential & nefarious:


Tim argues both the people that love, & the people that hate the Jewish State are "Israel First", because they presume it has such power over everything & is the foremost thought in their minds. Phil criticices the lack of noticing the rising debt, which is a bigger threat than any money or support given to Israel. Tim says he can respect people that evenly call for ending foreign funding, but if you focus upon Israel, alone, when Tim tries to bring up other nations, he calls those people Israel First, implying their lack of intelligence. The beanie boy listed off the groypers & Nick Fuentes being particularly guilty of this. Tim claims that when he wakes up the nation he is focused upon is America, & its problems, with Israel being a distant issue for him:


-A super-chatter brings up the desire to root out Israel's influence that makes it such a large topic, but Tim rejects this. To rebut the claims of Israels' influence, Tim "did the math, for you". Tim used Open Secret's foreign lobby watch to list several other nations spending more money than Israel. & the beanie boy claims that the Jewish State only spent "50" million, which derives from AIPAC "at $40 (million), & then you've got Israel, at $5.7 (million)". Tim declares that unless you think Open Secrets is in a Jewish conspiracy, hiding payments, you have to accept this:


Since accepting what Tim says is a fool's game, I decided to vet his numbers. & to no one's surprise, he was wrong.
First, Tim's claim that Israel, itself, only spent $5.7 million, between 2016 to 2024, is incorrect. That is the total for non-governmental spending, only in the year 2024, by groups from Israel. The site makes clear their numbers include "tourism and trade promotion on behalf of a foreign principal", as well as the more conventional lobbying. The actual total, for money spent over those eight years, by Israel, combining government & non-government money, is over $192 million.
accounting 0.webp

This raises the Jewish state to almost in the top ten. While still small, compared with Communist China, it is several times higher than what the beanie boy claimed.
accounting 2.webp

Second, AIPAC is not mentioned anywhere on Israel's page of registered organisations, so not sure why he chose to include it. But, it does have its own separate entry for American lobbying groups. Because it is not a registered foreign agent. The $40 million, like the Israeli number, is only for 2024, & only includes spending, not lobbying. Open Secrets has scant records for AIPAC, prior to 2022, but for the two recent federal election cycles, it lists it spending around $75 million, via is own PAC, with the incredibly original name, AIPACPAC. Atop this, AIPAC is listed as using approximately $3-4 million for lobbying, each year. & by he way, spending $6 million, in lobbying, for each two year election cycle? A bit too on the schnozz, you would think.
accounting 1.webp

One of my big gripes with Tim is squaring these sorts of simple errors with his claims of how hard he works, slaving away 16 hours a day. Clearly, that does not include vetting his information, if basic arithmetic & fact-checking is beyond Tim. I would have less issue if he just said he was loafing around, spending time with his child, & playing in his personal skatepark, but the beanie boy keeps exclaiming about how hard he works, every day. It just puts the lie to the claim with cases, like this.



Nick Fuentes responded to Tim's statements about him, on the last show.





On 28 May, Tim had Tony Kinnett, a correspondent for The Daily Signal, as the guest.
Ian & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Ian is back, on set, & just as barmy:


-Tim, finally, is starting to consider entering politics, after slamming people for not doing as he wished, in government. But is going to wait 20 to 30 years. Also, Tim accidentally says he likes what Kashyap Patel & Dan Bongino are "Jewing", before correcting it to be "doing":


-Tim gets a super-chat about race-swapping, & he is no fan of it. Thus, the beanie boy proposes doing a short film, about the Marvel superhero Black Panther, & cast Ian in the lead role. He shall be the graphene face of white supremacy:
 
Last edited:

Tim had Elijah Schaffer, & Sarah Stock, his employee/Lauren Southern clone, as the guests.
Mary & Phil were the co-hosts.

The eternally brave Tim, standing up for free speech, simply has to preserve his YouTube ad money by saying "unalived" instead of committed suicide:
mqdefault.webp

& in the tradition of taking embarrassing photographs when Elijah shows up, Phil, Sarah, & Tim decided to pose with some of the beanie boy's weapons:
GsKsOPjWkAM5YBw.webp

The other tradition being clip-heavy posts, when he appears.


Clip Collection:
-Tim continues to have faith in Dan Bongino & Kashyap Patel, despite the lack of high-profile arrests. He compares it to the absence of any action by the last Attorney General in Donald Trump's first term, William Barr:


-Elijah takes the opposite stance, & derides the lack of "extreme" action against people committing treason, opposing Trump. Tim has to "Erm Acktually..." that what Elijah means is sedition, not treason, because it is more legally correct. Despite treason by a colloquial term that covers both. Elijah accepts this, & says that having such people "executed, live, on TV" would be a deterrent to such actions. Tim argues that would only make them martyrs, & death is no worry for "nihilists". The beanie boy proposes jailing them, because that removes the ne'er-do-wells from society. But leaves them open for having their sentences commuted, no one mentions. Tim tries to argue that the "deep state" does not assassinate people, anymore, but does character assassinations, instead, citing what happened with Julian Assange. Sarah asks who else this is happening to, & appends that Andrew Tate suffered the same as Julian. The beanie boy states that the Tates said things, on camera, about pedalling women for sex, not had lies made up. Elijah tries to argue that young men, in Britain, as an example, were flocking to the Tates' message, so it is believable that they would attempt character assassination. But Elijah forgets that Britain is not what it once was, even a generation ago, particularly with its youth. & the Tates' appeal tends to be with the swarthy & negroid sort. Sarah mentions Andrew Tate faced similar accusations of rape as Donald Trump, but Tim rejects this comparison:


-This is going to be a long one....The beanie boy outdoes himself coming off as unsympathetic as the stereotypical boomer harridan. Tim argues that pushing people to have children will not resolve the immediate issues facing the United States. In the short term, the nation becomes "a slum" by either importing millions of low-skill labourers to do work, or factories remain overseas, cutting off jobs. But Tim has faith Donald Trump's tariffs could help prevent that. Elijah argues that politicians across the West are "importing the third world", with Tim chiming in to say Trump is not doing that. Sarah reminds Tim that Trump backed H-1B visas, which overly imports Indians. Tim responds that there is a difference between H-1B visas, & "opening the doors to 20 million illegal immigrants, in four years". The beanie boy does acknowledge that the programme does bring in people for menial jobs, like cashiers, but Sarah interjects that H-1B immigrants take higher skill jobs from Americans, as well. Tim brings up the comments by Elon Musk & Vivek Ramaswamy about the poor quality of American workers, which he agrees with, but says you still need to invest in the nation's youth to improve their status. Tim calls many Millennials & Generation Z "lazy, entitled losers" that refuse to improve their lot. Sarah & Elijah reject this framing, claiming that the system, as it exists, is set up against the youth getting ahead, such as competing for jobs with the whole planet. Tim takes this as Sarah arguing for young people not having to work, & the beanie boy says they should just take the job, even if it is not enough to afford a home. Mary asks what is the answer to a declining standard of living, to which Tim responds that housing prices are not affected by one issue. But he admits immigration does drive up costs. Then, Tim argues that wages rise because corporations compete over workers, to which Sarah, again, returns to the H-1B visa issue feeding more labour to employers to depress pay:


Tim claims that he supports "a functional immigration system" that "brain drain(s) other countries". Sarah makes clear that H-1Bs are not that, to which Tim says they agree, but still insists on bringing people in. Elijah regards this as a "post 1960s" take on immigration, & falls in with the idea of replacing a "lazy" native populace with foreign workers. Tim interjects that no one is arguing that, despite agreeing with Elon & Vivek's claims, earlier. & Sarah states that. Tim becomes more heated, claiming that anyone not saying Generation Z are, for the most part, lazy, is "pandering to the Gen Z audience". Elijah contends that the generation is disillusioned over cost-of-living increases, & not helped by people, like Tim, calling that being lazy. Tim claims he never said any of that, & not being able to afford to start a family, over the rising cost, is "excuses". Tim decides to compare the current situation to the "Founding Fathers", but uses the initial settlers at Plymouth & Jamestown as his example, rather than the established colonies they lived in. Tim, then, reiterates that "a large portion of Gen Z & Millennials...literally don't want to do any job". Tim decides the bring up "femcels", for some reason, as well, which Sarah is befuddled by:


Sarah asks what he means by femcels, which Tim regards as women "locking themselves in their rooms, not going out, not doing anything". Tim does return to claim that most of Generation Z is mooching off of their parents, & not "owed a house". Tim beings hectoring Sarah about what these young people should be doing. Sarah argues that competing against immigrant labour, from India, was never something prior generations had to deal with, & is surprised Tim supports it. Tim angrily interrupts to say she is conflating the current, broken immigration system, with his ideal system that should exist. Mary tries to explain that O-1 visas are for the exceptional cases, but Tim disagrees. But in explaining, he basically concedes to Mary's point, but does not admit it. Elijah asks why Tim would want to import people that do not share Western values, simply because they can fill a supposedly empty job. Tim takes offense, shouting "Who said that?!?", to which Elijah explains that most of the immigrants coming lack a shared culture with the West. Tim begins stammering, asking if his guests want a full stop on immigration, which both Sarah & Elijah agree. This leads Elijah into pinning the decline in family generation to feminism & cost-of-living, but he derides the Trump administration focusing upon antisemitism. Tim asks what solutions Elijah has, but keeps interrupting him to state that none of these are what a singular Generation Z youth can do to fix things. Elijah states that both he & Tim are lucky to have careers which make so much, which only serves to upset Tim more:


Tim says no "20 year old Gen Z" is going to Washington "to bang a gavel" & change the system. Tim becomes more heated, demanding Elijah explain what he would say to a Millennial that cannot afford a house. When Elijah asks why reforming the system is not considering "functional", Tim keeps pushing for what an individual can do to afford a house, right now. Sarah chimes in to say Tim's argument of pull yourself up by the bootstraps is "so boomer-coded". Tim rounds on Elijah for saying he chose a job that makes a lot of money, regaling us with how he was homeless & busking for "$7 an hour". Elijah responds that this sort of content creator career Tim has now, is limited & most people are just looking to work a normal job. Tim snarls that he worked at ABC News, before this, & demands Elijah explain his own job history, which he does. Elijah recommends people become entrepreneurs, as an alternative to that 9-5 life. When Sarah highlights that if people took Tim's advice, & accepted a job at lower pay, it would still not lead to getting a home, as their pay is not enough. Tim retorts that this sounds like Democrat liberal talk:


Elijah compares the economic outlook in his grandfather's life to the current economy, which has become much bleaker for the average American. Tim keeps asking what an individual can do, in these circumstances, to get ahead, not a systemic answer. Soon after, Tim asks Elijah whether NEETs can be considered lazy. Elijah regards this more as due to apathy with a system pitted against the average person, not laziness. He begins to list out policies that could make the changes & improve their outlook, but Tim continues to demand immediate answers & accepting poor-paying jobs, as a stopgap, to improve themselves, citing Andrew Tate's advice on taking on challenges:


Elijah argues that despite things being weighed against White men, & men in general, he advises them to get their testosterone checked to see if that may be affecting their hopeless outlooks. Regarding Andrew Tate, he does express distaste at how they made his money, via swindling men out of money, via cam girls. Tim clarifies that Andrew was also talking with men, pretending to be a cam girl, as well. Tim, now, concedes there are systemic issue, & argues that the people he was talking about were specifically the leftist Millennial & Generation Z youth:


-Elijah brings up the recent decline in Western nations, such as Canada, amidst an increasing surge of third-world immigrants. Tim says he does not care, as long as this happens outside of the United States. The beanie boy tries to claim that whites are responsible for this happening, as they were both the majority population & in power, before mass migration started. Elijah & Sarah both note that, despite polls showing a majority of people want less immigration, it keeps coming, to which Tim argues that non-white nations, like Communist China are not seeing this happen. Because there is such demand to immigrate there, or to other non-Western nations. To the polls question, Tim responds that polls matter little, compared to election results. & if people elect Democrats, & that means more immigration. Elijah & Phil bring up cases of politicians overriding desires to limit immigration, but Tim refuses to accept this. Sarah adds that judges are also obstructing that. Phil asks Tim to clarify what he means, & the beanie boy states that half of the U.S. voted for "open borders":


Sarah & Mary both state that open borders was not a stated position, in 2024, with even Kamala Harris reeling in her prior statements. Tim refuses to budge, even when Mary brings up the case of someone she knows voting Democrat, that does not agree with all of the party's positions. The beanie boy claims this means he actually supports it, even if he does not like it. That means Tim backs bombing Yemen, because he voted for Trump, despite how much the beanie boy claimed he opposed that, to use his argument to its natural end. In the end, Tim blames White liberals, & their out-group preference, for mass immigration. Sarah notes white guilt plays a large role, & Tim pipes in to say that is pushed by White people, themselves. Some unspoken objections occur to Whites being responsible for it, & Elijah brings up the fact he is anti-Zionist, yet voted for Trump, as a counter to Tim's arguments. Tim continues to draw a distinction between agreeing with a policy, & supporting a policy via voting for politicians. Elijah reiterates that a plethora of polls show majority support for reducing immigration, but Tim adds "Not if Trump is doing it", because Democrats may knee-jerk oppose it:


Elijah says that does not change the poll results, & highlights the lack of response to that popular sentiment from government, across the West. Tim repeats, once more that voting for "things you need", may include things you do not like, stating that Nick Fuentes is correct that voting for Trump is voting for supporting Israel. Elijah uses Israel, as an example of not getting real choices in politics, as both parties support it & do not allow many anti-Zionists to emerge, via the primary system. Tim counters Elijah arguing for intent behind opening the borders for third-world masses to people making mistakes, such as opening trade with Communist China, & not understanding the consequences of it. Tim cuts things off, to move to super-chats:


-But, do not worry, Tim got his 30 pieces of silver, for all his work. The beanie boy promotes his investment in precious metals, via silver coins, thanks to his new sponsor. Seriously, Tim cannot be worse at optics if he tried. He may as well jingle them about in a big bag labeled "shekels":


-A super-chatter jokingly calls Nick Fuentes Israel First, & Elijah asks when they are going to debate, each other. Tim asks what is there to debate, & there is nothing to be gained via debating the Israel-obsessed Cum Hunter. Elijah tries to dispel the notion Nick only talks about the Jewish State, & Tim is a constant defender of it, saying he has seen enough to see both do not deserve their reputations. Sarah brings up the allegations Nick made that Tim is bought & paid for by Israel, citing the meeting he had with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Tim tries to compare a closed-door meeting, with rules to cover whom said what, to Tucker Carlson doing a video interview of Qatar's prime minister, to excuse his attendance. Elijah asks why Netanyahu chose Tim, & he responds that IRL is the "second biggest podcast" in the nation & Israel wants people to support an attack on Iran. Phil says people claim he does not speak ill of Israel, because he is in the Jew-run music industry. Tim objects to people trying to claim Qatari money, or Israeli money, is why people back one side of that conflict:


Elijah roundaboutly asks if Tim thinks Netanyahu invited him, because he felt the beanie boy could be swayed, & if the meeting included offers of money or influence, if he was. Tim says there was not, & most people at the meeting disagreed with the Israeli PM. The beanie boy says all groups think there are nefarious actors paying people to say things, & calls out "the Israel First people" for implying he does. Tim states how he desires to see all federal funding stripped from Israel, & praise for Dave Smith's non-interventionism, makes him a terrible investment for Israel. Elijah asks if he would still have the same level of influence, access, etc., if he was anti-zionist & more interrogative about Israel. Tim says that is true of any subject. Elijah, then, asks if this would happen if he grilled Qatar that way, & without missing a beat, Tim says "No one cares about Qatar". Elijah asks if that focus on Israel is part of the reason Nick is "so censored...de-banked", to which Tim brings up Hasan being one of the biggest live streamers to counter that:


Tim says coming out strong, on certain topics, would see barred from certain spaces, either way. The beanie boy tries to use an example of a progressive with TDS, like Brian Tyler Cohen, being denied an interview with Trump, to prove his point Going beyond that, Tim claims that the right is far more accepting of differences in opinion than liberals, noting that Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump, & Elon, were all Democrat-leaning until recently. Sarah notes no conservative seems willing to cooperate with Nick, & Tim struggles for a bit, but Phil helps to blame that on the Cum Hunter being "trolly & caustic". Before Sarah can respond, Tim cuts it to move on to the paywalled segment, so we did not get her reply:
 

On 30 May, Tim hosted a "debate" on the topic of men leaving the Left.
For one side, there was American Nacho, a surprisingly small, conservative account for Tim to platform, & on the opposite there was Kyla Turner, a liberal podcaster, originally from Canada.

But, you know any debate Tim hosts means he usurps his preferred side of things, arguing on their behalf. Nacho slowly shifted into the background, & even the topic was forgotten, intermittently around the 1:37:00 mark, but definitively at 2:10:33, as Tim & Kyla debate the Russo-Ukraine War. This consumes 1/3 of the entire show, making it run an extra hour longer.

Clip Collection:
-Tim decides to rope support for Ukraine into a discussion about whether to use sex, or gender, on government identification. The beanie boy argues that Kyla believes in American exceptionalism, because she supports having gender on passports & providing "some support" to Ukraine. Tim goes on to claim the United States is in "a hot war" with Russia, having "U.S. special forces...on the ground". When Kyla asks if they are on the frontline, Tim vociferously states "YES!". This leads into combining this with allegations of the U.S. paying the salaries for American volunteers & being in charge of the Ukrainian army. To bolster his argument, Tim brings up an article, with a headline supporting his claim about special forces being present. But the article, itself, says there was only 14, in total. & an article I found clarified that it was for embassy security & protecting the military attachés helping transfer weapons to Ukraine. When Kyla tries to get Tim to state whether the U.S> is directly paying the volunteers to go fight, Tim claims that is semantics:


Because he conflated veterans that volunteered in the Ukrainian International Legionaries & active-duty special forces, it leaves Kyla confused for a tick. She does call out Tim shifting from using frontline to on the ground & asked for more sources to back up his statements, but the beanie boy barrels onward. Now he claim that the fourteen special forces "are in control of the operations that are happening & they're giving direction to the Ukrainians". When Kyla brings up the information I did, that is was only for security, rather than engage on that point, the beanie boy acts petulant, saying how only a single source is not enough to verify something, just as Kyla did earlier. Tim deflects responsibility to verify his claims because "it's very difficult, in the span of 20 minutes, to pull up ten years of research" he did:


As she lacks the mental acuity & verve to better trip up Tim, Kyla is bowled over with his rant that does not address her questions:


It goes on...:


After almost 15 minutes, Tim finally admits he could have looked up articles to bolster his argument, instead of ramble on about his understanding of the history of Ukraine. Tim persists in arguing how it is American-controlled & -directed munitions, with only a button press by the Ukrainians. This all became rather humorous, after the most recent development, with Ukraine launching an attack upon Russia's strategic bomber force, without notifying the White House:





Later that day, the beanie boy hosted Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian Army veteran that advocates for mental health support for soldiers, as the guest.

Brett & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim describes how the property is haunted, & they have experienced paranormal encounters. So, not only does it have sulfur water, but the Branch Timidian compound has the spirits of the damned floating around:


-Ian is an idiot savant, having given Tim advice to invest in graphene & Palantir, well before they became profitable:





On 2 June, Tim had Stephen Horn, who was arrested at the Capitol, on 6 January, whilst recording the events, as the guest.
Phil & Shane were the co-hosts.

This outing was notable, not for what it covered, but what it did not. There was no mention of the recent Ukrainian drone strikes, across Russia, targeting its strategic bomber force. Nor had Tim commented upon it, either on Twitter, or his stream that day. Considering his usual concerns about escalation by Ukraine, I was surprised at the lack of coverage.
 
Last edited:
Tim's analysis of the Dave Portnoy thermonuclear Judeo spergout is completely wrong. Whether that is intentional or not, I'm not sure. They begin discussing the subject at 36:50.



The actual story itself isn't all that interesting, I've typed way too much about it here already. The facts are that a billionaire Jew was neurotically seething Jewish-ly, leveraging his power, silencing critics, and this was when he took a break from promoting degen gambling to children. This story was trending for several days when it first happened a couple of weeks ago. It wasn't just Barstool guys talking about it, much of the wider sports broadcasting and sports betting worlds were as well. It's unbelievable that Tim gets the facts so incredibly wrong here.

Tim says that Dave was upset because an employee of his, a server at one of his bars in Philly, held up a sign at work that said "Fuck the Jews", and that this cost Portnoy business opportunities and massive brand deals worth millions with advertisers. It was not an employee of Portnoy's though, it was a random freshman student at nearby Temple University who did the sign. There was no affiliation whatsoever.

Tim says that "this is the only route for him [Portnoy] to go". He keeps repeating this idea that Portnoy was losing business and contracts because of the fallout from the sign at his bar. That literally never happened. Also, nobody else is even implying that. Because why would they? Everyone's understood from day 1 of this kikery that it was a random muslim student. Tim seemed to just make up this entire narrative of Dave Portnoy losing business as a result of all of this on his own. There are no "contracts being lost" and nobody has ever even mentioned this.

It does allow Tim to not acknowledge just what an insanely neurotic Jew Portnoy is being in reaction to the whole situation though. Tim's saying that Portnoy wanted no part in any of this, that he's been forced to take a defensive position in order to protect his brand and businesses worth hundreds of millions of dollars. That could not be further from the truth.

Portnoy was red in the face filming dozens of selfie videos raging at this teenager through his iPhone's camera. He was attacking the Temple student for days on end when this first went down. He even used his Jew powers to successfully get him investigated by Philadelphia police, he got him expelled from Temple University's business school, and even went so far as buying him a round trip flight to Poland where he was to take a guided tour of Auschwitz with the understanding that he'd permanently ruin his life further if he did not take it seriously and continue to apologize to Jews profusely throughout.

This was a major topic of discussion on today's episode - there's no excuse for how lazy and incorrect all of this is, even for a story as retarded and insignificant as this one. They discussed this Barstool clip of Dave sperging out for 20 minutes. And as displayed here, Tim had literally all of the facts wrong. Truthfully, Tim's incorrect understanding was very convenient for Tim, Phil's, and Timcast's priors as they relate to their position on Israel and the subject of "dangerous antisemitism on the rise".

The only explanation here that seems to make sense to me is that Tim has zero connection to the sports world at all. He's never played them and he's never watched them. When Portnoy is first brought up, Tim mentions how he liked that he helped small businesses stay afloat during COVID. But that was 5 years ago. Portnoy is an annoying billionaire Jew who has been in the news a ton since then. Tim only recognizes him from his history where he's brushed up with the politics world a few times. Instead of acknowledging that he is a total outsider to the wider sports world and thus doesn't follow any of the Barstool orbit or have any of the facts, he seems to have just filled in the blanks and created his own.

This clip below, what Tim is describing, it literally never happened. He can't blame others for bad info either because like I said, nobody else is claiming this happened either, Tim just made all of this up himself while confidently asserting it as if it's a story with top secret clearence only he's allowed access to. He's prefacing all of these claims with qualifiers like "I'll tell you what's really going on..." , "What you guys don't understand is..." , "I guarantee you..." , "Let me tell you something..." - this is so fucking annoying, especially while he is 100% wrong on all of the facts.



So everything Tim says in this clip is fake. It's not just like he misinterpreted something or is going off of outdated info - Tim just made all of this up, seemingly on the fly. What makes me lmao for real is at the 0:10 mark while Tim is just creating this impromptu false reality, you can hear Phil the cuck in the background chiming in with a "Yup!" as if to remind the viewer he's still there - while just like Tim, being completely incorrect on the facts.


Something that has always annoyed me about Tim is his over-reliance on nonsense political labels and his habit of hiding behind them. They reduce already understood beliefs and nuanced positions to simplistic categories, discouraging deeper dialogue. He uses these as a form of semantic evasion of sorts, which allows him to avoid having to actually defend his own ideas, of which he increasingly seems to have none.

The insistence on dropping a quick "techno-anarcho, eco-futurist traditionalists, neo-liberal agrarians, pan-gender fiscal hawks" and pretending we're all on the same page is insane. Why is he pretending anybody knows what the fuck he's talking about? Yes, I'm sure each of those above labels have their own Wikipedia page, their own team of Wiki editors, and bizarrely enough their own flag, but these are still unnecessarily confusing.

Unnecessary political labels: in. Easily understood ones: out.

He does this so often and it's always so frustrating watching his insistence on repeating them stifle what could otherwise make for interesting debates with whatever guests are in the studio.

Tim was openly talking about how much he could not wait to vote for Trump 5+ years ago. Everybody knows the score. Nobody seriously believes he holds onto the same political beliefs that his comrades at Vice had 10 years ago. So why is he seemingly so terrified of not even him, but his YouTube live show, being labeled "conservative"?

Also Phil is a total cuck and I was not at all surprised to see that upon checking out tonight's ep after a long break from listening, he still remains an absolutely insufferable faggot.
 
Last edited:
So why is he seemingly so terrified of not even him, but his YouTube live show, being labeled "conservative"?
This is the most mystifying part about Tim to me. He doesn't have the "heterodox" bonafides (ie: former champion of the left, that still entertains left wing economic views, but by and large rejects left wing cultural views) of say a Glenn Greenwald, he pretty much exclusively takes the fox news party line position on most issues, sometimes to the point where his slightly more "based" guests and hosts jump him over it. Why keep up this charade that you're unbiased and non-partisan when literally all anybody watches this show for is is to confirm their right of center politics?

Saying the obvious here, but Tim uses these insanely baroque and nonsensical political labels you mentioned to both pretend he's smarter than he really is, and to obscure his actual stance on a topic he disagrees with someone on.
 
Last edited:

On 3 June, Tim had A.K., from his Discord that started his own podcast, as the guest.
Elad & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Elad decides to play the heel, today, for Israel, when Tim asks why Fox News described the Boulder attack as "antisemitic". The Branch Timidian White House correspondent insinuated that not calling it an antisemitic attack somehow permits violence against Jews, so long as it is described as anti-Zionist. When Phil & Tim push back on this framing, Elad argues that the media is overly critical of Israel, due to it being a Jewish state. The two other hosts do not agree:


-But, Tim earns his shekels by griping about groypers, this episode. After reading, what I presume was a joke, super-chat about how Tim platforms anti-Israel personalities, because he is afraid to lose his "groyper viewers", he goes on an extended rant about how crazy people are about Israel being the villain. Despite the super-chat criticising Tim for being insufficiently pro-Israel, the beanie boy keeps ragging on the anti-Israel side. Tim even brings up the now two year old video from Leather Apron Club breaking down what percentage of IRL''s guests were Jews. Then, Tim drags in the "fake" video, when Ian brought up the USS Liberty & Tim appeared to dismiss it:






On 4 June, Tim had Chrissie Mayr, comedienne & host of The Simpcast, as the guest.
Ian & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:

-Ian is concerned about deporting the entire family of Mohammed Soliman, due to the actions of their patriarch. The rest of the panel does not share his worries, as the family, too, were visa holders & here at the discretion of the Secretary of State. Tim even says they are not punishing the family, then a moment later, states that the members of the family are just having their visas revoked:


-Tim says Kirk Minihane, co-host of Dave Portnoy's podcast, should have quit on the spot, rather than suffer being yelled at by his boss over not simply agree with all he says. The beanie boy mocks him, stating how "500k" was enough for Kirk "to drop to your knees". This is rich coming from the man-child that has bent over backwards to retain his YouTube monetisation:


-A super-chatter compares the deportation of the Soliman family to Israel's alleged targeting families of terrorists. Tim says "it is not incumbent upon us, to wait to find out" if the other members of the family share Mohammed's views. Phil argues that visas are conditional, anyway:


-The following super-chat sees Ian subjected to a bit of a struggle session, from the rest of the panel. It asks Ian if one among a group of house guests committed a wrong, would he expel the group or the specific offender. Our Graphene Guy says the singular antagonist. Then, Tim makes the house guests into a group of orcs, where one smashes a child with a hammer, & asks the same question. Chrissy, then, asks if it was a group of pit bulls. Ian notes this is asking him to be racist & judge these groups as collectives, but Tim says he is not trying to do that. He just presumes, without evidence, that the family members of the terrorist share the same views, because of their blood relation. The beanie boy keeps trying, making up a group of people that think the moon is made of cheese, & murder those that disagree. One kills a child for disagreeing with him, asking if that group should be expelled from Ian's home, or just the one offender. Ian responds that if "a psychotic death cult" came into his home, he would remove them. Tim argues that is what is happening with the Soliman family, & the American people should not have to wait to verify if the other family members believe what the attacker does. The beanie boy claims all they are doing is sending them home, anyway, stating it would be like sending a burglar back to his house, with no punishment. After this, Tim gave up on arguing the matter of deporting the family, but changed over to "violent criminal aliens", instead:


Instead of acknowledging that he is a total outsider to the wider sports world and thus doesn't follow any of the Barstool orbit or have any of the facts, he seems to have just filled in the blanks and created his own.
Tim combines arrogance & stupidity into a very neat, economical package.

Tim was openly talking about how much he could not wait to vote for Trump 5+ years ago. Everybody knows the score. Nobody seriously believes he holds onto the same political beliefs that his comrades at Vice had 10 years ago. So why is he seemingly so terrified of not even him, but his YouTube live show, being labeled "conservative"?

Why keep up this charade that you're unbiased and non-partisan when literally all anybody watches this show for is is to confirm their right of center politics?

It is moments, like these, I appreciate Ian being on set. I half believe Our Graphene Guy knew what he was doing, saying IRL was "generally conservative", but played up his barminess, as a shield, once Tim became upset at that label.

Tim tries to appease both sides of the political spectrum, in some of his arguments, presumably to retain an appearance of neutrality. But this ends up making him look the fool. There was the beanie boy's position on elective abortions, from his debate with Sam Seder, which is simultaneously:

*The Supreme Court has yet to rule on whether the unborn are protected under the law, as people, & this needs to be settled
*Women should still have the right to abort children, up to the point of viability, until the Supreme Court adjudicates the issue

I cannot square how Tim is alright with supporting what could be potential murder, depending upon which way the highest U.S. court rules, without waiting for that decision, first, unless he is trying to play both sides. But it comes off as sociopathic.
 
Tim tries to appease both sides of the political spectrum, in some of his arguments
This is the other character trait of Tim's I don't get. liberals and leftists, what few of them were ever in his camp to begin with are gone from his audience, and are NEVER going to give him the benefit of the doubt, precisely because Timcast is basically just a more retarded and less coherent version of The Five on Fox (Which If you've ever watched The Five, is kind of an insane feat).

Does he actually believe Walter Kronkite "The real news is about the truth, not politics!" bullshit, or is it reflective of a deep need of his to be loved and respected by everyone?
 
This is the other character trait of Tim's I don't get. liberals and leftists, what few of them were ever in his camp to begin with are gone from his audience, and are NEVER going to give him the benefit of the doubt, precisely because Timcast is basically just a more retarded and less coherent version of The Five on Fox (Which If you've ever watched The Five, is kind of an insane feat).

Does he actually believe Walter Kronkite "The real news is about the truth, not politics!" bullshit, or is it reflective of a deep need of his to be loved and respected by everyone?
As scummy as I find Breadtube, I can understand why they treat him like a Cuckoo bird.
 
As scummy as I find Breadtube, I can understand why they treat him like a Cuckoo bird.
He's literally so retarded even they can dunk on him. Even someone who's only taken a single poli-sci class in college would be able
to lap this simpleton on any topic. It would
almost make me feel kind sympathetic if I didn't know better that under the exterior
of this ugly, dumb guy, is also an asshole and narrcisist that fucks people like his brother over.
 
Tim decided to play the fool, posting "Elon 2028", amidst the squabbling between the Tesla CEO & President Donald Trump, in an attempt to troll:
squabble.webp
(archive)

He has to explain how he was merely trolling, which undermines the whole affair, because so many people took him seriously:
squabble2.webp
(archive)

You have to have actual comedic bonafides to pull this off, or else you end up like the beanie boy, being the butt of the joke, in the end:
squabble3.webp






Tim had Drew Hernandez, an on-the-ground reporter, as the guest.
Mary & Phil were the co-hosts.

The first hour is consumed by talk of the spat between Musk & Trump, so discussion of the large-scale airstrikes in Ukraine is pushed back for this far more important news.

Clip Collection:
-Tim tries to argue that "the left" will welcome Elon Musk back, now that he is "anti-Trump", because Democrats are simply that. Mary notes how aggressively the left targeted Elon, before, & does not expect them to accept him, now. The audio cuts out on the stream for a bit, so we miss out on part of the conversation. The beanie boy argues that this was a fabricated fight, designed to help Elon separate from his Trump connections, because this feud costs neither participant "nothin'" (which was incorrect). Mary concedes this is possible, but not after Elon accused Trump of being involved with Jeffrey Epstein. The beanie boy responds that both men are trolls, so he can totally see this being fine, bringing up Trump calling his former Attorney General William Barr names. None of which rose to the same level as pedophile associate. But do not worry, Tim knows this is all an act, because "it is in line with my personality" which is similar to Elon & Trump's:


Mary contends that Elon made a donation to Trump's campaign, expecting something in return, & after damaging his business, with little to show for it, he lashed out. Phil responds that Elon want to address the national debt, but Mary does not see it as his motivation. She notes the miniscule effect DOGE made in tackling the debt, with its cuts, but Phil counters that any cuts are a positive sign for investors in treasury bonds:


-Every conversation cannot be complete without Tim referencing some piece of media, to compare the situation to. Mary breaks down the risks involved in surrogates carrying children for people, & in-vitro fertilisation, after Nucleus Genomics announced their ability to vet embryos for a number of traits. Tim says those concerns Mary has are not really important, because this is like the movie, Gattaca. Mary ignores this, noting that the company's statement is more of a pitch than actually what they can do:
 

Tim had Rosanne Barr, & Melody Krell, a podcaster & producer on the former's new movie, "Rosanne Barr is America", as the guests.
Brett & Phil were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim tries to teach Rosanne about the different AI programmes that can generate content, via someone's likeness:


Tim sees this AI proliferation ending with dystopia, where they "pump the bug paste into your stomach, through a tube". Rosanne thinks the overarching evil manipulating the world is Satan, but Tim thinks it will be AI as "The Dark Lord, incarnate". The beanie boy regales the panel about how people have started to worship ChatGPT, as a deity, & when Tim tried it, it commanded him to draw its name:


-Tim brings up one of the AI systems capable of making shows. He gives it the ringing endorsement of being on the level of "1997 Newgrounds.com":
 
Tim Pool responded to Daily Show segment about him.
Brevity being the soul of wit, of course Tim took 24 minutes to break down a segment a quarter as long.

& seeing that clip of past Tim, at 14:30, is such a contrast with current Tim. He went from reporting on the ground, "straight from the source"
to regurgitating headlines, without investigating the contents, unless it benefits his narrative.




Tim had Michael Krechmer, aka Michael Malice, as the guest.
Phil & Shane were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-In a discussion about President Donald Trump's accomplishments, Michael notes that what can be done with a one seat majority is challenging. Tim interjects that "the problem is Mike Johnson", the Speaker of the House's lack of mettle. The beanie boy goes on to talk about how he would have been so much tougher in confronting Democrats defying censure, but Michael has to explain that possessing powers, in the abstract, does not mean you can exercise them, whenever you wish. Tim reiterates that he does not care, & he would have just live-streamed ordering the Congressional sergeant-at-arms arresting the Democrats. Michael uses the example of how Trump could not have defied the lockdowns, early in COVID, despite having the power to do so, because he would have been removed from office. Tim decides that this is not the case, but it is "an issue of someone's belief in themself (sic)". To prove this, the beanie boy claims anyone can choose to simply walk backstage, & meet Taylor Swift, "if they want". Phil, having experience at concerts, adds people can "try to", because security would be ready to remove you, but Tim just tells him that they can. The other example is carrying a ladder allows people to have "an all-access pass to any venue, any time he wants". While agreeing with the general sentiment, Michael does not concede Tim's point:


-Tim gets a super-chat about illegal aliens using false identities to work at food delivery services, like DoorDash. Tim admits that he uses it to get food for the Branch Timidians, but has noted cases where people show up to drop off an order, but it did not match with the driver's name. For security reasons, he dumps this food, for risk of harm, & demands a refund. Michael jokes Ian should come back as the compound's food tester, but Tim says "security" will check the ID of all people bringing food to see if it matches the name of the driver from the app. Funnily enough, the idea of having a staffer do a pickup order seems to have only recently crossed Allison & Tim's mind. Even after claiming there was a "30%" markup on orders from DoorDash, he seems set on using it:
 
Back