🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Here's the motion to dismiss

7.jpg
8.jpg

Here's the police report:

Scan1.jpg
Scan2.jpgScan3.jpg
Scan4.jpg

profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
@N9OGL how many more continuances do you think you can pull out of your lawyer’s ass before she gets tired and drops you?
Click to expand...
She agrees it was general warrant.
 

Attachments

  • Scan4.jpg
    Scan4.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 16
Last edited by a moderator:
N9OGL said:
Here's the motion to dismiss

View attachment 6059913
View attachment 6059917

Here's the police report:

View attachment 6059937
View attachment 6059941View attachment 6059942
View attachment 6059945
Click to expand...
I don’t see what that has to do with you having CSAM on your drive. Also, they did not do their due diligence and took your lies at face value. Nobody is obsessed with you enough to visit your shitty site over 2,000 times to make threats against schools in your name.
 
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
I don’t see what that has to do with you having CSAM on your drive. Also, they did not do their due diligence and took your lies at face value. Nobody is obsessed with you enough to visit your shitty site over 2,000 times to make threats against schools in your name.
Click to expand...
HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CSAM ... the warrant was so broad and didn't have particulars that they went looking for CSAM.

WANT TO BET??? I have a stalker (FCCBODYGUARD AKA DIRTY HARRY) who follows me everywhere. In fact, in stated in tweets on twitter that this was going to happen and in October of 2018 he complained to the FBI claiming I lied to the police and the FBI
 
N9OGL said:
I suggest you read some court cases. start with one: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-winn-15

FYI I NEVER USE TOR OR VPN....ONLY PUSSIES DO!
Click to expand...
No, you're just too stupid to use them, like Jackie Singh
N9OGL said:
YOU FIRST...I still waiting for you and your dumbass friends to explain how seizing everything on a computer isn't a general warrant.
Click to expand...
We have, you're just too stupid. They aren't my "friends" by the way. We are just more intelligent than you and that hurts your fee fees. Your parents should have drowned you at birth. They would have been told you were retarded before that.
 
N9OGL said:
HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CSAM ... the warrant was so broad and didn't have particulars that they went looking for CSAM.
Click to expand...
They were looking for threats against children, having a collection of photos of your local pedophile buddy abusing his daughter falls within that scope. The warrant specifically stated you Todd are a threat to children. Searching your computer for evidence of such is fair and legal.
 
warrant that are overboard and lack particulars are also consider general warrants.

FYI: MY FAMILY WAS THE ONES WHO STARTED THAT SHIT OVER IN ENGLAND
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
They were looking for threats against children, having a collection of photos of your local pedophile buddy abusing his daughter falls within that scope. The warrant specifically stated you Todd are a threat to children. Searching your computer for evidence of such is fair and legal.
Click to expand...

nope, the police didn't investigate, they used a reasonable person standard when it comes to the threat, and they had a overboard warrant that lacked particulars to look for child porn.

I really suggest you read that court case I posted start at part D or Section D and go from there.
 
N9OGL said:
warrant that are overboard and lack particulars are also consider general warrants.

FYI: MY FAMILY WAS THE ONES WHO STARTED THAT SHIT OVER IN ENGLAND


nope, the police didn't investigate, they used a reasonable person standard when it comes to the threat, and they had a overboard warrant that lacked particulars to look for child porn.
Click to expand...
They particularly asked for your computer and internet records fucktard. Get it through your water brained paper thin skull. Nothing about you screams reasonable. They clearly failed in doing their jobs, probably because mommy and daddy paid them off.
 
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
They particularly asked for your computer and internet records fucktard. Get it through your water brained paper thin skull. Nothing about you screams reasonable. They clearly failed in doing their jobs, probably because mommy and daddy paid them off.
Click to expand...
Get it through your head FUCKWAD....THEY CAN'T SEIZE EVERYTHING ON THE COMPUTER. That's what the courts are saying.

Again read: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-winn-15 start at D
 
N9OGL said:
Get it through your head FUCKWAD....THEY CAN'T SEIZE EVERYTHING ON THE COMPUTER. That's what the courts are saying.

Again read: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-winn-15 start at D
Click to expand...
Todd. They don’t need to technically seize anything on your computer. You gave it to them willingly. They already cloned everything up to the moment you got it taken away. You had ample opportunity to pick it back up after they were done. It’s a good thing you didn’t get it back though, giving a pedophile back their computer is like putting gasoline on a fire.

Speaking of having access to a computer, I think you’ve probably been violating your probationary period, I might have to call the county law clerk and leave a message for the judge.
 
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
Todd. They don’t need to technically seize anything on your computer. They already cloned everything up to the moment you got it taken away. You had ample opportunity to pick it back up after they were done. It’s a good thing you didn’t get it back though, giving a pedophile back their computer is like putting gasoline on a fire.
Click to expand...
I asked twice for them to return it, and refused to had the computers back over. Even after the 2018 warrant was quashed in April of 2018 (two months before they found the image) they still refused to return it.
 
N9OGL said:
I asked twice for them to return it, and refused to had the computers back over. Even after the 2018 warrant was quashed in April of 2018 (two months before they found the image) they still refused to return it.
Click to expand...
They said you could pick it up and your lazy ass didn’t leave to go pick it up. Them refusing to go to your house and bring it back is not withholding, they’re not paid enough to be your delivery service.
 
They did seize everything the warrant even says it. " Any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2; any and all magnetic or optical media, including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVDs, USB devices, and any and all passwords or other computer security devices, and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or on media capable of being read by a computer or with the aid of computer equipment, any and all computer software, any and all evidence, data or information pertaining to the possession including but not limited to"

profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
They said you could pick it up and your lazy ass didn’t leave to go pick it up. Them refusing to go to your house and bring it back is not withholding, they’re not paid enough to be your delivery service.
Click to expand...
Nope, they flat refused to return them, that's a fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
N9OGL said:
They did seize everything the warrant even says it. " Any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2; any and all magnetic or optical media, including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVDs, USB devices, and any and all passwords or other computer security devices, and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or on media capable of being read by a computer or with the aid of computer equipment, any and all computer software, any and all evidence, data or information pertaining to the possession including but not limited to"
Click to expand...
That is not everything in your home. Therefore, it is not a general warrant. They went there specifically to ask for your devices.
 
That is not everything in your home. Therefore, it is not a general warrant. They went there specifically to ask for you devices.
Click to expand...
AGAIN, they cannot seize ever file or document in your computer they had specify a file or files related to the crime which they have probable cause. Nor are they allowed rummage through it. Images was not part of their probable cause.

and the CSAM wasn't in plain view either as another court noted:

To the extent the Government believes that child pornography could be seized pursuant to the plain view doctrine,
the Court disagrees. The child pornography was only in plain view because Robertson and Lambert violated the Fourth Amendment and overseized data. See United States v. Stabile, 633 F.3d 219, 241 (3d Cir.2011) (nothing that the first requirement for a valid seizure in plain view is that “the officer must not have violated the Fourth Amendment in arriving at the place from which the evidence could be plainly viewed.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). The Government did not make the argument, and there is nothing to suggest, that had the search warrant been properly circumscribed to photos and videos within a specific time period and the executing officers narrowly tailored the search to uncover only those things, that the officers would have nonetheless stumbled upon the child pornography.
United States v. Winn, 79 F. Supp. 3d 904, 926 (S.D. Ill. 2015)
 
N9OGL said:
AGAIN, they cannot seize ever file or document in your computer they had specify a file or files related to the crime which they have probable cause. Nor are they allowed rummage through it. Images was not part of their probable cause.
Click to expand...
Not true. They can search everything on your computer because that’s what the warrant listed. They even show specific file findings in the report. Their probable cause is your being a spergadocious pedophile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom