🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

and the CSAM wasn't in plain view either as another court noted.

Yes. Not your court, not your case. The files you had were readily apparent as they were labeled and known CSAM material beforehand. They didn’t have to prove it was child abuse because your buddy already did time for producing those files.

 

[N9OGL]

Not true. They can search everything on your computer because that’s what the warrant listed. They even show specific file findings in the report. Their probable cause is your being a spergadocious pedophile.

That makes it a general warrant, because the courts including the US Supreme Court has stated they can't do that.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

That makes it a general warrant, because the courts including the US Supreme Court has stated they can't do that.

That’s not a fucking general warrant. They were looking for harm against children. They found it.

 

[N9OGL]

Believe what you want, you're going to be pissed when I win.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

Believe what you want, you're going to be pissed when I win.

I’ll miss your sperg sessions when you’re getting fucked in county holding.

 

[N9OGL]

I also think your missing one other point....there is no proof or evidence of any kind to link me or my computers to the crime, there never was. The police did investigation, instead they went out to get warrants and handed it all to the FBI and said "here you figure it out" even their "probable cause" is lacking.

They were told the night I was arrested that there was no login requirement...they didn't investigate, they thought it was an open and closed case. because they believed I did it, simply because it was my name. They even believed the site hate and Flame belong to me, it didn't, it never did. if they would have checked my claim it would cast some doubt on their case. Not to mention all the emails I sent to the FBI and DOJ about that site and the activities on that site, regarding threats and using people's name to get them in trouble.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

I also think your missing one other point....there is no proof or evidence of any kind to link me or my computers to the crime, there never was. The police did investigation, instead they went out to get warrants and handed it all to the FBI and said "here you figure it out" even their "probable cause" is lacking.

There was child pornography on your computer. That is a crime.

 

[Lloyd the Timelord]

1. NO they can't they are not allowed to seize everything on a computer. 2. go back to playing with your toy trains in your HUD apartment you fat fuck!

I've written several letters to the DA Toad.

Within distance of one of another to share internet with a decent setup so they can all trade photos among one another.

Believe what you want, you're going to be pissed when I win.

You're going to "win" with well hung black fellows when you get to prison. They're going to win in your end.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

Is it illegal to set up a streetcam facing the Toad Cave?

 

[Uncle Buck]

I've written several letters to the DA Toad.

Why? You don't know anything. You just want to feel like there's finally someone out there who's a bigger loser than you.

Note: even if he's convicted, he'd still not be as big a loser as you.

You're going to "win" with well hung black fellows when you get to prison. They're going to win in your end.

Sort of like your buddies Kevin Strom, "Brother" Stair and Art Candell? All convicted of various crimes involving children whom you've vehemently defended?

 

[N9OGL]

There was child pornography on your computer. That is a crime.

That wasn't the crime, they didn't have probable cause for it. The crime was terrorism, that's what they had probable cause for.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

There was child pornography on your computer. That is a crime.

According to this smooth brain it isn't and if found on his electronic devices during a search it should be ignored.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

That wasn't the crime, they didn't have probable cause for it. The crime was terrorism, that's what they had probable cause for.

Your argument is they can’t try you for possessing CSAM because it was up in the air if you actually called for that threat or not. Do you see how goofy you sound?

 

[N9OGL]

For those who don't believe me



I done fighting with FUCKWADS ... later

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

For those who don't believe me

View attachment 6060154

Posting that doesn’t do you any favors Toad. You’re just confirming what we’ve been saying.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Your argument is they can’t try you for possessing CSAM because it was up in the air if you actually called for that threat or not. Do you see how goofy you sound?

Todd wasn't charged with possessing "CSAM"; he was charged with making a terroristic threat.

In the course of searching his devices specifically for proof that he made said threat [which, FYI, they didn't find], they "just happened" to find a lolicon image [disgusting, but not per se illegal] which, somehow, they imagine was a basis for a new warrant seeking "CSAM".

I know it doesn't, but it should bother you that your local police and/or Federal agencies can seize a device you own for a specific purpose and then just go poking around looking all through the device until they find something "offensive" and thereby seek out a warrant for some other sort of material. Obviously you don't believe Todd's contention that he didn't go seeking the alleged "CSAM" material. That's fine; because, you know, law enforcement agencies never plant evidence ever, nor do they never seek to obtain warrants on flimsy grounds either. Ever. /sarcasm

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

Todd wasn't charged with possessing "CSAM"; he was charged with making a terroristic threat.

In the course of searching his devices specifically for proof that he made said threat [which, FYI, they didn't find], they "just happened" to find a lolicon image [disgusting, but not per se illegal] which, somehow, they imagine was a basis for a new warrant seeking "CSAM".

I know it doesn't, but it should bother you that your local police and/or Federal agencies can seize a device you own for a specific purpose and then just go poking around looking all through the device until they find something "offensive" and thereby seek out a warrant for some other sort of material. Obviously you don't believe Todd's contention that he didn't go seeking the alleged "CSAM" material. That's fine; because, you know, law enforcement agencies never plant evidence ever, nor do they never seek to obtain warrants on flimsy grounds either. /sarcasm

Go back to Reddit. /seriously, you’re defending a man who had photos of his friend abusing his young daughter. If you think that’s “not illegal” then I’m going to need you to face the wall.

 

[Mikoyan]

"I'll show you who is autistic" - this is a constant condition.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Go back to Reddit.

After you, faggot.

/seriously, you’re defending a man who had photos of his friend abusing his young daughter.

Proof?

If you think that’s “not illegal” then I’m going to need you to face the wall.

Lolicon is disgusting, it's true, and people consuming it are likely pedophiles, but it's simply not illegal.

 

[profoundlyunfunnyshitpost]

After you, faggot.


Proof?


Lolicon is disgusting, it's true, and people consuming it are likely pedophiles, but it's simply not illegal.

Read the fucking thread. It’s been proven. The files he had were named Mountain Dew, named after the Mountain Dew pants the victim was wearing in some of the photos.