حلال TranLord - Let me preface this by saying I like the idea of fucking dogs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought it was pretty clear-cut. Don't touch a kid, regardless of whether you're attracted to them. Wouldn't force yourself on an adult, don't do it to a kid. Wouldn't manipulate an adult for sex (if you have any respect for others anyway), don't do it to a kid. As an adult, it's your job to teach children how to get by in the world and make sure they're happy and have fun growing up. Not take advantage of them and treat them like lesser beings.

Whe it comes to animals, don't fuck 'em. They can't really consent to it, so don't pin a puppy and fuck it up the arse.

In necrophilia, you can only do that if the person gives their consent before they die. Like "yeah, you can fuck my dead body." If not, you're still raping 'em.

When it comes to incest (as someone mentioned a few pages ago), as long as it's between two adults who give their consent there should be no issue. You've got no more a right to tell them they can't be together as you do telling a gay couple or an interracial couple of whatever they can't be together. Two able-minded adults have the right to be with whomever they so choose. Doesn't matter if you don't like it, it's not your life so fuck off.
 
does anyone here want to start digging for info on Chained Divinity? (like if he posted his extremely sickening views on other forums)

Edit: I guess I skipped over Valiant's digging. sorry about that :(
 
Last edited:
  • Late
Reactions: FuckedUp
does anyone here want to start digging for info on Chained Divinity? (like if he posted his extremely sickening views on other forums)

Valiant already has info on him posted a while ago

Dearest Colin.Morse.96 ("Chained Divinity.")

By humble decree of the kiwifarms.net chat we have discussed and shun your posts: Hows it like being the Lady in Chains? Heres some more information: You're a student of PACE university and talk of moral ambiguity on the net, like how you asked your professor for some sexual favours (was this at PACE university or somewhere else?)

This isn't tumblr my dear friend, oh no: This is kiwifarms.net in fact we have a thread just for your type of people.

48258006.jpg



  • Paedophile Sympathizer who troll shielded a person who admitted they wanted to have sex with dog.
  • Made sock puppet accounts on cwcforums/kiwifarms to voice their opinions on consent being ambigious at young ages.
  • From NYC.
  • Roleplayer on rpnation forums.
  • Has a vampirefreaks account.
  • Identifies as INTJ personality, which by the way is the most snidest personality communities who consider themselves "masterminds" in comparison to say "architect" or "performer" - basically it's the chaotic-evil of the Briggs-Meyer Personality Test. Edit: He identifies as an xNTJ which is even worse.
  • Has a God Complex.
  • In many RP circles he attempts to become a god (literally more worse than godmoding)
  • Identifies as trans male.
  • Apparently a Vegan.
  • Really keening for that tumblr attention.
  • He doesn't fucking understand that he's becoming a lolcow.
  • He talked about kiwifarms irl - which makes him a total sperg.
Thankyou Cat Party for your glorious contribute.

9b08a16a24.png


My suggestion to all people who go above and beyond an argument is that humbleness is next to godliness, don't post things like:



Instead keep them to yourself and don't Thesaurus-Rex.
 
When it comes to incest (as someone mentioned a few pages ago), as long as it's between two adults who give their consent there should be no issue. You've got no more a right to tell them they can't be together as you do telling a gay couple or an interracial couple of whatever they can't be together. Two able-minded adults have the right to be with whomever they so choose. Doesn't matter if you don't like it, it's not your life so fuck off.

I'm going to disagree on this one because most cases of incest usually involve abuse and a massive power imbalance.

Theoretically, two adults siblings could do whatever they want, but in real life, it rarely works out that way unless two siblings meet as adults and have an attraction to each other.

So I'm gonna say, "nah."

Even then it's still icky.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to disagree on this one because most cases of incest usually involve abuse and a massive power imbalance.

Theoretically, two adults siblings could do whatever they want, but in real life, it rarely works out that way unless two siblings meet as adults and have an attraction to each other.

That's why I said two consenting adults. I know a lot of incest ends up being molestation or rape of some form or another, and I obviously don't condone that. Rape of any form is bad. I'm referring specifically to when two people love each other and happen to be related.
 
That's why I said two consenting adults. I know a lot of incest ends up being molestation or rape of some form or another, and I obviously don't condone that. Rape of any form is bad. I'm referring specifically to when two people love each other and happen to be related.

Let me preface this by saying I don't like the idea of siblings banging each other:

I hate to be the asshole that defends deviancy, but I'm actually with you here.

Most sex involves some exchange of power. It's easy to identify who's abusing who when you deal with kids. But with adults? If someone wears a dog collar and gets a name tattooed on their back, isn't that an abusive power imbalance? Or they wear vials of blood around their neck in some kind of weird ownership ritual (thank you Billy Bob Thorton and Angelina Jolie)?

With adults, it gets harder to establish where something is really abuse, and where something just makes you personally uncomfortable. And at the same time, it gets harder to establish when the government should be allowed to tell you not to have sex (which, let's be honest, should be a rare thing).
 
That's why I said two consenting adults. I know a lot of incest ends up being molestation or rape of some form or another, and I obviously don't condone that. Rape of any form is bad. I'm referring specifically to when two people love each other and happen to be related.

Agent Brendel: "These are the descendants of our Lord. I myself have seen the documents that prove it. We have protected them and their predecessors for nineteen centuries, and whatever their appearance now, we believe - we know - their child will be the next messiah".

Herr Starr: "He's shitting in his hand, Brendel".

The brother hurls his feces at, and hits Agent Brendel in the face

Agent Brendel: "Have faith, Herr Starr".

Herr Star: "Son of man or son of God, you can't fuck your sister and expect much good to come of it."

-Preacher, Garth Ennis
 
So, uh...why can't minors consent then? The sum total of the arguments I've seen against it are "they may think they want to, but they won't afterward".
They don't have the mental capacity to understand the gravity of the activity, the long term consequences it could cause, the emotion involved, and the damage it can cause.
 
Oh hey, looks like I should have read a little further before posting that above cap. Maybe Colin isn't alluding to raping all the pretty girls in his demesne, leaving us none to choose from. Maybe he just hates women.

JeAmZr7.png


So which is it, @Chained Divinity ? Will the female population woe your godship because you're a bitter misogynist who wants to punish them, or are you just rapey as fuck and want to rape women?
 
Oh hey, looks like I should have read a little further before posting that above cap. Maybe Colin isn't alluding to raping all the pretty girls in his demesne, leaving us none to choose from. Maybe he just hates women.

JeAmZr7.png


So which is it, @Chained Divinity ? Will the female population woe your godship because you're a bitter misogynist who wants to punish them, or are you just rapey as fuck and want to rape women?
@Chained Divinity confirmed for Marijan sock.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back