- Joined
- Aug 21, 2024
more like tranny learns what men have known since the dawn of time: women are complicated.
📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet
- Thread starter Meiwaku
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2024
I want him to hop in a cannon and launch himself too, and it hasn't even been ten minutes.
Comfy Summer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 20, 2025
Post - Archive
There are two types of faggots: The regular ones who actually like men and masculine features, and the ones who like feminine young men who are the least masculine as possible. A lot of tranny chasers fit the second category. The fact that retarded troons think straight men are attracted to them is very funny.
- Joined
- May 7, 2025
They assumed it was aimed at them, when it was a joke about Zuckerberg not being human.
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
I wonder if furries also get dysphoria triggered by e.g. people saying racoons have tails or bunnies can hop. NOT ALL BUNNIES CAN HOP etc...
Izdaja Slika
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2024
I suggest prison as an environment where your decision-making opportunities can be vastly reduced.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2024
If we're taking his word for being autistic, which I don't actually believe he is, but for the sake of argument let's say he is.
It's horrific to think that there are young people with suicidal tendencies and autism spectrum disorder who have been groomed into this crossdressing fetish and for the longest time this lunacy was not only being enabled but forcibly pushed on everyone.
Having mental illness and consistent suicidal ideation and compulsive thoughts is a serious problem that requires actual psychiatric help, including and up to electro convulsive therapy if the obsessive thoughts start to cause psychosis symptoms. Instead the unofficial prescription for these issues for the past 10 years has been to goon on discord to increasingly deranged forms of pornography and abuse material.
We're on the other side of the heights of this madness but there has to be a real reckoning for this. This was pushed by the medical industry, investment firms through funds, as well as governments. Clownshows like Canada are still pushing this lunacy. A lot of people have been comparing this to lobotomies but this is worse, lobotomies only affected those who were treated and their families, this tranny madness has millions on victims from kids being groomed to people sitting in jails and courtrooms for not letting a institutionally backed mentally deranged pervert molest them.
A Fly on the wall
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2024
I think the most disgusting thing about troonism is the fact that groomers sell it as a cover all solution to all of life's problems but just make it worse in every way. Unfortunately most of them blame society at that stage
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Oh no. How will I ever know the proper gender word for when you want to rip out your own intestines?
Rosemary West
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2026
These gender specials aren’t worth the price of gas at the minute.
FPTMIU
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2025
I think the distinct lack of empathy from certain people did absolutely worsen the situation. Because almost nobody bothers to understand why someone would do this to themselves to begin with.
There is a significant difference in how we treat the same issues for both men and women and autism is one of the biggest ones. What is often the subject of mockery for a man with autism is often considered cute and desirable in a woman. Not to mention the fact that men are expected to approach women and be the active social participant, again, something kind of difficult when you have a disorder that messes with your sociability. Not to mention our modern society actively discourages and condemns masculine behavior, now look at all of this from the perspective of someone young and impressionable: You are often bullied for things you cannot control and then the media you consume in your free time also condemns you for who you are. But then, you are told that you have the ability to get rid of all of this and that you can be desired and loved as long as you go to Dr. Schlomoberg and get your weekly bathtub chemicals. And now, they are able to surround themselves with all kind of people who think like them, support them and give them validation.
Now imagine the same people who bullied you previously (at least, to your perception), now making fun of suicide statistics of your group and depicting you as a fat middle aged man hanging from a noose. Then imagine someone of your group committing suicide and there is widespread mockery and defilement of this person's grave (Obviously talking about fosgate here). Is it any wonder that modern political discourse now is just "Ah sweet, new tragedy from the other side I can make fun of"?
It's why I have grown to dislike harassing and outright mocking trannies and think that it's better to approach them on a more intellectual level. Whenever you aim hatred at a group, that group is only going to sink further back into itself. A trannyjak is going to make a tranny far more likely to double down than they are to reconsider their ways and I think it's overall effect is a net negative for society as a whole.
This post is another good example, the person writing it does not leave this person and doesn't even write that he's planning to. Because even if his boyfriend is a pedophile, he is probably one of the few people in his life who love him for who he is (even if for a reason as disgusting as that). His fear of being alone has overridden his moral compass, and that is absolutely fucking depressing.
cancelmysubscription
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2024
‘The entire purpose of it was to catalog genders’ -
That should be a short fucking wiki then. Two pages, nigga.
I’d like to give these people some serious shock therapy, take them off the internet and drop them off with a tribe in Africa or somewhere along the Amazon, make them fend for themselves for a while and see what life and existence really is. They’re so far removed from the core tenets of humanity that it’s ridiculous - is there a term for it? Hypercomfortable? Pernicious safety/comfort?
@FPTMIU Good post and I largely agree, the ones that are clearly lost victims do deserve some sympathy and an attempt to wrest them back from the groomers and fetishists. It’s pretty much impossible to take the ‘caring and open dialogue’ route with someone like Bardfinn for instance though.
Last edited:
MaximKnight76
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2024
The term you're looking for is hubris.
Syikeblade
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
This tranny is sooo close to getting that the men who date them are not actually straight.
Of course this isn't going to be well received as those in the comments are desperate to believe they attract real masculine straight guys.
Even when saying the quiet parts out loud they need to deny reality for their fantasy.
They need to believe their attractive women pulling straight men, and not effeminate gays pulling masculine gay or bisexual men.
Archive Link
Are straight men attracted to trans women? A realistic view (self.StraightTransGirls)
submitted 8 hours ago * by Whilstledowner
I saw a recent post that claimed that straight men are into or secretly into trans women. It made it sound like it's a universal attraction among straight men. A lot of the responses in that post were cheerleading that claim. To be completely frank, I think that view is very naive and sheltered.
To be fair, it was a belief I held early in my transition. It was based on a number of hookups and casual dates with guys who self-identified as straight. Those experiences made me think that straight men secretly had a thing for trans women and as a transwoman I could be dating any straight man the same way a cis woman could.
It was an empowering thought. Unfortunately it was misleading and false. Yes, there are men who are attracted to trans women for fetish or non-fetish reasons. However, only a tiny fraction of those men are truly straight. The vast majority of truly heterosexual men aren't attracted to trans women or lose their attraction as soon as they find out.
How do I know? It's based on my personal experience and the different types of men I have been with in my transition journey. Most of the men I met early in my transition were bisexuals, chasers, or bisexuals with preference for feminine presentation, regardless what label they put on themselves. As I transitioned more and went through all the surgeries to be able to be stealth, I have been able to meet men at random places besides online. Those men I meet irl are much more likely to be straight and they are completely different from men I met in the past.
Are they attracted to women in general? Yes.
Are they attracted to female anatomy? Yes.
Are they attracted to male anatomy? No.
Are they attracted to me before I disclose? Yes
Are they attracted to me after I disclose? Almost always no.
Thinking back, I felt incredibly naive to have believed the men I met when I was non-passing were straight. When I was passing but before my bottom surgery, the men I met who felt comfortable with my genitals were unlikely completely straight. Only after my bottom surgery and seeing how much he was into my new anatomy did I feel he was truly straight.
What does this all mean? It means that labels are unreliable and deceiving. Most men will hesitate to identify as anything but straight. Don't let experiences with those men sway you in any way about your transition decision. Our dating life is never going to be the same as a cis woman's dating life. Our dating life will be far more challenging than a cis woman's, no matter how passing and stealth we get.
For me personally, I didn't regret my decision, because for me being who I truly am is the most important reason. Men's attraction is just an added benefit.
submitted 8 hours ago * by Whilstledowner
I saw a recent post that claimed that straight men are into or secretly into trans women. It made it sound like it's a universal attraction among straight men. A lot of the responses in that post were cheerleading that claim. To be completely frank, I think that view is very naive and sheltered.
To be fair, it was a belief I held early in my transition. It was based on a number of hookups and casual dates with guys who self-identified as straight. Those experiences made me think that straight men secretly had a thing for trans women and as a transwoman I could be dating any straight man the same way a cis woman could.
It was an empowering thought. Unfortunately it was misleading and false. Yes, there are men who are attracted to trans women for fetish or non-fetish reasons. However, only a tiny fraction of those men are truly straight. The vast majority of truly heterosexual men aren't attracted to trans women or lose their attraction as soon as they find out.
How do I know? It's based on my personal experience and the different types of men I have been with in my transition journey. Most of the men I met early in my transition were bisexuals, chasers, or bisexuals with preference for feminine presentation, regardless what label they put on themselves. As I transitioned more and went through all the surgeries to be able to be stealth, I have been able to meet men at random places besides online. Those men I meet irl are much more likely to be straight and they are completely different from men I met in the past.
Are they attracted to women in general? Yes.
Are they attracted to female anatomy? Yes.
Are they attracted to male anatomy? No.
Are they attracted to me before I disclose? Yes
Are they attracted to me after I disclose? Almost always no.
Thinking back, I felt incredibly naive to have believed the men I met when I was non-passing were straight. When I was passing but before my bottom surgery, the men I met who felt comfortable with my genitals were unlikely completely straight. Only after my bottom surgery and seeing how much he was into my new anatomy did I feel he was truly straight.
What does this all mean? It means that labels are unreliable and deceiving. Most men will hesitate to identify as anything but straight. Don't let experiences with those men sway you in any way about your transition decision. Our dating life is never going to be the same as a cis woman's dating life. Our dating life will be far more challenging than a cis woman's, no matter how passing and stealth we get.
For me personally, I didn't regret my decision, because for me being who I truly am is the most important reason. Men's attraction is just an added benefit.
Of course this isn't going to be well received as those in the comments are desperate to believe they attract real masculine straight guys.
]Killermueck 1 point 59 minutes ago*
Scientifically speaking genitals do not matter that much. Phallic objects are universal sexual stimuli no matter the sexual orientation which is why shemale porn is so popular or big dick porn watched by men. I think this Ogi Ogas guy who made a study about this.
But straight men are drawn to feminine bodies and voices. They don't like masculinized trans women meaning trans women who went through male puberty long enough or strong enough that they cannot pass as a woman.
All men are attracted to passing trans women because they look and sound like women.
You notice it with very attractive gigapassoids. They get huge engagement and suddenly the comments are full of men saying they would and don't care about genitals.
But some straight men also have a donation fetish and specifically seek out clocky submissive trans women.
What keeps most men from pursuing serious relationships even with very passable trans women is the fact that society very aggressively condones that. A man dating a trans women openly would have to deal with a lot of shit even from his otherwise supportive or progressive friends and family.
So usually straight men dating passable trans women try to keep it a secret. Even cis women police straight men to abandon us. I've read multiple accounts of cis women where cis women are ok with their partners consuming porn but as soon when it's trans porn they show their true colors and act like he's into illegal stuff and basically a deranged criminal that cheated on her. You will also notice this dynamic when you read the mypartneristrans sub. It's kinda like they see trans women as tarnishing their lives if someone was or is romantically involved with them even when they otherwise portray a progressive exterior. It's because to them we are creepy, taboo body horror fetish monsters.
[–]AmberWarning 1 point an hour ago
I think there is a difference between sexuality and preference that you are missing.
If you are feminine presenting, and I mean in as in a trans woman as opposed to feminine acting men, and someone of the opposite gender presentation is attracted to you, then that person is straight regardless of what genitals you have. Before you get to the bedroom, your genitals are like Schrödinger's box but replace the cats mortality with genitalia. It is the femininity they are attracted to. Now if that same person is also not ok with that feminine person they were attracted to having a penis, that is preference. They are attracted to femininity but have a preference for femininity coinciding with that person only having a vagina.
Now if a person is attracted to femininity but prefers them to have a penis, we call them a chaser (and sometimes that's true and I will come onto that) but they could just have that preference. This is where a destination between sex and gender is important. A trans woman is a woman, therefore any man attracted to her is attracted by femininity. If that same man realises that woman is trans and he assumes (rightly or wrongly) that she has a penis and that is not his preference for sexual activity so does not pursue that attraction, he isn't any more straight (or necessarily transphobic) than the guy behind him looking at the same trans woman, finding her attractive, believing she is trans, assuming she has a penis and pursuing that attraction.
Where someone is a chaser (at least in my belief and/or understanding) is when a male (usually) has a preference for the women he is attracted to have a penis AND is only interested in keeping that attraction/encounter/sexual preference/relationship a secret from anyone in his life because he is ashamed of that fact. In the cis world they are fuck boys.
I hope this comes across with the right intent, I don't want to seem preachy or like I am lecturing. And I am completely open to a different description of what a chaser is if someone has a better or more nuanced explanation
[–]HaileyBopps 0 points an hour ago*
I believe sexual orientation is more of a sliding scale than well defined catagories such as straight, bi, gay. There are few people who are perfectly straight or gay. Social conditioning leads people who are mostly straight or mostly gay to identify exclusively as such.
There are many straight identifying men who love the female anatomy but live secret lives to get their dick fix. Just because they love you post op anatomy doesn't mean they don't also experience attraction to men or dicks.
[–]Whilstledowner 1 point an hour ago
Again a huge number in fantasy but a tiny fraction in reality.
aileyBopps 1 point an hour ago
Yes we agree on that. The same is true with cis women. Most of the "straight" men they date have some capacity for same sex attraction but deny and bury it for social reasons. I just think attraction is more based on the whole package than genital preferences. Men in general are obsessed with dick because it is very familiar to them and they understand the pleasure it provides. When they find a stealth pre op trans woman attractive but loose interest when they learn the T it often has more to do with social conditioning than actual genital preference based on orientation.
We are just having a discussion btw. You don't have to downvote me because we don't perfectly agree. We agree for the most part, I just see it as more nuansed.
[–]Due_Campaign_6771 -1 points 2 hours ago
As a straight man, I'm into and do not doubt that transgender girls deserve to be loved and respected totally.
[–]Old-Mapstar 1 point 59 minutes ago
You are not. You are a chaser.
Scientifically speaking genitals do not matter that much. Phallic objects are universal sexual stimuli no matter the sexual orientation which is why shemale porn is so popular or big dick porn watched by men. I think this Ogi Ogas guy who made a study about this.
But straight men are drawn to feminine bodies and voices. They don't like masculinized trans women meaning trans women who went through male puberty long enough or strong enough that they cannot pass as a woman.
All men are attracted to passing trans women because they look and sound like women.
You notice it with very attractive gigapassoids. They get huge engagement and suddenly the comments are full of men saying they would and don't care about genitals.
But some straight men also have a donation fetish and specifically seek out clocky submissive trans women.
What keeps most men from pursuing serious relationships even with very passable trans women is the fact that society very aggressively condones that. A man dating a trans women openly would have to deal with a lot of shit even from his otherwise supportive or progressive friends and family.
So usually straight men dating passable trans women try to keep it a secret. Even cis women police straight men to abandon us. I've read multiple accounts of cis women where cis women are ok with their partners consuming porn but as soon when it's trans porn they show their true colors and act like he's into illegal stuff and basically a deranged criminal that cheated on her. You will also notice this dynamic when you read the mypartneristrans sub. It's kinda like they see trans women as tarnishing their lives if someone was or is romantically involved with them even when they otherwise portray a progressive exterior. It's because to them we are creepy, taboo body horror fetish monsters.
[–]AmberWarning 1 point an hour ago
I think there is a difference between sexuality and preference that you are missing.
If you are feminine presenting, and I mean in as in a trans woman as opposed to feminine acting men, and someone of the opposite gender presentation is attracted to you, then that person is straight regardless of what genitals you have. Before you get to the bedroom, your genitals are like Schrödinger's box but replace the cats mortality with genitalia. It is the femininity they are attracted to. Now if that same person is also not ok with that feminine person they were attracted to having a penis, that is preference. They are attracted to femininity but have a preference for femininity coinciding with that person only having a vagina.
Now if a person is attracted to femininity but prefers them to have a penis, we call them a chaser (and sometimes that's true and I will come onto that) but they could just have that preference. This is where a destination between sex and gender is important. A trans woman is a woman, therefore any man attracted to her is attracted by femininity. If that same man realises that woman is trans and he assumes (rightly or wrongly) that she has a penis and that is not his preference for sexual activity so does not pursue that attraction, he isn't any more straight (or necessarily transphobic) than the guy behind him looking at the same trans woman, finding her attractive, believing she is trans, assuming she has a penis and pursuing that attraction.
Where someone is a chaser (at least in my belief and/or understanding) is when a male (usually) has a preference for the women he is attracted to have a penis AND is only interested in keeping that attraction/encounter/sexual preference/relationship a secret from anyone in his life because he is ashamed of that fact. In the cis world they are fuck boys.
I hope this comes across with the right intent, I don't want to seem preachy or like I am lecturing. And I am completely open to a different description of what a chaser is if someone has a better or more nuanced explanation
[–]HaileyBopps 0 points an hour ago*
I believe sexual orientation is more of a sliding scale than well defined catagories such as straight, bi, gay. There are few people who are perfectly straight or gay. Social conditioning leads people who are mostly straight or mostly gay to identify exclusively as such.
There are many straight identifying men who love the female anatomy but live secret lives to get their dick fix. Just because they love you post op anatomy doesn't mean they don't also experience attraction to men or dicks.
[–]Whilstledowner 1 point an hour ago
Again a huge number in fantasy but a tiny fraction in reality.
aileyBopps 1 point an hour ago
Yes we agree on that. The same is true with cis women. Most of the "straight" men they date have some capacity for same sex attraction but deny and bury it for social reasons. I just think attraction is more based on the whole package than genital preferences. Men in general are obsessed with dick because it is very familiar to them and they understand the pleasure it provides. When they find a stealth pre op trans woman attractive but loose interest when they learn the T it often has more to do with social conditioning than actual genital preference based on orientation.
We are just having a discussion btw. You don't have to downvote me because we don't perfectly agree. We agree for the most part, I just see it as more nuansed.
[–]Due_Campaign_6771 -1 points 2 hours ago
As a straight man, I'm into and do not doubt that transgender girls deserve to be loved and respected totally.
[–]Old-Mapstar 1 point 59 minutes ago
You are not. You are a chaser.
Even when saying the quiet parts out loud they need to deny reality for their fantasy.
KnownLetterhead7279 1 point 5 hours ago
It seems like internal transphobia to suggest that guys attracted to non op or preop trans women aren’t straight. Trans women are women so the relationship between a man and a trans woman is straight regardless of anatomy. By your logic, would a relationship between a cis man and a trans man be straight? It seems like you are suggesting it is… it’s 2 men.
[–]Old-Mapstar 1 point 53 minutes ago
[ Removed by Reddit ]
[–]Whilstledowner 3 points 3 hours ago*
I don't understand how we can ignore the sex aspects when talking about sexual attraction or sexual orientation. It's literally called sexual attraction/orientation. I find it dubious to say a man who is attracted to a penis is straight no matter who the penis is attached to. It's a sex organ and it's part of what defines one's sexuality and sexual orientation. A cis man who is attracted to a pre-op trans man and his natal anatomy is likely bisexual, not gay. A cis man who is attracted to afab who identifies as a non-binary or trans man but hasn't begun medically transition is probably straight. I am sorry but sexuality is not same as gender identity. You can't use gender identity in a vacuum when discussing sexuality. If one's sexuality is defined by attraction to a specific gender identity or presentation, then maybe we can leave out attraction to specific genitals out of the equation.
[–]KnownLetterhead7279 -4 points 3 hours ago*
You’re the one creating a vacuum by detaching the anatomy of a person from their gender to label someone else’s sexuality. You obviously cannot physically do that.
[–]Whilstledowner 2 points 3 hours ago
No, I never said detaching. I am saying you need to consider both the gender and the anatomy. It sounds like you are the one detaching them and want to define sexuality only by gender, excluding anatomy.
[–]Eternal_Heighthon41 1 point 3 hours ago
if the trans guy is like pre transition or doesn’t pass, yes it’s straight
[–]Minarosebbyy 2 points 3 hours ago
They act like bottom surgery is waving a magic wand and this huge pool of “super straight” men flock to them lol it’s giving delulu
[–]Whilstledowner 2 points 3 hours ago
No, I never said that. In fact, I said the opposite. Even after you have bottom surgery, most straight men will lose interest immediately if they ever find out if you weren't born a woman.
[–]Interesting_Cut_1509 1 point 54 minutes ago
Do you have thoughts on why that is the case? If it's (mostly) not the anatomy, I think its either that they are triggered in their no homo mentality or they simply are in disbelief that medical transition can achieve bodies that they are interrested in. I think you are right that most straight man would turn down a post op trans woman just because she is trans but i nevertheless think that transphobia plays a big role here still since they would have the capacity to be attracted to female anatomy acheaved by transition. In a less transphobic world the rate of straight men losing interrest in post op trans women would be different in my opinion.
It seems like internal transphobia to suggest that guys attracted to non op or preop trans women aren’t straight. Trans women are women so the relationship between a man and a trans woman is straight regardless of anatomy. By your logic, would a relationship between a cis man and a trans man be straight? It seems like you are suggesting it is… it’s 2 men.
[–]Old-Mapstar 1 point 53 minutes ago
[ Removed by Reddit ]
[–]Whilstledowner 3 points 3 hours ago*
I don't understand how we can ignore the sex aspects when talking about sexual attraction or sexual orientation. It's literally called sexual attraction/orientation. I find it dubious to say a man who is attracted to a penis is straight no matter who the penis is attached to. It's a sex organ and it's part of what defines one's sexuality and sexual orientation. A cis man who is attracted to a pre-op trans man and his natal anatomy is likely bisexual, not gay. A cis man who is attracted to afab who identifies as a non-binary or trans man but hasn't begun medically transition is probably straight. I am sorry but sexuality is not same as gender identity. You can't use gender identity in a vacuum when discussing sexuality. If one's sexuality is defined by attraction to a specific gender identity or presentation, then maybe we can leave out attraction to specific genitals out of the equation.
[–]KnownLetterhead7279 -4 points 3 hours ago*
You’re the one creating a vacuum by detaching the anatomy of a person from their gender to label someone else’s sexuality. You obviously cannot physically do that.
[–]Whilstledowner 2 points 3 hours ago
No, I never said detaching. I am saying you need to consider both the gender and the anatomy. It sounds like you are the one detaching them and want to define sexuality only by gender, excluding anatomy.
[–]Eternal_Heighthon41 1 point 3 hours ago
if the trans guy is like pre transition or doesn’t pass, yes it’s straight
[–]Minarosebbyy 2 points 3 hours ago
They act like bottom surgery is waving a magic wand and this huge pool of “super straight” men flock to them lol it’s giving delulu
[–]Whilstledowner 2 points 3 hours ago
No, I never said that. In fact, I said the opposite. Even after you have bottom surgery, most straight men will lose interest immediately if they ever find out if you weren't born a woman.
[–]Interesting_Cut_1509 1 point 54 minutes ago
Do you have thoughts on why that is the case? If it's (mostly) not the anatomy, I think its either that they are triggered in their no homo mentality or they simply are in disbelief that medical transition can achieve bodies that they are interrested in. I think you are right that most straight man would turn down a post op trans woman just because she is trans but i nevertheless think that transphobia plays a big role here still since they would have the capacity to be attracted to female anatomy acheaved by transition. In a less transphobic world the rate of straight men losing interrest in post op trans women would be different in my opinion.
They need to believe their attractive women pulling straight men, and not effeminate gays pulling masculine gay or bisexual men.
Archive Link
cancelmysubscription
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2024
I don’t think it is. What I’m getting at is that their basic needs are so utterly provided for that they can spend all their time creating new genders, which is so far out of line with the human condition. It’s comfort on a level not heretofore seen.
They all seem to hate capitalism, and yet it’s the only economic system that could’ve created them.
For the thread, the beauty of finally being who you always were, and then weren’t again:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2024
This is a very good point. I do have to add that discernment is needed; not all autistic people are the same just as all non-autistic people aren't. There are heinously evil autists out there with god complexes and abusive personalities. Lead with compassion but don't give it to someone who doesn't deserve it is probably the best way forward.
The worst part of the tranny community is that the central pillars of it are evil people, it's the periphery that are usually the victims of this nonsense. You have giant underground drug trafficking rings, pedophile rings, and powerful influence networks used to silence the truth. If I remember right the biggest trans streamer on twitch, streaming to impressionable kids and teens, is constantly pushing porn and public friends with pornographers, who themselves are very close to literal pedophiles sharing abuse materials to other groups of young people.
Reading reduxx is another great way to see from where this tranny madness spawned, fetish forums where old men in lingerie wank to ideas of eternal toddler rapeslaves.
German "trans cafe" shut down due to sex abuse.
ApeBass
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2021
Maybe to men, and I would guess that most of them have a limited understanding of what autism actually is if they find it desirable. A girl/woman with autism is not considered cute or desirable to other girls/women. Female autists struggle to socialise and are often outcasts.
I wonder how awful (or non-existent) this redditor's sex life must be to believe that genitals don't matter that much in a relationship.
Yet another Tranny L.
FPTMIU
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2025
I truly wish the deepest and most painful suffering for those who pushed this upon the innocent and the depressing part is that no possible punishment would be enough for this filth.