📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[Law]

White men enable it too.

I agree. Most transwomen are white men - certainly the famous and influential ones. The guys funding trans are all white men. Plenty of the surgeons making bank off of amholes are white men.
Trans activists bringing "white" into it are cloaking things in the language of American racial politics to disguise the fact that they're sweeping up for men who get boners from solen underwear.

The Zoomer white men I know are all super racist and only parrot the gender beliefs to not be ostracized but don't really believe it.

Parroting it cause you're scared that no one will be your friend is how institutional capture happens. Grow a pair. I've lost friends over trans shit, and I'll do it again.
Aren't the oldest "zoomers" like 29? You're really afraid that Bruce will dis-invite you to the sleepover when you've got a car and a mortgage and your hair's starting to leave? Also racism is pretty socially unacceptable, but I guess if the local bimbofication-enthusiast also does a funny Indian voice, we gotta keep him around?
I hope non-binary identification becomes known as a cringe Mellenial thing because then people will stop doing it.

 

[QwahlityKahntent]

The guys funding trans are all (((white))) men.

fixed

 

[Vlad the Implier]

You'd think with how traumatized by bad men pooners always are they'd have an inkling of awareness about objectifying others

I don't have quantitative figures to share, but from what I've seen the connection between trauma/sexual abuse and pooning out isn't nearly as strong as some people make it out to be. It can definitively increase the likelihood, but the strongest factors by far are autism and porn sickness. They literally goon themselves retarded.

Parroting it cause you're scared that no one will be your friend is how institutional capture happens. Grow a pair. I've lost friends over trans shit, and I'll do it again.

This. Be practical of course, don't get yourself fired from your job by sperging out about troons, but we as a society need to start pushing back. At one point, I considered the possibility of troons being in womens' sports from an accelerationist standpoint; women would lose to the imposters or get injured and this would turn a majority of women against the troon movement. I realized this was wrong when I came to the realization that shitlibs don't actually care about women. What they care about is performance; saying the "correct" or "progressive" to everyone publicly and getting asspats for it.

There are limits to tolerance, "tolerance" that endangers women and children is evil and I'm tired of people acting like being gender critical is equivalent to committing a fucking war crime.

 

[Dr. Butt]

from what I've seen the connection between trauma/sexual abuse and pooning out isn't nearly as strong as some people make it out to be. It can definitively increase the likelihood, but the strongest factors by far are autism and porn sickness. They literally goon themselves retarded.

Dude it's both.

I don't have quantitative figures to share

Nice.

 

[Vlad the Implier]

Dude it's both.

Nice.

What? Did you want me to catalog every single pooner posted here, search their social media posts for claims of being raped and then sort them for you?

I'm not saying that it isn't a factor, I even said it is. My point is that this narrative of "woman gets raped -> poons out" understates the much stronger factors of porn and autism.

 

[Dr. Butt]

What? Did you want me to catalog every single pooner posted here, search their social media posts for claims of being raped and then sort them for you?

Hey man you're the one making the claim.

 

[Law]

I think women have a greater likelihood of experiencing sexual violence than of being autistic or being really into porn. Like if I had a sample of 1000 women I bet I could find more sexual assault survivors than I could autistic porn aficionados.

I considered the possibility of troons being in womens' sports from an accelerationist standpoint; women would lose to the imposters or get injured and this would turn a majority of women against the troon movement. I realized this was wrong when I came to the realization that shitlibs don't actually care about women.

I thought that men impregnating women in prison would do it.
I still think many pro-troon women were asked to pick a side but never told what each side actually stood for.

 

[HalTurner]

Parroting it cause you're scared that no one will be your friend is how institutional capture happens. Grow a pair. I've lost friends over trans shit, and I'll do it again.
Aren't the oldest "zoomers" like 29? You're really afraid that Bruce will dis-invite you to the sleepover when you've got a car and a mortgage and your hair's starting to leave?

Yeah between 14 and 29 is the zoomer category. The thing is though, zoomers are just laughably more fragile overall. That clip I linked there had self identified liberal feminists shocked at how hopeless the youngest generation saw things. One woman I think she said she was 28 said she couldn't relate to them at all because even in her fighting college days everyone had hope and excitement for the future but now they're scared and full of hate. That isn't to say I disagree with you. I agree. But the zoomers are the ones who regularly have described being too scared to talk to people on the phone. So when you bring up losing a car and mortgage? Brave of you to assume they have either, lol.

Hey man you're the one making the claim.

To be fair we have people constantly making the opposite claim and often minimizing pooners for their actions. Claiming that most of them are all sexual abuse sufferers when theres never a source posted to support it either. In fact I did a LOT of deep diving on this topic, and the most I can find is when they go back to the claim that trans people as a whole are more likely to be victims of SA than non trans. And that does not differentiate from pre transition or post.

 

[Dr. Butt]

minimizing pooners for their actions.

Well obviously don't do that. Pooners who prop up trans shit by refusing to see that their incest rape made them hate being female aren't helping anyone.

 

[Meat Grinder]

inkling of awareness about objectifying others, but they really couldn't give two shits as long as they get off.

I for one think it is hilarious that fags are getting harassed and their areas polluted with annoying wannabes just like lesbians with troons. They're barely less nasty than pooners, at least pooners are permavirgins instead of disease vectors.

 

[Vlad the Implier]

I think women have a greater likelihood of experiencing sexual violence than of being autistic or being really into porn. Like if I had a sample of 1000 women I bet I could find more sexual assault survivors than I could autistic porn aficionados.

Yes and most of them don't poon out. Meanwhile, most pooners exhibit social cluesslessness (autistic) and pornosexual behaviors.

Hey man you're the one making the claim.

Given the nebulous nature of gender sorcery, under-reporting of sexual assault in general, and how incredibly dishonest these people are, this is difficult to quantify objectively. Consider the following parameters:

• Are they claiming to have been assaulted before their transition or after?
• Are they actually transitioning (hormones,surgery) or they zero effort women who just claim to be doods?
• Would any of them actually admit being assaulted influenced their decision to transition?
• Is the birth sex of the "non-binary" retards recorded?
• What is the scope of sexual assault as defined by the study? Remember, these people are insane. I promise you, some of them will consider being misgendered or referring to their genitals "incorrectly" to be equivalent to rape.
• Does a study involving men and women include troons in their figures and fail to point out their participants true and honest sex?
• Is the study being done in a country/region of pronouns respecters or in a place that's hostile to them?
• The (((science))) does not acknowledge the existence of porn addiction. There is an agenda here and you will not get much meaningful research into the influence of pornography consumption, especially by minors.
• One thing (((they))) have actually allowed to be published is the connection between autism and trooning. Autists are WAY more likely to troon. TERF Island has actually made it a requirement for retards to get screened for autism before any "gender affirming care".

Work is slow today so Dr. Vlad is pulling some science for you:
Porn and MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+
Transgender "potentialities" through porn
Study of mostly pooners and the porn they watch (~83%)
Notice how much more porn pooners consume over normal women (~28.5%)
Autism and Troonery 1 - autistic women more likely to trans than autistic men, according to 3 prior studies
Autism and Troonery 2 - largest dataset had ~25% autism rate
1 in 5 women in Burgerland experience attempted or completed sexual assault (~25%)
Roughly 50% of pooners in this study report sexual assault, no indication of it happening before or after transition
More numbers comparing pooners and women
Study on adolescents, sexual abuse ~19%, "psychological abuse" ~73%
Bonus! ~75% of of adolescent girls grow out of their dysphoria within 5 years of diagnosis.


Sexual assault/abuse is higher in troons, I never denied that its a factor, but its by a factor of 2, while porn consumption is a factor of 3 and autism a factor of 3-6.

Looking forward to seeing you at the next Institut für Gender-Zauberei conference Dr. Butt!

 

[Dr. Butt]

I refuse to back down from my initial assertion that bitches what got raped should admit they got raped.

 

[Toxic BRAAAAP Mask]

I for one think it is hilarious that fags are getting harassed and their areas polluted with annoying wannabes just like lesbians with troons. They're barely less nasty than pooners, at least pooners are permavirgins instead of disease vectors.

As a trad and based gay man, I'd mostly agree with you for the pure schadenfreude of it. I do however believe in sex exclusionary spaces and pooners are still women invading a men's space no matter how degenerate it is. If fags desire to keep their 'lifestyle', I hope they get to cleaning house even if it's one I won't be stepping in. Poons and troons need to be othered from all corners of society so they cut this shit out. We want longterm satisfaction, not short-term gratification.

And let's not pretend pooners aren't walking toxic dumps with a hyena clit too. How many posts have we seen about them being on PreP and doxyPEP and getting gonorrhea, the Clap, and HIV? Their dried up snail trails are POZitively glowing with radioactivity.

 

[RonRiot]

As a trad and based gay man, I'd mostly agree with you for the pure schadenfreude of it. I do however believe in sex exclusionary spaces and pooners are still women invading a men's space no matter how degenerate it is.

True, but at least Pooners aren't much of a physical threat even when they do sidle in. They just stand seething in the corner, then go home and blog teary novellas about being ignored. They’re not towering rape hons who suck the air out of every room they’re in. They do more harm on the internet than they do in real life. They can shit up places like reddit with little trouble, but it doesn’t translate into real life for the reason that women generally don’t have much success physically intimidating groups of men.
Yes, the lil’ fellas shouldn’t be in gay bars, but in the meantime at least we can rest our drinks on their heads.

 

[Rosemary West]

I refuse to back down from my initial assertion that bitches what got raped should admit they got raped.

Yeah but not everyone wants to send their dad to prison.

 

[stinky patchouli]

young white women are doing the stereotypical fawn response and are trying to “keep the peace” and repent for being white and cis.

But the zoomers are the ones who regularly have described being too scared to talk to people on the phone.

I worked with a lot of white zoomer women up until recently (retail management) and their learned helplessness/infantilization is actually a huge problem. I heard "I'm just a girl," so many times unironically I had to explain to them that they are grown women. Society has browbeaten white people for the last few decades and this is the result, I fear. Only met a handful of based zoomers. One was a lesbian who was really bad at the job but made sure to tell the tranny we worked with his colorblindness and autism was extremely male coded.


Anyway, tax:

 

[Tragi-Chan]

They're not and this needs to be emphasised. Visit Stonewall UK's website and try and tell me they are not lockstep with every troon demand possible.

What Stonewall's new president did was fail to say she wanted to hang, draw, and quarter JK Rowling. None of its other rhetoric and none of its policies have changed. Nevertheless, Stonewall will be subject to the same purity-spiral witch hunt that the left is addicted to.

I do not wish them well.

Euan Weddell / Sophie Molly has some super serial problems today:

View attachment 8892948View attachment 8892945

The SNP is probably the most absurdly pro-trans party in the UK. These loons are never not burning every possible bridge in public life. You love to see it.

These two instances demonstrate perfectly why troons will never win. Every misstep is an unforgivable sin, no matter what you did before. Lest we forget, Rowling was seemingly fine with troons until they dogpiled her on Twitter.

Claiming that most of them are all sexual abuse sufferers when theres never a source posted to support it either. In fact I did a LOT of deep diving on this topic, and the most I can find is when they go back to the claim that trans people as a whole are more likely to be victims of SA than non trans. And that does not differentiate from pre transition or post.

TBH, given what drama queens all trans people are, I’m not sure how many claims of SA are trustworthy anyway. Look at all the troon human zeppelins claiming to have been raped multiple times, often in explicit detail.

 

[Sean Andalou]

A message from the tranny jannies about surveys.


Reddit -- Archive

Spoiler: Wole rant.

Hey all,

The mod team wants to remind you to please be cautious of participating with research teams and surveys that are studying trans people.

Another trans subreddit offered the following statement to their subscribers:

"Lisa Littman, a transphobic researcher who invented the concept of "rapid-onset gender dysphoria", recently asked our moderation team for permission to post about a study she's working on with Kenneth Zucker and J. Michael Bailey. We said no." The moderators went on to offer contact information in the case of this survey popping up.

There are numerous organizations attempting to study trans people right now with dubious intent. It's important that you remember to verify the source of the studies, related organizations, and the names of the lead researchers before moving forward with any of these. It's very easy for a research group to manipulate data to get the results they want.

As a reminder, however, we do allow some surveys on this subreddit, but we require all surveyors to be screened by our moderation team first. If you feel that a survey is here without being screened first, please report the post AND message our moderator team so we can take a look.

Thank you!

Key quote:

There are numerous organizations attempting to study trans people right now with dubious intent. It's important that you remember to verify the source of the studies, related organizations, and the names of the lead researchers before moving forward with any of these. It's very easy for a research group to manipulate data to get the results they want.

Most interesting comment:

Spoiler: Whole rant. Quite long but really worth the read,

Hi there, trans gal and researcher here! Gonna offer a smidge more info about Littman's absolutely garbage study, then some more general stuff.

Littman's current research project is aimed at trans youth (they don't even acknowledge them as trans, instead calling them "gender dysphoria), and it includes the same disastrously bad methodology as her ROGD study--she is, in short, going to fabricate results for trans kids by taking data from their transphobic parents or those who claim without evidence to be the parents of trans kids. This methodology is bad bad, and is ultimately what caused her ROGD paper to be retracted. This next bit is important, so I'm gonna bold it:

If Littman cannot get a large enough participant pool of trans respondents, her research will likely be rejected for publication, or retracted if published. It is IMPERATIVE that you not participate, and that you spread the word to make sure other people don't participate in this study.

More generally, when you're thinking about participating in a research study on trans stuff, check out the following information:

• What university and department is it based out of? Psychology, women's studies, social work, and fields like that are mostly safe, but there are bad actors out there soooo
• Go to Pubmed and search for the Principal Investigator's prior research. See what their other work says. Does it generally mesh up with what we know about trans folks, or is it filled with transphobic dog-whistles?
• If in doubt, email the PI--their email will be on the disclosure page and is meant to field questions--and ask how their research is being funded. Stuff backed by government grants is usually pretty safe, and stay away from anything backed by SEGM, GENSPECT, or other pseudoscientific hate groups. If they won't answer, don't do the study.

The significant majority of the research offers you'll see out there are from people who are intellectually honest, and many are even run by fellow trans people these days! And it's important to support that research when and where we can, because good science drowns out bad science. Nevertheless, you've gotta stay vigilant--bad actors exist in the academy, same as any other organization, and just like anywhere else, they find clever ways to keep their hooks in so they can keep producing bullshit pseudoscience.

But those hooks only work as long as they can produce the bullshit pseudoscience. If they can't, their shadowy funders will move on.

Starve their research. Not. One. Response.

Key quote at end:

Starve their research. Not. One. Response.

Gotta control that narrative!

 

[Syikeblade]

Another post of pooner's complaining about trannies dismissing them.
Sadly I can't archive this at the moment.



Even their mantra of transmen are men doesn't apply when around real men or being treated like one.



They hate being reminded about the fact they can get pregnant, either from jealous trannies or prison rape or a fetish. They seem to really despise it and by extension children, unless they can use them for their degenerate cult.



And the irony of trannies making fun of their stupid name choices, which honestly they're not wrong on.



Reddit Post

 

[Lord Of Shit]

Gotta control that narrative!

They've been quite explicit for some time now about their intentions concerning tranny research ― if they do not enjoy total control over a study, they want no study done at all. They know, deep down, that any objective researchers will reach conclusions which the gender cult cannot tolerate.

They are telling on themselves, yet again.