War Twitter Suspends Accounts of Half a Dozen Journalists - Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences, sweaty

1671161626431.png

SAN FRANCISCO — Twitter suspended the accounts of roughly half a dozen prominent journalists on Thursday, the latest change by the social media service under its new owner, Elon Musk.

The accounts suspended included Ryan Mac of The New York Times; Drew Harwell of The Washington Post; Aaron Rupar, an independent journalist; Donie O’Sullivan of CNN; Matt Binder of Mashable; Tony Webster, an independent journalist; Micah Lee of The Intercept; and the political journalist Keith Olbermann. It was unclear what the suspensions had in common; each user’s Twitter page included a message that said it suspended accounts that “violate the Twitter rules.”

The moves came a day after Twitter suspended more than 25 accounts that tracked the planes of government agencies, billionaires and high-profile individuals, including that of Mr. Musk. Many of the accounts were operated by Jack Sweeney, a 20-year-old college student and flight tracking enthusiast who had used Twitter to post updates about the location of Mr. Musk’s private plane using publicly available information.

Last month, Mr. Musk had said he would allow the account that tracked his private plane to remain on Twitter, though he said it amounted to a security threat. “My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk,” he said in a tweet at the time.

But he changed his mind this week, after he claimed a car in which one of his sons was traveling was accosted by a “crazy stalker.” On Wednesday, Mr. Musk tweeted that any account that posted “real-time location info of anyone will be suspended, as it is a physical safety violation. This includes posting links to sites with real-time location info.”

Some of the journalists whose accounts were suspended had written about the accounts that tracked the private planes or had tweeted about those accounts. Some have also written articles that have been critical of Mr. Musk and his ownership of Twitter. Many of them had tens of thousands of followers on the platform.

Mr. Musk did not respond to a request for comment and Twitter did not respond to an email for comment. In a tweet, Mr. Musk said Twitter’s rules on “doxxing” — which refers to the sharing of someone’s personal documents, including information such as their address — “apply to ‘journalists’ as well as everyone else.” He did not elaborate.

“Tonight’s suspension of the Twitter accounts of a number of prominent journalists, including The New York Times’s Ryan Mac, is questionable and unfortunate,” said Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesman for The Times. “Neither The Times nor Ryan have received any explanation about why this occurred. We hope that all of the journalists’ accounts are reinstated and that Twitter provides a satisfying explanation for this action.”

A representative for The Post did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Kristine Coratti Kelly, a CNN spokeswoman, said the suspensions were “concerning but not surprising” and that “Twitter’s increasing instability and volatility should be of incredible concern for everyone who uses” it. In an appearance on CNN after his account was suspended, Mr. O’Sullivan said Twitter’s actions could intimidate journalists who cover companies owned by Mr. Musk.

“I was disappointed to see that I was suspended from Twitter without explanation,” Mr. Webster, whose account was suspended, said in an emailed comment. He added that he had tweeted about the Twitter account that tracked Mr. Musk’s private plane before his suspension.

Mr. Binder, the Mashable journalist, said that he had been critical of Mr. Musk but had not broken any of Twitter’s listed policies.

After his suspension from Twitter, Mr. Sweeney turned to Mastodon, an alternative social network. After Mastodon used Twitter to promote Mr. Sweeney’s new account on Thursday, Twitter suspended Mastodon’s account. As some journalists shared the news of Mastodon’s suspension, their own accounts were suspended.

Mr. Musk, who purchased Twitter in October for $44 billion, had said that his takeover would expand free speech on the platform and allow more people to participate in the public conversation. In recent weeks, he allowed some banned users to return to the platform, including former President Donald J. Trump, who was barred from his account after the Jan. 6, 2021, riots on Capitol Hill.

Mr. Musk said in October that he would form a council to advise him on policy matters before making changes to the company’s content moderation policies. The council has not materialized. This week, Mr. Musk disbanded a trust and safety advisory group that had guided Twitter on thorny issues like harassment and child exploitation.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” Mr. Musk tweeted in April, shortly after announcing his intent to buy the company.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/15/technology/twitter-suspends-journalist-accounts-elon-musk.html (Archive)
 
They deserve more than being suspended from Twatter. It's as suspension and not a ban. It's a temp suspension as well and a short one from what I heard.
It's all about optics. Musk has stated categorically and repeatedly that he's all about free speech. Permabanning journoscum without a good reason isn't a good look.

Anyway, 7 days is the ideal length of time to cast offenders into the Twitter sin bin. It's not long enough to make Musk look hypocritical to a reasonable person but it's long enough to be literal murder in the eyes of leftard journos and their groupies.
 
Not sure if this was posted anywhere, but it seems like the journoscum had a chatroom going and Elon decided to pop in to talk to them.

Some noticeable names: Keffals and Ben Collins. I'm not really sure who the other people are, I only started to follow this.

Got this from this Tweet:

Link;Archive


View attachment 4090770
They laugh when he's out of earshot, so to speak, after agreeing they did link to the thing he considers suspension-worthy.
Him saying you can't do some snide workaround to achieve the same result just doesn't make sense to them. They know what they're doing and that they're doing it on purpose and are just trying to make him look like the bad guy, he just doesn't care.

I believe Musk is aware that people don't actually respect journalists so no one will care if he doesn't give them the time of day.
 
Not sure if this was posted anywhere, but it seems like the journoscum had a chatroom going and Elon decided to pop in to talk to them.

Some noticeable names: Keffals and Ben Collins. I'm not really sure who the other people are, I only started to follow this.

Got this from this Tweet:

Link;Archive


View attachment 4090770

God, that's just delicious. All of these pampered children of the wealthy who populate media today, sitting there spluttering, incapable of processing the idea that they will no longer get special treatment.

By the way, notice how they all sound completely indistinguishable? Same inflection, accents, etc.? They're all from the same handful of zip codes and went to the same exclusive schools. Musk buying Twitter really is like Trump winning in 2016-- this tiny little insular, pampered group of people just cannot believe they've been told no.
 
wiki soy boys are creating s new article for this event called Thursday Night Massacre!!!

Hopefully it gets as big as gamergate one


On December 15, 2022, several high-profile journalists had their accounts suspended from the Twitter platform, in an event that was dubbed the "Thursday Night Massacre".[1][2] At least nine journalists who covered the social media company and its owner, Elon Musk, were all suspended without warning. This included reporters Keith Olbermann, Steven L. Herman, and Donie O'Sullivan, and journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and The Intercept.[3][4][5][6] The suspensions were initially described as permanent,[3][4][6] but the accounts were reinstated the next day after Musk conducted a Twitter poll.[7][2]

Although the journalists were not initially provided specific reasons for the ban,[3] Twitter and Musk later stated it was the result of doxxing, and due to violations of Twitter's new rules prohibiting accounts from sharing real-time flight information of private jets.[3][4][8] That rule was created on December 14, 2022, one day before the suspensions, and was reportedly in response to the @ElonJet account, which tracks Musk's private jet. That account and other flight tracking accounts were suspended from Twitter on December 14, but continued operating on other platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Truth Social, Mastodon.[4][9][10]

Several of the suspended journalists said they had not violated the rule, and while some included links to @ElonJet in their articles or had reported about the account, this account was already suspended and not providing any information at this time.[3][5][6] The Twitter account of Mastodon – a rival social media platform – was also suspended on December 15 after linking to @ElonJet on a Mastodon instance. Users were unable to share Mastodon links from numerous instances in their tweets, with such links labeled as "potentially harmful" and containing "malware".[3][4][6][11]

Musk wrote of the suspensions that "same doxxing rules apply to 'journalists' as to everyone else"[3][12] and "you doxx, you get suspended. End of story."[13][4][5] The account suspensions drew criticism from several media outlets and international representatives,[3][13] some of which said the actions undermined Musk's repeated claims of supporting "free speech" on Twitter.[3] The suspensions were condemned by representatives of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United Nations, the European Union, the European Commission, and others.[13][14]

On December 16, after running two Twitter polls asking how long the accounts should remain suspended for, Musk tweeted "The people have spoken. Accounts who doxxed my location will have their suspension lifted now."[7][2]

there is a battle going on to speed delete it

 
1671379349271.png


1671379452012.png
so a big hit piece in short
.....
Or the bleeding heart ban i will give it 50 to 40 points of true.
1671379712607.png
.................
Merry Christmas to Tim learning people & grifting & not moral.
Stop being a fucking idiot Tim
1671380433163.png1671380683983.png
 
Last edited:
Half a dozen!? That's like.. Like six! Freedom of the press is under attack!!
Something something jan 6 something number of the beast something Hitler something numerology something something but muh science

Imagine being upset about Musk and not literally deleting your account.

It's one thing if you just go into lockdown because of some edge lord on the internet, but it's another if your opponent is the owner of the platform himself and the journos have been screeching about him possibly letting bad people into private DMs and you still don't go into DFE mode on principle.

They keep getting negrated on Mastodon. Even Lefties don't like Lefty echochambers.
Are you sure they're negrating eachother? That would be funny, watching them eat their own, but can't it just be that over there they can't ban wrongthinkers from negrating them too?

Plane registrations are matters of public record.
"Public Record" reminds me... On some forums, I think bans are a matter of public record. Not sure if it's common but I remember seeing a sparkledog furfag site where they keep a public wall of shame for everyone who got banned.

The left does it in places they're in control, it'd be funny if that was implemented in a a place they didn't own and they suddenly decided it was bad.

We need better PR - something that sounds as inoffensive as "flight tracking enthusiast".

We aren't the kiwi farms dox squad - we're "Eccentric personality enjoyers".
Null used to release a cute T Shirt (every?) Halloween, and he'd do it even if it was a PITA with providers shutting him down every time. Does that count?
 
Back