Ubisoft Sellout - Bankruptcy Speedrun Any% Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Spaced Outside Cargo said:
In hindsight it's funny as fuck that the original movie said "you need to assimilate when you immigrate to another people's land" but the target audience think this only applies to white immigrants.
Click to expand...
didn't james cameron (the greatest pioneer) seethed at the fact that people sided with the humans and wanted them to literally fucking drop the tungsten rods in pandora? i member seeing something like that or maybe it was some shitty clickbait but avatar is honestly pretty good to exposé pretentious faggotry, some niggers like to dunk on people siding with humans on starship troopers by saying they are too stupid and didn't notice the criticism but avatar is so fucking shallow with the pseudo environmentalism message that it makes clear as day as to why you would and should side with humans on such conflicts.
that scene of the "slaughter" is truly fucking funny with the hippie chick trying to stop people from killing them blue freaks when you remember what happened in the movies, humans had all the chances to wipe that shitty planet clean and still didn't do it, the third movie trailer is giving the impression that JC got the memo but in his own retarded way as he still on that enviromentalism talk.
 
Last edited:
I don't see an active Ghost Recon thread, but I just want to say I am still mad that they didn't include my beloved OICW for the futuristic era entries. It's there in the original game, but the games that actually play into the games taking place into near future? Nah, let's just give everyone (X)M8 instead. They even had some soldiers in the intro of Advanced Warfighter hold OICWs, which meant that they included it in the early builds but cut it out later like in Half Life 2. Thankfully they brought it back in Advanced Warfighter 2...on the PSP. I guess the weapon just isn't sci-fi or futuristic enough to include it in a game today anymore outside of nostalgia or sentimental value, but it always pissed me off how much of a missed opportunity this was. Especially since the main assault rifle of GRAW was some literally who mockup gun that never even had a working prototype, it only exists in these two games. At least M8 had working prototypes.

Does anyone here even remember Ghost Recon before it became yet another open world Ubisoft title?
 
Ubisoft doesn't make Assassin's Creed, Far Cry or Rainbow Six anymore, they lost it all. Management moved it to a new company with Tencent :story:

www.pcgamer.com (archive.ph)

ubisoftlostitall.png
 
Hermiöne Granger said:
Ubisoft doesn't make Assassin's Creed, Far Cry or Rainbow Six anymore, they lost it all. Management moved it to a new company with Tencent
Click to expand...
This was originally announced like 6 months ago. They haven't actually lost shit, yet, since they still own the majority share of the subsidiary that licenses the IP, and according to your own article it's literally the same shitty Ubisoft studios that will be making the games anyway.
 
East_Clintwood said:
This was originally announced like 6 months ago. They haven't actually lost shit, yet, since they still own the majority share of the subsidiary that licenses the IP, and according to your own article it's literally the same shitty Ubisoft studios that will be making the games anyway.
Click to expand...
Make, sure, but they don't call the shots anymore. If Chang says no trannies, there are no trannies, if Chang says there will be micro transactions up the ass then there indeed will be microtransaction up the ass. Hopefully the rest of their IPs will be sold off soon, I don't like having Rayman and friends still be under the abusive household of Ubisoft.

BTW, I am really appreciating the irony of a Tom Clancy IP getting sold off to the Chinese. I don't think his coffin could be spinning any harder than it already does, but maybe someone should check up on his grave, just in case. For all I know, he will pop out of the ground any moment and curse Ubisoft for ruining his legacy.
 
Hermiöne Granger said:
Ubisoft doesn't make Assassin's Creed, Far Cry or Rainbow Six anymore, they lost it all. Management moved it to a new company with Tencent :story:
Click to expand...
The recent Shadows DLC was also handled by the team who made AC Mirage and not the main AC team, and is apparently much better.

Admittedly that's an extremely low bar to clear, but it implements some features that are such no-brainers --like having Naoie and WE WUZ do missions simultaneously and swap control back and forth-- that it made the guy I was watching give a review puzzled why Yasuke felt like such an afterthought in the original game.

It's almost like he was never meant to be in it.
StacticShock said:
Murphy disagrees with you.
it can always get worse.
Click to expand...
The great thing is, in the case of Ubisoft, getting worse only means things getting more fun for us.
 
Oliver Onions said:
The recent Shadows DLC was also handled by the team who made AC Mirage and not the main AC team, and is apparently much better.

Admittedly that's an extremely low bar to clear, but it implements some features that are such no-brainers --like having Naoie and WE WUZ do missions simultaneously and swap control back and forth-- that it made the guy I was watching give a review puzzled why Yasuke felt like such an afterthought in the original game.

It's almost like he was never meant to be in it.

The great thing is, in the case of Ubisoft, getting worse only means things getting more fun for us.
Click to expand...
It made sense that a DLC that will be released so shortly after the Game release is made by another team(Persona 3Reload expansion for example).
And also made sense a team of guys that hear the dual protagonist would do something like that instead a pricks that shoehorned another MC for no reason
 
Oliver Onions said:
The recent Shadows DLC was also handled by the team who made AC Mirage and not the main AC team, and is apparently much better.

Admittedly that's an extremely low bar to clear, but it implements some features that are such no-brainers --like having Naoie and WE WUZ do missions simultaneously and swap control back and forth-- that it made the guy I was watching give a review puzzled why Yasuke felt like such an afterthought in the original game.

It's almost like he was never meant to be in it.

The great thing is, in the case of Ubisoft, getting worse only means things getting more fun for us.
Click to expand...
Funny enough Naoe is the star of the expansion. And the story is....actually good? Its not shit. Map is smaller too so that's a plus. Antagonist is actually interesting as the character is tied to a minor antagonist from main game.

It really does feel like Naoe was the original solo assassin but they got scared of SJW ppl so they added nigger samurai thinking it would appease ppl. Didn't work.
 
Last edited:
Kane Lives said:
Appeasing a minority by pissing off the normie fans. Only a French will think this makes sense.
Click to expand...
These are the same retards that:
*Turned Rayman into a minigame franchise because the suits thought that casual Wii games will make more money than a AAA launch title 3D platformer
*Cancelled Splinter Cell Conviction because their focus group did not like hobo Sam Fisher, then rebooted the game and literally removed all stealth from the game and turned it into the world's most generic third person shooter
*Cancelled Rainbow Six Patriots because the thought of going up against patriotic civilians would be seen as too controversial, so they canned the single player and released the multiplayer under the name "Rainbow Six Siege", which ended up becoming unironic capeshit tier reddit game with a hundred operators

As you can see, they always chased the most profitable market by releasing the most safe games possible. It is worse than them pissing off normalfag fans, they think SJWs ARE the normalfag audience and they shun the actual casual audience that are supposed to be their bread and butter because the morons they have running the company tell them that faggot and dyke reprentation will make the green line go up, this time for sure even tho that gambit failed the last 64 times.
 
Ubisoft apparently cancelled a post Civil War AC

In July of last year, word began to trickle through Ubisoft that an ambitious new installment of the company’s top franchise, Assassin’s Creed, had been cancelled.
Click to expand...
The new game would have brought the history-spanning series to one of its most modern settings: The American Civil War and, moreso, the Reconstruction period that followed in the 1860s and 1870s.
Click to expand...
In this Reconstruction-era Assassin’s Creed, gamers would play as a Black man who had been formerly enslaved in the South and moved west to start a new life. Recruited by the series’ Assassins, he would return to the South to fight for justice in a conflict that would, among other things, see him confront the emergence of the Ku Klux Klan.
Click to expand...
That’s according to interviews with five current and former Ubisoft employees who spoke to Game File on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the project. (Ubisoft did not respond to a request for comment for this story.)
Click to expand...
The people were enthusiastic about the game but were also frustrated by its cancellation, which they perceived as Ubisoft bowing to controversy.
Click to expand...
Three sources told Game File that word filtered through the company last July that management in Paris had stopped development of the game for two reasons: 1) online backlash that spring to the reveal of Yasuke, a historically-inspired Black samurai, as a protagonist in the company’s then-upcoming Assassin’s Creed Shadows; and 2) concern that the political climate in the United States was becoming increasingly tense.
Click to expand...
“Too political in a country too unstable, to make it short,” one source familiar with the game and its cancellation told Game File.
Click to expand...
 
30+GameOvers said:
BTW, I am really appreciating the irony of a Tom Clancy IP getting sold off to the Chinese. I don't think his coffin could be spinning any harder than it already does, but maybe someone should check up on his grave, just in case. For all I know, he will pop out of the ground any moment and curse Ubisoft for ruining his legacy.
Click to expand...
It's okay, they were never gonna top Chaos Theory, ever.
Kane Lives said:
Appeasing a minority by pissing off the normie fans. Only a French will think this makes sense.
Click to expand...
Terminal nigger worship is in the post-imperial frog's blood.
30+GameOvers said:
As you can see, they always chased the most profitable market by releasing the most safe games possible. It is worse than them pissing off normalfag fans, they think SJWs ARE the normalfag audience and they shun the actual casual audience that are supposed to be their bread and butter because the morons they have running the company tell them that faggot and dyke reprentation will make the green line go up, this time for sure even tho that gambit failed the last 64 times.
Click to expand...
Every modern company also gets those debased "sweet" Fink-tier shekels for shoving the PoZ shit in don't forget. D.I.E. didn't go anywhere, and B.R.I.D.G.E. is the even worse cancer being made common core behind the scenes. Ain't a single thing changed in terms of the extra "funding".
 
30+GameOvers said:
*Turned Rayman into a minigame franchise because the suits thought that casual Wii games will make more money than a AAA launch title 3D platformer
Click to expand...
Actually, that wasn't Ubisoft's worst idea. Nintendo has the platformer genre on lock; Ubisoft would had not been able to compete, especially with their subpar Wii launch titles. If anything, Rabbids are synonymous with Ubisoft IPs in general: copy and paste, flooding the market, can't be rid of them in abundance. I'd take Rabbids over Minions any day of the week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom