Culture unfuckable hate nerds - yes, young men are losers. they deserve sympathy, not contempt.

Status
Not open for further replies.
(article) (archive)

Unfuckable Hate Nerds​

Yes, young men are losers. They deserve sympathy, not contempt.​

BY WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ
JUNE 28, 2023

“The army of unfuckable hate nerds”—Marc Maron’s term for the mass of young men who pollute the internet with their misogyny. “They play video games all day,” the comedian said on his podcast, “then they watch MMA, then they spend the evening jerking off to … porn, then they put a few hours” into attacking women online.

He’s right, of course. There are hordes of these young men (and, no doubt, of not-so-young ones). They congregate on Twitter, in comment threads, on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms, and 8kun, the successor to 8chan. They trade in misogyny, racism, antisemitism, and assorted other hatreds. Their words are violent and vile.

But Maron is also wrong. I mean in his response, which is that of so many: to answer hate with hate, contempt with contempt. As opposed to what? As opposed to understanding, just like we extend, at least on the left (and I am on the left), to another set of violent young men, the ones who live in inner cities. Yes, I am calling for sympathy for my brothers in the army of unfuckable hate nerds.

My brothers: I was a young man once. And since there’s now an ever-growing genre of commentary in which feminists speak, with placid condescension, like so many anthropologists (if not entomologists), on the topic of men, especially young men, I thought it might be useful to hear from someone who actually knows what it’s like to be one.

Here’s what it’s like: It sucks. Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts, but there are important ways in which young men are clearly underprivileged.

Women are sex objects, goes the cliché, and men are success objects. But success requires many years to achieve, if you ever achieve it at all. Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them, barely deigns to notice them. I’m not talking about the advertising industry, or the entertainment industry; I’m talking about the day-to-day experience of living in the world. Young women often have a lot of social power, whereas, except for the fortunate few—the born rich, the strikingly handsome, the 6-foot-3—young men have none. Socially speaking, young men are shit, and nobody gives a shit.

Any young woman who is even moderately attractive will be courted, complimented, paid attention to, by women as well as men. Older men will buy them things. People will hang on their words even when they aren’t interesting and laugh at their jokes even when they aren’t funny. They will have entry into places—private clubs, backstage after a show—young men can only press their noses against. They will be able to advance professionally by batting their eyelashes at powerful men. Young men, meanwhile—those losers, those loners, those apes—are left to pick their psychic zits on the periphery.

There’s more. Young women can have sex whenever they want. For most young men, persuading a woman to sleep with them is like trying to crack a safe. You understand that it’s theoretically possible, but you have no idea how to do it. Which means that you’re stuck with your hard-on. Unfuckable? No one needs to tell you that. You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.

The mental climate of the typical young man is three parts unrelenting horniness to one part self-disgust. Young women are not the only ones who are taught to hate their bodies. So, if less intensely, are young men. Why else would they lift all those weights? What you are really working out, when you go to the gym, is your dysmorphia. Aella, the OnlyFans star and online commentator, has said that what men look for when they come to her—and her clientele is mostly young—isn’t sex per se but “sexual acceptance.” They want to be assured, in other words, that they aren’t hideous. The fact they have to pay for this says everything you need to know.

Do I sound bitter? I’m channeling my younger self. It’s all worked out for me, I have no complaints, but I am intensely aware that it could have gone a different way. Turn this dial a click to the left, turn that one a click to the right—a little less privilege, a little more emotional instability—and I could have turned into a hate nerd myself. I suspect that a lot of men sense that. What does it feel like to be a young man? It feels like you are Kafka’s cockroach, Dostoevsky’s Underground Man. It feels like you were drawn by Harvey Pekar or R. Crumb. You are an Untermensch, a particle, a stew of envies and resentments, a festering sore. You look, from below, at the happy and lovely and rich. You creep, alone, along a wall. You masturbate as if your life depended on it.

Yes, I made it out. I found success; I reached the fabled land of love. But many men do not; many recognize, and recognize quite early, that they never will. And I was young in the ’80s and ’90s. We know what’s happened since. Blue-collar wages have slumped. Men have lost the education race. Add to that the dating apps, which gamify sex and love and quantify desirability and value. Like everything else on the web, the distribution follows a power law curve, with a small fraction of alphas soaking up the lion’s share of female attention. Add further the misandry that has now become de rigueur wherever the liberal elite holds sway: the ritual (and often gleeful) man-hating, the pathologization of masculinity.

We also know how young men are responding. Some are opting out of manhood by becoming trans or nonbinary. Some are going the other way, reaching for an ersatz hypermasculinity and joining the army of unfuckable hate nerds. Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable, but what do we think is going to make them stop? Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem. Hate breeds hate. Revenge is not justice. The hate nerds are human, no less than you and me. We need to treat them like it.
 
Last edited:
Dating a puppy, and doing so quietly.

Oh my god. How do reach the keys?

doggie.jpg

But your situation is pretty rare.
 
Oh my god. How do reach the keys?

View attachment 5185382

But your situation is pretty rare.
What do you mean? Just in reference to the money? I've heard women like to use men for free shit, some of them even stringing along multiple men to always have a dinner set up. I suspect that's a behavior that comes from spoiled people that don't have to work in the first place. There are plenty of women that are proud to be workers.
 
It matters not the gender of who is bashing your face in, it's a problem men as a gender face at 3x the rate of women. And honestly, no one expects you to have sympathy for incels, but it's tone deaf to complain about a problem to people who have that same problem way worse than you do. Are you expecting men to fix women's safety issues as well as their own?


This is silly. By that same logic, men can only fix their risk of false rape accusations by never spending any time at work alone with women. Nevermind the fact that 99.9% of your encounters with men never involve violence or rape.


Most men are not violent or causing the problem either. Why is it their responsibility but not women's?


This is 100% correct. Men need to take responsibility for their own actions. Plenty of self-destructive things in life are tempting. It is on us to resist those temptations for our well-being.
I expect there to be criminal consequences for sexual aggression & rape against women, via the government / legal system which is completely failing at it and has never done a good job historically either. That would also be true of violence against men. Ideally for me the government would be representative 50/50 or similar between men and women but it isn't, so from that aspect I'm sure it looks like I am asking men to fix the problem. But the point of the government is to serve it's populations needs. This is the social contract between the population and their government. It should be clear from everything else I've posted in this thread that I think that the only way out of this that isn't 'ww3 meat grinder' or 'more mass shootings' is social recognition of porn as an incredibly addictive substance and mass movement away from it, which needs a social campaign like smoking or obesity etc. & at this point means taking away access from future kids as a matter of urgency (and ipads, social media etc from kids in general).

So far, most people in this thread may not like how I'm saying things but seem to ultimately agree that porn is fucking everything up, and is being socially engineered to do so. If the problem is known, why is the focus and expectation on women to ignore the problem and go into relationships like it's not happening when it is? This is not a reasonable expectation.

The above just honestly feels like I'm repeating what I've been saying for the last 8 pages, so I think I'm done on that topic.

I don't know what the answer is re: rape prosecution vs false rape allegations, because every rapist is going to insist it's a false allegation and every liar is going to insist it's a genuine one. However, in my experience, the 'quiet one where you had no idea it was coming' serial killer stereotype isn't generally reflective of reality, and usually it's a guy with a history of more minor inappropriate behaviours beforehand (hence increased vigilance on more minor behaviours) but who is superficially charming and so both men and women won't want to believe that it's him. Also, like paedophiles, they will also seek out social status as a shield to allow them to get away with it. If you can use statistical correlation to estimate how these kinds of crimes play out in reality, you should be able to make the system more foolproof, but the only want to do that is through data, and almost every country in the world is sitting on a mass backlog of rape kits, etc and is making no attempt to do this.

I think you could do the same with false rape allegations (and it will probably have a lot to do with mental illness / unstable personalities) - from what I'm aware that most false rape allegations come from people from or families who use the police as a sort of personal vengeance service and have long histories of misusing other public services the same way (e.g. in and out of social services, in and out of the hospital). Again, basically, that the people causing the problem don't come as a surprise if you're actually paying attention to how they behave on the regular.
 
So far, most people in this thread may not like how I'm saying things but seem to ultimately agree that porn is fucking everything up, and is being socially engineered to do so.

I never even got the porn addiction thing. Like any guy I have a folder of pics of my favorite nude models/pornstars/celeb nude selfies. But I never got into sitting in front of my computer watching worse and worse stuff until I was watching nothing but Women getting double fisted while strapped to a rotating wheel while being shot with airsoft or anything like that.

I don't even understand how that happens. It's like they made sex fetishes the primary focus of their life.
 
. If the problem is known, why is the focus and expectation on women to ignore the problem and go into relationships like it's not happening when it is? This is not a reasonable expectation.
I think the issue is it's not the penultimate factor. It is a problem but it's not the entire whole. Whether it be from women's issues or men's issues (of fault) in modern relationship/dating.
you should be able to make the system more foolproof, but the only want to do that is through data, and almost every country in the world is sitting on a mass backlog of rape kits, etc and is making no attempt to do this.
I've always believed this is intentional to cover for connections of the ruling classes. It's quite often those in power may be committing these acts and if you allow the evidence to never be tested/wait until too much time has passed to process: well: No evidence, no crime.

This is 100% correct. Men need to take responsibility for their own actions. Plenty of self-destructive things in life are tempting. It is on us to resist those temptations for our well-being.
I just wanted to clarify I agree, men are responsible for their own impulses and control of them, but when one lacks an alternative the path of least resistance eventually follows thus making it easier. The thing about human sexual dynamics is women and men influence each other and a loss of those dynamics will also have disastrous results. It may sound dumb to blame the dynmic results of change of either sex impacting the other but it does have major consequences as we currently see, and it can be rectified but the issue has to be acknowledged to ever be fixed.

I never even got the porn addiction thing. Like any guy I have a folder of pics of my favorite nude models/pornstars/celeb nude selfies. But I never got into sitting in front of my computer watching worse and worse stuff until I was watching nothing but Women getting double fisted while strapped to a rotating wheel while being shot with airsoft or anything like that.

I don't even understand how that happens. It's like they made sex fetishes the primary focus of their life.
Two train of thoughts honestly: The first can be from requiring something more extreme over time. Obsessing over sex and porn leads to desensitization. The same is true for nay action that one may indulge or obsess over for far too long or make a primary focus. The reason some obsess is because a lot of men are insecure over it, or have been pushed the idea of inadequacy unless they fuck every women they meet senseless. It's as obvious as it is a sordid world view.

The second concept is less about getting into extreme forms of porn but more that some being to believe what is in porn is real and act with women (or women to men) as if they were. Unsurprisingly although most things are ficticious in presentation most of society tends to believe such things are realistic regardless of rhyme or reason.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WebLurker
Two train of thoughts honestly: The first can be from requiring something more extreme over time. Obsessing over sex and porn leads to desensitization. The same is true for nay action that one may indulge or obsess over for far too long or make a primary focus. The reason some obsess is because a lot of men are insecure over it, or have been pushed the idea of inadequacy unless they fuck every women they meet senseless. It's as obvious as it is a sordid world view.

Well you'd think that wouldn't be happening since testostrone levels have been dropping in Men in the last 50 years. Their sex drive should be theoretically less.
 
@Mewtwo_Rain I can definitely agree that the rape kit backlog is to avoid dealing with rich rapists (e.g. harvey weinstein; I think there's a lot more like him), one of the most unsafe spaces I've personally been in was a school full of rich kids. They're sociopaths. Single-sex education is more common in that social sphere for a reason.

But I don't think you can separate the breakdown of social dynamics from porn like that. I would argue that porn - mild by today's standards, but the idea of film-stars deliberately becoming pin-ups for soldiers, visiting soldiers on base, rather than being people who were privately/incidentally sexualised - has been around pretty much simultaneous to every step of the post-ww2 entrance of (middle-class and up) women into the workplace. Working class women have always had to work.

For the millenial generation, or for me at least, the 2008 recession seemed like a real turning point to a real reinforcement of men dominant woman submissive, with the mass normalisation of bdsm for women that came about shortly after with 50 shades of grey, etc. Which leaves women who don't want an extreme, aggressive dynamic out of luck, see withdrawal / resentment cycle.

Also not you that said this but sex drives can drop - leading to men not pursuing women - but that doesn't stop dicks from being a personal dopamine crank that get tugged on whether you're horny or not. Which would also reinforce porn as an aid for when you're not feeling it but want that dopamine release anyway.
 
then why don't women find this appealing
I don't know. Maybe men and women have subtly different sexual and emotional needs and desires. Maybe they're looking for different things in a cheap substitute. Maybe men cope with loneliness using porn and chatbots, and women buy 29 cats and trashy romance novels. Maybe men are more emotionally isolated because of certain ideas of masculinity in our society and can't fall back on friends the way women can, so AI is the next best thing. Maybe men are experimenting with AI rather than inanimate sex dolls as a substitute that can at least fake independent thought, precisely because they DON'T want a slave. Maybe women DO find AI appealing, but also find it threatening because it would break their monopoly on sex that they use to control men. Maybe women just haven't tried it.

Or maybe men are finally giving unshaven, bra burning feminists EXACTLY WHAT THEY ASKED FOR and leaving them alone forever, and for their efforts are now being accused of oppressing inanimate objects. Maybe men have reached the conclusion that they're going to be accused of being the ultimate evil no matter what they do, and just don't give a fuck anymore.

But I'm just speculating. If you want to know why women aren't interested in AI companionship the way men are, I suppose you'd have to ask them.
 
Well you'd think that wouldn't be happening since testostrone levels have been dropping in Men in the last 50 years. Their sex drive should be theoretically less.
I think it's because of how porn effects the brain, the lowering of testosterone levels could be because of the rise of estrogen in foods and more overtime on the body and chemicals most men are exposed too. The thing with obsession is it's neurological and not necessarily sex hormone produced.

What I mean is it doesn't directly effect the sex drive it merely changes how these men who are coomers see the world and how it effects their understanding of sex/women/etc. around them. There even used to be some disorders documents about it can't remember the name precisely but some young men could only get erect after watching porn and could not feel anything towards a literal direct women in front of them because of how they had conditioned themselves because of porn. The same is true of constant erections and all kinds of other (and damaging) effects. Haven't seen too many analysis of the damage caused by porn on women yet though if any documentaries exist.

Slight pl, I knew a guy who would openly do sexual acts out in the open (not direct sex but vulgar displays) due to how warped he became after years of hardcore consuming of porn.

When I say it turns them degenerate I mean it in a literal sense, common sense of how to behave often flies out the window at the point of porn addiction imagine a drooling foaming at the mouth mongrel trying to fuck anything or anyone, that's how many porn addicts become after the conditioning and it's quite disturbing to see.
@Mewtwo_Rain I can definitely agree that the rape kit backlog is to avoid dealing with rich rapists (e.g. harvey weinstein; I think there's a lot more like him), one of the most unsafe spaces I've personally been in was a school full of rich kids. They're sociopaths. Single-sex education is more common in that social sphere for a reason.

But I don't think you can separate the breakdown of social dynamics from porn like that. I would argue that porn - mild by today's standards, but the idea of film-stars deliberately becoming pin-ups for soldiers, visiting soldiers on base, rather than being people who were privately/incidentally sexualised - has been around pretty much simultaneous to every step of the post-ww2 entrance of (middle-class and up) women into the workplace. Working class women have always had to work.

For the millenial generation, or for me at least, the 2008 recession seemed like a real turning point to a real reinforcement of men dominant woman submissive, with the mass normalisation of bdsm for women that came about shortly after with 50 shades of grey, etc. Which leaves women who don't want an extreme, aggressive dynamic out of luck, see withdrawal / resentment cycle.

Also not you that said this but sex drives can drop - leading to men not pursuing women - but that doesn't stop dicks from being a personal dopamine crank that get tugged on whether you're horny or not. Which would also reinforce porn as an aid for when you're not feeling it but want that dopamine release anyway.
Yes, but WWII young men weren't sitting home watching on the go sexual imagery for hours on end. Sure they could read a magazine (playboy/etc.) but the direct exposure to porn was minimal. America during that time frame was also more anti-porn, christian, and a slew of other reasons exposure was minimal. As America and other western countries began to tolerate porn, the acceptance of people being exposed to it began to grow, I'd argue that's how we're at porn ruining so many today. : Today: you pull out your phone boom, driving set it on a handle, walking somewhere again there you go. No need for magazines restrictions when you can watch it anywhere you please with little restraint.

I'm merely saying the issues in dating and relationships even with porns negative effects are not the only or the most devastating issues between both sexes. It most certainly is a part of the overall picture and I'm not dismissing it has those effects merely as previous mentions there is far more to it than that. Even if you erased porn from existence that would not erase the other dating dynamic/conflicts.

Thing is 50 Shades of Grey was pushed by women, so that was an adoption of women, not men's sexual dynamics pushed onto women. BDSM as a fetish as far as I know is more popular among women and not men and there was a study done a few years ago to figure what kinks and fetishes men vs. women prefer. Men was all over the place with a ll kinds of bizarre adoptions while women's preferences were more direct like spanking, bdsm, etc. The issue for the ones who don't want that often won't speak up and I get that it's women's evolutionary line but this is a point where women need to overwrite their hard wiring to point out what they do not want from sex. If you want men to lead sex and you don't refuse something, or go along well a man isn't going to read minds. Men's sexual evolutionary path is also different.

On your last paragraph spot on, some have discussed the effect on men like a drug, and although I mentioned the term before it can literally condition a man's brain to react to seeking that pleasure over and over again some have said it even overwrites the sex drive to a pattern of need.

I don't know. Maybe men and women have subtly different sexual and emotional needs and desires. Maybe they're looking for different things in a cheap substitute. Maybe men cope with loneliness using porn and chatbots, and women buy 29 cats and trashy romance novels. Maybe men are more emotionally isolated because of certain ideas of masculinity in our society and can't fall back on friends the way women can, so AI is the next best thing. Maybe men are experimenting with AI rather than inanimate sex dolls as a substitute that can at least fake independent thought, precisely because they DON'T want a slave. Maybe women DO find AI appealing, but also find it threatening because it would break their monopoly on sex that they use to control men. Maybe women just haven't tried it.

Or maybe men are finally giving unshaven, bra burning feminists EXACTLY WHAT THEY ASKED FOR and leaving them alone forever, and for their efforts are now being accused of oppressing inanimate objects. Maybe men have reached the conclusion that they're going to be accused of being the ultimate evil no matter what they do, and just don't give a fuck anymore.

But I'm just speculating. If you want to know why women aren't interested in AI companionship the way men are, I suppose you'd have to ask them.
I think it comes down to many things: Women often are more social which AI can not provide such realistic interactions. Where men are more technologically driven and I'd argue science fiction has driven this idea about AI being the next step into their brains.

I think women feel more threatened that their sense of worth will be devalued if men replace them, we already see this effect in society when men are going to foreign countries for women and ignoring western women and how the native women get hostile and angry over it. The mere reason is they then have to put more effort in, and in the west women haven't had to fight or put effort in as much because most men just comply with the dynamics, now we see resistance and it angers those who have the major stock in that power: Women.

Though I think you're partially correct as well on the feminist concept, it's becoming many men are starting to get minority (Nigger fatigue) and women fatigue at this point. That whole "B-B-But men" being ridiculed and mocked and blamed for everything has possibly permanetly effected a lot of men in society and unless things change men will continue down this isolation path. We similar things in non-western countries such as Japan too.


I'd add also ai's don't really feel an emotional nexus which women are more dependent on then men, ai can only fake that emotional validation and I think that would leave women lacking to adopt something that literally can't where at least pets do give off emotional validation and reaction. Men are better at accepting fake validation such as game hero fans of sorts.
 
I was having a conversation the other day, on the topic of religion. How the sales pitch of religion has changed over time. You look at religion in ancient times, and what does it sell? Solution to practical problems pertaining to survival. The gods will water your corn. The gods will stop the tornadoes. The gods will drive away the barbarians. All the concerns of a people who are in a constant state of distress from having to fight nature and man for their lives.

Then a civilization gets more advanced, and it becomes a propaganda tool to get people to act somewhat better behaved and obeyed authorities. Then more advanced and the focus becomes psychological in nature, about healing the self.

What I see being pitched more than anything by the American church nowadays is love. Jesus loves you. Jesus is watching out for you. Jesus is your buddy and will help you out through your hard times.

So what does that tell us?

For a huge chunk of the population, their basic emotional needs are not being met. Their needs aren't being met or that wouldn't be the dominant advertising strategy on radio, print, and TV, almost overtaking the one constant, fear of the afterlife.

I think the world is full of people who are all alone inside. Many of them have a wife, friends, and kids.

ancient religion varied a lot but the best documented practices we have were also about emotion needs, and modern religion is also super into prosperity gospel/law of attraction stuff, so I don't know if there really has been that much of a shift. OT but do you know what is a real change? Modern Western people believe in positive vibe stuff, they'll do feng shui, they'll buy crystals, if they tend more towards Abrahamic religions, they pray for good stuff - we do *not* do or believe in using magic/vibes/whatever to harm our enemies. Some Africans still do, I don't know about Asians.
 
I expect there to be criminal consequences for sexual aggression & rape against women, via the government / legal system which is completely failing at it and has never done a good job historically either
How do I put this? There is absolutely nothing stopping women from joining the police department and delivering those criminal consequences. Men have been told over and over that we need to sit down and shut up and now that we do you have expectations that aren't being met. Welcome to equality, you're expected to solve your own problems and there is no sympathy left to go around. That's exactly what being a man is. You're welcome to it.
 
How do I put this? There is absolutely nothing stopping women from joining the police department and delivering those criminal consequences. Men have been told over and over that we need to sit down and shut up and now that we do you have expectations that aren't being met. Welcome to equality, you're expected to solve your own problems and there is no sympathy left to go around. That's exactly what being a man is. You're welcome to it.
I appreciate the "stop whining and do something" spirit of your comment. However, the administration of justice is not supposed to be dependent on the characteristics of the individuals involved in administering it; that guts and is antithetical to the rule of law.

Investigation and prosecution of rape is inadequate because the system doesn't prioritize it, and because the system isn't well equipped for it.

Asking the legal system to fix itself is a legitimate demand of a public function. De-prioritization of an entire class of offenses is not some come-uppance to the people who are the primary victims of those offenses. Sympathy isn't useful, and neither is spite; investigation of alleged crimes, prosecution of crimes, and development of laws and a system that gets closer to repeatable accountability is.

Tl;dr: there is a gap in the system, and that is a problem regardless of who is negatively impacted by it.
 
I appreciate the "stop whining and do something" spirit of your comment. However, the administration of justice is not supposed to be dependent on the characteristics of the individuals involved in administering it; that guts and is antithetical to the rule of law.

Investigation and prosecution of rape is inadequate because the system doesn't prioritize it, and because the system isn't well equipped for it.

Asking the legal system to fix itself is a legitimate demand of a public function. De-prioritization of an entire class of offenses is not some come-uppance to the people who are the primary victims of those offenses. Sympathy isn't useful, and neither is spite; investigation of alleged crimes, prosecution of crimes, and development of laws and a system that gets closer to repeatable accountability is.

Tl;dr: there is a gap in the system, and that is a problem regardless of who is negatively impacted by it.
I 100% agree with this. It is easy to forget sometimes that women are ALSO fed the message that they are to blame for everything.

The only way we fix this is by stopping pointing fingers and working together.
 
I doubt that they want to look for a solution. These "unfuckable hate nerds" are the ultimate scapegoats for [current year].
I think I posted it before but incels/wizards/virgins/foreveralones are like the perfect bogeyman for this day and age, can be blamed for anything. Maybe I'm misremembering but wasn't there a point somewhere last decade where frat boy crimes started being attributed to "incel culture"? Sometimes I have this feeling that a bunch of sociopathic normalfags disguise their opinions as coming from incels when venting on social media. Before geek culture got assimilated, sanitised and retarded into the monoculture, being an unfuckable nerd was regarded as social failure, a loser, heavily stigmatised but harmless and ignored. Now? It's a moral failing as well as a social failing, you're a "dangerous incel" and regardless of whether the failings are the fault of you or the system, you will be chastised for it because "the system is perfect". Makes it very useful as a label as more and more people fall by the wayside because the system is falling apart.

hotchinesecartoons.nut
I find it funny/disturbing that hentai has been normalised amongst normalfags. I didn't see that coming all those years ago.

but why are replacement rates in the shitter?
what phenomena over the past several decades has been steadily increasing to get society to this point?
Is this a rhetorical question? Social atomisation and devaluing labour. You can barely earn enough to support yourself in your mum's council house, let alone outright buying a house and supporting an entire family.

Here's a question (that I may repeat for a self-contained thread) for (mainly millennial) femanons, nonas/nonnies, female geeks/nerds/dorks/outcasts and catladies/femcels: Where are you and how are you doing?
Cos like, geek culture becoming mainstream (and other more significant reasons) really fucked up male geeks/outcasts to the point where a large number of them are either trooning out or turning into alt-right reactionaries and potential shooters. I don't really know what happened to their female counterparts, I don't know if it had a similar effect or if it was a non-issue and was actually positive for them. I doubt "Chad" has a harem of "low social status" girls and I don't know if they're just as housebound as their male counterparts.
 
@AWizard I think that most female nerds are either shut-ins or they want to get with guys of higher looks and status than the people that most folks stereotype as D&D/anime/video game fans. To be fair, it's at least tiring and frustrating to be with a person whose life largely revolves around escapism, but a lot of these guys have literally nothing else going for them in life. Sure there might be guys who aim a little too high for the kinds of women they want to be with, but there are guys who would be completely fine with a 300+ lb. ugly fat chick if she had similar outlooks on life. Plus there is the idea that you have to be some multimillionaire UberChad with 12 pack abs and a collection of supercars that makes Andrew Tate look like a pauper in comparison, but that's not reality.

Personally, I say that if you can't get anything decent as you are, well, then, maybe dating/sex/relationships aren't for you. You just have to accept that and learn how to be okay with it, which incels have failed to do.

Ironically, being content with being a loner is likely to be more attractive than doing the whole angry unfuckable Redditor thing.
 
The chickens coming to roost, reaping the whirlwind, consequences of your actions, etc...

Misandry is normalized, its so normalized that if you reverse the terms most feminists completely mogs the average incel on hatred, meanwhile radfems and femcels are complete extremists and while most normalfags dont agree with them they dont attack them as much as they do to even the mildest of these nerds

The point of no return was when those dudes posted mein kampf with 'jews' ctrl+f replaced with 'men' and it got published to a mainstream feminist site, and all the insane bitches there praised it until the authors came clean and said it was fucking hitler writings, and what they do? did it finally click that they were a bunch of hateful cunts?

Nigga please, they deleted fucking everything, no apologies, no introspection at all
on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms,
We are in big leagues now, are you gonna start shopping for a yatch @null?
Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts,
Name 5, shit, name 3 of these "contexts"

And no being conscripted and send to die is not a privilege, zero women want that either
Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them
Nigga talking like this is the 19th century and women are just baby ovens, old women are at least mostly respected specially if they have a career, and protected since nobody is gonna drop an old hag but some 18 can easily get suckerpunched into brain damage and no women around will care except his mother, and yeah in some cases even the mom is a 'maybe'
You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.
The banality of evil
Dostoevsky’s Underground Man.
Most of those ruskies became the og hardcore commies that killed millions, foreshadowing?
Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable
Nigger please, if they were women most of them would be the average feminist, not even radfem levels of hate

You got unironic total-men-death bitches working in academia and I'm supposed to be scared of some fat unemployed neckbeard with a toaster PC
but what do we think is going to make them stop?
Dont matter because you're not gonna give that to them
I like how everyone knows there is a problem and no one has a solution.
Again it dont matter, its pointless to have a convo about what to do because you're not gonna do it anyway, you bitches are just gonna let this stew even further, you're gonna let it boil well past the point of no return and when the pressure cooker explodes and blows half the kitches you're gonna be like "how could this happen!"

Is what you normalfaggots always do, its why the world its a shithole
it's funny how there's a shortage in everything and their response to a group of people with nothing to do or live for is further antagonizing from society
The normalfag believes in the 'end of history', no amount of black swan events are gonna convince him otherwise and thus it believes this mass of undermen are gonna stay quiet forever, that nothing will trigger them

See the shit happening in france? theres been people warning normalfags about it for decades now
Dude complains later about chads getting all the women as if he isn't representing a 'stacy' experience as happening to all women right here.
C'mon buddy, 555-come-on-now, you know full well even a mid 6/10 chick can get action, meanwhile even chad has to work for that pussy, chicks dont drop at his feet like dudes do to even a 7/10 girl with enough makeup to cover the acne scars

If a chad wants to hit right now he's gonna have to lower his standards a lot, if he wants stacy he's gonna have to wine&dine her too, tho unlike the incel losers he's gonna get to fuck her at the end

Another example: for all the talk about lonely women I've yet to see a male camwhore o "e-guy" making any money from them, or being popular among women. Thats because even meh-looking chicks can get attention for free, they dont need to pay a chad to say their name on screen to feel validated like these desperate fucks do

Most male camwhores are gay and their viewers are lonely gay men
Older men buying them shit to have access to them is predatory behaviour
555-are-you-fucking-kidding-me? predatory is "you either suck it or you dont get the job" which does happen, but if you're willing to date, not even fuck just date, and older man for free shit then thats you choice, theres no fucking extortion here
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back