Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
MAGA MY NEGHOLE DADDY TRUMP
I'LL JUST STOP USING THE INTERNET



upload_2017-11-22_3-33-42.png

upload_2017-11-22_3-34-34.png

upload_2017-11-22_3-35-38.png




upload_2017-11-22_3-41-27.png

upload_2017-11-22_3-42-1.png



MAGA MY NEGGGGGGHOOOOOOOL3EEE
 
Last edited:
Evidently the FCC doesn't give a shit about public comments. But when Congress threatened to pass SOPA the internet basically blacked itself out in protest and they backed off pretty quickly. Why isn't there a similar campaign for net neutrality?


Internet (and people in general) is too autistic and random when it comes to putting a trend

SOPA seems to have pushed out as a trend instead of a cause
 
Culture warring is when you think your retarded political views are so sensible and rational they count as 'cynicism'.

Didn't realize that being suspicious of the goals of a marketing firm was a political view, my fault. Unless you're talking about my political view on net neutrality, which is that it's a good thing? Or are you just being a moron and about to hide behind "shitposting" as an excuse?
 
Last edited:
Didn't realize that being suspicious of the goals of a marketing firm was a political view, my fault. Unless you're talking about my political view on net neutrality, which is that it's a good thing? Or are you just being a moron and about to hide behind "shitposting" as an excuse?

okay fine, soros is behind nn in an effort to turn america into a antifa commie hellhole.
you can hate it now
 
The DNC are the fire extinguisher salesmen. They're definitely interested in the situation for their own personal gain, no doubt about that.

I was suggesting that perhaps they're scared about political discussion being 100% in Facebook's hands. They don't like free speech, of course. But I think handing over the discussion to Facebook would amount to a defeat for them. Despite what people think, Facebook does provide a dumbed down form of free speech. Facebook is driven by money and not ideology, so they have to entertain the whims of middle America to some degree.

Facebook doesn't have to provide free speech or even the dumbed down version of free speech, just the illusion of it. Just like youtube and google, I'm sure facebook has a bunch of algorithms to just make sure anything considered outside the major media sites as restricted in search, won't show up in trending or popular sidebars. It's not as much as ideology as people think it is. It's more about money. SJW's are supported in the media because they serve the same purposes as they did as soccer moms. Pushing for extra regulartion, extra oversight, more power over what people get to see and hear.

A good show to watch was Charlie Brookers "How to watch Television" made before success and fame turned him from a misanthropic everyman comedian to a limousine liberal with a magazine model wife. He talks about various studies about how much Television influences peoples buying habits, voting, perception of the outside world, what their odds are of being raped or mugged.

Idiots just eat it all up as gospel, and seriously think the Gamergators are coming to get them because they just discovered women play videogames 3 years ago, and want to drive them out, so they decided to mobilize enough people to get Trump elected with the end goal of turning America into a Nazi state.
 
I hope this doesn't pass... And I hope we keep shit up in terms of fighting these old fossils until they die, if only so that we can replace them for trying to steal our free will from us.

I don't want America to end up like China when it comes to shit like this... Fuck, I'm leftist, but I don't want to see America end up like China in any sense, especially when it comes to keeping the internet open & free.

I don't need no old fossils deciding how I live; this shit does go that far... After all, look at China.
 
Last edited:
Didn't realize that being suspicious of the goals of a marketing firm was a political view, my fault. Unless you're talking about my political view on net neutrality, which is that it's a good thing? Or are you just being a moron and about to hide behind "shitposting" as an excuse?

We're just tired of you fucking pearlclutching because not everyone supporting net neutrality is Literally Jesus.

Yes, not everyone behind NN has the best intentions, but we fucking knew that and you screaming into your megaphone about ((((((((((THE DNC))))))))))) isn't giving us anything new to think about. You just look like a paranoid idiot.
 
Some middle aged autism dev will finally build the non-normie internet. As soon as it's easy to set up it will be flooded with pedophiles and soccer moms like TOR and USENET. Then we'll find out the autism dev was just doing it for access to green haired counterculture tumblr chicks who he roofied and fingerbanged for years despite their best efforts to teach him not to rape.
 
Back