Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
Another thing I can see happening if this DOES go through unabated: it leads to a shitload of discussion about monopolies (which are supposed to be illegal in this country), and laws start getting changed. Instead of just having like one or two ISPs per area, a ton of local ones start popping up. Ones with traditional mom and pop values that don’t fuck over the consumers.

ha,good joke.
 
So did anything concrete actually change in 2015, and has any of these nightmare predictions about throttling ever happened, or it this just a bunch of sperging? Did google turn off access to a bunch of websites in 2015, and the gov't swooped in and saved everyone with net neutrality?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Nuthatch and XYZpdq
I think raising the idea ISP monopoly breaking isn't unrealistic, at the very least Google will probably think about expanding Google Fiber services if only for pragmatic reasons (Google Fiber isn't going to charge Google services for priority, I would think, plus Google Fiber defended Net Neutrality)
 
So did anything concrete actually change in 2015, and has any of these nightmare predictions about throttling ever happened, or it this just a bunch of sperging? Did google turn off access to a bunch of websites in 2015, and the gov't swooped in and saved everyone with net neutrality?

Whatever it was you were told, Reddit is lying about it. Horribly, as well.
 
I think raising the idea ISP monopoly breaking isn't unrealistic, at the very least Google will probably think about expanding Google Fiber services if only for pragmatic reasons (Google Fiber isn't going to charge Google services for priority, I would think, plus Google Fiber defended Net Neutrality)

the monopoly will break if even bigger and richer company's want them too.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Shokew
to be fair that would still show big issues with our government.

That should be the point - fire people up on what's truly a serious issue worth being angry about for once, instead of some SJWBS that will come-and-go sooner than you think.
 
That should be the point - fire people up on what's truly a serious issue worth being angry about for once, instead of some SJWBS that will come-and-go sooner than you think.

our government was founded with the assumption that the american people were idiots, lets just hope that its changed since then.
 
Last edited:
even if they vote to take it away, it still has to go to court doesn't it? and correct me if i'm wrong but those courts have shown nothing but support for NN
Its not the court's job to differentiate between 'good' laws and 'bad'
Its just their job to determine whether or not something is legal
In the best case scenario lower courts will block it because of 'muh feels', only to eventually have the SC tell the lower courts to fuck off
 
Back