What happened is Alex Jones was asked to provide his text messages as evidence. His lawyers said it didn't exist, but then they sent evidence of it by accident to the lawyers representing the Sandy Hook families. Deceiving the court like that is a huge no-no. You can't do that.
Can I get a spoonfeed on where to find information on these legal games he was playing?
This would definitely get someone fucked in court. Still think $1 billion is way too high, but will look into this shit more.
She posted another video answering comments she go but took it and the original down before I could download it. Guess people were finding out where she was shopping at and car model and it made her reconsider being an attention whore.
It really isn't. The whole situation is fucked. Alex Jones had every right to question the things he did. There's a lot of sketchy things that went on after Sandy Hook and with the families and various charitable organizations and with the school building afterwards. Even then, Alex Jones has a decades long reputation as a conspiracy theory schizo retard. He is not a reputable news source. He is essentially a psycho schizo tabloid magazine and that's been his reputation for years prior to the lawsuit. Nobody takes him seriously and it's impossible to prove genuine damages as a result because his own credibility tarnished.
It really doesn't matter how long he's been there, agreeing with death threats/wishes against your boss is not a great path to job security.
Absolutely. It was basically down to: "Say anything we don't like and you'll get punished so severely that you may as well kill yourself. We can't give the death penalty for this offense, but we can sure approximate it."
He didn't, you can read the entire judgment against him online. Here's a rundown:
Just to be clear: I like Alex Jones. He is wildly entertaining. However, him and his lawyers can say whatever they like. The courts made it clear that Jones willingly withheld evidence. This also meant Jones lied under oath and got caught at it because he claimed the evidence didn't exist. Then his lawyers failed to declare certain evidence as part of client-attorney privilege. His lawyers were terrible and deserve a lot of the blame here.
I agree that it is an obviously excessive judgment that only exists as an albatross over the guy's neck.
I also agree that it was a political hitjob to take down Jones, but Jones and his lawyers got caught doing a bunch of dumb shit in court proceedings and it bit them in the ass.
Jones would have gotten a better outcome representing himself. His lawyers were a mixture of incompetent and too eager to please their client.Ffs who was his lawyer?
And so what? You act like this isn't an ordinary thing for courts. The lawyers don't always have evidence during discovery. It may not have been an accident. You can tell a judge one day that you don't have evidence, find said evidence, and send it to opposing lawyers. IANAL but I don't need to be know that narrative doesn't pass the smell test. It's discovery and things like that happen literally all the time.
What a schizo fucking retard. Fine, I can get behind a default judgement. You'll never sell me on Total Financial Death.
I guess I just hate the spineless of them ,the inability to actually understand and or question the narratives they have been told. But I truly despise normal faggot YouTubers people who regularly talk about whatever, games,movies etc but then they suddenly decide they have the chops to talk about politics and make the most retarded thing you will ever see in your life. I’ve seen so many YouTubers think they can jump into the world of politics only to crash and burn.
Sponsored by Bloitzhole
