US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: the aging locust., Hassou Tobi, Based Downie and 145 others
Click to expand...
Oilspill Battery said:
Its a filter dumbass, not a chasm. Its not meant to stop all cases, its meant to stop some of them by putting an additional hurdle.
Click to expand...
If forcing everyone to use tor to access porn is the solution, you're only gonna catch the really dumb folks. Which, might work I guess. Kids who grew up with smart phones have no idea how regular pcs work. Apparently.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird and marvlouslie
Oilspill Battery said:
That's contested and not really conclusive, otherwise using this logic you could 100% predict homosexuality based on brainscans which we can't do, so it doesn't really hold up.
Click to expand...
I never knew that it was contested, I just went based off my memory. The study I'm mentioning is probably an old one with a small sample size then.
 
The Wall of Ambition said:
I assume someone has already posted this but I want to give a shout out to Pew Research Center for publishing that Trump almost won Hispanics in 2024. I've been reading Reddit threads about it and the mald is legendary.

View attachment 7565812

Reddit is a website full of bots and white women with savior complexes. It's only good for a laugh.

I think there might not be a demographic in this country I love more than legal Hispanic immigrants. The ones I've met have all been based. Wish they'd spend more time learning English, though.
Click to expand...
"They claim the people are criminals for being here illegally" YES IF YOU DO SOMETHING ILLEGAL YOU'RE A CRIMINAL BY DEFINITION. This makes me quite mad.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Shazam, spiritofamermaid, indomitable snowman and 6 others
tehpope said:
TOR is a lot simpler to use than making a convincing fake id. You just need to download the TOR browser on your desktop or phone. Then know the tor address to use.

The problem is not porn. its parents not parenting their kids. Either because they won't, are too lazy to, or have no time to.

For internet access, there's various free and paid DNS services that allow you to block porn and other sites you don't want your kids accessing. you can lock down settings on android and ios.
Click to expand...
The majority of teenagers aren't white and will never figure out this shit.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: WhiteBoySummer, Smar Mijou, spiritofamermaid and 5 others
CaliforniaRaisin said:
Ok. But the differences between those two hurdles... if we're using an actual jumping hurdle as an analogy, is one is 2 inches off the ground and the other is 2 feet. Dumbass.
Click to expand...
Its easy for you. For average phone addicted zoomer that can't even operate a PC not so much. Yeah no shit you can go through again.

Again fucking braindead argument. No law ever stopped anyone from doing anything. Should we abolish homicide laws because people can just ignore them?
 
  • Dumb
  • Agree
Reactions: CIS White Droid and Verpa Teutonica Ingens
pwnest injun said:
f someone wants to challenge one of Trump's EOs, they have to go before a court and argue their case. EACH INDIVIDUAL. So, every TDA sleaze getting deported under the Alien Enemies act has to try and hire a lawyer. Some Guatamalan criminal alien tries to pop out a beanie baby? Gonna need a lawyer.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. They can always class action if they meet the requirements.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fetch!
gay porn is the best porn said:
I never said that it was impossible that he actually meant that retard, maybe if you actually read my entire message you would realize that faggot.
Click to expand...
you are running defense for a blatant anti white politician by trying to minimize and soften the perception of his anti white policies
you are either brown or a race traitor
either way kys
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shazam, Smar Mijou, Accidental Racism and 4 others
Point and Laugh said:
I am so excited for the ramping up of Trump’s EO’s Commie’s BTFO by the Supreme Court today. Waiting for the story to be featured. A huge win!
Click to expand...
The Muslim gay story ruling was already featured. Probably not gonna feature another political story.
 
CaliforniaRaisin said:
Ok. But the differences between those two hurdles... if we're using an actual jumping hurdle as an analogy, is one is 2 inches off the ground and the other is 2 feet. Dumbass.
Click to expand...
I have a gut feeling that you're going to teach kids how to access porn.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Verpa Teutonica Ingens, gay porn is the best porn, Oilspill Battery and 1 other person
DumbDude43 said:
you are running defense for a blatant anti white politician by trying to minimize and soften the perception of his anti white policies
you are either brown or a race traitor
either way kys
Click to expand...
I'm pointing out the possibility of it being a miscommunication and gave a good explanation for why that could be the case (his lack of education). You're just being retarded and trying to call me brown because I give people the benefit of the doubt.
kill yourself tranny
 
Blewberry Nausea said:
The Muslim gay story ruling was already featured. Probably not gonna feature another political story.
Click to expand...
No this is the ruling filed on the birthright citizenship EO but the ruling is on the district courts authority to issue nationwide injunctions. Totally different case! This is much bigger and a huge win for Trump. I posted it in A&N.

Edit: Link to the post
 
Safir said:
Does anyone know how the justices go about writing opinions, the formal process I mean? This is the Opinion of the Court and it references Jackson's dissent, so the dissent had existed before this part of the Opinion was written. But some form of the Opinion must have existed before, for her to dissent. So how many of these back and forth iterations can they do? Has there ever been a decision that was basically two lolcows shitting up a forum thread, split between two documents? "NO U" "YES ME"
Click to expand...
The justices have conference after a day’s oral arguments. They go into a room with just them. The newest justice has the duty of opening the door for people who knock (this is true, and Justice Stevens said it was great after years of being on duty that a new guy was confirmed so he didn’t have to do it anymore).

They go around the table, usually starting with the chief and then by seniority. They give their takes. Then there’s a vote on what to do. The chief, if he’s in the majority, assigns the case. If not, the senior most justice assigns the case. It works that way for people in dissent, too, if a coherent group of dissenters forms.

After that, it’s weeks to months of writing. Memos may be written and distributed as necessary. When the majority is done, other judges decide whether to join or not. They may have issues and suggest changes. Sometimes it’s unconditional. They also begin sending around concurring opinions and dissents. The same process works for those—people can join or ask for changes. Revisions are then circulated in the same way to address points brought up by other justices. It can ping pong back and forth for a while with that. Usually it ends when there’s nothing more to say, or they believe the other point is so dumb it’s not worth responding to.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Apple Sneed, spiritofamermaid, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back