US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They piss away the money on shit like "oh I need a car and a fancy apartment, I can't live in the dorms."
Outside of places like Manhattan, dorms are a rip off that charge more than it would cost to get a private studio apartment for a tiny shared bedroom with no kitchen or bathroom.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Davis
Outside of places like Manhattan, dorms are a rip off that charge more than it would cost to get a private studio apartment for a tiny shared bedroom with no kitchen or bathroom.
Not if the schools want to get student loan money -- make them adhere to section 8 housing limits for how much they can charge the government for the dorms.
 
You see, there's no real auditing to student loans. So as long as you maintain the minimum class requirement to be classified as a student, it doesn't really matter what you do with the rest of the money
Slight powerlevel but as someone who works in higher ed this is largely correct. There is virtually no auditing being done outside of "Well is the student enrolled?". Most schools will push through anything as long as it does not break fed regs, because there is simply no incentive on either side to call foul. The schools can charge whatever because they know students can get insane loans at virtually no risk. Its a dumb system
 
How in the world did he get them to agree to this??? Yeah he probably left some details out.
It seems so one-sided to be a detriment. Maybe a ton of shit that was previously very expensive to the Vietnamese might become affordable now, but it seems just as likely to undercut the Vietnamese themselves whilst also making it far harder to export into their primary sales market. Yeah, some details had to have been left out. Like, I'm pretty sure the China tariffs have electronics as an exclusion on them, something to that affect - gotta be.
 
So, what about people who go to community college first, get their A.A, then go to a university? those tend to not flunk out as much vs someone who goes to a 4 year right off the bat. Also, Pell grants already cover trade schools as well as colleges and universities.
That’d probably be fine. We just need some way of filtering out the people who are without a doubt not going to finish college so they don’t waste taxpayer dollars. My idea isn’t meant to be punitive it’s really just meant be a filter
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Davis
I quite like the idea, at face value at least, of schools themselves handling the loan systems. If the school itself is the one lending the money and dealing with repayment and such, they have a incentive to keep costs lower, so the loans they give are smaller.
Probably a bunch of issues with this, but it seems better again at face value than my tax dollars going to random bullshit degrees.

The school I work at does short term in house loans. It really forces our admin to look at costs more, so its better than nothing
 
Click on the "bankruptcy" link under the list of ways to discharge student loan debt.

Thank you. It looks like the bankruptcy only applies to FAFSA. If you have a loan from a private bank, I assume you are still fucked.
If there's no government guarantee, there's no loan program. It's been abolished.
Funny how that works. It's almost like the government shouldn't put itself in a position to bail out banks handing out risky loans.
 
The Democrats trotted out AOC to condemn Trump's OBBB:

View attachment 7588960
Democrats spend all their years in power doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of Americans. Republicans get voted in with a mandate to do something, and Democrats scream that they are ruining the country.

Also, she asks if getting more money personally is worth losing health care potentially. For most people if the choice is between food for their kids or healthcare, they will pick the food for their kids.
 
Isn't it difficult to get rid of American debt on a conceptual level because so many people have financial interests tied to America having its debt because so long as the ceiling is increased, it's a safe investment with ever-returning yields, but paying it off effectively decreases the value of the bond through lowering its overall yields?
 
Isn't it difficult to get rid of American debt on a conceptual level because so many people have financial interests tied to America having its debt because so long as the ceiling is increased, it's a safe investment with ever-returning yields, but paying it off effectively decreases the value of the bond through lowering its overall yields?
Getting rid of debt under our current monetary policy framework is never going to happen anyhow. And there is no political will on either side to actually fix the issues causing unnecessary debt. It's kinda unfixable in our current political system, so its kinda w/e yano
 
Back