US US port strike by 45,000 dockworkers is all but certain to begin at midnight - A Rather Unique October Surprise

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

L A

1727718692641.png

1 of 3 |
FILE - Shipping containers are stacked in the Port of New York and New Jersey in Elizabeth, N.J., May 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)
1727718719893.png
2 of 3 |
FILE - In this photo provided by the Georgia Ports Authority, Griff Lynch, President and CEO of the Georgia Ports Authority, provides an update on the Port of Savannah’s progress and future trajectory to 1,200 leaders from the maritime, supply chain, business and political sectors Thursday, Oct. 12, 2023, during the annual State of the Port event in Savannah, Ga. (Stephen B. Morton/Georgia Ports Authority via AP, File)
1727718744388.png
3 of 3 |
FILE - Containers are moved at the Port of New York and New Jersey in Elizabeth, N.J., on June 30, 2021. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)

Updated 12:13 PM GMT-5, September 30, 2024
NEW YORK (AP) — The union representing U.S. dockworkers signaled that 45,000 members will walk off the job at midnight, kicking off a massive strike likely to shut down ports across the East and Gulf coasts.
The coming work stoppage threatens to significantly snarl the nation’s supply chain, potentially leading to higher prices and delays for households and businesses if it drags on for weeks. That’s because the strike by members of the International Longshoremen’s Association could cause 36 ports — which handle roughly half of the goods shipped into and out of the U.S. — to shutter operations.
ILA confirmed over the weekend that its members would hit the picket lines at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. In a Monday update, the union continued to blame the United States Maritime Alliance, which represents the ports, for continuing to “to block the path” towards an agreement before the contract deadline.

“The Ocean Carriers represented by USMX want to enjoy rich billion-dollar profits that they are making in 2024, while they offer ILA Longshore Workers an unacceptable wage package that we reject,” ILA said in a prepared statement. “ILA longshore workers deserve to be compensated for the important work they do keeping American commerce moving and growing.”

ILA also accused the shippers of “killing their customers” with sizeable price increases for full containers over recent weeks. The union said that this will result increased costs for American consumers.

The Associated Press reached out to a USMX spokesperson for comment.
If drawn out, the strike would led would force businesses to pay shippers for delays and cause some goods to arrive late for peak holiday shopping season — potentially impacting delivery of anything from toys or artificial Christmas trees, to cars, coffee and vegetables. Americans could also face higher prices as retailers feel the supply squeeze.

ILA members are demanding higher wages and a total ban on the automation of cranes, gates and container-moving trucks used in the loading or unloading of freight.
The coming strike by the ILA workers will be the first by the union since 1977.
If a strike were deemed a danger to U.S. economic health, President Joe Biden could, under the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act, seek a court order for an 80-day cooling-off period. This would suspend the strike.
All eyes are on what, if any, action the adminstration might take — particularly just weeks ahead of a tight presidential election. But Biden has signaled that he will not exercise this power.
During an exchange with reporters on Sunday, Biden said “no” when asked if he planned to intervene in the potential work stoppage.

“Because it’s collective bargaining, I don’t believe in Taft-Hartley,” Biden said referring to a 1947 law that allows the president to intervene in labor disputes that threaten the nation’s health or safety.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When people with nothing jobs start demanding 77% raises over 6 years, yes I will crack down on them. Blue or white collar alike. However, especially union guys. Why? Because there's a Mafia style institution behind them.
There's a mafia behind every shitty DMV clerk and IRS jackoff too but I don't see you pissed at them. He'll, nobody would even notice if they quit or went on strike but the whole world notices when these "useless" dockworkers tell you to fuck off.
 
Unions are a fucking joke, and have far outlived their usefulness. Yes, at one time they did benefit the common worker, but now only benefit those in charge.
Especially in this instance. They were offered 50% raises and the union said no. They're demanding job guarantees from automation as if that will somehow stop them gimping the system. These people will find a way anyway to justify their existence regardless of how much automation comes in.
 
Especially in this instance. They were offered 50% raises and the union said no. They're demanding job guarantees from automation as if that will somehow stop them gimping the system. These people will find a way anyway to justify their existence regardless of how much automation comes in.
The ILA recently lowered their demanded raise from 77% to 61%, so it looks like their main grievance is the possible automation of the ports
 
There's a mafia behind every shitty DMV clerk and IRS jackoff too but I don't see you pissed at them.
the entire A&N board is a seethe session about the evils of government corruption and the public workers that love to stomp on the rights of the public. hatred of lazy workers that add a net negative to the fabric of society is built in
 
The ILA recently lowered their demanded raise from 77% to 61%, so it looks like their main grievance is the possible automation of the ports
Except they can't stop automation of the ports. The reality also is, they can't fully automate the ports. These are people who have found ways to maintain their jobs through every possible technological innovation on the planet. They'll find a way to survive again. They always find ways to justify their existence. That's how these jobs work.
 
the entire A&N board is a seethe session about the evils of government corruption and the public workers that love to stomp on the rights of the public. hatred of lazy workers that add a net negative to the fabric of society is built in
True. But would them going on strike even make the news? No, You wouldn't notice. Yet, while they're massively useless and totally irrelevant, the Longshoremen have the ease of their jobs held against them constantly as if they're useless and spoiled even though them walking off got the East Coast shut down.
Except they can't stop automation of the ports. The reality also is, they can't fully automate the ports. These are people who have found ways to maintain their jobs through every possible technological innovation on the planet. They'll find a way to survive again. They always find ways to justify their existence. That's how these jobs work.
If you give up an inch on an issue like automation then you're guaranteed to lose a mile. Nobody in their right mind should ever advocate for their job to fall under that scythe to any degree and you're looking at a union doing what a union should do.
 
If you give up an inch on an issue like automation then you're guaranteed to lose a mile. Nobody in their right mind should ever advocate for their job to fall under that scythe to any degree and you're looking at a union doing what a union should do
I don't think you have any clue how the ports work.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji
I don't think you have any clue how the ports work.
I know that the moment they went on strike, everybody noticed and everybody got scared or pissed. That doesnt happen with people who are useless at their jobs or otherwise don't fill an important niche. If it makes this much news that they went on strike then I'd argue they're pretty important to our economy and should have their concerns addressed.
 
I know that the moment they went on strike, everybody noticed and everybody got scared or pissed. That doesnt happen with people who are useless at their jobs or otherwise don't fill an important niche. If it makes this much news that they went on strike then I'd argue they're pretty important to our economy and should have their concerns addressed.
Important doesn't mean we have to like it when some guido wannabe who makes $900k a year and owns a yacht starts fucking threatening everyone; and uses Corona as a crutch about "my guys were out here working." So were fastfood as others, and they don't make the money or have the protections you do, you massive fucking faggot. Then come to find out that the strike isn't money as much as it is stopping automation/advancing the ports to help make things more efficient; that doesn't draw sympathy, it then becomes obvious you're running a protection racket, and when you threaten others over your racket, no one should be happy about it.
 
Important doesn't mean we have to like it when some guido wannabe who makes $900k a year and owns a yacht starts fucking threatening everyone; and uses Corona as a crutch about "my guys were out here working." So were fastfood as others, and they don't make the money or have the protections you do, you massive fucking faggot. Then come to find out that the strike isn't money as much as it is stopping automation/advancing the ports to help make things more efficient; that doesn't draw sympathy, it then becomes obvious you're running a protection racket, and when you threaten others over your racket, no one should be happy about it.
I didn't say people should be happy about it outside the union. A strike should be painful and if that union rep can get his workers the good conditions and the pay they desire then he can get his weird yacht and statues all he likes. You deserve commendations for good work and if you don't flex your importance and fight hard for your interests, then you will end up cut down and underpaid just like the fast food workers you brought up and that goes double if you live on the east coast.
 
That guy is a literal mafioso.

I grew up in a port town and my dad knew all the longshoremen in our area. All of them were complete pieces of shit and drunks. Yet they pulled $100k/year even in a backwater port running forklifts and whatnot.

They were all faggots and would have been total losers if they didn't squirm their way into the longshoremen's union. You should not have any sympathy for them whatsoever.

One moment that sticks out in my mind? A longshoreman drove a truck owned by the union to a part of the port where one of the companies that used it stored fuel for their boats. He filled an entire like tanker pickup truck with fuel, waved at the cameras as he stole it then drove it back to his house and put it in a private tank he had. Think like a big propane tank kind of thing but for gasoline. Not uncommon in rural America.

The unions response to this was to sick the union legal firm on the company to the extent that the company just dropped the issue despite overwhelming evidence.
 
A strike should be painful and if that union rep can get his workers the good conditions and the pay they desire then he can get his weird yacht and statues all he likes.
They're turning down an over 50% pay raise to not bring the ports up to date and be more efficient; that's not being cutdown and underpaid, it's holding everyone hostage to keep your protection racket going. You can't sell me on "We're so damn fucking important to the USA" while also saying "Fuck you, we ain't gonna modernize." It's not about the paycheck, it's about not modernizing; so they're gonna hold the entire east coast ports hostage, because you want to be sure you can get all your corrupt buddies well paying jobs? Cool, bust the fucking union, impound the fag's yacht, and come up with a plan to modernize the ports.
 
Back