User 'Nykytyne3' / Blinski / Joe Muchlinski rants about his own parents in random threads - Took DXM, broke his brain, now gibbering about pedo conspiracies.

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

Is it possible that some adults have produced children purely in order to satisfy a pedophilic sexual perversion?

Is it possible that robotripping broke your brain?

 

[Nykytyne3]

Is it possible that robotripping broke your brain?

I'm willing to entertain that hypothesis, but first you're gonna have to address my arguments on their merits rather than just dribble "hE cRaZy" out of your putrid, herpes-pockmarked lips

 

[Recoil]

putrid, herpes-pockmarked lips

It's a fucking cold sore, you asshole

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

I'm willing to entertain that hypothesis, but first you're gonna have to address my arguments on their merits rather than just dribble "hE cRaZy" out of your putrid, herpes-pockmarked lips

I am addressing your arguments on their merits; they completely lack any, and are clearly you spitballing hypotheses and then treating them as the gold standard of truth.
For example, your "molestation makes you gay" theory is based entirely on Jungian psychological schema, when there are actual neurological differences in the homosexual brain that can be detected by MRI scanning, which (obviously) suggests an innate, biological basis for homosexual attraction. There is also clear evidence that external factors such as the age of the mother (older mothers are more likely to have homosexual children, regardless of the age of the father) and birth order (every subsequent male child a mother has has an increasingly higher likelihood of being homosexual) are correlated with homosexuality. These are things you would have to explain in your theory, along with (since you believe that being molested even once, when you would be incapable of remembering it- to wit, infancy- turns you gay) why many victims of child molestation are not homosexual.

 

[Nykytyne3]

I am addressing your arguments on their merits; they completely lack any, and are clearly you spitballing hypotheses and then treating them as the gold standard of truth.
For example, your "molestation makes you gay" theory is based entirely on Jungian psychological schema, when there are actual neurological differences in the homosexual brain that can be detected by MRI scanning, which (obviously) suggests an innate, biological basis for homosexual attraction. There is also clear evidence that external factors such as the age of the mother (older mothers are more likely to have homosexual children, regardless of the age of the father) and birth order (every subsequent male child a mother has has an increasingly higher likelihood of being homosexual) are correlated with homosexuality. These are things you would have to explain in your theory, along with (since you believe that being molested even once, when you would be incapable of remembering it- to wit, infancy- turns you gay) why many victims of child molestation are not homosexual.

Older mothers are more likely to have pervert fathers. The youngest male child will likely be the target of a child molester for a longer time than his brothers, since the molester will move on to a new son whenever one is born.

 

[Nykytyne3]

Older mothers are more likely to have pervert fathers. The youngest male child will likely be the target of a child molester for a longer time than his brothers, since the molester will move on to a new son whenever one is born.

Edit: pervert *husbands*, not fathers--(though due to the intergenerational cycle of abuse, they likely will also have pervert fathers.)

 

[Nykytyne3]

I'm also thinking over the hypothesis that autism may be caused by infant sexual abuse. That would bring my theory full circle.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

Older mothers are more likely to have pervert fathers. The youngest male child will likely be the target of a child molester for a longer time than his brothers, since the molester will move on to a new son whenever one is born.

I knew you would say that: homosexuals are as likely to come from single-mother households, single-father households, or two-parent households, which suggests the presence or absence of a father of any kind, molesting or otherwise, has no significant impact.
Now, would you like to actually address the points that you can't just handwave?:
- If homosexuality is exclusively psychological, why are their neurological differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals that can be detected with an MRI scan?
- If being molested once when you cannot remember it makes you homosexual, how can people who have endured years of systemic sexual abuse remain heterosexual?

I'm also thinking over the hypothesis that autism may be caused by infant sexual abuse. That would bring my theory full circle.

And now you've really outed yourself as stupid. Autism is a neurological condition characterized by an excess of synaptic connections in the brain, lower counts of mirror neurons, and delayed development in the portions of the brain used to filter sensory data. We have MRI and CAT scan data that shows this. We have the brains of autistic people that have been donated to science that have been dissected, so we can physically see these differences. Do you have an explanation about how molestation can literally cause the human brain to fundamentally develop in a radically different way?

 

[Nykytyne3]

I knew you would say that: homosexuals are as likely to come from single-mother households, single-father households, or two-parent households, which suggests the presence or absence of a father of any kind, molesting or otherwise, has no significant impact.
Now, would you like to actually address the points that you can't just handwave?:
- If homosexuality is exclusively psychological, why are their neurological differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals that can be detected with an MRI scan?
- If being molested once when you cannot remember it makes you homosexual, how can people who have endured years of systemic sexual abuse remain heterosexual?


And now you've really outed yourself as stupid. Autism is a neurological condition characterized by an excess of synaptic connections in the brain, lower counts of mirror neurons, and delayed development in the portions of the brain used to filter sensory data. We have MRI and CAT scan data that shows this. We have the brains of autistic people that have been donated to science that have been dissected, so we can physically see these differences. Do you have an explanation about how molestation can literally cause the human brain to fundamentally develop in a radically different way?

(1) A mother will flee an abusive husband/boyfriend, creating a single-mother household, but the damage is already done. The baby was already abused. As for other types of households, the dad is right there, so he is free to abuse the kid.

(2) Abusing an infant causes developmental differences in the brain.

(3) The process of sexual grooming is not flawless. If a person is abused, but manages to disconnect from the abusive environment and stay away from older "daddy" predators who would groom them, they may escape the homosexuality trap.

(4) You're probably right about the autism thing. More likely, symptoms of childhood sexual abuse in adults can resemble autism in some people, but autism itself is a separate thing.

 

[whatintheheck]

In matters of taste, there is no dispute... but good lord Blinski, based on what you have posted in your alt youtube channel, your taste in 'music' leaves a lot to be desired. link

Also, you clearly are still suffering from paranoid delusions. I don't think it's possible for anyone to interact with you meaningfully when you just shoot down any claims that are contrary to what your mind has made up. It seems obvious that 3 weeks involuntarily committed in a psychiatric facility still wasn't enough to un-fuck your headspace. Lay off the OTC drugs and alcohol, as you've definitely and clearly demonstrated that DXM *doesn't* reduce autistm. I'd suggest laying low, as continued online idiocy is going to make you progressively unemployable.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

(1) A mother will flee an abusive husband/boyfriend, creating a single-mother household, but the damage is already done. The baby was already abused. As for other types of households, the dad is right there, so he is free to abuse the kid.

(2) Abusing an infant causes developmental differences in the brain.

(3) The process of sexual grooming is not flawless. If a person is abused, but manages to disconnect from the abusive environment and stay away from older "daddy" predators who would groom them, they may escape the homosexuality trap.

(4) You're probably right about the autism thing. More likely, symptoms of childhood sexual abuse in adults can resemble autism in some people, but autism itself is a separate thing.

1. What about households where the father was never in the picture to begin with? Did he magically turn invisible to molest the child?
2. Would you care to cite a medical study about that? Or is this something that you're just "sure" of?

Let me take things out a level: what would it take for you to believe that homosexuality was not caused exclusively by child molestation? Is there a level of proof sufficient to convince you that you are wrong?

 

[Eli Whitney]

I don't plan on making any more videos on these subjects. I don't gave anything more to say. You can expect either no more videos at all, or possibly some new videos talking about something entirely different.

Hey Blinski. I had reached out to you privately before you went on your vacation. Good to see things are going well for you. I just wanted to reiterate, while I can't say I'm sold on your grand theory which unifies classical and quantum homosexuality, I do think you do some really great videos. You have a lot to say and you say it pretty well. I think you can probably help a lot of people struggling with some of the same things you have. It would be a shame if you stopped doing videos entirely.

 

[Nykytyne3]

I've learned that people close to me are monitoring this board. Therefore, I need to limit my posts here and be careful with my choice of words. As for whether I'm willing to consider the possibility that my theories are wrong, sure. They're just theories. With that, I'll sign off for now with a little mandolin tune that I recorded today. A cover of Jesse Stewart's cover of Donnie Dumphy. To be clear, I'm not drinking again; I just really love this song:

Cold Beer

Just having some fun.

www.youtube.com

 

[Spunt]

Yeah dude, you still have a great opportunity to use your experiences and your talents to help others. You're a genuinely interesting and cool dude and I don't detect any animosity towards you from KF - and if KF don't think you suck, you're in an elite club.

But my advice would be that if you are going to return to your theories on sexuality, be it in video or text form, that you go out and find corroborating evidence for what you say. Find some studies that back up your theories, otherwise you're just another guy with an opinion. That's why people are calling you out - you're theorycrafting out loud, then when people call bullshit, you accuse them of not addressing your argument. The problem is that without any data, it's not really possible to address your argument because we don't know the basis for it. I could say that the moon is just a hologram projected by the Illuminati, then when people call me a sped I can't say "you haven't addressed my theory" - because my theory has no evidence to back it up other than it's just theoretically possible. If I found the Illuminati's giant moon projector, or someone did some science saying the moon doesn't seem to be made of rock, then people might take my ideas seriously, but not before. Big claims need big evidence.

 

[Nykytyne3]

Yeah dude, you still have a great opportunity to use your experiences and your talents to help others. You're a genuinely interesting and cool dude and I don't detect any animosity towards you from KF - and if KF don't think you suck, you're in an elite club.

But my advice would be that if you are going to return to your theories on sexuality, be it in video or text form, that you go out and find corroborating evidence for what you say. Find some studies that back up your theories, otherwise you're just another guy with an opinion. That's why people are calling you out - you're theorycrafting out loud, then when people call bullshit, you accuse them of not addressing your argument. The problem is that without any data, it's not really possible to address your argument because we don't know the basis for it. I could say that the moon is just a hologram projected by the Illuminati, then when people call me a sped I can't say "you haven't addressed my theory" - because my theory has no evidence to back it up other than it's just theoretically possible. If I found the Illuminati's giant moon projector, or someone did some science saying the moon doesn't seem to be made of rock, then people might take my ideas seriously, but not before. Big claims need big evidence.

Thanks for the kind words. You're obviously correct amount my lack-of-evidence problem; I feel a little like Freud, spouting theories that can't be proved or disproved. It's hard, though, because I'm just one guy with essentially no resources except the internet and my own experiences and observations, and I don't even really know what kind of evidence would suffice to make my claims more tenable.

As for helping other people, that's all I ever wanted to do. Unfortunately, I'm about to lose my law license due to the DXM use, and I lost my job, so at the moment I'm just scrambling to find work so I don't lose my apartment and car. I'm applying to work at an Amazon warehouse just to pay the bills until I'm back on my feet. Until then, I can't afford to help anyone but myself.

 

[whatintheheck]

Thanks for the kind words. You're obviously correct amount my lack-of-evidence problem; I feel a little like Freud, spouting theories that can't be proved or disproved. It's hard, though, because I'm just one guy with essentially no resources except the internet and my own experiences and observations, and I don't even really know what kind of evidence would suffice to make my claims more tenable.

As for helping other people, that's all I ever wanted to do. Unfortunately, I'm about to lose my law license due to the DXM use, and I lost my job, so at the moment I'm just scrambling to find work so I don't lose my apartment and car. I'm applying to work at an Amazon warehouse just to pay the bills until I'm back on my feet. Until then, I can't afford to help anyone but myself.

You're going to have a nearly impossible time finding/getting a new job if you continue posting online like this, especially with your crackpot theories that are poorly received. You really ought to reconsider posting at all, or if you do, doing so *completely* anonymously -- things really seemed to go sideways for you once you outed your identity (which is still confusing as to why you chose to do this, considering how interested in anonymity you were previously). The last thing you'd want is for your name to be google-able and link to a lolcow thread that documents your absurd schizoid theorizing and paranoid drug-induced accusations. A law firm in particular doesn't want to hire someone who is prone to going off on the deep-end unexpectedly. The fact that your Facebook *still* isn't set to private indicates that you're not thinking straight -- but we also can tell that you're still mentally fucked up since you're still making baseless accusations towards your dad and openly talking about your sister's supposed abuse. None of this seems plausible, but even if it were, it's not the kind of thing that you should be talking about so openly on the internet. Clearly your family is upset about the whole ordeal, seeing as they've had you committed *and* apparently had a temporary restraining order levied against you.

You seriously ought to consider getting seen by a legitimate psychiatrist so you can get a diagnosis. I mentioned before that I had a relative who like you was a high functioning lawyer, but then developed schizophrenia in his late 20s/early 30s. Long story short, it ruined his career and relationship with friends and family. I am simply a dude on the internet who's only watching what's happening from a distance, but there's enough similarities that it seems possible that the same thing is happening with you.

It'd be in your best interest to protect yourself via medical diagnosis -- which could allow for you to be put on medical disability. Otherwise, you're just going to be completely fucked over and *still* be unemployable. Plus, if what's happening to you actually is burgeoning schizophrenia or some other mental health condition, maybe you can get it treated to the extent that at least with medication and/or therapy, you can maintain a relatively normal life. There are plenty of people who've had temporary mental health crises which were stumbling blocks in their careers, but who were able to get professional help and get back on track. But this is only possible if you take the appropriate steps necessary.

 

[Nykytyne3]

You're going to have a nearly impossible time finding/getting a new job if you continue posting online like this, especially with your crackpot theories that are poorly received. You really ought to reconsider posting at all, or if you do, doing so *completely* anonymously -- things really seemed to go sideways for you once you outed your identity (which is still confusing as to why you chose to do this, considering how interested in anonymity you were previously). The last thing you'd want is for your name to be google-able and link to a lolcow thread that documents your absurd schizoid theorizing and paranoid drug-induced accusations. A law firm in particular doesn't want to hire someone who is prone to going off on the deep-end unexpectedly. The fact that your Facebook *still* isn't set to private indicates that you're not thinking straight -- but we also can tell that you're still mentally fucked up since you're still making baseless accusations towards your dad and openly talking about your sister's supposed abuse. None of this seems plausible, but even if it were, it's not the kind of thing that you should be talking about so openly on the internet. Clearly your family is upset about the whole ordeal, seeing as they've had you committed *and* apparently had a temporary restraining order levied against you.

You seriously ought to consider getting seen by a legitimate psychiatrist so you can get a diagnosis. I mentioned before that I had a relative who like you was a high functioning lawyer, but then developed schizophrenia in his late 20s/early 30s. Long story short, it ruined his career and relationship with friends and family. I am simply a dude on the internet who's only watching what's happening from a distance, but there's enough similarities that it seems possible that the same thing is happening with you.

It'd be in your best interest to protect yourself via medical diagnosis -- which could allow for you to be put on medical disability. Otherwise, you're just going to be completely fucked over and *still* be unemployable. Plus, if what's happening to you actually is burgeoning schizophrenia or some other mental health condition, maybe you can get it treated to the extent that at least with medication and/or therapy, you can maintain a relatively normal life. There are plenty of people who've had temporary mental health crises which were stumbling blocks in their careers, but who were able to get professional help and get back on track. But this is only possible if you take the appropriate steps necessary.

I'm done making

You're going to have a nearly impossible time finding/getting a new job if you continue posting online like this, especially with your crackpot theories that are poorly received. You really ought to reconsider posting at all, or if you do, doing so *completely* anonymously -- things really seemed to go sideways for you once you outed your identity (which is still confusing as to why you chose to do this, considering how interested in anonymity you were previously). The last thing you'd want is for your name to be google-able and link to a lolcow thread that documents your absurd schizoid theorizing and paranoid drug-induced accusations. A law firm in particular doesn't want to hire someone who is prone to going off on the deep-end unexpectedly. The fact that your Facebook *still* isn't set to private indicates that you're not thinking straight -- but we also can tell that you're still mentally fucked up since you're still making baseless accusations towards your dad and openly talking about your sister's supposed abuse. None of this seems plausible, but even if it were, it's not the kind of thing that you should be talking about so openly on the internet. Clearly your family is upset about the whole ordeal, seeing as they've had you committed *and* apparently had a temporary restraining order levied against you.

You seriously ought to consider getting seen by a legitimate psychiatrist so you can get a diagnosis. I mentioned before that I had a relative who like you was a high functioning lawyer, but then developed schizophrenia in his late 20s/early 30s. Long story short, it ruined his career and relationship with friends and family. I am simply a dude on the internet who's only watching what's happening from a distance, but there's enough similarities that it seems possible that the same thing is happening with you.

It'd be in your best interest to protect yourself via medical diagnosis -- which could allow for you to be put on medical disability. Otherwise, you're just going to be completely fucked over and *still* be unemployable. Plus, if what's happening to you actually is burgeoning schizophrenia or some other mental health condition, maybe you can get it treated to the extent that at least with medication and/or therapy, you can maintain a relatively normal life. There are plenty of people who've had temporary mental health crises which were stumbling blocks in their careers, but who were able to get professional help and get back on track. But this is only possible if you take the appropriate steps necessary.

You should inform Will Mattson about the importance of anonymity too.

 

[Nykytyne3]

This inability to edit is really grinding my gears.

 

[Eli Whitney]

Thanks for the kind words. You're obviously correct amount my lack-of-evidence problem; I feel a little like Freud, spouting theories that can't be proved or disproved. It's hard, though, because I'm just one guy with essentially no resources except the internet and my own experiences and observations, and I don't even really know what kind of evidence would suffice to make my claims more tenable.

As for helping other people, that's all I ever wanted to do. Unfortunately, I'm about to lose my law license due to the DXM use, and I lost my job, so at the moment I'm just scrambling to find work so I don't lose my apartment and car. I'm applying to work at an Amazon warehouse just to pay the bills until I'm back on my feet. Until then, I can't afford to help anyone but myself.

I’m not fully up to speed on all the details but when you say DXM use do you mean like getting high on cough syrup?

 

[whatintheheck]

I’m not fully up to speed on all the details but when you say DXM use do you mean like getting high on cough syrup?

Exactly, dextromethorphan is the active ingredient in over the counter cough syrup. According to online articles, when taken in a high enough dose it can cause effects similar to other dissociative drugs like ketamine.

Blinksi must have come across this study, or a similar one like it as he had mentioned DXM’s effect on autism in an earlier post before things went down: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16134036/

The claim is that DXM could help alleviate symptoms of autism and/or generalized anxiety. However, this is dubious at best, and clearly overdoing it can lead to bad side effects.