- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
You are weak, and I am strong.
No you aren't, you're a weird, mentally ill, gibbering loony power leveling on a forum for laughing at crazies like you, for what reason, nobody knows.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are weak, and I am strong.
As much as we'd like it to be otherwise, there's often no reasoning with delusional people.I think the saddest part of this, aside from what might become of Blinski's job prospects, is how he's treated people who've come to him with genuine heartfelt advice and he's completely shunned them as part of his crusade against a secret cabal of pedos who want to turn people gay.
Like there has been some really good posts where people have opened up to him and it just...seems to go nowhere. It's a little heartbreaking.
We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.As much as we'd like it to be otherwise, there's often no reasoning with delusional people.
@Nykytyne3 I asked you this a while ago, and don't remember if you answered: is there any threshold of evidence that would make you change your mind about this whole "most/all forms of queer shit is caused by pedophiles, and also almost every single adult male is a pedophile" thing?
We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.
Idk how to have people call in. I'm not gonna give out my phone numberHow are we doing on that call in show? Really looking forward to that.
Also, I'm well aware of the dangers of running a call-in show. I've seen how 4chan operates.How are we doing on that call in show? Really looking forward to that.
You could always make a throwaway gmail and use Hangouts or Skype.Also, I'm well aware of the dangers of running a call-in show. I've seen how 4chan operates.
Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.
My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.
In addition, if something is unfalsifiable and unprovable, it is an article of pure faith. You are trying to preach what you yourself admit to seeing as an article of faith without even trying to convert anyone, instead proclaiming anyone who so much as questions you as being a pedophile. You are no better than the evangelicals you rant against.
And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.
In addition, if something is unfalsifiable and unprovable, it is an article of pure faith. You are trying to preach what you yourself admit to seeing as an article of faith without even trying to convert anyone, instead proclaiming anyone who so much as questions you as being a pedophile. You are no better than the evangelicals you rant against.
Yes, because the problem isn't that you're incorrectly using scientific jargon in an attempt to look smarter than you are, it's that we're all just brainlets unable to keep up with your level 9,000 galaxy brain.And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.
How about you start by talking with one other person who can corroborate your story? Someone other than you to talk about this idea who was turned gay by molestation.My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.
So it's either autism or narcissism, imo.
I don't see why not. Studies show a large number of transgender people have personality disorders, literature on AGP claims that huge numbers of them are narcissists, and a history of substance abuse hugely increases the likelihood.Is autistic narcissism a thing? Or narcissists who are autistic?
I never said you were. It was just illustrative.I'm not gonna mass shoot anyone, for God's sake.
My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.
Then you don't have a theory. You have a bauble.And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.