User 'Nykytyne3' / Blinski / Joe Muchlinski rants about his own parents in random threads - Took DXM, broke his brain, now gibbering about pedo conspiracies.

for what reason, nobody knows.
tenor.gif

💊💉🧪🧴
 
I think the saddest part of this, aside from what might become of Blinski's job prospects, is how he's treated people who've come to him with genuine heartfelt advice and he's completely shunned them as part of his crusade against a secret cabal of pedos who want to turn people gay.

Like there has been some really good posts where people have opened up to him and it just...seems to go nowhere. It's a little heartbreaking.
 
I think the saddest part of this, aside from what might become of Blinski's job prospects, is how he's treated people who've come to him with genuine heartfelt advice and he's completely shunned them as part of his crusade against a secret cabal of pedos who want to turn people gay.

Like there has been some really good posts where people have opened up to him and it just...seems to go nowhere. It's a little heartbreaking.
As much as we'd like it to be otherwise, there's often no reasoning with delusional people.
@Nykytyne3 I asked you this a while ago, and don't remember if you answered: is there any threshold of evidence that would make you change your mind about this whole "most/all forms of queer shit is caused by pedophiles, and also almost every single adult male is a pedophile" thing?
 
What's extra sad/amusing/odd is that I agree with him on some stuff. I do actually think there are probably pedos on KF, because I think pedos hide anywhere in online anonymous spaces. I do think that pedos are attempting to guide "queer" discourse and infiltrate LGBT politics. I do think there are groups of creepy grooming men who support each other in pedo rings (in fact, these rings sometimes get arrested, so we know they're true). I do think that at least some "trans" people have clockwork oranged themselves with porn (and anime lol) and become fixated. I do think there are autistic people who are mistaking autistic symptoms for the "easy" solution of being trans instead.

But the idea that all gay and/or trans people are caused by infant abuse is suspiciously convenient for the fact that it can't be disproved -- there's no time machine to go back and check if every queer was molested. That alone should be a red flag. As pointed out elsewhere in the thread, there would be other early signs of abuse if this were true, so it's very easy to dismiss.

So either Blinski's having an autistic fixation on this pedo theory (combined with compensatory narcissism, something AGPs are well known to have), or he's experiencing psychosis after a manic break. If you know anything about psychosis, you'd know that once a person has a break, in all likelihood it isn't a one-time thing. But honestly, writing it out, I think it's probably a bit of all of these.

tl;dr supposedly-reformed AGP continues to be delusional
 
As much as we'd like it to be otherwise, there's often no reasoning with delusional people.
@Nykytyne3 I asked you this a while ago, and don't remember if you answered: is there any threshold of evidence that would make you change your mind about this whole "most/all forms of queer shit is caused by pedophiles, and also almost every single adult male is a pedophile" thing?
We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.
 
We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.

How are we doing on that call in show? Really looking forward to that.
 
We are in the realm of unprovable and un-disprovable theory here. I've already acknowledged that. I'm aware it's a problem. Which is why your continued calls for evidence are tiresome.
Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.
In addition, if something is unfalsifiable and unprovable, it is an article of pure faith. You are trying to preach what you yourself admit to seeing as an article of faith without even trying to convert anyone, instead proclaiming anyone who so much as questions you as being a pedophile. You are no better than the evangelicals you rant against.
 
Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.
In addition, if something is unfalsifiable and unprovable, it is an article of pure faith. You are trying to preach what you yourself admit to seeing as an article of faith without even trying to convert anyone, instead proclaiming anyone who so much as questions you as being a pedophile. You are no better than the evangelicals you rant against.
My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.

Whether or not someone is a practicing pedophile is provable. Whether or not someone was sodomized as a child or infant is provable. Whether or not molestation neurologically transforms your brain is also provable. The fact you claim that it is impossible to corroborate your theory, to me, smacks of you knowing that there is no evidence for it and plenty of evidence against it, and are trying to head such attempts off at the pass.
In addition, if something is unfalsifiable and unprovable, it is an article of pure faith. You are trying to preach what you yourself admit to seeing as an article of faith without even trying to convert anyone, instead proclaiming anyone who so much as questions you as being a pedophile. You are no better than the evangelicals you rant against.
And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.
 
And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.
Yes, because the problem isn't that you're incorrectly using scientific jargon in an attempt to look smarter than you are, it's that we're all just brainlets unable to keep up with your level 9,000 galaxy brain.
 
My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.
How about you start by talking with one other person who can corroborate your story? Someone other than you to talk about this idea who was turned gay by molestation.
The more people you find who can lend credence to your theory can lead to the next bit of proof.
The burden of proof is on the one who makes a claim; you have a JD, you know about this. You made a claim so it's your onus to provide evidence. Otherwise we're just dealing with a Devil's Proof.
 
I know I'm wasting my time arguing this, but there IS proof that homosexuality isn't caused by abuse-origin dissociation: trying to repress it causes lower mental health, not better. Acceptence of one's own sexuality causes the subject to improve in health.

Like, I'm sure that to a small extent what he's describing is sort of true: there probably (absolutely) are people with abuse histories who become confused about their sexuality and gender. I'm certain that men with sex abuse might go "does this mean I'm a fag now?", especially if they grew up with social difficulty. But it's irrational to say this is every single homo.

This is a case of someone thinking their personal experience must be the only real experience. So it's either autism or narcissism, imo.
 
Is autistic narcissism a thing? Or narcissists who are autistic?
I don't see why not. Studies show a large number of transgender people have personality disorders, literature on AGP claims that huge numbers of them are narcissists, and a history of substance abuse hugely increases the likelihood.

Here's one study

Perhaps worth noting a quick seach came up with more then one study linking an autism/narcissist combo with mass shootings.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Unog
My theory is unprovable in the sense that I don't have the resources to prove it.
And my theory is un-disprovable in the sense that none of you can definitively disprove it. I can't believe I have to spell this out for you idiots.
Then you don't have a theory. You have a bauble.
 
Back