Vegetarian or Vegan? - Which would you rather be?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
To Answer the question I'd have to be a Vegetarian, I love lot's of vegi dishes but I have yet to find anything that purely vegan that's OK let alone decent.

A bit off topic but not really. Have any of you ever heard of those vegetarians that still eat seafood?

Piscatarian.

That doesn't make any sense to me, you are still eating meat, its just coming from an animal of the sea. If I could be a vegetarian that still got to eat seafood though, I would do that in a heartbeat. I live in N.O. and can get the best seafood the world has to offer all day every day, for the most part. Some things are seasonal, naturally, but there is always something good to eat that's in season.

The rationale behind it is that fish don't feel pain, so killing them doesn't "hurt" them, or alternatively killing them isn't as "immoral" as killing birds birds and mammals.

You see that's what pisses me off, about them it shows either level of wilful ignorance that I just cant get along with especially when it comes to larger crustecia or willing duplicity.

I make no secret of this but I trained as a Gamkeeper, and had to learn a fucking awful lot about Game animal Biology, and the falicy that fish don't feel pain is pissing me off, they quote a very old study that was dubious in it's methods to say the least with very little follow up. Fish can feel pain but they don't get it when a hook pierces the mouth (and about 10% of all fish sold commercially are caught this way) and it heals really really quickly. What does harm fish is Dry handeling, when you remove a fish from water and want to return it you need to handle it in a very careful way otherwise you can harm them just lifting them out of the water suspended by the mouth especially larger fish will really harm them as the internal organs can and do get dislocated (they evolved to have support that the air doesn't give them). But there is also the Dry hands issue a lot of anglers hold fish really badly even if they have been fishing for a while. A lot of them hold them in a pinching grip along the latteral line this is the most sensitive parts of most Fish body's, as all true fish are capable of electroception (i.e. sensing electrical distubances) to some degree or other, your try hand's scraping along your most sensitive neverves is what causes a lot of fish to spaz out. A marine Bilogist who I know said for a Bass (european Sea Bass) handeling like that would be like having some one scrape corse dry sandpaper over your bell end / vulva in human terms.

You can fix both of these by using a drop net / landing net and making sure your hands are wet and if you can suspend them with your hand under the belly ideally gripping them by the head so the tail is facing your elbow or at least making sure that the internal organs are supported is key to quick recovery.

Ethical veganism isn't necessarily about pain and suffering, it's about eliminating the use of animal products period. Even if the bee doesn't suffer (which isn't true, the queen bee is often de-winged or clipped to prevent migration) the idea is that the honey belongs to the bees, not people.

I have never heard of De-Winging, it's not something that I have ever seen practiced, if I ever did see that practiced I'd have the same reaction I would of some one debeaking game birds (an Chickens) and that would be to punch them in the mouth.

But seeing as you brought up "Pain an suffering" I'll address it, if the Millitant vegans had there way a lot more pain an suffering would be instore for the worlds animals as we'd have to deforrest every single part of the world and cull every pest to be able to harvest about half of what we need to survive, so more animal deaths would need to happen just out of practical necessity, Veganisim isn't just a nice idea it's completely and totally unfeasible.

If you want to cut down suffering protest Halal and Kosher butchery practices, those animals die a needlessly slow panicked death and encourage diversity in meat, modern slaughterhouse practices (hindered by Kosher an Hallal), and hunting, hunters like myself and every other one I know the world over is willing to take aanimal and deal with it with respect and get really fucking angry when meat goes to waist.
 
But seeing as you brought up "Pain an suffering" I'll address it, if the Millitant vegans had there way a lot more pain an suffering would be instore for the worlds animals as we'd have to deforrest every single part of the world and cull every pest to be able to harvest about half of what we need to survive, so more animal deaths would need to happen just out of practical necessity, Veganisim isn't just a nice idea it's completely and totally unfeasible.

Except we'd be using all the extra food and land that used to go to the livestock and pastures, so I really don't understand where you're getting "complete deforestation" out of that.
ETA: I'm not an ethical vegan, I don't care about pests. If you want their perspective on those you should ask one of them.
 
Except we'd be using all the extra food and land that used to go to the livestock and pastures, so I really don't understand where you're getting "complete deforestation" out of that.
ETA: I'm not an ethical vegan, I don't care about pests. If you want their perspective on those you should ask one of them.

Ah OK, I'll clarify.

If I'm using 2006 statistics but most land used for for Pasture isn't really useful for Arable farming, it can't naturally sustain human crops but it can sustain animals, to sustain the 2006 statistics for the efficiency of Plant based diets we would have to flatten every single part of the world and we wouldn't even get close to what we need with the worlds population at the time that was roughly 6.5 billion, let alone the 7 billion + we have today.

If we did that and found a way of sustaining the bioshphear that would still be a ecological nightmare, the second something upsets that like a virus that efected a family of a essential crop people the world over are dyeing, and the food chain becomes a lot more fragile.

I do think that we need to consume less meat, and also less things that are sold as meat. But Vegerterianisim and Veganisim are not the answer they are the problem, a lofty goal but something we cant realistically do any time soon, if ever given our biology.

If you really want to help fix the eco system you need to eat local, seasonal and support some things that are rather repugnant, with our current level of technology. But these are questions that we neeed to redress and will have to very soon, as will the idea od making more space. Our own gread will make us pread out just to sustain what we have let alone who we will become.
 
I still don't understand how

field -> your plate

is less efficient or takes up more space than

field -> several hundred pound cow -> your plate
 
Because there is a lot of land that can sustain grass, but not much else. Said land is good for feeding cows, but sod all use for growing crops.

This is not complex.
 
It isn't, it just wasn't put very well. I'm pretty sure @Ravenor has mentioned that English isn't his first language.
 
Most cheese has rennet, which is an enzyme from the stomach of young calves. And gathered as a byproduct of butchering. Where as the eggs people eat are unfertilized.

By 2008, about 80% to 90% of commercially made cheeses in the US and Britain were made using FPC.[2] Today, the most widely used FPC is produced either by the fungus Aspergillus niger and commercialized under the trademark CHY-MAX®[11] by the Danish company Chr. Hansen, or produced by Kluyveromyces lactis and commercialized under the trademark MAXIREN®[12] by the Dutch company DSM.

The vast majority of rennet is made artificially via genetically modified organisms. I really doubt that there are enough calves slaughtered annually to provide enough rennet for the world cheesemaking industry.
 
The vast majority of rennet is made artificially via genetically modified organisms. I really doubt that there are enough calves slaughtered annually to provide enough rennet for the world cheesemaking industry.

I stand corrected.
 
I'm a full-on carnivore.

I don't like eating things that can't fight back. All things that are nutritious have to have some sense of self-preservation; it's how they evolved to protect that valuable investment of biological energy.

Plants are defenseless, and they just sit there and take the abuse. Plants tend to have fibers, which is indigestible nonsense that helps you shit (I guess), but I prefer reinforcing my anal muscles with animal proteins.

Truly, all veggie-munchers are worse than Hitler.
 
I was a vegetarian for a while, until I took a hard look at what impact I was making and saw it was an empty guesture to make myself feel like a good person. I lived on a farm for a long time and toured a slaughterhouse as a kid. I know how animals are raised and no farmer is going to intentionally damage product. A cow is worth >$1000 and killing or hurting one just because is stupid and makes no economic sense. I do draw the line at veal and foie gras though.

I would probably be willing to go vegetarian again if it actually made an impact on how much meat is produced instead of the animal dying just to sit in a grocery store and rot. For now, I'll just be thankful for the animal who gave their life so I can eat delicious steak.
 
I don't believe it. I once watched him in chat for over five minutes and he didn't say he was a vegan.

upload_2016-11-27_11-43-25.png
 
I'm an omnivore dating a vegan. As a result, I've been eating a shit ton of vegan food. Vegan food has the capacity to be pretty tasty, as long as you're not trying to make it taste like meat. Also, cashews are magic.
 
Back
Top Bottom