I'd argue against that. Neither is widely socially acceptable for an adult man or woman to be doing.
Because there are more important things an adult of either sex should be doing.
Focusing on the video games as an example, although casual gaming has been taken up by the masses, "serious" gaming such as World of Warcraft has not.
On a productive level, a man or woman who is gaming could have been doing something more useful. They could have put in extra hours at work, they could have done some DIY around the house. On this level video gaming is a sign of sloth.
On a leisure level, I know sometimes to me its a sign of lower intelligence and I know some of my female friends think the same way. That's not to say I think anyone who likes Opera is a big brain (quite the opposite, it's pretentious and it sounds shit), but I think there's something pathetic about a guy who sits in front of a TV screen pretending to be a soldier. That sort of experiential make-believe play is an essential formative experience for developing confidence and understanding....In the younger years; by now developmentally this individual should have moved from this stage well into the experiential. It's a sign of being psychologically stunted; it's no coincidence many of the Lolcows, furries etc here are very often hardcore gamers.
And then there's also the familial level. If the goal of a human life is successful reproduction (if it isn't, it's still something essential to sustain out societies) what makes a financial/social capital risk looks safer and more promising? Good looks are usually an indicator of good health and genetics, a sense of humor has been scientifically linked to a higher intelligence, a musician has a creative streak that suggests flexibility....There are a range of qualities we might prize or seek out in our mates or close confidants. Does a man or woman who spends an inordinate amount of time on a computer screen in an unproductive task that in no way develops their skills or mainstream networking potential present themselves as a viable or worthy mate or ally? Why would I desire to interact with this person over someone with more useful skills, or hobbies that suggest other positive attributes about this person?
This might seem like a very cold opinion, and that is all it is. We ultimately are to a great extent the things we do, and there is truth in stereotypes. The basement dwelling manchild is one of them, and they are infamous for their love of toys and computer games.
Of course, more people on social media are more likely to be gamers than the public. But have a look in your life off the internet, how many people actually do play with toys; and if they have them like makeup consider if they actually serve a constructive purpose? Make up and gym time can be used to make an individual look more attractive which is a valuable asset, and attending workshops could be used to develop talents or skills; nightclubing can be used to build a network and expand sexual/reproductive options, even watching shitty TV like Tiger King has some degree if use in that because it is so widely watched by a large range of ages it can be used to build rapport with random members of the public you may come across (whereas gamers of specific titles tend to be of a narrower age range), but what use does an anime body pillow serve?