WaPO's Uvalde shooting article.

[Vect]

This looks a bit sensationalist, I've got to be honest. One of the parents of the Uvalde victims mentions an upcoming article that shows graphic pictures of her daughter - she doesn't elaborate or respond to people asking if she's taken any recourse or why they're doing it. Have any of the other parents mentioned this article? Nobody else she assumes already knows actually seems to know anything. If she wasn't in contact with the Post how does she even know about the existence of the article?

It's incredibly rare for newspaper publications to release graphic photos, and it's unheard of for graphic photos of dead children. The Washington Post is more than aware that this is a taboo that goes beyond simply getting stuff wrong.




I'd guess she's made assumptions about what photos the Post would put in an article about the shooting, or she's been told something by another source that for some reason she assumes everyone already knew. I could be more cynical, because its social media, but I'll hold my tongue.

I think we'd better wait for the article to come out before we treat this as legit.

 

[HopperTopper]

I'm sure some deeply sick and depraved individual won't see the photos and get excited, both over the contents and the idea that something like that can go down in history. Remember, we're trying to stop future violence!

 

[Sammich]

I am completely fine with this stuff being posted/printed, but I am also against the manifestos being hidden and memory holed. I"m a weird guy that believes in all information being open and shown though. I thought liveleak shutting down like it did was one of the worst things to happen in the past decade.

 

[Judge Holden]

I think it might be a way to stop schizos from being schizos screeching about "false flags!!" That is the only reason I could think of.

As if schizos and attention whoring grifters wont immediately declare the photos fake (and probably generated by AI) and use the length of time taken to release the photos to "prove" they were desperately trying to perfect the fake evidence before release

 

[Rungle]

Im not totally opposed to it.

The morality of releasing it is undeniably fucking disgusting, but nothing new for journalism.
Maybe these tranny lovers that protected the shooter and constantly yelling that the shooter was misgendered will see the fucking reality for once.

 

[Dire Dire Cocks]

It worked in New Zealand, after that glownigger shot up those sandniggers. That was just a few years ago.

I’d ask you for proof Tarrant was a glownigger but I already know it’s gonna be the fact that he dropped a mag as he entered the mosque and picked it up as he ran back into the hallway, which doesn’t prove shit.

There is a video of one of the parents that just seems highly irregular, he is supposed to be speaking to the press but as he approaches the guy starts laughing while talking to some of the camera people. He then blanks his face over the space of 10 seconds before the prepared statement starts. The conspiracy crowd generally focuses on this guy and claims he is a crisis actor, something that is quite real -- during training for fire fighters, national guard, or the police, the government will put ads out for people to sign up and their job is to pretend to be wounded or injured or crazy during a simulated crisis setting so that the trainees can learn to block out bad things and focus on their tasks rather than getting shellshocked by what they see. This guy in the video just seems like he is overacting for some reason to me, some may think otherwise but usually a telltale sign is the lack of tears or runny nose. He just gives off the vibe of someone faking it, Patrick Bateman style fake human shit.

View attachment 5495135

This video is posted all the time as “proof” but all I see is people acting like he’s not “grieving hard enough”.

Im not totally opposed to it.

The morality of releasing it is undeniably fucking disgusting, but nothing new for journalism.
Maybe these tranny lovers that protected the shooter and constantly yelling that the shooter was misgendered will see the fucking reality for once.

Again, wrong shooting. You are thinking of Nashville. Anyways, yeah I also think that if the media was able to show photos of Vietnam of kids dying and things like that then this isn’t that far off. It’s just if the parents are opposed to it…

 

[Meat Target]

I know what a gun does to a human body. I'm not a fucking idiot. This emotional blackmail won't work on me.

 

[JOHN SHRIMP DOE]

Recently at the gym I saw the news on and it was barely censored clips of Palestinians getting butchered, like shit straight off Watch People Die, I think news people just got gore fetishes.

 

[Rabbi Palpenstein]

Remember this when more shit about the Nashy Pooner gets leaked, and they act like the leaker is the devil for "sensationalizing dead kids"

 

[cgk qqq]

This looks a bit sensationalist, I've got to be honest. One of the parents of the Uvalde victims mentions an upcoming article that shows graphic pictures of her daughter - she doesn't elaborate or respond to people asking if she's taken any recourse or why they're doing it. Have any of the other parents mentioned this article? Nobody else she assumes already knows actually seems to know anything. If she wasn't in contact with the Post how does she even know about the existence of the article?

I'm genuinely convinced that they're either being taken for a ride or misinterpreted something a WaPO reporter told them. I don't believe that they would lie about this, but I can totally believe that they're emotional and misunderstood something (inb4 this is real and I look like a jackass).

somewhat unrelated, do any lawcels know how WaPO would get these photos? can they just file a FOIA and get graphic images of a crime? I remember there being graphic images from sandy hook but they all got redacted. Would they get in trouble for posting unredacted leaked photos, or does the pentagon papers case protect them?

 

[Sean_Igger]

I know what a gun does to a human body.

Yes, it blows the lung out of a human body.

- A Normie.

 

[NoReturn]

The Washington Post is a low grade tabloid at this point. Releasing crime scene photos just glamorizes the whole thing and inspires copycats.

Vultures are more respectful of the dead then the Washington Post is.

TJD. Defecate in a WaPo journo's food.

Such neutral and professional language:

 

[Ghostse]

Day of the rope when?

 

[Doctor Love]

There is a video of one of the parents that just seems highly irregular, he is supposed to be speaking to the press but as he approaches the guy starts laughing while talking to some of the camera people. He then blanks his face over the space of 10 seconds before the prepared statement starts. The conspiracy crowd generally focuses on this guy and claims he is a crisis actor, something that is quite real -- during training for fire fighters, national guard, or the police, the government will put ads out for people to sign up and their job is to pretend to be wounded or injured or crazy during a simulated crisis setting so that the trainees can learn to block out bad things and focus on their tasks rather than getting shellshocked by what they see. This guy in the video just seems like he is overacting for some reason to me, some may think otherwise but usually a telltale sign is the lack of tears or runny nose. He just gives off the vibe of someone faking it, Patrick Bateman style fake human shit.

View attachment 5495135

Hey man, I'm just gonna put it out there - if you are using "inappropriate emotional reactions" as a diagnostic tool for if something is fake, you're thick as shit. Just google that phrase, "Inappropriate emotional reaction" and list how many conditions have it.

He is probably faking the emotion, to be respectful - I've done that a bunch of times. Hell, usually, it's because it's instinct to tell a joke to "cheer someone up" - if you have a fucked up brain like that, paradoxically, you end up making things worse by "seeming too happy" - look at his eyes, they're "thousand-yard stare" and focused. This is a man trying his absolute best not to say "Ah well, saves a bit on shopping, amiright?" - he still feels the emotions, but they don't come with the urge to cry or anger. You feel sad, so you want to cheer yourself up - and you see the others sad, and want to cheer them up.



In short - stop fucking larping as a psychoanalyst. Trust me, that has been my exact reaction whenever bad shit happens. I once sat in with a friend who was describing her rape to the police trying to keep my best poker face and NOT offer anybody a slice of pizza during it.

 

[cgk qqq]

Hey man, I'm just gonna put it out there - if you are using "inappropriate emotional reactions" as a diagnostic tool for if something is fake, you're thick as shit. Just google that phrase, "Inappropriate emotional reaction" and list how many conditions have it.

a really good example of this is the Death of Azaria Chamberlain (the 'dingo ate my baby' case). the mom seemed almost unfazed that her baby died, and that led a lot of people to assume that she had killed her daughter

Public and media opinion during the trial was polarised, with "fanciful rumours and sickening jokes" and many cartoons. In particular, antagonism was directed towards [the mom] for reportedly not behaving like a "stereotypical" grieving mother.

tldr; you dont know how you'll react when a loved one dies, dont be autistic.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

The Kiwi Farms is the scourge of the Internet for keeping the New Zealand shooting online but here we have the Washington Post publishing images of dead children against their parents wishes with the intention of profiting off it. Journalists are vermin.

That would be worth for a meme featuring the Third World Skeptical kid. "People hated Kiwi Farms for showing the New Zealand shooting online but they're ok when the Washington Post publish images of dead children?"

 

[Just a Humble Farmer]

"journalists" lol

 

[Ancient Pioneer]

Hey man, I'm just gonna put it out there - if you are using "inappropriate emotional reactions" as a diagnostic tool for if something is fake, you're thick as shit. Just google that phrase, "Inappropriate emotional reaction" and list how many conditions have it.

New reg, every single one of your 5 posts is shilling for Israel or trying to tamp down "conspiracy thinking." How about you go fuck yourself, I'm allowed to have my suspicions and I'm not even a Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist, I just find that guys antics weird.

 

[Neurotypical Mantis]

and there are no riots because libs hate children unless they're touching them

 

[Doctor Love]

New reg, every single one of your 5 posts is shilling for Israel or trying to tamp down "conspiracy thinking." How about you go fuck yourself, I'm allowed to have my suspicions and I'm not even a Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist, I just find that guys antics weird.

lol

You're dumb as shit, for the love of God I hope you're never on a jury.

You really don't like it when people point out that, in reality, you're a spoiled faggot who rarely leaves his house. Anyone who's had any serious shit in their lives would tell you - you never know how you'll react until you do.

Except you, apparently, where everything perfectly matches with what you see through your dusty ass PC screen.