WaPO's Uvalde shooting article.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Instant_Pot_User said:
I feel for those parents whose unimaginable tragedy is being prostituted by Potomac Pravda.
Click to expand...
That would be insulting for the Pravda to be compared to the WaPo.
Rubick said:
Indeed. Journalists making lawyers look like decent human beings. What a world we live in.
Click to expand...
And also that's why people trust more used car salesmen than journalists.

Btw, these journalists might have private security guards, "gun control for the thee but not for me".
 
Akran said:
Sad is all I can say really, I do not think they will ever show the dead bodies of the children because I genuinely think the real mangled ones were shot multiple times. I do not believe this single bullet entrails removal. I want to think it's been said to them so they think their child wasn't shot more than once.
Click to expand...
What in the fuck are you talking about? Why do you think it's relevant if a single bullet blew some kids guts out or it took 2?

Why do you think this matters at all?
 
VargReallyDidNothingWrong said:
What in the fuck are you talking about? Why do you think it's relevant if a single bullet blew some kids guts out or it took 2?

Why do you think this matters at all?
Click to expand...
Read the photos I replied to. The father is being disingenuous about the wounds his son received. He specifically states one bullet blew his stomach out. This is a false narrative being pushed around with retards that think the ar15 was designed to explode bodies. There is no chance of that happening with a single shot in that caliber.
 
Akran said:
Read the photos I replied to. The father is being disingenuous about the wounds his son received. He specifically states one bullet blew his stomach out. This is a false narrative being pushed around with retards that think the ar15 was designed to explode bodies. There is no chance of that happening with a single shot in that caliber.
Click to expand...
Holy shit you are autistic as fuck.
 
Wodanaz said:
I have no patience for libtards unwilling to arm teachers or security to stop school shooters because they can't accept that some deserve to die
Click to expand...
This is pretty much what I've been saying for years with regard to this topic, if the people who claim so badly to want this problem 'solved', actually wanted it solved? It would have already been solved. But actually solving the problem prevents you from getting more bloodied corpses of children for you to soapbox upon before they reach ambient temperature. The root of the problem itself is a complex mesh of societal ills that have come to a head in the past six decades or so, the solution for the further ills this causes is a rather simple one.

1) Bring back fucking asylums and put people in them, prevent them from becoming torture porn theaters as they did in the past.

2) Mass shooters choose their targets either due to ideological reasons, or because they're looking for a soft target, or both. Make them hard targets. When someone wants a body count and little resistance they don't attack a police station or a fucking military base.

3) Get over this pathological fucking fear of guns and encourage people to carry them, train with them, practice with them and use them if the need arises.

Alternatively you could also begin to perhaps address some of the societal ills that have resulted in young men being so disenfranchised from their society and communities that they decide the resolution to their problems is to take a rifle into a public place and try to beat Eric and Dylan's high score, but that would be even more difficult and time-consuming, so I'd settle for just making soft targets into hard targets. Let a few would-be mass shooters get domed thirty seconds into their "day of retribution" by an armed bystander, armed faculty, etc without hurting anyone and eventually they'd be forced to either choose different targets or just off themselves instead. Everything important to society, we protect with typically armed guards and various security measures. Courthouses, town halls, capital buildings, airports, banks, etc. Why in the fuck should a school be any different? And they always go: "well seeing people with guns might frighten the children!" or "we shouldn't have to do that!", well seeing a man in a uniform standing next to a door with a gun is a whole lot better than seeing some sperg in a black trench coat with a gun right before he blows your teacher's head off, and to "we shouldn't have to": there's a lot of things we shouldn't have to do, we shouldn't have to keep fucking razor blades and hair dye behind lock and key in melanin enriched areas, but we do it anyway because not doing it would have a poorer outcome.

But these people are not interested in solutions, they are interested in using corpses as a soapbox and using them as a wedge to further restrict other people that they happen to dislike. I don't think you're ever going to 100% solve this problem entirely without some huge tectonic societal shift but you can at the very least reduce the frequency and reduce the fucking body count.
 
Last edited:
GettrGriftr said:
I realise that doesn't have the same Tom Clancy-novel/Sylvester Stallone-movie punch as "Deep State," but it also doesn't carry the same "conspiracy theorist" baggage. IMO
Click to expand...
Deep State is a term that came from Turkey to describe the fusion of the permanent bureaucracy, military and literal mobsters. Its a better term than "permanent Washington" because it describes the shadowy network of NGOs like Council on Foreign Relations, RAND and foreign organizations like the WEF along with the media censorship machine and military-industrial-complex.
 
attractive_pneumonia said:
the shadowy network of NGOs like Council on Foreign Relations, RAND and foreign organizations like the WEF along with the media censorship machine and military-industrial-complex.
Click to expand...
Which are all a part of the machinery of permanent Washington. But I won't quibble, fren
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom