- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
we got the children taken away. was this morally the right thing to do or was it just a knee jerk outrage culture reaction?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's be fair here, would the kids be any better if they were taken away from both families? They're fucked regardless of whether they're placed in the hands of Mike, Rose or a complete unknown simply because of their situation.They'll be worse off with their biological mother. Great job slacktivists, look what your moral outrage has achieved.
No. Staying with Mike is the best option and it's not up to youtubers or forums to meddle in a family's affairs.Let's be fair here, would the kids be any better if they were taken away from both families? They're fucked regardless of whether they're placed in the hands of Mike, Rose or a complete unknown simply because of their situation.
They'll be worse off with their biological mother. Great job slacktivists, look what your moral outrage has achieved.
Yes.Should folks have simply sat back and said / done nothing?
But had that happened, the police would never have gotten involved and for all we know, Mike could have done a "Prank gone wrong" thing that could've wind up killing one of his children. And he'd still be profiting off that child's death. And get away with it.Yes.
Yes.
"for all we know" "could have" "could've" "if"But had that happened, the police would never have gotten involved and for all we know, Mike could have done a "Prank gone wrong" thing that could've wind up killing one of his children. And he'd still be profiting off that child's death. And get away with it.
Would you still support "Mike the Child Murderer" if that ever came to pass? Besides, we wouldn't have this great salt if no one did anything.
Mike might be a cunt but he's at least mentally sound. The biological mother is a proper slow-in-the-mind.Why? So those kids staying in that environment would be better off than moving on to a home where, hopefully, they're given support and a chance to lead a happier life? I should imagine there'll be people looking after their welfare, now, a damn sight more than what was offered at Martin's freak show abode.
"for all we know" "could have" "could've" "if"
I'm not speaking in hypotheticals.
Mike might be a cunt but he's at least mentally sound. The biological mother is a proper slow-in-the-mind.
You can't really blame youtube or forums for any of this. The descision was made by CPS or whoever is in charge of child protection there. If we're gonna have the "stay in your lane" discussion, is it up to you to question the judgement of the CPS? This can go both ways.No. Staying with Mike is the best option and it's not up to youtubers or forums to meddle in a family's affairs.
The descision was made by CPS or whoever is in charge of child protection there