- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
we got the children taken away. was this morally the right thing to do or was it just a knee jerk outrage culture reaction?
Was it the right thing to do to get involved in Do5?
- Thread starter CatParty
- Start date
Bob's Fries
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2016
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
I think it was the right thing to do. Most of the time, I dislike intervening in what a lolcow is doing, but in this case, we had child abuse to do with. As other has said, the farms weren't the only one who went ballistic over the D05 case.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
Everyone got involved. These people shouldn't even be allowed to nurture pubic lice.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
They'll be worse off with their biological mother. Great job slacktivists, look what your moral outrage has achieved.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
Let's be fair here, would the kids be any better if they were taken away from both families? They're fucked regardless of whether they're placed in the hands of Mike, Rose or a complete unknown simply because of their situation.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
No. Staying with Mike is the best option and it's not up to youtubers or forums to meddle in a family's affairs.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Should folks have simply sat back and said / done nothing?
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
But had that happened, the police would never have gotten involved and for all we know, Mike could have done a "Prank gone wrong" thing that could've wind up killing one of his children. And he'd still be profiting off that child's death. And get away with it.
Would you still support "Mike the Child Murderer" if that ever came to pass? Besides, we wouldn't have this great salt if no one did anything.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Why? So those kids staying in that environment would be better off than moving on to a home where, hopefully, they're given support and a chance to lead a happier life? I should imagine there'll be people looking after their welfare now, a damn sight more than what was offered at Martin's freak show abode.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
"for all we know" "could have" "could've" "if"
I'm not speaking in hypotheticals.
Mike might be a cunt but he's at least mentally sound. The biological mother is a proper slow-in-the-mind.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Mentally sound? Bloody hell, you on a wind up?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
I have no idea what you people are even talking about but I'll guess no.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
You can't really blame youtube or forums for any of this. The descision was made by CPS or whoever is in charge of child protection there. If we're gonna have the "stay in your lane" discussion, is it up to you to question the judgement of the CPS? This can go both ways.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
but would cps have even known if not for outside meddling?
King_Scrotus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
As other's have said, it wasn't just us. If anything, we didn't do anything, it was youtube outrage culture which claimed this issue. But anyway, was it right to get the guy's kids taken away? To be honest, based on what I saw of the guy's life, it was horrifying the way he treated his kids. I could barely watch some of the videos of them fucking screeching in their faces without turning that off.
That gets people emotional, and they did what they thought was best. If CPS took the kids away, well, we can only assume they did so because they felt there was ample reason. The biggest worry is whether the real mom is actually any better, because really, what do we know about her, do we even know if any or all of her stories are true?
That gets people emotional, and they did what they thought was best. If CPS took the kids away, well, we can only assume they did so because they felt there was ample reason. The biggest worry is whether the real mom is actually any better, because really, what do we know about her, do we even know if any or all of her stories are true?