Culture Watching 'A Wrinkle in Time' is a political act - Supporting Disney movies is a sign of resistance, says CNN

Purchasing a movie ticket has become the latest act of political resistance.

The Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements, started and inspired by courageous black women, have ushered in cultural sea changes -- including challenging harmful and inaccurate media portrayals of African-Americans. The movie "Black Panther" has provided a rare opportunity to celebrate and savor the success of a story in which black characters' individual choices shape their collective destiny.

"A Wrinkle in Time," directed by Ava DuVernay, opens this weekend. The film is an adaptation of the 1962 book of the same name written by Madeleine L'Engle. A blend of science fiction, fantasy, and young adult coming-of-age narrative, it is the story of Meg Murry, an awkward and brilliant teenage girl, who adventures across space and time to rescue her scientist father, mysteriously gone missing. DuVernay's role as director brings a subtle strain of intersectionality woefully missing from much popular young adult fiction like "The Hunger Games" and the "Twilight" trilogy, in which white girls save the world.

The diverse casting in "A Wrinkle in Time" also takes an important step in normalizing girls and women of color as heroines of our own stories, interested in math and science, and struggling to define ourselves in a world that doesn't always accept us for who we are. The movie presents a vision of female empowerment in which whiteness is no longer the standard.

Unlike "Black Panther," race is not central to the characterization or plot of "A Wrinkle in Time." L'Engle, who authored multiple young adult novels, was white. While her books touch on issues of equality in some ways, race is rarely an explicit theme.

Race is present in this film adaptation because of DuVernay's decision to cast biracial actor Storm Reid as the movie's protagonist. Oprah Winfrey and Mindy Kaling are also cast as two of the fantasy creatures who help Meg and her brother seek their father's freedom.

Representation matters, as Rashad Robinson, executive director of Color of Change (a civil rights advocacy organization formed in 2005 in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina) told me -- especially for children. By going to see films like "Black Panther" and "A Wrinkle in Time," "kids of color get to see themselves as heroes, centered in the story, and as the person to root for," Robinson said.
It remains to be seen whether "A Wrinkle in Time" will experience anything like the same box-office success and emotional resonance with African-American audiences that "Black Panther" has had. Some prognosticators think it's unlikely, but it's possible. As teenagers, we often consume media to affirm we are not alone in our freakishness. We long to embark on heroic quests in which the very qualities society deems "wrong" about us -- a love of math and science for example -- become tools for positive transformation and change.

This is what the book "A Wrinkle in Time" did for generations of white girls, and some black girls, who loved the book and now want to share the same sense of awe and recognition they felt when reading the book with their children and grandchildren.

Black girls of a certain age who liked speculative fiction had limited choices when searching for inspiration. Some enjoyed L'Engle, and looked to other authors like Octavia Butler or Tananarive Due for inspiration because their novels featured characters who looked and sounded like them. For some black women, the "Wrinkle in Time" movie's appeal may be less about nostalgia and more about its director. DuVernay's bold directorial vision inspires us all.

"I absolutely love Ava DuVernay," said my friend Kimberly Simon as we discussed the importance of the success of giving black children positive role models on- and off-screen. Simon and her husband raised more than $300 to take 32 local foster children to see "Black Panther," and will do the same for "A Wrinkle in Time."

"She is the first African-American woman given the budget (of more than $100 million) to do this," Simon said. "Little girls can see her and say, 'I want to be a director.'"

Regardless of the reasons why we choose to see "A Wrinkle in Time," it is important that we eradicate negative stereotypes of blacks in media. The media images we consume bleed into the public consciousness and seep into our education, housing, health care, and criminal justice systems. We may not be able to march every day. But we can vote at the polling place and with our dollars at the movie theater. The revolution will not only be televised, but it will come with a pair of 3-D glasses.

http://archive.is/oYYrV
 
Is there literally any proof that children past the age of like, 3 give that much of a shit about lack of benis and coloring when they admire something?
People more readily relate to people that are more like themselves. People feel a more automatic affinity for members of whatever group they are in. Is this honestly a point of dispute anywhere?
 
It's as stupid as John Boyega's crying about a lack of darkies in Game of Thrones and Lord of the Rings. Just write a fucking story, nigga. They're doing exact what they accuse whitey of doing - inserting themselves into everyone's culture and history.

Is Pacific Rim 2 going to be the next woke Hollywood film we need to support? It looks terrible.
 
My question is why would Disney choose to remake a Wrinkle in Time of all movies? It's already been done twice as a movie and once as a TV series and all of their quality could be summed up in one word: CRAP. Secondly, a Wrinkle in Time the book is one of the most boring Young Adult books out there. The characters are exceptional individuals, the settings are predictable and the ending is something right out of Carebear's movie. Finally, it's nice to know the Woke crowd ignores the works of people like Walter Dean Meyers to make stupid crap like this.
Now that I think about it, Fallen Angels would make for a good movie. It's interesting how a film like Coco that has a Hispanic protagonist and digs deeply into Mexican culture wasn't over-hyped by the Hispanics and Mexicans as some great peice of cultural resistance.
 
Now that I think about it, Fallen Angels would make for a good movie. It's interesting how a film like Coco that has a Hispanic protagonist and digs deeply into Mexican culture wasn't over-hyped by the Hispanics and Mexicans as some great peice of cultural resistance.
Totally :offtopic:, but whenever I see somebody talking about Fallen Angels I always think of this book.
 
I guess Katherine Bigelow making great films like Near Dark and Point Break never happened then.

It's a book about centaurs and shit, people need to calm down.
women who did things before current year don't real, it's all about the women who do things now, erasing history is great
Now, I've never read, but I always thought Twilight was more about a girl trying to get all of her holes stuffed with vampires and werewolves? :thinking:
twilight is for goths and furries

No, Guillermo del Toro just stole the Best Picture Oscar from "Get Out", so from this point on, everything he does will be censured by the "woke" crowd.
i'm sure most of the woke crowd doesn't know he's mexican, because he's not yelling arriba while pulling a taco from his sombrero.
 
No, Guillermo del Toro just stole the Best Picture Oscar from "Get Out", so from this point on, everything he does will be censured by the "woke" crowd.

I don’t think Guillermo is involved with Pacific Rim 2 besides a producer credit. Besides, he has white passing privilege and the light skins have to get out of the way for the dark skins. I wish this was a joke but one of the actors who didn’t get a role in Black Panther said she didn’t try because even though she’s black, she’s light skinned and the roles should go to dark skins, she is also, no joke, non-binary.
 
Now that I think about it, Fallen Angels would make for a good movie. It's interesting how a film like Coco that has a Hispanic protagonist and digs deeply into Mexican culture wasn't over-hyped by the Hispanics and Mexicans as some great peice of cultural resistance.

I think the woke crowd didn't latch onto Coco because it wasn't about an illegal immigrant family fighting against the evil ICE. That's the only Mexican culture I ever hear SJW's talking about.
 
I think the woke crowd didn't latch onto Coco because it wasn't about an illegal immigrant family fighting against the evil ICE. That's the only Mexican culture I ever hear SJW's talking about.

And iirc the characters spoke decent English and didn't have billions of kids
 
Every Wrinkle in Time movie adaption fails because the idiot writers don't know what they are fricking dealing with. The overall theme is Feminine power, but not the woke feminist type of power. Its about a womans power to save men from darkness, and to create life. The main character has to save her father from the darkness. She has to give her male love interest a purpose in life where before he was literally aimless. She has to discover her own creative "spiritual" power in the process to accomplish these roles, as a dutiful daughter, partner, and even mother to a certain extent. In the form of the three spirit guides who are representative of these traits. There is also an embrace of the very old concept of women having to give up everything so they can create or save life (the light). Remember that the three spirit guides used to be Stars but destroyed themselves to save light from dark. Its all overlaid with a overt religious spirituality, and horror elements. Tesseracting around is not some whimsical thing the main characters are doing. Its a deeply dangerous act, one that bends the nature of reality and puts them all at frightening risk.

This is some heavy stuff, and any writer raised on Feminist concepts of what it means to be female will fail at adapting the book. Men likewise would have a very hard time of it too since we don't really understand the existential horror at the heart of the female psyche when it comes to having to deal with powerful forces you are not physically able to control (like men), or the very real prospect that to create new life you may have to die, and even if you don't you must sacrifice almost all of yourself to the exercise.

Which basically means there is nobody in hollywood capable of adapting the book successfully.
 
I think the woke crowd didn't latch onto Coco because it wasn't about an illegal immigrant family fighting against the evil ICE. That's the only Mexican culture I ever hear SJW's talking about.
That and to a lesser extent other people "culturally appropriating" them and how whitey hurt them in the past.
 
People more readily relate to people that are more like themselves. People feel a more automatic affinity for members of whatever group they are in. Is this honestly a point of dispute anywhere?
That's true but people that are literally incapable of empathizing with someone not exactly like them are psychos or autists.

Now that I think about it, Fallen Angels would make for a good movie. It's interesting how a film like Coco that has a Hispanic protagonist and digs deeply into Mexican culture wasn't over-hyped by the Hispanics and Mexicans as some great peice of cultural resistance.
Not enough of them spoke English to make it work.
 
People more readily relate to people that are more like themselves. People feel a more automatic affinity for members of whatever group they are in. Is this honestly a point of dispute anywhere?
OK, duh, but is it really to the point where a kid loves a movie but doesn't want to become a filmmaker solely because they find out "wtf thiz is dudes a whitey yo"
 
People are all over cyberpunk trash nowadays

:off-topic: If that was true, Ghost in the Shell would've done well at the box office (thus why ScarJo was cast and it still didn't bring in the large crowds). The average movie-goer can't comprehend cyberpunk unless it's already an established brand like Blade Runner (Matrix could count too if it still had more films). It found better success in other mediums, though.
 
Not enough of them spoke English to make it work.

I think its more that Mexicans don't view themselves as victims. You tell a Mexican that his entire life is shit because whitey has oppressed him and how its so tragic for him, you will get a weird look at best, or beaten to death at worst. For starters, Mexicans view themselves as part of the great colonial expansion by and large, in much the same way Americans do. Race relations within Mexico itself is totally alien to the American experience. They are all pretty much Spanish colonialists and their native wives that have formed their own mono-culture based upon a mixture of native traditions and Spanish. They think of themselves as "White" in the way that any European thinks of themselves as "White", which is to say they don't think of themselves as White at all because that is not their world view. They are Mexican. The idea that they are a sperate race is a purely American fixation, pushed first by our government during the good ole' days, and now by woke SJW's.

With respect to evil White oppression, they are sore about the 1848 war, but they are sore in the way Poland is sore at Germany and Russia. Tell a polish dude he's a perpetual victim of Russian and German aggression, and he might agree in his heart of hearts, but he will still kick your ass for trying to argue that he is essentially a weak victim.

In a way, the Woke SJW's are more racist then the "they need to go back" crowd.
 
I think its more that Mexicans don't view themselves as victims. You tell a Mexican that his entire life is shit because whitey has oppressed him and how its so tragic for him, you will get a weird look at best, or beaten to death at worst. For starters, Mexicans view themselves as part of the great colonial expansion by and large, in much the same way Americans do. Race relations within Mexico itself is totally alien to the American experience. They are all pretty much Spanish colonialists and their native wives that have formed their own mono-culture based upon a mixture of native traditions and Spanish. They think of themselves as "White" in the way that any European thinks of themselves as "White", which is to say they don't think of themselves as White at all because that is not their world view. They are Mexican. The idea that they are a sperate race is a purely American fixation, pushed first by our government during the good ole' days, and now by woke SJW's.

With respect to evil White oppression, they are sore about the 1848 war, but they are sore in the way Poland is sore at Germany and Russia. Tell a polish dude he's a perpetual victim of Russian and German aggression, and he might agree in his heart of hearts, but he will still kick your ass for trying to argue that he is essentially a weak victim.

In a way, the Woke SJW's are more racist then the "they need to go back" crowd.
Also Coco is about Mexicans from Mexico and not Mexican-Americans. Whenever you have a minority ethnicity and the ethnicity-Americans, it's always the 'whatever ethnicity it is here'-Americans who raise more of a stink about being oppressed and victimized by whitey.
 
I loved the book as a kid but I have this intense loathing of all things Oprah. So the internal struggle I have going on goes like this:

Me too, the book was a real eye opening experience for my young self. Which I suppose all great art is in a way. When I saw the promos, I wanted to hope that Disney did the story justice, and treated it not as a young adult adventure story, but as the existential horror and grand epic it was.

But of course they instead made young adult adventure schlock. Completely missed the point. Its as if they decided to make a movie based upon the book "Lolita" and chose to make a Romantic Comedy. When you don't even know what genre the book you are adapting for film is, you are doomed from the start. Wrinkle in time is an Epic horror science fiction. Like the Aliens series (in fact exactly like the Aliens series) They made a young adult adventure.

qQ0RPsM.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back