Culture Watching 'A Wrinkle in Time' is a political act - Supporting Disney movies is a sign of resistance, says CNN

Purchasing a movie ticket has become the latest act of political resistance.

The Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements, started and inspired by courageous black women, have ushered in cultural sea changes -- including challenging harmful and inaccurate media portrayals of African-Americans. The movie "Black Panther" has provided a rare opportunity to celebrate and savor the success of a story in which black characters' individual choices shape their collective destiny.

"A Wrinkle in Time," directed by Ava DuVernay, opens this weekend. The film is an adaptation of the 1962 book of the same name written by Madeleine L'Engle. A blend of science fiction, fantasy, and young adult coming-of-age narrative, it is the story of Meg Murry, an awkward and brilliant teenage girl, who adventures across space and time to rescue her scientist father, mysteriously gone missing. DuVernay's role as director brings a subtle strain of intersectionality woefully missing from much popular young adult fiction like "The Hunger Games" and the "Twilight" trilogy, in which white girls save the world.

The diverse casting in "A Wrinkle in Time" also takes an important step in normalizing girls and women of color as heroines of our own stories, interested in math and science, and struggling to define ourselves in a world that doesn't always accept us for who we are. The movie presents a vision of female empowerment in which whiteness is no longer the standard.

Unlike "Black Panther," race is not central to the characterization or plot of "A Wrinkle in Time." L'Engle, who authored multiple young adult novels, was white. While her books touch on issues of equality in some ways, race is rarely an explicit theme.

Race is present in this film adaptation because of DuVernay's decision to cast biracial actor Storm Reid as the movie's protagonist. Oprah Winfrey and Mindy Kaling are also cast as two of the fantasy creatures who help Meg and her brother seek their father's freedom.

Representation matters, as Rashad Robinson, executive director of Color of Change (a civil rights advocacy organization formed in 2005 in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina) told me -- especially for children. By going to see films like "Black Panther" and "A Wrinkle in Time," "kids of color get to see themselves as heroes, centered in the story, and as the person to root for," Robinson said.
It remains to be seen whether "A Wrinkle in Time" will experience anything like the same box-office success and emotional resonance with African-American audiences that "Black Panther" has had. Some prognosticators think it's unlikely, but it's possible. As teenagers, we often consume media to affirm we are not alone in our freakishness. We long to embark on heroic quests in which the very qualities society deems "wrong" about us -- a love of math and science for example -- become tools for positive transformation and change.

This is what the book "A Wrinkle in Time" did for generations of white girls, and some black girls, who loved the book and now want to share the same sense of awe and recognition they felt when reading the book with their children and grandchildren.

Black girls of a certain age who liked speculative fiction had limited choices when searching for inspiration. Some enjoyed L'Engle, and looked to other authors like Octavia Butler or Tananarive Due for inspiration because their novels featured characters who looked and sounded like them. For some black women, the "Wrinkle in Time" movie's appeal may be less about nostalgia and more about its director. DuVernay's bold directorial vision inspires us all.

"I absolutely love Ava DuVernay," said my friend Kimberly Simon as we discussed the importance of the success of giving black children positive role models on- and off-screen. Simon and her husband raised more than $300 to take 32 local foster children to see "Black Panther," and will do the same for "A Wrinkle in Time."

"She is the first African-American woman given the budget (of more than $100 million) to do this," Simon said. "Little girls can see her and say, 'I want to be a director.'"

Regardless of the reasons why we choose to see "A Wrinkle in Time," it is important that we eradicate negative stereotypes of blacks in media. The media images we consume bleed into the public consciousness and seep into our education, housing, health care, and criminal justice systems. We may not be able to march every day. But we can vote at the polling place and with our dollars at the movie theater. The revolution will not only be televised, but it will come with a pair of 3-D glasses.

http://archive.is/oYYrV
 
A Wrinkle in Time told me that Afrofuturism was a real genre, so instead of spending any time on the actual movie, I went and looked at a bunch of classic examples, typified by the same sort of racial activism. Here's a brief rundown of my favorite examples:

You forgot the obvious example and the only one that matters...
Gayniggers-From-Outer-Space-1.jpg
 
I don’t think Guillermo is involved with Pacific Rim 2 besides a producer credit. Besides, he has white passing privilege and the light skins have to get out of the way for the dark skins. I wish this was a joke but one of the actors who didn’t get a role in Black Panther said she didn’t try because even though she’s black, she’s light skinned and the roles should go to dark skins, she is also, no joke, non-binary.

Light skinned guilt seems to be growing. Pretty soon you'll have to be pitch black to claim any sort or real blackness.

It does have some basis though. Hollywood tends to cast a lot of mixed and light skinned blacks. Especially women. Supposedly it's because light skin and more Caucasian features are more appealing to white audiences. What I've heard people say is that when there are too many black actors, and especially if they are dark skinned, people just label it a black movie that doesn't have any appeal for anyone else.

There are a lot of complaints about Hollywood not casting enough dark skinned women and black women in general not having enough good leading roles to go around.

So, now that the movie flopped, are they going to still tout it as 'the first $100m+ blockbuster helmed by a POC woman'?

People are already saying the only reason it didn't do well on its opening weekend is competition from Black Panther. They don't want to admit it's a disappointing mess that stars a black girl and was directed by a black woman.

Wouldn't this send kids screaming from the theatre?

wrinklespot-768x489.jpg
 
People are already saying the only reason it didn't do well on its opening weekend is competition from Black Panther. They don't want to admit it's a disappointing mess that stars a black girl and was directed by a black woman.

Wouldn't this send kids screaming from the theatre?

wrinklespot-768x489.jpg
I for one am glad that the Black Patriarchy sunk that.

Goddamn it, man, you may have spoilered that image but I was not ready for that...
 
Get Out and Moonlight were good movies by talented black directors; black people can relate to them and others can see a different perspective. They don't need to be defended by 'woke' idiots cause they're movies that can hold on their own, even if not perfect or if you don't like them. Black Panther and Wrinkle in Time are mass produced soulless products by the most powerful entertainment company; since Coco was mentioned (contrary to what you think it did super well in Mexico) never forget Disney tried to copyright the words Dia De Los Muertos and important symbols of the festivity like sugar skulls. "POC friendly" my ass.
 
Get Out and Moonlight were good movies by talented black directors; black people can relate to them and others can see a different perspective. They don't need to be defended by 'woke' idiots cause they're movies that can hold on their own, even if not perfect or if you don't like them. Black Panther and Wrinkle in Time are mass produced soulless products by the most powerful entertainment company; since Coco was mentioned (contrary to what you think it did super well in Mexico) never forget Disney tried to copyright the words Dia De Los Muertos and important symbols of the festivity like sugar skulls. "POC friendly" my ass.
People still bitched about Moonlight because it was about GAY black men.
 
Incoming right wing salt...

It’s Official. ‘A Wrinkle in Time’ Is A Disastrous Adaptation Of The Book
Twin brothers from the book are missing entirely from the movie, which may be a blessing, considering that political correctness probably would have dictated they be played by a Native American dwarf and a disabled transsexual.

JamesDawsonheadshotblacksuitcropped.jpg

By James Dawson
MARCH 7, 2018

Madeleine L’Engle’s classic young adult novel “A Wrinkle in Time” is the latest victim of diversity-deranged stunt casting in which no respect is paid to the race or sex of existing literary characters. But that’s only one reason why this frustrating fiasco is such an embarrassing failure. Director Ava DuVernay (“Selma”), who has no feel at all for the material, seems more interested in promoting colorblind multi-culturalism than producing an entertaining adaptation that is worthy of its much-beloved source.

Although movies featuring original characters whose physical attributes have been unspecified elsewhere are legitimate equal-opportunity roles for any actors, deviating from already established characters turns a project into either a sort of alternative-reality racelifted remake (the black-cast versions of “Annie” and “Steel Magnolias”), a re-imagined novelty (“The Wiz”), comic exploitation (“Blacula”) or a display of randomly colorblind inclusiveness (a black Human Torch in the most recent “Fantastic Four”). All of those swaps are distracting enough to seem like gimmicks, even if an appearance-miscast actor gives an otherwise adequate performance.


Teenage Meg Murry and her mother, both white like the rest of their family in the 1962 “A Wrinkle in Time” novel, are portrayed in this film version by black actresses Storm Reid and Gugu Mbatha-Raw. Dad is played by Caucasian Chris Pine. Because Meg’s precocious younger brother Charles Wallace is played by Filipino-American Deric McCabe, this results in the absurdity of the character now being identified as adopted, presumably because it would be hard to believe he could be the product of Mbatha-Raw and Pine’s union. Twin brothers from the book are missing entirely from the movie, which may be a blessing, considering that political correctness probably would have dictated they be played by a Native American dwarf and a disabled transsexual.

The irony of making changes like these to a book in which Meg herself states that “like and equal are not the same thing at all” apparently was lost on those responsible. (Then again, the line does not appear in the movie, possibly because the filmmakers knew they had sabotaged said theme.) Also, it’s unfortunate that the film eliminates the novel’s references to Christianity that resulted in it being banned from some libraries. Inclusion apparently has its limits.

Changing Meg and her mom’s race may have been DuVernay’s attempt to promote the illusion of a universe in which such changes don’t and shouldn’t matter, but that aim is subverted by moments that take on unintended meanings in this new context. Meg’s white friend Calvin (Levi Miller) twice mentions that he likes her hair, which is a huge explosion of curls. Coming from a white boy to a black girl, the compliment has a different implication than if both teens were white. Similarly, when Meg is shown a vision of an idealized makeover of herself that she could become if she gives in to nefarious temptation (a scene not in the book), the fact that her doppelganger’s hair is unnaturally straight and flat comes off like a racist insult to the hair she was born with.

While “whitewashing” conversions of any character to Caucasian are routinely criticized (such as white Natalie Portman’s recent “Annihilation” portrayal of that novel’s half-Asian lead), changing any white character to black apparently is supposed to be regarded as a refreshing redress of historic racist wrongs. That kind of mindset makes it easy to see why the source of pure evil in “A Wrinkle in Time” never is referred to as The Black Thing or The Dark Thing, as it is in the book.


The basic plot sends Meg, Calvin and Charles Wallace on a quest to find her long-missing dad, with the help of three supernatural beings. But the screenplay (by Jennifer Lee and Jeff Stockwell) contains so many annoyingly unnecessary deviations from the novel that it almost could be mistaken for an unauthorized pastiche that attempts to alter just enough details to avoid a plagiarism suit.

A female character known as the Happy Medium in the book is now male (Zach Galifianakis). Calvin’s abusive mother is now an abusive father. Meg’s father has been missing for four years instead of two. A character transforms into a flying green leaf-creature instead of a winged white centaur. Instead of taking place in an imposingly grim office building, an encounter with the evil “man with red eyes” (Michael Peña, known here simply as Red) takes place on a sunny, umbrella-crowded beach.

The movie completely ignores L’Engle’s creepy description of the book’s main villain as an oversized, disembodied brain. Even the ending is altered — mild spoiler alert — by having Meg rely upon another character’s feelings toward her, instead of triumphing solely by expressing hers toward him.

Also new is the idea that Meg’s mother is given more credit than her father for the scientific theories that led to “tessering,” or instantaneous space-time travel. In the book, dad and a half-dozen cohorts are the ones who were working on that project, while mom only has doctor degrees in biology and bacteriology … which apparently didn’t make her enough of a credit-deserving superwoman for today’s #TimesUp audiences.


The book’s three supernatural “Mrs.” characters — Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which, who transport Meg and company through space-time — are as multi-culti as the rest of the cast. Mrs. Who is Mindy Kaling, whose parents are from India. White Reese Witherspoon’s age and red tresses directly contradict the book’s description of Mrs. Whatsit’s “sparse quantity of grayish hair.” And Mrs. Which, a shimmer who takes the form of “a figure in a black robe and a black peaked hat, beady eyes, a beaked nose and long gray hair” clutching a broomstick in the book, is embodied here by Oprah Winfrey in disco glitter mascara and lipstick. Because of course.

It’s probably rude to criticize a 14-year-old for being lifelessly dull even when she tries acting defiantly spunky, but Reid is missing whatever charisma would have been required to make Meg appealing. Like everyone else here, she seems to be going through the motions without much involvement. Pine is saddled with what may be the movie’s most cringeworthy not-from-the-book dialog, however. At one point, he tells Meg, “I wanted to shake hands with the universe, when I should have been holding yours.”

A yellow brick backyard pathway and an otherworldly twister (neither from the book) presumably are attempts to evoke “The Wizard of Oz,” which is like slapping Ferrari decals on a 1971 Pinto. Also, forget about giving what should have been called “A Waste of Time” a pass because it might be good enough for kids. “A Wrinkle in Time” is so unconvincing, uninvolving and unlikeable that expecting even small children to enjoy it seems cruelly condescending.

James Dawson has written more than 1,000 movie reviews and feature articles for various print publications and websites. His work has appeared in places ranging from The Los Angeles Times to Penthouse Forum to a Marvel Comics "Silver Surfer" anthology. His personal website is iDawson.com.

Edit:

Teenage Meg Murry and her mother, both white like the rest of their family in the 1962 “A Wrinkle in Time” novel, are portrayed in this film version by black actresses Storm Reid and Gugu Mbatha-Raw.

Can't make shit like that up, can you? Looks like what results when the cat walks across your keyboard.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Incoming right wing salt...



Edit:



Can't make shit like that up, can you? Looks like what results when the cat walks across your keyboard.

Okay I legit hate this movie now, and everyone involved in turning it into an abomination in comparison with the book.

Not that the book was perfect in any way, and there's always going to be changes in a movie version for time or pacing purposes. I get that. But goddamn, at least stick to the right theme when you remake a book as a movie. While 'A Wrinkle In Time' did have a happy ending (Dad is saved, our human characters all live and get back home, Meg gets a boyfriend, etc.), it was NOT a lighthearted young adult romp by any stretch of the imagination. Most of L'Engle's books had a lot of weird existential and surreal creep factors with moments of cosmic horror. It was one of the reasons I liked them so much as a child; their 'feel' was unique and made you try to get your head around strange concepts.

Also, WTF is with the look of the three Mrs. characters?! Ugh, that pic of Oprah made me gag. They weren't pretty princess fairy godmothers, for fuck's sake REEEEEEE!
 
I didn't see who was involved with the screenplay, but since it was Jennifer Lee, that explains why it's shit. It didn't matter that another man was writing alongside her (Jeff wrote the film adaptation of Bridge to Terabithia btw), she was obviously the main writer and she has to insert her own ideals into everything she touches. She was in Zootopia's writing circle, too, but there were enough men to cancel/balance her out.

This is what Jeff looks like (2007 photo):

JEFF-STOCKWELL-300x282.jpg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Peepeepoopoo Witch
I didn't see who was involved with the screenplay, but since it was Jennifer Lee, that explains why it's shit. It didn't matter that another man was writing alongside her (Jeff wrote the film adaptation of Bridge to Terabithia btw), she was obviously the main writer and she has to insert her own ideals into everything she touches. She was in Zootopia's writing circle, too, but there were enough men to cancel/balance her out.

This is what Jeff looks like (2007 photo):

View attachment 401100
My god. I'd never heard of this guy before but just looking at him I feel like pointing on the doll to where he touched me. When the creep factor comes through that hard in just a photograph...
 
So what happened to the Disney that just used to make entertaining movies? Can we get that back?

Light skinned guilt seems to be growing. Pretty soon you'll have to be pitch black to claim any sort or real blackness.

Wouldn't this send kids screaming from the theatre?

wrinklespot-768x489.jpg

I'm confused. In this movie, is Oprah playing a supernatural being, or a overweight drag queen?

When I was forced to read "Wrinkle" in grade school I found the three Mrs. characters to be a cross between uninteresting, pompous, and frightening (and that last, not in the fun horror movie way). I was utterly unimpressed with L'Engle's work and I feel like these are 'beloved' books only because we're TOLD they're that way. You're supposed to like them, even if you don't.

And I'm glad this film is taking flack and getting poor reviews and box office. Disney needs a good hard kick in the ass and hopefully, this will shy them away from any more woke SJW versions of old novels.
 
Good to hear this shite is failing and failing hard; very fucking good.

I wasn't going anywhere near this film, anyway - even better, it's being shilled as some BS political statement, which makes it even more unwatchable / wise to ignore it. Thanks for that, CNN - I never asked for your help, but what-fucking-ever.
 
Back