We aren't being told the truth about the James Webb Space Telescope's abilities. - The lies are stacking up

[Vecr]

If you can get the resolution to be good enough you can probably tell what kind of radioactive material it is. So X-ray machines will look very different from nuclear reactors which will look very different from Nuclear weapons.

I hope you can understand the immense value in being able to determine where any nuclear weapon on the planet is via spy satellite.

So why hide it in a research telescope? Because if I wanted to use anti-satellite weapons to take out spy satellites I might not suspect this humble little research telescope.

Just a theory and I could be wrong who knows. I did hate optics and found it kind of boring and stupid.

They've got those satellites, I just doubt the JWST is close enough to earth to get anything. And it would ruin the cryo on the infrared instruments every time you turned it around. The NRO already gave NASA a telescope, maybe the NRO gave NASA parts because they were too far behind schedule.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I enjoy some of the detailed schizo posts here on KF. In all honesty, unless you're an astrophysicist that has significant familiarity with deep space imaging outside of the visible optical wavelengths, don't be surprised if I don't take what you say seriously.