EU Weapon Ban for AfD Members: Ruling Now Confirmed - German courts rule that members of the only opposition party are to be disarmed... *Anarcho-tyranny intensifies*

Fresh publication over at Apollo News [A], translated by yours truly for the Kiwi audience

The Higher Administrative Court of North Rhine-Westphalia has ruled in summary proceedings that being a member of an anti-constitutional organization is sufficient to be barred from owning a firearm under firearms laws. This also applies to members of the AfD, even if the party is currently merely a suspected case.

This was announced by a spokeswoman for the court at the request of the German Press Agency (dpa). The reasoning behind the decision is the classification of the AfD as a suspected case of right-wing extremism by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz). This classification was confirmed by the Higher Administrative Court (OVG) of North Rhine-Westphalia in Münster on May 13 2004.

In two summary proceedings, the OVG emphasized that an AfD membership is already a sufficient basis for the revocation of a firearms license. It is considered especially aggravating if a party member is not just an ordinary member, but actively supporting the party as a functionary.

In its expedited rulings, the 20th Senate of the OVG claimed that it is also aggravating that one of the plaintiffs did not unequivocally and persistantly distance himself from anti-constitutional endeavors within the AfD. The court referred to inflammatory statements or intimidating behavior by party members.

The two summary proceedings were proceeded by rulings by the Düsseldorf Administrative Court at the end of June, in which it ruled that the respective AfD members must hand in their weapons (Apollo News reported on this). In doing so, the authorities had previously revoked the plaintiffs' gun permits, which they attempted to challenge in court. In the main case, four appeal proceedings are still pending at the Higher Administrative Court. According to the court spokeswoman, no hearing dates have been set yet.
 
God damn, were the Founding Fathers prescient with the First Amendment. As bad as the UK and Europe were in the late 1700's, they've somehow managed to get even worse.
They were indeed. Look at us as a cautionary tale.
 
They were indeed. Look at us as a cautionary tale.
They used Europe as many different cautionary tales. One of the arguments in favor of ditching unanimous approval for things was "Do we really want to risk ending up like Poland, too wracked with indecision to defend ourselves?" To be honest that surprised me when I first heard about it. Poland was famous as a clusterfuck even all the way across the Atlantic, it seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otterly
Ironically, didn’t the Nazis do this too?
Some things never change.
1000002440.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otterly
Back