- Joined
- Sep 16, 2018
These american writers make their stories racially diverse in settings where it doesn't make sense or there's no explenation for it.>creatives can make their characters look however they want and the purpose of stories are to be interesting and well written
>some American writers will make their stories racially diverse to reflect the area they were raised in (i.e NY or LA or whatever)
If your character is a black man in the middle of imperial japan with no explenation then by definition its not well writen.
The fact that so many writers are unable to write worlds that don't resemble american coastal cities is part of the reason why fiction is so shit today.
You've yet to explain why white men being the main characters of western fiction is a problem but black men and asian men being the main characters of african and asian fiction isn't.>writers who live in more homogenous countries like Japan, Russia, or Nigeria will not feel obligated to due so because of said homogeny
>people are individuals and can have any personality and varied outlooks on life and the characters people write should reflect this
>"this oppression of the white man will not stand!"
Both female cops and female soldiers are pitty hires at best and jokes at worst. Female cops get manhandled by criminals all the time and female soldiers are a straight up liability for any unit they're in.Okay
We have female cops and female soldiers in real life so why can't they be in fiction?
Which hey, if you want to make a story about a completely mismanaged and incompetent coutry run by idiots, that's actually a great thing to focus on!
But if you wanna make a story about a massive imperialist authoritarian fearsome empire? That's a big nono.
Stealth roles and extended deployments still require strength, agility and endurance all of which they lack compared to men making still a far worse choice than men. Is a woman assassin less stupid than a woman in a shield wall? Sure. Is it still insanely stupid? Yes.There are logical reasons for why women aren't on the front lines. Men are stronger than women, obviously and are needed to maintain the homefront, but women would excel in stealth offensive roles like assassins or snipers.
Of course there are scenarios where a female assassin can work and does make sense, but this falls into the "men with tits" problem. Agent 47 does not make sense as a woman.
If you want a female assasin you need to actually write a story for a female assassin (focused more on social infiltration) insead of writing a generic assassin story and putting a woman in the lead lore.
Men and women are different both physically and mentally. A well writen character should not be able to be gender swapped with no effect on the story. You cannot gender swap james bond without making the story severly shittier because a large part of his story are his character traits primarily excibited by and assosicated with men.I never understood the "men with tits" thing. Unless she's a troon, then she is a woman. She may be brash, arrogant, aggressive and have short hair, but she is still a woman.