UN What Are Those Mysterious New Towers Looming Over New York’s Sidewalks? - As the city upgrades to 5G wireless, the streetscape is changing. Not everyone is impressed.

1667713674565.png
A new 5G tower on Mulberry Street in Manhattan’s Chinatown. Amir Hamja for The New York Times

By Dodai Stewart
Nov. 5, 2022

A curiously futuristic tower recently appeared on the corner of Putnam and Bedford Avenues in the Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn. A gray column topped by a perforated casing, at a whopping 32 feet tall, it reaches higher than the three-story brick building behind it.

Sixty-year-old Marion Little, who owns Stripper Stain & Supplies, the hardware store that has operated on that corner for 17 years, said that he and his neighbors had received no warning. One day there were workers outside; then the tower materialized.

“We were shocked because we had no idea what it was,” Mr. Little said. Since it’s right outside his store, people keep asking him about it. “They’ve been emailing me, calling me weekends, Facebooking me, like, ‘Yo, what’s that?’ and I’m sitting there like, ‘I have no clue.’”

The object in question is a new 5G antenna tower erected by LinkNYC, the latest hardware in New York’s sweeping technological upgrade.

New York City has an agreement with CityBridge, the team behind LinkNYC, that involves installing 2,000 5G towers over the next several years, an effort to help eliminate the city’s “internet deserts.” Ninety percent will be in underserved areas of the city — neighborhoods in the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island and above 96th Street in Manhattan.

Once the towers are activated, residents will have access to free digital calling and free high-speed Wi-Fi as well as 5G service. Many of the locations were previously home to pay phones.

According to officials in the city’s Office of Technology and Innovation, 40 percent of New York City households lack the combination of home and mobile broadband, including 18 percent of residents — more than 1.5 million people — who lack both.

The 5G towers, as well as fiber cables underground, will make up an infrastructure that carriers like AT&T and Verizon can use to provide better service to customers. Most of the towers, including the one on Mr. Little’s corner, have not yet been activated.

But as is often the case when something new appears on the New York City streetscape, people seem startled by the large structures — and some have expressed unfounded fears about 5G. They’re concerned about the towers’ sheer size and, in some cases, the wrecked views from third-floor windows. Mr. Little also questioned the practicality of placing the tower on his corner at the B26 bus stop: “The buses turn here,” he said. “It’s going to be easy to miscalculate and hit the thing.”

Another 5G tower popped up in Fort Greene, on the corner of Vanderbilt and Myrtle Avenues, again, by a bus stop — the B69. It looms alongside a three-story residential building with a ground-level liquor store.

Mark Malecki, 26, who moved to New York City in mid-October from Richmond, Va., has an intimate view framed by his third-floor bedroom window. “I wasn’t even quite sure what it was,” he said.

1667713733285.png
The new tower at the corner of at Bedford and Putnam Avenues in Bedford-Stuyvesant caught residents by surprise. Amir Hamja for The New York Times

Just down the street lives Renee Collymore, a 50-year-old Brooklynite who said her family is “four generations deep in this neighborhood” and who serves as the Democratic liaison for the 57th Assembly District in Fort Greene. She has been wary of the tower since it appeared this summer.

As the head of the Vanderbilt Avenue Block Association, Ms. Collymore said, “Never have I heard one mention of residents asking for a tower to be placed where we live.” She plans to hold a meeting about it.

Before this tower came, I had fine service,” Ms. Collymore continued. “What, a call dropped every now and then? So what. You keep going.”

In Manhattan’s Chinatown, where a tower cropped up on the corner of Mulberry and Bayard Streets, one resident of a nearby building declared it a “monstrosity.”

“Who wants to look at something like that?” she asked.

The towers are not the only 5G antennas being installed in New York City. Others are going up on city property, like traffic lights and streetlamps.

At the end of September, jackhammering could be heard outside of the six-story brick building on the Upper East Side where Chelsea Formica, 32, lives with her husband, Joe, and their infant son.

Ms. Formica was in New Jersey visiting her mother when Joe called. “He was like, ‘Hey, you know, they put something up outside of our window. I’m just laying here on the couch and it’s pretty big.’” Then Ms. Formica got home. “I was like, ‘Oh, my God,’ freaking out. It’s huge. It’s so big.”

Workers for the telecommunications company ExteNet had installed a cylindrical object roughly the size of a human being: a 5G antenna that is 63 inches tall and 21 inches in diameter, according to the company. It is accompanied by a box that is 38 inches high, 16 inches wide and 14 inches deep — about the size of a filing cabinet or a night stand.

The imposing antenna is mounted on top of a slender pole, three stories high — more than 30 feet in the air — and right in front of Ms. Formica’s living-room window. It’s also just steps away from where their 5-month-old baby sleeps, which makes Ms. Formica uncomfortable.

“People say that it is safe; the F.C.C. says it’s safe and everything,” she said. “We’re just worried that it’s so close to my son’s bedroom.”

Alex Wyglinski, the associate dean of graduate studies and a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, said residents need not worry. He noted that 5G is non-ionizing radiation, on the opposite end of the spectrum from ionizing rays that people need protection from, like UV rays and X-rays.

In addition, Dr. Wyglinski said, the tower “cannot just blast energy everywhere. It’s going to be hyper-focused points of energy going directly to your cellphone.”

And while the towers are tall, “you’ll get used to it,” he said. Just like streetlights and traffic lights, he added, “this will get integrated into the cityscape.”

Ms. Formica and her next-door neighbor Virginie Glaenzer, whose window view is also dominated by the antenna, took a measuring tape to the sidewalk and discovered that the newly installed pole is slightly less than 10 feet away from the building, a distance that typically triggers a community notification process, according to the agreement between New York City and ExteNet.

1667713801866.png
From her apartment window on the Upper East Side, Virginie Glaenzer has a close-up view of a new 5G antenna.Credit...Amir Hamja for The New York Times

Ms. Glaenzer and Ms. Formica contacted their local representatives and handed out fliers urging their neighbors to do the same. They would like to see the antenna removed — or at least moved across the street, alongside the Asphalt Green turf field and not next to a residential building.

Julie Menin, the New York City Council member who represents Ms. Formica, Ms. Glaenzer and the rest of District 5, said that she has, on behalf of her constituents, asked the city to hire a third party to conduct emissions tests on the antennas to ensure that they comply with federal regulations, and the city’s Office of Technology and Innovation has agreed to do so.

The city also asked ExteNet to move the antenna, but ExteNet said it had no plans to do so. Ms. Formica said she wouldn’t feel comfortable living next to it once it is turned on. She isn’t sure she would move out, she said, but she would consider her options. “I think I would look into a lawyer.”

As for Ms. Glaenzer, she laughed as she pointed to some crystals she’d placed in a bowl on the windowsill in front of the antenna. “They’re supposed to remove the radiation,” she said, shrugging. “You’re just holding on to whatever you have.”

A correction was made on Nov. 5, 2022: An earlier version of this article incorrectly characterized a 5G tower on the Upper East Side. Its location, less than 10 feet from a building, typically triggers a community notification process. It does not put it in violation of the city contract.

Source (Archive)
 
I don't live in a big, shitty city, so pardon my ignorance. Is there a reason they just put new towers in to the ground instead of putting them on top of the street posts where they have the cross walk signals attached? Why add MORE shit in to the sidewalk instead of stacking it on an existing post?
When I live in downtown st louis cell phones , Radio data, ect lease space on roofs its gets them out of the way and higher up. ( and building owners getr money for nothing) Why the fuck would you put them on the side walk ???? ( prob bad planning )
 
For once the government does something at least half way decent and New Yorkers are already whining about it. Fuck off.
>Good

No. The benefits for this system lie in the arms of the data brokers and five eyes intelligence. The supposed pluses in speed and latency will be gone once enough people are on this network, and in my opinion are outweighed immediately by the failings orchestrated in
What I read is that 5G is actually shorter range. It also doesn't penetrate buildings as well. So I guess it needs to be closer to the ground. I think also it has a variety of receivers for similar reasons which probably adds to the bulk.

Ugly as fuck regardless of any technical factors anyway. Looks like one end of those padded batons that American Gladiators used to use to knock each other off platforms with.
this reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Particle Bored
6G is at least 10 years away, probably more like 15, so obsolescence won't be an issue for at least a few decades.
Do you believe that the additional work to support so many small nodes + potential latency between so many different smaller towers and the complexity of that will allow 5G to ever reach the theoretical benefits being espoused? Will it be economically worth it? I saw
It depends on what type of 5G you are talking about. Mid-band, or millimeter wave.


5G can be as much as 10x faster than than 4G. 5G can also have more than 40x less latency. Current implementations are 3x faster than 4G and have 2x lower latency.
If current implementations are way below the limits proposed by manufacturers, do you ever believe they will reach them once as many people that are on 4g lte are on 5g? You know they're pushing people to hop onto a cellular plan for their houses, too. Which means even more stress on the system. Do you really even think we'll have 6G with how close to the limit on just how small wavelengths can be made before they're essentially gamma and thus very unsafe? I'll admit I'm not in the telecom industry and am just collecting information as I go, but there seem to be huge problems going forward. Is mid-band ever used for small devices like phones or is it purely for the main cell to communicate with all the smaller milli band ones?
 
>free high speed internet
yea no i don't trust that, never trust anything given for free by people who would gain nothing from giving it out for free.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox
Do you believe that the additional work to support so many small nodes + potential latency between so many different smaller towers and the complexity of that will allow 5G to ever reach the theoretical benefits being espoused? Will it be economically worth it? I saw

If current implementations are way below the limits proposed by manufacturers, do you ever believe they will reach them once as many people that are on 4g lte are on 5g? You know they're pushing people to hop onto a cellular plan for their houses, too. Which means even more stress on the system. Do you really even think we'll have 6G with how close to the limit on just how small wavelengths can be made before they're essentially gamma and thus very unsafe? I'll admit I'm not in the telecom industry and am just collecting information as I go, but there seem to be huge problems going forward. Is mid-band ever used for small devices like phones or is it purely for the main cell to communicate with all the smaller milli band ones?

If 4G is any indication, 5G will continue to improve as the hardware that runs it gets more refined. The latest generation of 4G is vastly superior to the original hardware that 4G ran on. Also, one advantage that 5G has over 4G is that as the number of devices using it increases, it's spectral efficiency actually increases.

I'm not sure what you mean regarding the wavelength. The wavelengths being used for 5G are mid-band (so in the 470-570 MHz range), which is part of the old analog TV UHF band, the low-GHz band (around 2 GHz) which is a lower frequency that 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and mmWave (24-40 GHz) which is a lower frequency than the band used by satellite dishes, and the Wi-Fi Direct video standard. All of these bands are recycled from other purposes, so none of them are new or unusual. 6G would likely also use mid-band (likely recycling part of the old digital PCS spectrum) and the low GHz band because their penetration of walls and signal propagation is optimal for cellular. I expect they will actually ditch the higher frequency band for 6G that was used for 5G, being mmWave, since it turned out to be far less useful than expected. I would imagine they will keep any spectrum use to 14 GHz or below. Mid-band is the main frequency range used successfully with phones in the US.
 
Back