- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
O'Brien is probably the most interesting character. The protagonist is kind of a cipher.It has an interesting villain who explains his motivations well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
O'Brien is probably the most interesting character. The protagonist is kind of a cipher.It has an interesting villain who explains his motivations well.
I liked Moby Dick on how over the top it is. Reading it felt like the book was the whale itself if it make sense.22 chapters left on Moby Dick.
In the last chapter I read,Ahab has the ship blacksmith construct him a new harpoon, and it's the most dramatic shit, like watching some mystical weapon be forged.
One of my favorite books, so funny.Finished a Confederacy of dunces on my night shift and fuck it's the funniest book I've ever read. The ending came together so perfectly. I wish he had written more. Gonna be reading Jurassic park next
I don't like Orwell's prose that much, but I do think it's a pretty compelling book.Someone pls convince me to read 1984. I still haven't finished my current book, Flowers for Algernon, but I've been thinking about reading 1984 for a long time. But I'm worried it'll be super boring and dated. Any opinions? Is it worth reading?
It's one of those "must-read" classics and it's very relevant to how global society is leaning nowadays, but as others have said there is a big chunk in the middle-ish that is an absolute slog (I ended up skipping through it). I also didn't like the main character much after we see himSomeone pls convince me to read 1984. I still haven't finished my current book, Flowers for Algernon, but I've been thinking about reading 1984 for a long time. But I'm worried it'll be super boring and dated. Any opinions? Is it worth reading?
I think the party controls everything about every aspect of their lives even sex as is shown in the novel when he talks about marriage. I think maybe it's to show how the protagonists conception of love changes from something very hateful (a hate which is directed towards the party) to something more beautiful as his relationship with Julia progresses.I've heard several justifications on why this makes sense in the moment or is a symptom of government oppression or whatever and none of it makes sense to me. The ending is fantastic, imo.
I think the party controls everything about every aspect of their lives even sex as is shown in the novel when he talks about marriage. I think maybe it's to show how the protagonists conception of love changes from something very hateful (a hate which is directed towards the party) to something more beautiful as his relationship with Julia progresses.
Nah. About 85% of the population are proles. They're explicitly not political at all, they just live normal lives. There are a few scenes where Winston interacts with them. Only 15% of the population are party members, and only 2% of those are Inner Party. Winston and Julia are Outer Party, which is the most strictly controlled group of people. "Recreational sex" is technically banned, but it's only enforced for the Outer Party (Inner Party are privileged and rules don't apply to them, proles are considered below notice and the Party even provides them with "bread and circuses" in the form of condoms and pornography). Winston being a twisted human being is meant to be understood as due in large part to his being Outer Party.because this would imply that violent rape is the norm for loyal party members, which makes up 99% of the population
Is there any semblance of a happy ending?Let's just say there's a reason why this book gets referenced so much. It's a bleak story about subversion and subjugation. You can find less extreme examples of things that happen in it in real life. It has an interesting villain who explains his motivations well.
Nah. About 85% of the population are proles. They're explicitly not political at all, they just live normal lives. There are a few scenes where Winston interacts with them. Only 15% of the population are party members, and only 2% of those are Inner Party. Winston and Julia are Outer Party, which is the most strictly controlled group of people. "Recreational sex" is technically banned, but it's only enforced for the Outer Party (Inner Party are privileged and rules don't apply to them, proles are considered below notice and the Party even provides them with "bread and circuses" in the form of condoms and pornography). Winston being a twisted human being is meant to be understood as due in large part to his being Outer Party.
not surprised, I've heard everything past "Nova" really just gets too overtly sexual in the weird degenerate way.All right, I'm giving up on Dhalgren. I caved in and read the synopsis on Wikipedia. It looks like I'm not going to miss much. It's more degeneracy (bisexual triangle involving two adults and a 15-year old boy), amnesia, writing poems that we never get to read and no action to speak of.
Next in my big backlog is The Day Of The Locust by Nathanael West. Another well known book, but I'm sort of going in blind because I downloaded a lot of EPUBs from Z-Library a few years ago and I barely remember the reason for each one.
I watched a documentary which randomly interviewed a EU parliament person on the concept of books. They said it was tool-assisted meditating. It literally forces you to breathe slowly and focus intensely on.. "nothing" depending on how you read. At my apex efficiency I manifest the thing I read in my head and it helps a lot. Audio books are like taking everything you're meant to feel and do about reading and removing it. Like how having a stream open on your monitor next to a good RPG is ruining your actual enjoyment of the game. I had one monitor for a while and it honestly made me focus on things so much more, especially games.Don't do this. You won't remember anything. Your brain will get used to this multi-tasking and it will get even harder for you to read a book. Force yourself to read text for extended periods of time without interruptions. If you're going to listen to music, make it ambient.
This shit takes me out of a book so fast. One of the Silo books had a brief dump on "THE WAR IN IRAQ THAT LED TO THIS", while not specifically hugely important, it just took me out of it. Same with Dune and the whole ancient egypt shit.it's kind of just a lore-dump, explaining 'how we got here'.
I watched a documentary which randomly interviewed a EU parliament person on the concept of books. They said it was tool-assisted meditating. It literally forces you to breathe slowly and focus intensely on.. "nothing" depending on how you read. At my apex efficiency I manifest the thing I read in my head and it helps a lot. Audio books are like taking everything you're meant to feel and do about reading and removing it. Like how having a stream open on your monitor next to a good RPG is ruining your actual enjoyment of the game. I had one monitor for a while and it honestly made me focus on things so much more, especially games.
Classical music or soft jazz or soft funk IMO. Even Swing music. Don't do anything with tons of percussion.I should stop using Youtube as background noise. I keep playing the same couple of channels on repeat. I think I got used to listening to human speech without comprehending it. This is yet another bad 21st century habit.
Nature sounds are also neat.Classical music or soft jazz or soft funk IMO. Even Swing music. Don't do anything with tons of percussion.