- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Yes, I'm pretty sure Chris can buy a gun. Chris wouldn't buy a gun because that's less lego money.What if Chris went out and used hisand bought an actual gun? Would he even qualify to be able to under Virginia law?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I'm pretty sure Chris can buy a gun. Chris wouldn't buy a gun because that's less lego money.What if Chris went out and used hisand bought an actual gun? Would he even qualify to be able to under Virginia law?
Why would he buy one? He could just take one of Bob's.What if Chris went out and used hisand bought an actual gun? Would he even qualify to be able to under Virginia law?
Bob has guns? I assumed that they didnt since Chris mentioned that he'd ban guns if he was in charge.Why would he buy one? He could just take one of Bob's.
So under American law, Chris is eligible for gun ownership? Thats a scary thought....Yes, I'm pretty sure Chris can buy a gun. Chris wouldn't buy a gun because that's less lego money.
So under American law, Chris is eligible for gun ownership? Thats a scary thought....
Sorry, I'm kinda new to the whole forum thing.... first forum I've joined actually. Thanks for the heads up.Only crazy people double-post
I know the What If's are mostly for fun and giggles, but in all seriousness, Chrissys popularity to begin with was based on his stupidity and failing to make money of his creations. It would render him obsolete quicker than the bleeper.What if Chris figured out how to make money from commissions at the height of his popularity? I imagine he'd sell more, but the extra work would negatively affect Sonichu's production speed.
Nah, that's just a running joke.Bob has guns? I assumed that they didnt since Chris mentioned that he'd ban guns if he was in charge.
Until they have a reason to deny you a gun, you're always eligible for gun ownership. Chris is legally an adult with nothing on his record that would bar him from getting a gun, I believe.So under American law, Chris is eligible for gun ownership? Thats a scary thought....
Until they have a reason to deny you a gun, you're always eligible for gun ownership. Chris is legally an adult with nothing on his record that would bar him from getting a gun, I believe.
I've witnessed someone who had been buying guns their entire adult life denied from purchasing a gun because of a 30 year old failure-to-appear warrant on a traffic violation. The NCIC system is whacky an inconsistent. The stupid part is, if you fail one check for any reason, you are then not legally authorized to own any guns, so you have to give them to someone for safe-keeping until you get it sorted out. Yeah usually a felony conviction will do it, but you can actually get your gun rights reinstated if you care to fight that uphill battle.Absolutely nothing on his record would bar him. Autism wouldn't do it. The only thing that always bars you from owning a gun is a felony conviction.
As for mental issues, that's a state by state thing. Some states, like Texas, do not care about anything. Some states, like Colorado, require a background check on every sale. As for what would bar ownership, I do not know. Probably very little. Maybe treatment for schizophrenia? Definitely not autism, though.
But that's the real issue here. The sweepstakes was perhaps his greatest achievement (and only one for that matter) which boosted his ego beyond measure. We are still seeing the affects of it to this day. His personality might have been tottaly different today.He would of bitched that he should of won that contest as he got older. And maybe included that in an issue of sonichu.
Oh no, not even close. Winning that contest was just one out of all the various miscellanea Chris distinguishes himself with. Like the pedophile principal, saying monkey as an infant, the evil babysitter, changing his name to Christian, etc. (Well, and that contest went to the wayside when Chris found better things to represent himself with.)But that's the real issue here. The sweepstakes was perhaps his greatest achievement (and only one for that matter) which boosted his ego beyond measure. We are still seeing the affects of it to this day. His personality might have been tottaly different today.
Oh no, not even close. Winning that contest was just one out of all the various miscellanea Chris distinguishes himself with. Like the pedophile principal, saying monkey as an infant, the evil babysitter, changing his name to Christian, etc. (Well, and that contest went to the wayside when Chris found better things to represent himself with.)
What if Chris got a job at Wal-Mart doing something that most managers would trust a slow in da mind with?
Keep in mind Wal-Mart does tend to hire disabled people ( if for selfish and exploitive reasons).
How long would Chris last at a typical Wal-Mart, and what would happen if the manager tried to exploit him ( in an economic/labor sense?)
Thats sorta what I was thinking, I mean he doesn't have any felonies to his name but that restraining order and the fact that he was on trial for running a man over I'd imagine any gun shop owner would be reluctant to sell him anything. Although I'm assuming that gun store owners have a right to refuse service to people in America?I've witnessed someone who had been buying guns their entire adult life denied from purchasing a gun because of a 30 year old failure-to-appear warrant on a traffic violation. The NCIC system is whacky an inconsistent. The stupid part is, if you fail one check for any reason, you are then not legally authorized to own any guns, so you have to give them to someone for safe-keeping until you get it sorted out. Yeah usually a felony conviction will do it, but you can actually get your gun rights reinstated if you care to fight that uphill battle.
The thing that would be the biggest obstacle for Chris isn't his mental state or his arrest record. It's that restraining order. I'm not 100% positive, but i'm pretty sure you can't own a gun if someone has a restraining order or order of protection against you.[/QUO
Business owners can refuse service, but it can't be on the basis of certain factors, such as race. Telling Chris he couldn't bu a gun might get into a gray area.Thats sorta what I was thinking, I mean he doesn't have any felonies to his name but that restraining order and the fact that he was on trial for running a man over I'd imagine any gun shop owner would be reluctant to sell him anything. Although I'm assuming that gun store owners have a right to refuse service to people in America?