Corbin Dallas Multipass
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
OP is dumb and has bad ideas. Lurk more commie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's why so many anarchists have 'tism.This idea that everybody will somehow just decide en masse to work together is proof that someone has never worked in a group environment before.
Commie?OP is dumb and has bad ideas. Lurk more commie.
Not "real communism". Communism's (as defined by Marx) real goal is to abolish the slave master system and achieve a stateless and moneyless society where everyone is able to work for themselves to the point where they thrive rather than survive, allowing them to pursue their hobbies and interests. Marx would describe what we know as communism as "socialism" or "The Dictatorship of the proletariat". "Real Communism" is all about returning to the "true state of man" and it's goals are all about freedom.Commie?
View attachment 838922
I know you didn't bother reading, but Communism, from what I understand, is absolute Government.
The exact opposite of Anarchy.
Actually, we might both be wrong.Not "real communism". Communism's (as defined by Marx) real goal is to abolish the slave master system and achieve a stateless and moneyless society.
But surly you know that your description of Communism (As Marx put it) is a complete lie. It is, for all intent and purposes, a product of a Jewish mindset.The religion where you produce nothing, stealing everything, and then destroy the community
Oh... well this took a turn that I didn't expect.DA JOOS
Once again, another one who didn't bother to read the previous posts.As an idea, it is purely academic. It could never be sustained in the real world for the simple reason that nature abhors a vacuum. Groups of people who organize together to get what they want are far better positioned to achieve their aims than groups of people who deny themselves that advantage.
What? Did you think I liked Jews and communists? The very bane of the human existence?Oh... well this took a turn that I didn't expect.
While that will certainly happen, remember that a court room is about transparency. Putting your cards on the table and seeing what you've got. How the community takes it is another thing. There may be consequence for them and those they associate with. Let's look at the more recent case of Jeffrey Epstein.And apparently it will be run by whoever has enough money to pay off the judge and jury.
Look at these videos and tell me what you see...If you are unironically an anarchist I reserve the right to tie you to a stake and burn you alive
But they are anarchists (anarcho-communists). Just because you don't like communism doesn't mean you get to call them jews and therefore not real anarchists. I dont want to show off my fedora, but that is a no true Scotsman fallacyBy having Antifa call themselves Anarchists, the Jews have effectively skewered the meaning of Anarchy
How do you keep said secret societies from gaining power? There are always people who will do horrible shit for whoever pays them. Mercenaries have existed throughout history. Some people pool their money together to get power, their power attracts people who aren't as good at it, but are really, really good at being sycophants, thus more power, then start hiring people. Maybe the original group might have a schism, but usually that means one person ends up in charge.While that will certainly happen, remember that a court room is about transparency. Putting your cards on the table and seeing what you've got. How the community takes it is another thing. There may be consequence for them and those they associate with. Let's look at the more recent case of Jeffrey Epstein. Of course, he's going to get off. The ZOG has complete control of the justice system. But I wonder how different things would be in an anarchist society. Epstein has a mountain of dirt on powerful people, thus ensuring his victory (Unless he commits suicide, by somehow shooting himself in the back of the head). In a stateless society, secret societies (Or private clubs if you prefer) will still exist. But they might not have the same power as the ones that currently rule this planet. Let's say Epstein is part of that group and they all fuck little girls on his private island. To the common folk, there's not much they can do about it. But I'm pretty sure of one thing. That there will be more people with as much power and influence as Epstein, thanks to the restrictions of Government taxes and red-tape being lifted. With a larger pot of people on equal footing, it's more likely that there's going to be different opinions on what's acceptable.
Phew, but this is getting a little bit deep.
Anarchy isn't about the lack of organisation. It's not about the lack of authority either.
But they are communists, not anarchists. And they're puppets, groomed by the Jewish controlled schools.But they are anarchists (anarcho-communists). Just because you don't like communism doesn't mean you get to call them jews.
That's exactly how reality works. If you control the language, you control the minds. As the Jews have aptly proven. My own definition of reality is simply what you believe to be true or false.You don't just get to re-define terms until you win the argument, that's not how reality works.
How do you keep said secret societies from gaining power? There are always people who will do horrible shit for whoever pays them. Mercenaries have existed throughout history. Some people pool their money together to get power, their power attracts people who aren't as good at it, but are really, really good at being sycophants, thus more power, then start hiring people. Maybe the original group might have a schism, but usually that means one person ends up in charge.
This doesn't even get into where does the money come from in an anarchist society? Gold? Then you better learn chemistry to be sure you're not getting cheated. There's a reason kings in the past executed anyone caught fucking with coinage, it was because distrust in the money could cause the entire country's economy to tank. And in anarchy you either have roving mobs willing to kill people who dilute the coinage, or you end up with a strong leader (fuck it, a King, you're going to need a damn monarchy) who has the power to order a person killed for said crime. Crypto? What if the person you're trying to buy bread from uses a different system and tells you to fuck off? Also how would you make it? Whoever has the ability to make it has the power, everybody else will end up fighting over the scraps. Like ususal. And don't even start with "anybody can make crypto, nowadays it takes serious, real world money to start a setup, how many computer parts places are willing to take crypto to sell you the video cards, or hell the power company, how many power companies accept bitcoin?
My dude, they are both. How can you decide what are real anarchists and what are Jewish commies pretending to anarchists when you didn't even know what communism is. Moreover, why would Jews be pro-communism when most communist nations have exiled or killed Jews, for example, the USSR.But they are communists, not anarchists
You've just destroyed any argument you might ever have made. Nobody here is impressed with your bullshit which means you have no control, ergo you've lost the game.That's exactly how reality works. If you control the language, you control the minds. As the Jews have aptly proven. My own definition of reality is simply what you believe to be true or false.
My dude, they are both. How can you decide what are real anarchists and what are Jewish commies pretending to anarchists when you didn't even know what communism is. Moreover, why would Jews be pro-communism when most communist nations have exiled or killed Jews, for example, the USSR.
Dude, its over. You can stop replying now.You've just destroyed any argument you might ever have made. Nobody here is impressed with your bullshit which means you have no control, ergo you've lost the game.
Translation from the native faggot into English: "You can't fire me, I quit!"