What is Anarchy?

The word anarchy comes from the Latin word anarchos, meaning: without leaders. The word is a reference to the ancient Greek word archon, which was once commonly used to refer to rulers.

As an idea, it is purely academic. It could never be sustained in the real world for the simple reason that nature abhors a vacuum. Groups of people who organize together to get what they want are far better positioned to achieve their aims than groups of people who deny themselves that advantage.
 
OP is dumb and has bad ideas. Lurk more commie.
Commie?
838922


I know you didn't bother reading, but Communism, from what I understand, is absolute Government.
The exact opposite of Anarchy.
 
Commie?
View attachment 838922

I know you didn't bother reading, but Communism, from what I understand, is absolute Government.
The exact opposite of Anarchy.
Not "real communism". Communism's (as defined by Marx) real goal is to abolish the slave master system and achieve a stateless and moneyless society where everyone is able to work for themselves to the point where they thrive rather than survive, allowing them to pursue their hobbies and interests. Marx would describe what we know as communism as "socialism" or "The Dictatorship of the proletariat". "Real Communism" is all about returning to the "true state of man" and it's goals are all about freedom.

p.s
Please don't take this as me advocating for communism or the "muh real communism" argument. If you use this argument you are a colossal dipshit. Just because "real communism" has never been achieved, Every attempt of establishing a communist society has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Syaoran Li
Not "real communism". Communism's (as defined by Marx) real goal is to abolish the slave master system and achieve a stateless and moneyless society.
Actually, we might both be wrong.

Stephan Wise, a famous Rabbi had once said that Communism was the same as Judaism.
The religion where you produce nothing, stealing everything, and then destroy the community
But surly you know that your description of Communism (As Marx put it) is a complete lie. It is, for all intent and purposes, a product of a Jewish mindset.

 
As an idea, it is purely academic. It could never be sustained in the real world for the simple reason that nature abhors a vacuum. Groups of people who organize together to get what they want are far better positioned to achieve their aims than groups of people who deny themselves that advantage.
Once again, another one who didn't bother to read the previous posts.
I was expecting this site to be similar to 8chan where we could share forbidden knowledge. But it was purely about making fun of people, regardless on whether they're right or wrong. There is nothing to expect from people who simply want to watch the world burn.

839448


Oh... well this took a turn that I didn't expect.
What? Did you think I liked Jews and communists? The very bane of the human existence?
Well, its not really a surprise. By having Antifa call themselves Anarchists, the Jews have effectively skewered the meaning of Anarchy. Taking the symbol for themselves and controlling the 'language' by having it represent something entirely different. I didn't realise it was such a problem until now. Did everyone here think I was some kind of Tranny Faggot straight off the Campus production line?

And apparently it will be run by whoever has enough money to pay off the judge and jury.
While that will certainly happen, remember that a court room is about transparency. Putting your cards on the table and seeing what you've got. How the community takes it is another thing. There may be consequence for them and those they associate with. Let's look at the more recent case of Jeffrey Epstein.

Of course he's going to get off. The ZOG has complete control of the justice system. But I wonder how different things would be in an anarchist society. Epstein has a mountain of dirt on powerful people, thus ensuring his victory (Unless he commits suicide, by somehow shooting himself in the back of the head).

In a stateless society, secret societies (Or private clubs if you prefer) will still exist. But they might not have the same power as the ones that currently rule this planet. Let's say Epstein is part of that group and they all fuck little girls on his private island. To the common folk, there's not much they can do about it. But I'm pretty sure of one thing. That there will be more people with as much power and influence as Epstein, thanks to the restrictions of Government taxes and red-tape being lifted. With a larger pot of people on equal footing, it's more likely that there's going to be different opinions on what's acceptable.
Phew, but this is getting a little bit deep.

If you are unironically an anarchist I reserve the right to tie you to a stake and burn you alive
Look at these videos and tell me what you see...

Anarchy isn't about the lack of organisation. It's not about the lack of authority either. Even a parent has authority over their child. Sometimes people will have leaders because they're reliable. Other times, because of Nepotism (People in positions of power based on favouritism or family ties, not because of their skills). In this case, by organising themselves, they can oppose the decision that placed that person as a manager. But in a system such as Communism (Absolute Government) you are forced to comply at (Literally) gun-point.


 
Last edited:
By having Antifa call themselves Anarchists, the Jews have effectively skewered the meaning of Anarchy
But they are anarchists (anarcho-communists). Just because you don't like communism doesn't mean you get to call them jews and therefore not real anarchists. I dont want to show off my fedora, but that is a no true Scotsman fallacy :neckbeard:

Edit;
I see no problem from having next to no road safety laws...
839686
 
Last edited:
While that will certainly happen, remember that a court room is about transparency. Putting your cards on the table and seeing what you've got. How the community takes it is another thing. There may be consequence for them and those they associate with. Let's look at the more recent case of Jeffrey Epstein. Of course, he's going to get off. The ZOG has complete control of the justice system. But I wonder how different things would be in an anarchist society. Epstein has a mountain of dirt on powerful people, thus ensuring his victory (Unless he commits suicide, by somehow shooting himself in the back of the head). In a stateless society, secret societies (Or private clubs if you prefer) will still exist. But they might not have the same power as the ones that currently rule this planet. Let's say Epstein is part of that group and they all fuck little girls on his private island. To the common folk, there's not much they can do about it. But I'm pretty sure of one thing. That there will be more people with as much power and influence as Epstein, thanks to the restrictions of Government taxes and red-tape being lifted. With a larger pot of people on equal footing, it's more likely that there's going to be different opinions on what's acceptable.
Phew, but this is getting a little bit deep.
How do you keep said secret societies from gaining power? There are always people who will do horrible shit for whoever pays them. Mercenaries have existed throughout history. Some people pool their money together to get power, their power attracts people who aren't as good at it, but are really, really good at being sycophants, thus more power, then start hiring people. Maybe the original group might have a schism, but usually that means one person ends up in charge.

This doesn't even get into where does the money come from in an anarchist society? Gold? Then you better learn chemistry to be sure you're not getting cheated. There's a reason kings in the past executed anyone caught fucking with coinage, it was because distrust in the money could cause the entire country's economy to tank. And in anarchy you either have roving mobs willing to kill people who dilute the coinage, or you end up with a strong leader (fuck it, a King, you're going to need a damn monarchy) who has the power to order a person killed for said crime. Crypto? What if the person you're trying to buy bread from uses a different system and tells you to fuck off? Also how would you make it? Whoever has the ability to make it has the power, everybody else will end up fighting over the scraps. Like ususal. And don't even start with "anybody can make crypto, nowadays it takes serious, real world money to start a setup, how many computer parts places are willing to take crypto to sell you the video cards, or hell the power company, how many power companies accept bitcoin?
 
Anarchy isn't about the lack of organisation. It's not about the lack of authority either.
839759


Drop this solipsistic faggotry, OP. You don't just get to re-define terms until you win the argument, that's not how reality works. Either words have meanings, in which case conversations can be productive, or we're all just shrieking into the void, in which case just shut uppa yer mouth.

Or is this some kind of performance art piece where you try to apply the concept of anarchy to words ie. changing the definitions at whim because "LOLZERS YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT THAT MEANS!! " Whatever the case, this is some weak shit.
 
How would you stop cults or religions from forming? most cults and religions have some sort of hierarchy and you can't just tell them to stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li
But they are anarchists (anarcho-communists). Just because you don't like communism doesn't mean you get to call them jews.
But they are communists, not anarchists. And they're puppets, groomed by the Jewish controlled schools.


The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their true name.

You don't just get to re-define terms until you win the argument, that's not how reality works.
That's exactly how reality works. If you control the language, you control the minds. As the Jews have aptly proven. My own definition of reality is simply what you believe to be true or false.

How do you keep said secret societies from gaining power? There are always people who will do horrible shit for whoever pays them. Mercenaries have existed throughout history. Some people pool their money together to get power, their power attracts people who aren't as good at it, but are really, really good at being sycophants, thus more power, then start hiring people. Maybe the original group might have a schism, but usually that means one person ends up in charge.

This doesn't even get into where does the money come from in an anarchist society? Gold? Then you better learn chemistry to be sure you're not getting cheated. There's a reason kings in the past executed anyone caught fucking with coinage, it was because distrust in the money could cause the entire country's economy to tank. And in anarchy you either have roving mobs willing to kill people who dilute the coinage, or you end up with a strong leader (fuck it, a King, you're going to need a damn monarchy) who has the power to order a person killed for said crime. Crypto? What if the person you're trying to buy bread from uses a different system and tells you to fuck off? Also how would you make it? Whoever has the ability to make it has the power, everybody else will end up fighting over the scraps. Like ususal. And don't even start with "anybody can make crypto, nowadays it takes serious, real world money to start a setup, how many computer parts places are willing to take crypto to sell you the video cards, or hell the power company, how many power companies accept bitcoin?
 
But they are communists, not anarchists
My dude, they are both. How can you decide what are real anarchists and what are Jewish commies pretending to anarchists when you didn't even know what communism is. Moreover, why would Jews be pro-communism when most communist nations have exiled or killed Jews, for example, the USSR.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Syaoran Li
That's exactly how reality works. If you control the language, you control the minds. As the Jews have aptly proven. My own definition of reality is simply what you believe to be true or false.
You've just destroyed any argument you might ever have made. Nobody here is impressed with your bullshit which means you have no control, ergo you've lost the game.
 
My dude, they are both. How can you decide what are real anarchists and what are Jewish commies pretending to anarchists when you didn't even know what communism is. Moreover, why would Jews be pro-communism when most communist nations have exiled or killed Jews, for example, the USSR.
You've just destroyed any argument you might ever have made. Nobody here is impressed with your bullshit which means you have no control, ergo you've lost the game.
Dude, its over. You can stop replying now.

839815
 
Ha lol, https://trello.com/theworldasweknowit I thought the point of not getting vaccines was to not get autism. Also, you don't get to come on here, make a thread spouting your ideas that are so poorly thought out that a brainlet like me can start poking holes in and tell me when the conversation is done. You have failed to answer any of the points that people have brought up.
 
Back