What is replacement theory and what is its end goal?

3. Wealthy businessmen are annoyed at how much the domestic population expects to be paid and see nothing but green when illegal aliens flood over the border.
I forgot this one. They want to drive wages down so America can be "competitive" again in the globalized market they've created. They can't politically roll back regulations, but they can use magic tricks to make you poorer! (Also why they love inflation.)
 
Here’s what I think: it’s not necessary about race to our leaders. They just really like people who are completely reliant on the government. (This applies to really any western country.)

When a low-prosperity migrant enters a country, they are completely reliant on government assistance to survive. The pathway towards independence and prosperity includes an economic filter that’s designed to disincentivize ever abandoning government dependence. It’s actually sparked an in interesting discussion here in the King Cobra JFS thread.

The end goal is to “fortify elections” by guaranteeing votes. If the dependent electorate ever votes the “wrong way” and an opposition party gets in, you can slowly squeeze the drip feed of benefits as punishment.
Don't forget, MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of people entering a country absolutely stresses available housing, job opportunities, the welfare state, and medical care.
 
Don't forget, MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of people entering a country absolutely stresses available housing, job opportunities, the welfare state, and medical care.
The whole thing is a house of cards. Make everyone dependent on the state and just print infinite amounts of money is why the modern dollar is worth 3 cents.

My only solace is when this all inevitably collapses under the weight of sheer stupidity, the people most effected will be the ones most domesticated by daddy government.
 
I forgot this one. They want to drive wages down so America can be "competitive" again in the globalized market they've created. They can't politically roll back regulations, but they can use magic tricks to make you poorer! (Also why they love inflation.)
With sufficient immigrant populations in government it will not be hard at all to change regulations eventually, whether in law or just in practice.
 
The whole thing is a house of cards. Make everyone dependent on the state and just print infinite amounts of money is why the modern dollar is worth 3 cents.

My only solace is when this all inevitably collapses under the weight of sheer stupidity, the people most effected will be the ones most domesticated by daddy government.
It can still take a while. I mean there are still 17000 bridges left in the States for example. And we still didnt have a plane crash with lets say 100 passengers yet, but hey the millennium is young. And even then you need like some major 10 - 20 plane crashes before, yes what? Not like its gonna get fixed, no people will just stop flying. The end of air travel.




Its supposed to be "replacement" like you are replacing something good with something even better, but instead it is splitting up into: competency crisis, military recruitment crisis, housing crisis, affordability crisis, etc etc.
 
Whites are a potential threat and power base that needs to be neutralized, and so white replacement is de facto policy, and has been since the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965.
Screenshot_20240402-132503_Chrome.jpgGKHdKbXWAAANzZS.jpeg
 
Replacement theory isn't just about white people. It's about Anglo Saxon or homogenous culture that's eroded by multifaceted society. A divided people will never rise against the oligarchs. That's the whole point.
One thing I'm curious about is if the "hyphenated American" phenomena was deliberate and intentional to stop the formation of a single American identity, or at the very least a White American identity. It didn't work in the South because "Southern" was a real identity from the minute Reconstruction hit and the Carpetbaggers decided to exploit the South for cheap label, but everywhere else that wasn't the case and you have "Italian Americans", "WASPs", "Irish Americans", etc. even though for decades now anyone who isn't a senior citizen has minimal connection with the country of their ancestors. And to a degree this isn't just an American thing, since it happens in Canada (minus Quebec) and Australia and (maybe?) New Zealand too.

I wonder if the project is actually a very old one that goes back to the late 19th century, since by flooding America with Europeans they could obliterate any sense of a united American identity. It is well-known of course that the big promoters of immigration back then were big businesses since it helped keep wages down and prevent workers from organizing, but I wonder if it ever went deeper than that. It is of course pretty obvious that in the past decade they've been desperate to stop White Americans from forming their own identity as a collective.

I would go as far to say that the fact that "American" (which let's face it, would be whites and light-skinned Hispanics) or "White American" never becoming an ethnicity has been VERY helpful to the global elite. It gives a template for the entire world to follow. Since if America started as a dumping ground for white people and their black slaves and then Chinese railroad workers and that made America great, logically America will become even greater if it remains a dumping ground for the entire world. And other nations should copy America in becoming a dumping ground, so they become great too.
The ultra-elite believe that Third World nations can be managed (by them) into First World nations, but in the mean time, as they say, "talent is distributed equally, but opportunity is not" (an objectively and measurably false statement), so they believe untold riches and progress are being denied them by not bringing a billion Africans to America and Europe. They really do think those migrant boats are full of future doctors and engineers.
That isn't just the ultra elite. That's a lot of white leftists in general, at least in the US. They think the migrant boats are the same as the ones they're great-grandparents traveled on to get to America, and they think that if they just give those Somalis or Hondurans some opportunity then those people will become just like their ancestors and work hard, start businesses, become doctors and scientists, and build real generational wealth within 1-3 generations (if not their very lifetime).

In Europe it's probably similar, minus the "my grandparents were immigrants too" thing. Their ancestor moved to the city and worked hard and built some real wealth. Therefore the Third Worlders by moving to the city can do the same thing if not for those damn dirty fascists putting roadblocks on the way to a million immigrants per year.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cherry Eyed Hamster
I wonder if the project is actually a very old one that goes back to the late 19th century, since by flooding America with Europeans they could obliterate any sense of a united American identity. It is well-known of course that the big promoters of immigration back then were big businesses since it helped keep wages down and prevent workers from organizing, but I wonder if it ever went deeper than that. It is of course pretty obvious that in the past decade they've been desperate to stop White Americans from forming their own identity as a collective.

I don't think it quite had that organized, ideological component behind it. The belief that ethnic cohesion is an existential danger to minorities really crystallizes among Jews after the Holocaust, and we didn't have the big influx of Jews and their rise to power until the twentieth century anyway. Political support for restricting immigration grows following periods of mass migration, and while the business interests and the like always had the usual arguments for keeping the spigot open, this notion that having any controls on immigration at all is a grievous moral evil seems pretty recent.

Notably, America was in a long process of ethnogenesis since before the Revolution. Discussions on the question of American ethnic identity, how immigrants could be incorporated, and what kinds of immigrants could truly be "American" were discussed openly and freely, while today, even suggesting there's a question to discuss makes you a Nazi. An "American" is just anyone who happens to be inside America, just like a "German" is anyone who happens to be inside Germany, a "Swede" is anyone who happens to be inside Sweden, etc, a rule that is being spread to every country in the world. Well, almost every country.
 
I think one of the reasons many countries arent stopping illegal immigration is because they can (and do) use those people for labor and pay them way less with black money- This doesnt really benefit the immigrants but it's not like they have anywhere else to go, so...
 
So, I did a bit of looking into this kind of stuff, as I was questioning why people could come to this conclusion, and it requires a fair bit of deconstructing from emotionally loaded jargon to figure out the bottom of it.

The most logical explanation that I've seen for the reasoning (that isn't just schizo tier white nationalist ramblings) is that the intention for mass immigration of illegals, and the apathy towards improving volatile and impoverished neighborhoods and cultures that are predisposed to crime, is solely to attempt to import incompatible cultures in an attempt to destabilize the status quo for a society or culture, so the 1% can live more luxurious lifestyles while the common man suffers under the weight of crime and disorder. Hence the replacement. It's cheaper for corporations and the elite to outsource jobs to people from countries with higher poverty rates, because they're often easily replaceable. Why are these kinds of people given unlimited spending limit credit cards and other forms of housing, when veterans and the disabled are already treated poorly here.

America was largely built upon the back of immigration, and there's plenty of cases of people fleeing from countries with war and poor living conditions, but the problem starts to rise when you have a unprecedented amount of certain groups of people (Largely Indians) coincidentally appearing out of nowhere. There isn't the war excuse, like the middle east (Spanning hundreds of years, whether that's from Muslims or Israelites). You could argue that the immigration part is mostly inseparable from America, much in the same way that gun rights are.

Why do you think that certain globalist groups have a vetted interest to try and groom largely homogenous countries like Japan, Korea, and China (yes, regardless of how fucked China is as a whole) into accepting this? Why do you think that "wokeness" as a concept is purely a dogwhistle for intersectional marxism (AKA: Thinking that everything is connected, and then using that as a strange excuse to pin the world's problems on cisgendered straight white men)? Modern leftists don't like the idea of assimilating to a culture, let alone doing that while bringing some unique cultural standpoint to the table. They hate the idea of "cultural appropriation", and will swiftly cancel someone like Avril Lavene or Gwen Stafani for being slightly enthusiastic about Japanese culture while Japanese people don't seem to mind it. These same people will cry and virtue signal about a "unreported" rape statistic in Japan that could literally fucking mean anything the person wants to push as an agenda, while thinking that importing people from a country with a really bad rape problem (like India) is perfectly fine.

I think that both the idea that the reason illegal immigration is so widespread is because of the long processing times (You can justify this with background checks), AND the more insidious reasoning of the elite largely benefiting from destabilizing society can go hand in hand.
 
Never before in the history of the world has a whole race died out on account of sloth and arrogance.
Sloth yes, arrogance no. It is rather a deep form of self-loathing. You might argue that people cling arrogantly to this self-loathing, but from a larger perspective that isn't arrogance, that's battered wife syndrome.

So, I did a bit of looking into this kind of stuff, as I was questioning why people could come to this conclusion, and it requires a fair bit of deconstructing from emotionally loaded jargon to figure out the bottom of it.
It really doesn't. For a decade or so you could download documents like "replacement migration" from intra-government websites, before it became too politically inexpedient to show these openly.


Tell me what page of praktischer idealismus that quote is from. Because I read it, and I'm 95% sure that quote is modified from what it originally said.
 
Last edited:
Increasing mixity to destroy racial conscience.

Most often then not tho the people that are into racial conscience are poor speciment of their race.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gog & Magog
America was largely built upon the back of immigration, and there's plenty of cases of people fleeing from countries with war and poor living conditions, but the problem starts to rise when you have a unprecedented amount of certain groups of people (Largely Indians) coincidentally appearing out of nowhere. There isn't the war excuse, like the middle east (Spanning hundreds of years, whether that's from Muslims or Israelites). You could argue that the immigration part is mostly inseparable from America, much in the same way that gun rights are.
The immigration part shouldn't be inseparable, because this Great Replacement isn't even the first. The US was flooded with immigrants in the late 19th/early 20th century. They hugely changed the face of this country, its culture, and its ideologies in every way. That includes introducing criminal gangs like the Mafia and introducing socialism for instance, since socialism was a popular ideology in Europe. Actual American socialists were a minority and went about socialism in a very American way, but the European immigrants did not. In terms of other culture, go look at the "old" New England and old "Yankee" culture in general from before the late 19th century. They're all good ol' Anglo people descended from the Mayflower and the Puritans and shit and it's all purely Anglo. There's no Italian or Polack or Portagee or whatever.

What did these immigrants do? They kept wages down for working-class Americans for decades. American wages were stagnant and did not improve until the 1920s. Curiously, the South was exempt from this mass migration flow (and didn't have many local socialists as a result), because it was not popular there and because the South already had negroes for cheap labor and trying to import Italians (for instance) often failed from strong local opposition and sometimes the Italians themselves realizing they were conned into literally the same shitty conditions they fled Italy i.e. picking cotton as a sharecropper. So it was definitely a scheme driven by the rich. Just like importing Chinese was in California to keep wages down--Americans mobilized and stopped the flow of Chinese and made sundown towns to keep out blacks, and California and the West Coast prospered for over a century.

And yes, the immigrants back then were used by corrupt politicians to maintain power. Every big city had political captains for each ethnic group appointed by the big city boss. They'd collect the votes for the big guy while getting kickbacks and other free shit. So you'd have politicians like Jim Curley who spent 40 years bouncing between being mayor of Boston and Congress all while leaching off actually productive Americans. That style of politician faded away in the 60s because most of these immigrants assimilated into our society and there was no replacement migration to keep their enclaves alive, so these politicians either had to turn over the machines to their last ethnic base (black people) or go to prison for corruption.

We've had over a century of pro-immigrant propaganda in this country and they use emotional arguments like "oh, your great-grandparents were immigrants" to convince us that today's brown flood from the southern border is the exact same. Well guess what, it wasn't right back then. America needs a reckoning that the mass immigration 150 years ago that we celebrate with Ellis Island and shit was a decades-long disaster that took nearly a century for this country to heal from. We somehow worship this, hell, even conservatives worship this, but it wasn't right. It's intellectually difficult to oppose the modern Great Replacement without coming to terms with the 19th century Great Replacement of Anglo Americans by European ethnics. Even if your ancestors are all European ethnics like mine were, you have to realize that such immigration was detrimental and perhaps should be most committed of all to ensuring it never happens again. Because this time, WE are the ones being replaced.
 
It is all of this. White replacement is good for a lot of people.

Big companies get cheap labour that is supposedly just as good.

Politicians get free gibsmuh votes forever.

Jews get more shekels, and the respawn consition for Hitler (90% white) is out of the window.

The inner banking elite (oy vey, but like 1% of them) also get to try their immortal bodyswap utopia with 499 million brown south park future people to rule over.

Feminism, microplastics, birth control, chemicals, mouse utopia, line must go up, all help and this is all becoming a perfect storm. A great filter for whites, if you will.

Now, you may ask me, you magnificently autistic skizo, why aren't we living in Wakanda yet? Where are the flying cars, the immortality, the cure all illness pill, the limitless food, the automated factories, the brainchipped whites in the mines?

Because the elites, politicians, corpos bought their own bullshit.
They think Rajeet, Jamal and Abdul have 120 IQ and will hop onto Nasa's robotics plan for 2 dollars an hour.

Jews go along with it because muh 6 quintillion. Liberals go along with it to be heckin' wholesome. Darkies because it serves their interests.

While I do think the plan works, and whites are a goner, this isn't going to end in Slomo in a flying car.

Why? Because of racism. Not only do they think browns are just as smart, but also retained the older racism that slavs and yellows are subhuman 80 IQ niggers.

This leads into the competency crisis in the west. So the elites won't be getting immortal robot bodies and flying cars and floating castles from which they can watch the golem arena.

They are either getting a 3rd world shithole, or the yoke of more competent foreign power. Monkey's paw.

Perhaps if they waited, they could have unlocked genetic engineering to make browns smarter and more submissive. But AI is a dangerous tool unmuzzled, and I doubt it will save their bacon.

And yes, the elite are (((chosen))) by a vast majority, as many banker dynasties usuried their wealth out of Europe and then went to USA.

This means most of the 99% jews are not in on it. They just go:
-Oy vey, we are getting Hitler unless I support Abdul coming over here! Yuk yuk, I get more shekels too! Banker Slomoberg won't jew a fellow jew, I know this will go well and I'll have my own pool of shekels!
 
Last edited:
It's debt. Immigrants increase federal revenues, decrease the federal deficit, allow for more public debt, and become new cattle for personal debt schemes. The native population cannot be even deeper in debt so you import new debt slaves to delay the economic collapse. Migrants take out debt more frequently under less favorable terms and cannot deal with credit cards. The foreign poor are a gold mine.

Edit: If you want to understand these positive feedback loops, listen to Soros' Reflexivity lectures. The theory seems retarded until you realize that the financial world is retarded. More debt means a country becomes more attractive for immigrants who again increase the debt in a downward spiral. This will continue until the big bust.
 
Last edited:
Bold of you to assume there is a A plan and B that plan has a goal.
For as much as you want to blame the Powers that BeTM and a great conspiracy. People like to brag and gossip and I haven't seen enough of that to warrant a conspiracy theory.
The more likely reason for shit going to shit, is that it was meant to go to shit. It's easier for the big globo homo corporations to import millions of global homos that work for cheaper and they can control with visas than to not to that. It's easier for the government to not police their borders, than to do it.
Eventually things will get so shit that the path of least resistance will be to unfuck this. Or the whole thing goes tits up like a repeat of the Mayan civilization/Rome and urban centers become unviable for a few centuries.
 
Eventually things will get so shit that the path of least resistance will be to unfuck this. Or the whole thing goes tits up like a repeat of the Mayan civilization/Rome and urban centers become unviable for a few centuries.

I think they had a plan, but fucked it up due to ideology, incompetence and greed. The conspiracy people say it out loud, they want to replace you, and enforce behaviors. They just didn't realise that the replacement is subpar and can't do your job. It was supposed to be rainbows and hugs and renting everything, with Abdul hugging them and giving updoots on reddit after renting his bed for the day.

Repeat of Rome/Mayan/Bronze age collapse or hostile outside takeover are the teo options I see as viable future predictions.
 
Perhaps if they waited, they could have unlocked genetic engineering to make browns smarter and more submissive. But AI is a dangerous tool unmuzzled, and I doubt it will save their bacon.
Unfortunately, such a technology is forbidden to research, because it involves admitting that some races have lower IQs than others. But it would likely work since Ashkenazi Jews have an IQ 14 points higher than Middle Eastern Jews, but Ashkenazis evolved from the latter. All we gotta do is cram in 1,500+ years of natural selection into a few generations, but we've done that with plants and animals in the lab.
Repeat of Rome/Mayan/Bronze age collapse or hostile outside takeover are the teo options I see as viable future predictions.
I think modernity will linger on for centuries in a literal dark age. It's just everything will look like South Africa, full of racial and ethnic "enrichment" while society straggles on with decaying infrastructure. We never have technology much more advanced than nowadays because it's too difficult to maintain, but we maintain it well enough that we only sometimes get rolling blackouts and bridges randomly collapsing. Most countries still exist but their leaders are almost entirely shades of mystery meat and all speak "English" (a mix of pidgin and zoomer speak).
 
Unfortunately, such a technology is forbidden to research, because it involves admitting that some races have lower IQs than others. But it would likely work since Ashkenazi Jews have an IQ 14 points higher than Middle Eastern Jews, but Ashkenazis evolved from the latter. All we gotta do is cram in 1,500+ years of natural selection into a few generations, but we've done that with plants and animals in the lab.

I think modernity will linger on for centuries in a literal dark age. It's just everything will look like South Africa, full of racial and ethnic "enrichment" while society straggles on with decaying infrastructure. We never have technology much more advanced than nowadays because it's too difficult to maintain, but we maintain it well enough that we only sometimes get rolling blackouts and bridges randomly collapsing. Most countries still exist but their leaders are almost entirely shades of mystery meat and all speak "English" (a mix of pidgin and zoomer speak).

I don't think forbidden applies to CIA labs. I just have a feeling the (((elites))) thought it would be easier, or the competency crisis caught them totally unaware. And they would be too proud to uplift their goyim anyay. They would sooner engineer in faults.
Hey goy! Unable zo feel joy anymore? Renew your Dopamine DLC subscription today!

I also feel like you are discounting the rest of the world. A latam west will be prime colonial estate for China and Russia. The west does not exist in its own pocket dimension, isolated from the the rest of the planet.

Chinamen are yellow, have tiny penis, but they are working on human GMOs and new tech, they aren't spearchuckers.
 
Back