Like the double standards?
And the "rules for thee and not for me"?
What I find fascinating is how woke ideology becomes part of how they view the world. Speech isn't allowed if it is working against the goal of "ending oppression." It doesn't matter if it is true if it is plainly visible. It also allows for speech which is false if it supports this goal.
They see the modern world and civilisation built upon upholding oppression. Of course, oppression is bad but they aren't concerned with actually ending oppression. Nothing is practical, they're focused to see everything as oppression and just want to tear it down. It's anger, annoyance and frustration that everything exists.
The hypocrisy comes from if something is seen as working to end oppression or not. If something doesn't align with the goal, it can't be said, must be censored and they also often seem to actually not see it. I hate to use this example, but the BLM adjacent riots and violence is a really good one.
As BLM is seen as working to ending oppression, anything negative can't be said. The fact riots and violence occurred in their wake could not be said as it was seen as working against the goal of ending black oppression. Yet it went deeper, people acted as if it wasn't happening. Or if they acknowledged rioting, looting, violence etc, it was good because it worked towards the goal of ending oppression.
We can get into the notion of echo chambers, feedback loops and media not informing people of what was going on. Which is part of the censorship of anything that works against the oppression. Yet that doesn't explain reporters standing in front of carnage painting it in a good light. They're prevented from actually saying what is happening, because doing so may harm the goal of "ending oppression." Yet it seemed as if they couldn't even see it for what it was.
People literally could see all the horrible shit going on, but couldn't acknowledge it as real, wouldn't and would ignore it. The censorship and oppression of anything that works against the goal of ending oppression seemed baked into how they viewed the world. If you dared to want to speak about it, you got attacked. Not because what you were saying was false, but because it went against the goal of "ending oppression."
When it's undeniable, it's excused as justifiable because it aligns with the end goal. People are smashing up a Target for the goal of ending oppression.
It's fucking batshit.