What is the worst thing about the right?

The right would support importing brown rapists if those same rapists would vote for right wing parties after they got done decapitating little children. To be fair, that will never ever really happen but shows how opportunistic they are.

The whole supporting based brown people thing. It still very uncommon in Europe due to the lack of brown people in general. A special case is European right wing news papers. They often hire brownies to write "critically" about integration issues but they always have far softer stances on immigrants than the general opinion of their host country. Then they write for a few years until they shamelessly out themselves as hating the nationalist parties and are hidden away.

When Andrew Tate was humiliated/arrested too many right wing people were willing to get enter long discussions on whether he was sex pest or "just" a scamming, grifting pimp. And they even had the audacity to call gremlin Swede out for body shaming. As in, actually using that term, "body shaming". Seeing someone other than the left doing this was surrealistic.
The far right loves brown men just as much as any "Hispanics are natural conservatives" spouting Trump supporter, they just like them because they imagine foreign non-European/Hispanic societies that the brown men come from to be based trad utopias where gays and trannies are slaughtered and women get a quick punch in the mouth if they refuse to sleep with them on demand and cook their meals.
 
women are pretty terrible now. if you want to find one that isn't corrupted with unrealistic demands and laziness you'll have to start networking at church.
Rofl; MGTOW off the starboard bow Cap'n!

What sucks about the right wing is their hostility, stupidity, intolerance, and their retrogressive attitude. They want their women compliant and back to Kuche, Kinder, Kirche. If women do get a job (eg. secretaries, waitresses, nurses and teachers) a right wing man would want them to quit after having kids, so as not to inconvenience him with actually raising them. Right-wing men like Beto up here think sharing domestic labor is an "unrealistic demand" and demonstrates "laziness" on the part of women. They don't really want a relationship with another person, but a female automata that dispenses sex, food, and kids. They want their sex to be hetero and bland like a bowl of oatmeal; gays and lesbians and trannies back in the closet, and they'd probably like to go back to treating black people as subhuman if they could get away with it. A lot of the right-wing people here are awfully keen on calling black people the N-word. I find that unacceptable.

Right-wingers pine for a lost past that never existed. They think that in that lost yesteryear they'd be happy and in control, with no uppity minorities or women demanding things or trying to compete with them. Right wing women lionize SAHMing, but notable advocates of the practice don't do it themselves (e.g. Phyllis Schlafly, Sarah Palin.)

Right-wing presidential administrations in the US are prejudiced. Reagan's "War on Drugs" was expensive and accomplished very little (except putting a lot of black people in prison for longer than whites for similar crimes.) When AIDS reared its ugly head in the 80's, Reagan told the CDC to "look pretty and do as little as possible", because it suited the right-wing agenda to pretend God was punishing the gays for being gay and the junkies for being junkies by giving them HIV. But HIV doesn't discriminate; the CDC was remiss in its duty to investigate the epidemic because the Republican Party felt that it didn't need to work for all the people it governed, just for the ones whose lifestyles and race they approved of.

Right-wing people are relentless defense hawks who have wasted untold billions on military stuff we don't need and on foreign wars we never should have gotten involved in. Bush was happy to play the SJW and "liberate" Iraq; where is Iraq now? Mostly worse imo. Is America better off for having fought a 10-year war in Iraq and Afghanistan? I think not.

Right-wing people seem happy to be swindled by guys like Donald Trump, who is mostly the antithesis of "family values" (twice divorced, relentless tax cheat, never goes to church, adulterer), and whose appeal I have never really understood. Even back when he was just the host/star of "The Apprentice", he seemed like a pompous New York style jerk. He was in way over his head when he actually got to the Oval Office; I think he barely understood what he was doing. That was fine when the nation was headed in a good direction anyway and he didn't have to do anything, but when COVID-19 hit Trump made stupid decisions and unrealistic promises that the whole thing would be "over by Easter". When that didn't happen, he started to pretend COVID-19 was a hoax perpetuated by the Democrats, or a Chinese disease sent to hamstring our country, or whatever best suited the story he was spinning to his audience of brainless right-wing chickenheads. These voters either have the memory of goldfish or they just don't care that Trump constantly lies.

Right wing people believe in crazy conspiracies: today I talked to someone who thinks there's a bona fide war on white European culture and ethnicity (whatever that is), another who thinks a COVID-19 vaccine mandate is like being raped, and one more who thinks the Democratic party is actively promoting pedophilia. This is tinfoil hat stuff.

Now I'm sure you all are going to fire back that I'm an SJW (a fat SJW woman at that) and a Democrat willing to accept whatever bullshit minorities throw at me; that's not true. It's not literally true because I'm not a Democrat (I deregistered and am currently an unaffiliated voter.) Like most left-wing people I actually do have a limit to the amount of minority-first affirmative action bullshit I can handle; and I've more than reached my limit on trans demands to let men into women's sports leagues and make Medicare (or Medicaid? I always mix these two up) cover top and bottom surgery. I'm just trying to be polite about it and figure out a middle way that the raving lunatics on the left side of the field will tolerate.
 
Riding the fence just ends up with you hated by those on both “sides”
 
Their blind adherence to meme philosophies like fiscal conservatism and self-reliance. Yes I get it, big government bad. I too was a 16 year old libertarian that didn't know any better. But it's time to admit that in the current political climate all you're advocating for is "I want less stuff for my constituents". Because every single time it's something the government really needs(or convinces you they need),your cute little meme philosophy is nowhere in fucking sight.

Another forever war in the Middle East? Cut the check. Ukraine needs more missiles? Cut the check. The IRS wants to hire thousands of armed agents? Cut the check. More visas for 80 IQ Somalians? Cut the check.

Preserve social security benefits for old people? Invest in crumbling infrastructure? Raise minimum wage to something that's not a joke? Whoa there buddy, hang on just a sec. We aren't made of money here, ya know. Sorry sonny jim, but you're just gonna make do with what you have. And before someone comes in with some variation of "the government doesn't owe you anything son", yes. Yes it fucking does. As long as the government is going to continue abridging my rights and taking my tax dollars, it absolutely does owe me something. To argue otherwise is to effectively argue that the government can do what it wants and you just have to take it and be grateful.

If you're a fiscal conservative reading this, just cut out the middleman and get 'PAYPIG' tattooed on your forehead. The only thing you support in practice is everybody other than you and yours getting money.
 
Last edited:
Their inability to appeal to the youth.
They will look down and talk down to pop culture and mediums that the youth like (animation, movies, music) than ask why no one is joining their ranks.
The left knows the power of media and will use it to their advantage to recruit the youth to their cause and beliefs.
 
Wanting to replace commie-leftist tyranny with fascist-rightist tyranny, If you are against the authoritarianism of the far-left, why do you want to replace it with the authoritarianism of the far-right. Doesn’t that sound too hypocritical?

Also, Conservatives who only want to conserve their childhood and not conserve the moral values that are important for a productive society. So many conservatives, especially the younger ones, want to conserve not moral, but the era that they spent time as a kid in.

At this point, fuck all authortarianism. I‘m refusing to join this dumb slapfight between the left-wing commies and the right-wing fascists.
 
Their inability to appeal to the youth.
They will look down and talk down to pop culture and mediums that the youth like (animation, movies, music) than ask why no one is joining their ranks.
The left knows the power of media and will use it to their advantage to recruit the youth to their cause and beliefs.
A lot of people on the right don't care about appealing to anyone but bitter weirdos like themselves. They see Gen Z kids as nothing but pansexual, mixed-race mutants who represent everything they hate about modern society, so they definitely don't want to appeal to them. I do find it interesting how quickly people on the right went from "We'll have these kids bullying fags in no time!" to openly wishing for a third world war so that Zoomers can get mulched to extinction.
 
What do they "conserve" exactly?

In current year we have:
  • Endless war
  • Endless debt (not from spending, from fractional reserve banking)
  • All time record illegal immigration
  • Total economic dependence on foreign rivals
  • 1A restrictions
  • 2A restrictions
  • Troon surgeries for minors
  • MAPs slowly joining LGBTQIA+
  • Abortion and gay marriage
  • Pride parades with full nudity
  • All time record inflation
  • Precrime
  • Gas stove and gas car restrictions
When was the last time a conservative cut your taxes?
What is the worst thing about the right?
What is "the right"? Where do 'publicans end and 'emocrats begin? What is a conservative? Back in the '50s you could get a Communist foot up your ass for being a homosexual, now gays get hammer and sickle tattoos on their foreskins.

My answer? There is no right or left, it's all a joke.
 
Last edited:
What do they "conserve" exactly?

In current year we have:
  • Endless war
  • Endless debt (not from spending, from fractional reserve banking)
  • All time record illegal immigration
  • Total economic dependence on foreign rivals
  • 1A restrictions
  • 2A restrictions
  • Troon surgeries for minors
  • MAPs slowly joining LGBTQIA+
  • Abortion and gay marriage
  • Pride parades with full nudity
  • All time record inflation
  • Precrime
  • Gas stove and gas car restrictions
When was the last time a conservative cut your taxes?

What is "the right"? Where do 'publicans end and 'emocrats begin? What is a conservative? Back in the '50s you could get a Communist foot up your ass for being a homosexual, now gays get hammer and sickle tattoos on their foreskins.

My answer? There is no right or left, it's all a joke.

 
Their blind adherence to meme philosophies like fiscal conservatism and self-reliance. Yes I get it, big government bad. I too was a 16 year old libertarian that didn't know any better. But it's time to admit that in the current political climate all you're advocating for is "I want less stuff for my constituents". Because every single time it's something the government really needs(or convinces you they need),your cute little meme philosophy is nowhere in fucking sight.

Another forever war in the Middle East? Cut the check. Ukraine needs more missiles? Cut the check. The IRS wants to hire thousands of armed agents? Cut the check. More visas for 80 IQ Somalians? Cut the check.

Preserve social security benefits for old people? Invest in crumbling infrastructure? Raise minimum wage to something that's not a joke? Whoa there buddy, hang on just a sec. We aren't made of money here, ya know. Sorry sonny jim, but you're just gonna make do with what you have. And before someone comes in with some variation of "the government doesn't owe you anything son", yes. Yes it fucking does. As long as the government is going to continue abridging my rights and taking my tax dollars, it absolutely does owe me something. To argue otherwise is to effectively argue that the government can do what it wants and you just have to take it and be grateful.

If you're a fiscal conservative reading this, just cut out the middleman and get 'PAYPIG' tattooed on your forehead. The only thing you support in practice is everybody other than you and yours getting money.

IDK, I would rather the right stop printing money for wars than to turn on the spigot for more everything all at once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Last Stand
Wanting to replace commie-leftist tyranny with fascist-rightist tyranny, If you are against the authoritarianism of the far-left, why do you want to replace it with the authoritarianism of the far-right. Doesn’t that sound too hypocritical?

Also, Conservatives who only want to conserve their childhood and not conserve the moral values that are important for a productive society. So many conservatives, especially the younger ones, want to conserve not moral, but the era that they spent time as a kid in.

At this point, fuck all authortarianism. I‘m refusing to join this dumb slapfight between the left-wing commies and the right-wing fascists.
it's not hypocritical at all. It's the left that said "liberty over authority" and then turned around and sat in the author's chair. You're confusing muh classical liberalism with conservatism. Give me a king over a mob of peasants any day.
 
I think for the American right the "fighting woke ideology in our schools/businesses" aspect is somewhat needed but it does reflect a big problem for them

In the last 30 years (especially since 2012), the Republican Party has been losing the professional half of the US, and it turns out that's the powerful half. For right wingers, its an existential crisis that basically every institution is opposed to them. Government agencies, corporations, civil service, big tech, media, universities, etc. all belong to the Democrats. I'm sorry but you can't build an alternate empire on Heritage Foundation and Fox News.

American society is ran by the suit and tie wearing people. That's why even when Trump had a trifecta in 2017-19 he still struggled to implement his policies, and they acknowledge this with their rants about the Deep State/swamp. The Deep State is not just the CIA, it's all the cogs in the machine of the white collar world.

Its easier for Republicans to blame the institutions themselves, than admit that the problem is the people behind them. It's not just the few woke CEOs or the fat DEI officers, it's the millions of college educated white collar big city professionals, and they'd need to move mountains to win them back.
 
it's the millions of college educated white collar big city professionals, and they'd need to move mountains to win them back.
I agree with your whole post, and I'd like to add that they don't need to just try to get some of them (I say "some" because many are just completely unreachable) on their side, but also they need to try to enter these roles themselves. There's absolutely nothing wrong with getting into the trades, but this Mike Rowe mentality that a lot of Right wingers espouse just ignores that it's not plumbers and electricians who are going to dictate policy and culture.
 
IDK, I would rather the right stop printing money for wars than to turn on the spigot for more everything all at once.
Sure, that would be the ideal, but we don't live anywhere close to a world where that ideal is realistic. The powers that be have demonstrated they will assassinate a sitting president before they let anyone touch the spigot. They're not shutting off the spigot and they're definitely not letting you shut off the spigot. With this in mind, you have two options. You can play the game to maximize benefit to you and your constituents or you can obstinately stand by your outdated cargo cult principles and get nothing. If you opt for the latter option not only are you actively hindering the people you represent, but you're actively letting the money they were going to print anyway go into the pockets of people that fucking hate you. When I see my state refuse federal COVID gibs because we gotta get back to work right mcfuckin now, I don't look at the elected representatives that made the decision and think "wow, what a heckin' good job. I'm glad these people are there to make the tough calls", I think they're a bunch of retards that are literally kiking everyone over "muh budget". And then I think about the money that could have gone to people that work hard and deserve some help, and I just picture it going right up some blue state junkie's nose or into some pedophile mayor's slush fund and I just get fucking angry.

The worst part is the people that decree austerity and fiscal responsibility from on high aren't even really dedicated to those principles. We know damn well they use their positions to enrich their own lives, they just won't lift a finger to help you. They've got principles, y'know? If they helped you now that would just be giving you a handout. You've just gotta pull yourself up by your bootstraps, sonny jim. You'll thank me for it someday.
 
They're not shutting off the spigot and they're definitely not letting you shut off the spigot. With this in mind, you have two options. You can play the game to maximize benefit to you and your constituents or you can obstinately stand by your outdated cargo cult principles and get nothing.
There is the third option of opening the spigot to full blast and draining the reservoir.
 
Sure, that would be the ideal, but we don't live anywhere close to a world where that ideal is realistic. The powers that be have demonstrated they will assassinate a sitting president before they let anyone touch the spigot. They're not shutting off the spigot and they're definitely not letting you shut off the spigot. With this in mind, you have two options. You can play the game to maximize benefit to you and your constituents or you can obstinately stand by your outdated cargo cult principles and get nothing. If you opt for the latter option not only are you actively hindering the people you represent, but you're actively letting the money they were going to print anyway go into the pockets of people that fucking hate you. When I see my state refuse federal COVID gibs because we gotta get back to work right mcfuckin now, I don't look at the elected representatives that made the decision and think "wow, what a heckin' good job. I'm glad these people are there to make the tough calls", I think they're a bunch of retards that are literally kiking everyone over "muh budget". And then I think about the money that could have gone to people that work hard and deserve some help, and I just picture it going right up some blue state junkie's nose or into some pedophile mayor's slush fund and I just get fucking angry.

The worst part is the people that decree austerity and fiscal responsibility from on high aren't even really dedicated to those principles. We know damn well they use their positions to enrich their own lives, they just won't lift a finger to help you. They've got principles, y'know? If they helped you now that would just be giving you a handout. You've just gotta pull yourself up by your bootstraps, sonny jim. You'll thank me for it someday.

Arguing that the right should double down on the destruction of the dollar so they can win a few more elections in one last gibs-orgy before the economic power of the United States is completely depleted doesn't seem much different than arguing that we should should go harder & faster on open borders than the left so they can grab a few more Latino votes.

I would like "the right" to mean "the party that is going to secure the country's future and purge the left's contagion," not "the party that's going to embrace all the destructive policies of the left, but maybe throw in a soaring eagle instead of a tranny in a campaign ad." We already had that, it was the Bush administration--remember the largest Medicare expansion ever? Removing the working class from the income tax rolls?--and we're still dealing with the fiscal consequences.
 
@The Ugly One

>815 billion spent on Iraq war out of 1.5 trillion approved by congress, started by Bush
>over two trillion spent over lifetime of Afghanistan War, started by Bush
>untold billions wasted to prop up Israel so we can say there's a democracy in the Middle East, not initiated but continued bu Bush
>middle east destabilized, probably requiring further us intervention down the road, again thanks Bush
>the reason we're in this is because Bush cut the taxes of wages

And this is why fiscal conservatism is a fucking joke.
 
Back