What makes you angry?

Any scenario that hurts a woman's right to not have kids is something that grinds my gears... And this is happening in my state, which only worsens matters.:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/...s-after-19-weeks-of-pregnancy?detail=facebook

Seriously, shit like this is the reason Feminists and SJWs are making such a ruckus - and why it's becoming less safe for sane Christians and believers of certain religions to even exist.
 
I'm not an angry person, but there are quite a few things that make me angry. But this one just set me off so I'll elaborate on it first.

I swear, if you go onto an article about pets, 50% of the time you'll come across someone condemning pet owners for spending so much money on their pets when there are STARVING CHILDREN IN AFRICA. Typical white people/Americans/insert category here, caring more about dumb animals than other people smh tbh fam. Don't you know that instead of taking your dog to the vet or buying it toys you could be changing lives???

Actually, you know what? The worst thing about this is that it doesn't apply to just pets. I'm sure everyone here has come across that one sanctimonious asshole who loudly condemns other people for wasting their money on things like clothes/electronics/etc when they should be donating to CHARITY. I totally have the right to have the moral high ground here; I'm not typing this self-righteous message on my laptop on the internet I get with the bandwidth I pay for in the comfort of my home, I'm currently in some African country on the village I'm helping out with's single computer from 1987. I'm just taking a quick break being a humanitarian so I can look down on you all.

It's no secret that the world would be a better place if more people donated money (and time) to humanitarian efforts and charities. But I'm sorry that I don't feel like giving away all my spending money. I roll my eyes so fucking hard whenever some holier-than-thou internet denizen goes on and on about how horrible everyone is for not donating to CHARITY and how we should all be ashamed of ourselves for wanting to buy things we enjoy with the money we earned. Like, dude, it sucks that so many people live in poverty, but at the same time I really want that new Pokemon game. Do you feel me?
 
I swear, if you go onto an article about pets, 50% of the time you'll come across someone condemning pet owners for spending so much money on their pets when there are STARVING CHILDREN IN AFRICA. Typical white people/Americans/insert category here, caring more about dumb animals than other people smh tbh fam. Don't you know that instead of taking your dog to the vet or buying it toys you could be changing lives???

The perfect rejoinder to that bullshit.

xEb2Pjd.png
 
I'm not an angry person, but there are quite a few things that make me angry. But this one just set me off so I'll elaborate on it first.

I swear, if you go onto an article about pets, 50% of the time you'll come across someone condemning pet owners for spending so much money on their pets when there are STARVING CHILDREN IN AFRICA. Typical white people/Americans/insert category here, caring more about dumb animals than other people smh tbh fam. Don't you know that instead of taking your dog to the vet or buying it toys you could be changing lives???

Actually, you know what? The worst thing about this is that it doesn't apply to just pets. I'm sure everyone here has come across that one sanctimonious asshole who loudly condemns other people for wasting their money on things like clothes/electronics/etc when they should be donating to CHARITY. I totally have the right to have the moral high ground here; I'm not typing this self-righteous message on my laptop on the internet I get with the bandwidth I pay for in the comfort of my home, I'm currently in some African country on the village I'm helping out with's single computer from 1987. I'm just taking a quick break being a humanitarian so I can look down on you all.

It's no secret that the world would be a better place if more people donated money (and time) to humanitarian efforts and charities. But I'm sorry that I don't feel like giving away all my spending money. I roll my eyes so fucking hard whenever some holier-than-thou internet denizen goes on and on about how horrible everyone is for not donating to CHARITY and how we should all be ashamed of ourselves for wanting to buy things we enjoy with the money we earned. Like, dude, it sucks that so many people live in poverty, but at the same time I really want that new Pokemon game. Do you feel me?
This leads quite nicely into my hatred of those charity begging adverts you get on TV that last like 5 minutes and play sad music over pictures of starving kids or emaciated donkeys or whatever a particular charity is trying to rescue (feed one to the other guys problem solved) I don't mind TV charity advertising when it's done with a bit of thought and dignity but 5 minute prime time slots are a bit of a luxury for an organisation that needs just TWO FUCKING POUNDS A MONTH to give Ngumbey the operation he needs to produce water for his village.
 
I'm not an angry person, but there are quite a few things that make me angry. But this one just set me off so I'll elaborate on it first.

I swear, if you go onto an article about pets, 50% of the time you'll come across someone condemning pet owners for spending so much money on their pets when there are STARVING CHILDREN IN AFRICA. Typical white people/Americans/insert category here, caring more about dumb animals than other people smh tbh fam. Don't you know that instead of taking your dog to the vet or buying it toys you could be changing lives???

That sort of makes me think about this sped's article which is in the same vein of thought as the "how dare you take care of your pets."
Needless to say people like these rub me the wrong way.

-You never quite see them volunteering up the money and time they spend on themselves or their kids to solve the root of the problem they crusade against, you know?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Cosmos
Animal abuse and child abuse are things I can barely stomach to even hear about in small amounts. Teachers abusing students especially makes me incredibly angry. My locker in high school was right next to the Special Education classrooms and the things some of the teachers thought they could get away with were downright sickening.
 
That sort of makes me think about this sped's article which is in the same vein of thought as the "how dare you take care of your pets."
Needless to say people like these rub me the wrong way.

-You never quite see them volunteering up the money and time they spend on themselves or their kids to solve the root of the problem they crusade against, you know?
I think these people are more condemning this behaviour because it reduces reproductive success (subconsciously of course, I am the only one autistic enough to do it consciously)
 
Every single incident that involves extremists and terrorists. As a Muslim that grinds my gears the most.
This plus the smugness of the offenders in doing things that'd normally get anyone else arrested knowing that they can get away with it because of politicians and SJWs treating them better than the locals.
 
Whatever the fuck happens in Pakistan these days. I mean burning women alive for refusing marriage and accepting a law to "lightly" beat wives?
I'm torn between to reactions.
Funny response: They're probably a nation of loveshies.
Actual resonse: What the EVER LOVING FUCK Pakistan. Refusing marriage is like the only right of women in some countries anymore.:c
 
Whenever I'm laughing at something and I'm told it isn't funny or it isn't that funny.

If you do that, I will punch you square in the face.

It's like saying "Your not allowed to feel joy" or "Stop being happy because I want you to stop"
 
Whatever the fuck happens in Pakistan these days. I mean burning women alive for refusing marriage and accepting a law to "lightly" beat wives?

From what I've gathered Pakistan used to be a lot more diverse in it's muslim denominations. Sufi types and big pilgrimmages to monuments/graves (something considered shirk these days) were commonplace. During the wars with India over Bangladesh the government and military started receiving a lot of funding from Saudi Arabia, and this gave power to the Deobandi in educational spheres, who have shaped a generation.

These days though all the "purist" muslim cults who are fighting against the taint of the infidel's influence are starting to melt into one another, and there is precious little difference between a Deobandi and a Salafist and a Wahhabi and etc. SA aren't even bothering funding a rival school anymore, they just moved on to straight up funding their own schools in Pakistan a while back. And why not? They all share the same goal, really, and though they may have slightly differing interpretation they agree on the big points.

Always at the center of the web you find SA and the other petro-rich sunni feudal tribal kingdoms of the Gulf. Muslims the world over have no problem swallowing retarded, ridiculous conspiracy theories about evil world manipulating jews or bloodthirsty western crusaders out for muslim blood, cynically funding false-flag muslim attacks on their own people in some sort of convoluted geopolitical scheme for resources, going so far as creating ISIS out of hired mercenaries and Mossad/CIA undercover agents. But are seemingly oblivious to the much more obvious culprits, the ones with the most to gain from a religious/ethnic (same thing in the mideast really) civil war in Syria and Iraq.

Could it possibly be SA and Iran, the two figureheads for the sunni/shia cold war that has been shaping up in the region since decolonization? No, of course not, must be the mysterious figures sitting in the shadows smoking cigars, as they have total and absolute control over every single event that ever happens, like some sort of bored, omniscient greek pantheon. Not like SA and Iran and other "third world" countries have massive wealth and influence, with their own geopolitical goals and strategies.

And oh god, the naive idiots who were all pumped up about the "revolt" against evil tyrant Assad. Even had the "revolt" suceeded early on before the wolves moved in, it would have resulted in ethnic cleansing and fragmentation of Syria at best, a repeat of Iraq, since it was an ethnic/sectarian war from the very onset. The window-dressing of "freedom" and "democracy" was clearly directed at a useful idiot western audience, and paid off a little at the start. But as we see every time in the muslim world, those concepts aren't exactly motivating. Sooner or later the real organic product shows up, the insane radical islamist. That is the true populist expression of muslim-majority countries,something most western people can't seem to wrap their heads around. We are apparently too used to the insane extremes of individualist/collectivist dichotomy common to the western political process to perceive the world in any other way.
 
Whenever I'm laughing at something and I'm told it isn't funny or it isn't that funny.

If you do that, I will punch you square in the face.

It's like saying "Your not allowed to feel joy" or "Stop being happy because I want you to stop"

I dealt with that a couple of times in high school. It's worse when they put on a bitchy tone.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Lurkman
Back