What makes you obsess so hard about DSP? - a genuine question

Status
Not open for further replies.
I explained this in the first post. And to be accusing me of dodging questions you are not any better.
It's because a distinctive change in the way you are doing things.
Previously people told me it's ok to have a discussion about phil because he puts out all the information himself.
But now it's just 3rd parties with a story too good to be true. And you are wanting the burden of proof to be on phil. If you don't see the issue with that. Well then I guess the discussion is over. Because you have den crossed the line where you just belive in pure fantasy. It doesn't hurt me

Discussion is over?
Go post about it on TKOH then. Why are you here?

"it doesn't hurt me"
"i don't care"
"you can't fool me"

Sounds like that's all bullshit BSV, tell us how much of a financial hole you're in from throwing money through your computer screen all the way to Washington.
 
"Founded as the CWCki Forums, and originally dedicated to Christian Weston Chandler, the Kiwi Farms is about eccentrics on the Internet. These people are commonly referred to as Lolcows and are fascinating for reasons distinct to each spectator. We document the phenomenon, with every member bringing different perspectives and opinions to discussion. It is this diversity which has caused our peculiar community to thrive."

It's on the front page and I think it's a pretty accurate explanation.
 
@BSV

Oh shit my krone-bag there's some drama going on between the mods on Phil's chat:
upload_2017-12-26_0-48-35.png


u better check on that asap
 
I explained this in the first post. And to be accusing me of dodging questions you are not any better.
It's because a distinctive change in the way you are doing things.
Previously people told me it's ok to have a discussion about phil because he puts out all the information himself.
But now it's just 3rd parties with a story too good to be true. And you are wanting the burden of proof to be on phil. If you don't see the issue with that. Well then I guess the discussion is over. Because you have den crossed the line where you just belive in pure fantasy. It doesn't hurt me
And we all have a problem with phil never showing proof. You also believe in the pure fantasy that phil repeats every day.
P.S. i know your soul is crying every time you read one of my posts and can't do anything about it. Otherwise, you would have blocked me on twitter, but you won't .
 
I do expect a lot of personal insults. And I don't mind.
You say that I live in "pripryat" I live in one of the most expensive places in Norway.
You say that I am on welfare. I have never received any welfare in my life.
You say that I am a pedophile, but nothing what so ever have shown that I am.
So when you give false information, and elect to listen and belive in it. I may have some questions.
And yes you are more obsessed with what phil does then me.
Do you have any answers to me in regards to what I asked you or just personal insults?
What I asked is why are you obsessing with phils personal life?
And
Why are you suddenly creating the phil drama yourself with unverified 3rd person bullshit?

You're a tard so any money you have is tard bucks by definition.
 
And we all have a problem with phil never showing proof. You also believe in the pure fantasy that phil repeats every day.
P.S. i know your soul is crying every time you read one of my posts and can't do anything about it. Otherwise, you would have blocked me on twitter, but you won't .
Yes but if you talk about phil and phil is the source of the information you get it? When a 3rd party comes in from nowhere and shows nothing to prove what they are saying is true. It's just bullshit. And it is not even from Phil.
I even said how the trolling would pan out:
Arbitrary deadline given. Phil is going to "pay" no evidence shown.
And nothing have challenged that.
Just take a picture of the passport where you have a stamp from homeland security and when you entered. Story is suddenly credible. But not even that.
So yes it's a really huge difference if you use information from phil. And someone completely random that tells a good story. It hurts your credibility... Especially when it's about things that are borderline criminal
 
Yes but if you talk about phil and phil is the source of the information you get it? When a 3rd party comes in from nowhere and shows nothing to prove what they are saying is true. It's just bullshit. And it is not even from Phil.
I even said how the trolling would pan out:
Arbitrary deadline given. Phil is going to "pay" no evidence shown.
And nothing have challenged that.
Just take a picture of the passport where you have a stamp from homeland security and when you entered. Story is suddenly credible. But not even that.
So yes it's a really huge difference if you use information from phil. And someone completely random that tells a good story. It hurts your credibility... Especially when it's about things that are borderline criminal

you spent all this time arguing with people who don't care what you have to say and you didn't even get Phil a christmas present.

fuck dude you're a terrible friend to him. not even bailing him out of his 'tax' situation and now not even sending him a christmas present.
 
Y'know, at first I saw TIHYDP videos and thought Phil is just really fucking stupid when it comes to video games, but alas then you actually start listening his bullshit rants about game developers, detractors and everything else and it becomes apparent Phil isn't just some random average Joe who's shit at video games, but he's pretty shit in life as well.
 
Yes but if you talk about phil and phil is the source of the information you get it? When a 3rd party comes in from nowhere and shows nothing to prove what they are saying is true. It's just bullshit. And it is not even from Phil.
I even said how the trolling would pan out:
Arbitrary deadline given. Phil is going to "pay" no evidence shown.
And nothing have challenged that.
Just take a picture of the passport where you have a stamp from homeland security and when you entered. Story is suddenly credible. But not even that.
So yes it's a really huge difference if you use information from phil. And someone completely random that tells a good story. It hurts your credibility... Especially when it's about things that are borderline criminal
So if a known murder was standing next to a corpse, covered in blood, holding the murder weapon, and caught on camera than we should let them go because the evidence didn't come from the known murderer. Your logic is just outstanding.
Actually it hurts your image more because you openly said that you believe phil and he doesn't need to show evidence. Not one member on kiwifarms has had the same thought toward the escort claim
 
So if a known murder was standing next to a corpse, covered in blood, holding the murder weapon, and caught on camera than we should let them go because the evidence didn't come from the known murderer. Your logic is just outstanding.
Actually it hurts your image more because you openly said that you believe phil and he doesn't need to show evidence. Not one member on kiwifarms has had the same thought toward the escort claim
It's not how it is. Then you would have a whitness not just an accuser telling the story that this happened. What a bad comparison.
 
It's not how it is. Then you would have a whitness not just an accuser telling the story that this happened. What a bad comparison.
If it was caught on camera, than the need for an actual witness would not exist. Since no witness exists to confirm that dsp can't pay his bills, than he is a scammer. Your logic here.
Here is a better comparison:
If a street beggar was followed by investigators and concluded that he owned a new car, had an expensive house in a gated community, and bought expensive items while holding a sign 'need money for food and bills' than you would let him go because the evidence didn't come from his own mouth. Your own logic here buddy
 
View attachment 341966

I think you are one of the persons behind the drama. It's just a gut feeling since you came along with it, and seem to be very obsessed with it.
You also tried to oversell the "Traveling is hard" tweet like some nostrildamus tier shit. Even though it was known that phil had a girlfriend traveling over. You don't fool me, even if you have the listen and belive people on your side

I am behind this?

AMA
 
I think he's just mad that Philly boy spent his money on a fancy hooker rather than on himself and the other self-mutilating sex perverts from what I'm seeing.

Besides, why would I listen to a compulsive liar who could simply do this: a video with his girl to decisively shut me up. He clearly doesn't give a shit about her privacy given that it only took a week for him to take the back shot to satiate his childish ego, so really just doing this is win/win. It'd kill the hooker rumor, and then he can place her further in the background to protect her and look good when the really insane A-logs gun for her anyway and he shits on them for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back