I have seen the transhuman future on second life, and I can tell you right now that no one is going to hire a 7'foot tall minotaur with lactating tittys for any kind of job position.
Also trannys who do live long enough to reach old age will be the funniest things on earth and every nigga gonna laugh nonstop at them. They will be a symbol of retardation across eons.
I think we’re living in a lolcow era. Like in a thousand years people won’t remember exactly when we reached the moon but they’ll remember the time the I Fucking Love Science crowd castrated themselves and wore dresses. Also if the Republic falls, the economy upends, etc., and anything bad in the next century will be attributed to it.
View attachment 2125350
It will be different this time (tm)
I have a few counterpoints to this.
The first is not everyone who thinks trannyism is going to lose or is opposed to trannyism is a social conservative. Terfs are the best example of this. Many of these terfs still support gay marriage and overall are on the left, but they’ve become more vocal in their criticisms of trannyism. Every year they’re gaining more support, not less. At no point during the 2004 or 2008 elections was there a serious opposition amongst progressive activists to gay marriage. The main obstacle was the undecided, moderates, and social conservatives. There really wasn’t any opposition on the left, those who opposed it from the lgb community were die hard conservatives and token minorities. Many were republicans first, homos second. In contrast, there was quite an active number of libertarians and non-religious conservatives who vocally supported gay rights.
The second point is that I feel like this is the flip side of the “right side of history.” It basically boils down to people thinking that progressive activists are always going to win out, and if you don’t want to get left behind, you should jump ship and make sure you’re on the “correct side of history.” There isn’t a basis in this unless all you care and think about are nebulous “social values” and you ignore everything else. I’d argue though that progressives
aren’t winning out and when they do get something
at best it’s a concession by the establishment.
Trannyism only has so much clout because of big pharma, which has a lot of pull, supports it. The same big pharma also actively opposes and routinely beats a lot of progressive attempts to reform it. Why? Because reform would cost them bucket loads of money. It’s not that progressives are winning, they don’t feel like they’re winning, and many feel hopeless when it comes to guns, medical care, etc. When they do win its because they’re being milked for every last dime.
Third, there are some significant differences between gay rights and trans rights. Primarily, there really wasn’t an argument that many moderates and even a fair number of conservatives, would buy as to why gay marriage should be opposed. There really wasn’t something material at mistake, a lot of it was hypothetical fear mongering. A lot of opposition to gay marriage came down to ill defined ideas like “protect family values” and “religious freedom.” The issue with the former is that values are very subjective and aren’t necessarily universal. The problem with the latter is that not everyone was religious and even if they were, they’d ask ‘would or should religious freedom trump or even prevent two consenting adults from entering into a marriage agreement? How would two adults entering into a private agreement affect others religious beliefs?’ Turns out, most didn’t think it would and the apocalyptic preaching was wrong about it leading to arrests, the rapture, etc.
Other concerns that this line of thought would bring up (back then) is which religions and religious values should we allow to shape our society? Judo-Christian and even Christian values is a very, very broad concept and is very debatable. There are tens of thousands of congregations and I can assure you that there is not a lot they can agree on. Some denominations/religions for example oppose blood transfusions because of how they interpret the Old Testament. If we allowed religious values to dictate who can be married what consequences could it have on things like blood transfusions at the local level, especially in places where they made up a considerable portion of the population?
(Lol I feel like I went back in time there for a bit).
This differs from trans rights in that trans rights have
very substantial and material negative affects on others. Currently trannies are dominating women’s sports, are a threat to women and girls in bathrooms, the surgeries they proclaim are necessary are not as effective as advertised, and they’re irreversible. Furthermore many trannies think they’re animals, have multiple personalities, and are clearly mentally ill. One of the major advantages the lgb community had at the time is that they were often seen as just as or less crazy than fundies. A lot of them came out and were normies. In contrast trannies were the autistic kids in high school that flip out at the smallest perceived grievance. Its easier to defend gay rights when it’s for some relatively normal neighbor than it is to defend some bipolar furry pedo who claims to have multiple personalities and a feminine penis.
A fourth key difference is that there wasn’t as much money or attention that could be made from opposing gay rights like there will be with trans rights. There were some fundie grifters but it wasn’t as profitable. In contrast people were able to get progressive points if their children were gay or lesbian, much like how many can get them today if their kid is trans. If some attention whore tried to make their kid gay, and later it turned out they weren’t, it could be handwaved as a weird phase and forgotten about… There are people who flip out about being circumcised. Now imagine if those same people who were circumcised were pressured by their mothers to chop off their dicks. How would they feel? What would they do? They’ll shriek a lot more that’s for sure. How many of them would speak out and more importantly try to sue people? At that point there will be some that aren’t even interested in recouping money but just inflicting financial hardship on anyone they associate with their castration. With gays there wasn’t going to be a massive amount of lawsuits and if anything gay marriage would be a boon to family lawyers that specialize in divorce. With trannies there’s going to be
a lot of money in lawsuits. America is one of the most litigious countries ever. So of course people will sue when their daughter doesn’t get an athletic scholarship, is violated in the bathroom, when their kid is stunted because of puberty blockers, or because they were misled about being a woman in a man’s body. It’s going to be a shitshow of epic proportions…
Lastly, one also should factor in the grifters. How many would try to get 15 minutes of fame? If it got them views, donations, etc., how many would turn to YouTube and TikTok to talk about their slew of medical problems, their struggles with detransitioning, how they were lied and betrayed by the medical community, etc?
