What should be done to stop mass shootings?

It says under a well regulated militia. I know you're a proud, admitted, low IQ simpleton, but I put the second amendment right in my post. Is reading that difficult for you?
The founders understood that being allowed to own a weapon was the one constant thing in history that separated free people from niggercattle like you.

As for your fixation with the word militia, well regulated militias were necessary to fight off foreign governments at the time the constitution was written, since we didn't have a standing army. It's an antiquated part of the document.
 
Abolish schools. This way all mass shootings will only happen in the following places: 1) shopping mall, full of armed guards; 2) police stations, full of armed cops; 3) furry conventions, also full of armed guards but I wish they weren't. Oh and colleges as well, but fuck those - if you're not actively milking the post-c00f home office opportunities to get your medical degree then you're failing at life.

Problem solved. This way only people who deserve to be shot will get killed.
Less police for furry conventions means more police for shopping malls and police stations. Therefore, lowering the chance of mass shootings occuring even further, while the mass shootings that still occur in Minecraft are for a good cause
 
It says under a well regulated militia. I know you're a proud, admitted, low IQ simpleton, but I put the second amendment right in my post. Is reading that difficult for you?

Since apparently it is, here ya go:

random retards with guns isn't a well regulated militia


Not as funny as how much of retards you 2021 join dates are. Go back to /pol/ with the other theocratic 75 year old Republicans, son.
You want to play this game? You want your 'representatives' to play this game? Because redefining words and written intent is pretty much allowing this:
1674169731245.png
 
The founders understood that being allowed to own a weapon was the one constant thing in history that separated free people from niggercattle like you.
Only a low IQ /pol/tard uses terms like "niggercattle", but then again, we know that's you given the fact you're proud of being an uneducated simpleton
As for your fixation with the word militia, well regulated militias were necessary to fight off foreign governments at the time the constitution was written, since we didn't have a standing army. It's an antiquated part of the document.
Lol no, it's literally right in the words. "Well regulated militia". That supports gun control.

You want to play this game? You want your 'representatives' to play this game? Because redefining words and written intent is pretty much allowing this:
View attachment 4299953
Then why not change the second amendment?
 
Only a low IQ /pol/tard uses terms like "niggercattle", but then again, we know that's you given the fact you're proud of being an uneducated simpleton

Lol no, it's literally right in the words. "Well regulated militia". That supports gun control.


Then why not change the second amendment?
Why not change the 1st? Speech should be limited to only political and business figures.

Why not change the 4th? Citizens are irresponsible and shouldn't be allowed property.

Why not change if not outright remove the 5th? Punishments should be handed out double, triple, or even quadruple to drive the point home to would be criminals.

Why not change or remove the 6th? There should be no inefficient trial, summary punishment and execution should be handed out on the street.


Do you really want this door opened? Because if its done to the 2nd, it will be done to the rest of them. You give up one amendment on these grounds, you risk loosing the rest on these grounds.

Oh i'm sorry, the things I listed off above ALL READY HAPPEN.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: secret watcher
Why not change the 1st? Speech should be limited to only political and business figures.

Why not change the 4th? Citizens are irresponsible and shouldn't be allowed property.

Why not change if not outright remove the 5th? Punishments should be handed out double, triple, or even quadruple to drive the point home to would be criminals.

Why not change or remove the 6th? There should be no inefficient trial, summary punishment and execution should be handed out on the street.


Do you really want this door opened? Because if its done to the 2nd, it will be done to the rest of them. You give up one amendment on these grounds, you risk loosing the rest on these grounds.

Oh i'm sorry, the things I listed off above ALL READY HAPPEN.
Lol you just mentioned that amendments change all the time, so I asked why not change the 2nd. Then you throw a tantrum because you're a good little boomer who cant dare think that maybe his theocratic political party is lying to him
 
Lol you just mentioned that amendments change all the time, so I asked why not change the 2nd. Then you throw a tantrum because you're a good little boomer who cant dare think that maybe his theocratic political party is lying to
Every time I see you post bait like this, I wonder more and more if you are a 13 year old that understands fuck all.
 
The police and government want us to live in a society where they provide all of the safety, but are unable/unwilling to actually do so.

Any place that bans firearms must have well-paid security on patrol at all times, and those people must be held to strict fitness standards.

The police too, I hate fatfuck cops more than any other chubster.
 
It says under a well regulated militia. I know you're a proud, admitted, low IQ simpleton, but I put the second amendment right in my post. Is reading that difficult for you?

Since apparently it is, here ya go:

random retards with guns isn't a well regulated militia
(of a business, military outfit, routine, etc) controlled or supervised to conform to rules, regulations, tradition, etc
a well-regulated militia

Wouldn't laws that prohibit you from training with guns, forming gun clubs, militas, and etc... Count as an infringement of the second amendment.

Because it says the right of the people not the government, not certain people, but people ie you and me to bear arms.

Wouldn't the patriot act which your side extended and Dubya pushed constantly is trying to make LARPers who wish to form militas in the defense of themselves from a corrupt government become more criminal.

Literally the only way to "stop" mass shootings is to have law abiding citizens armed at all times OR have intense security in every block.
Look making good people defenseless doesn't save more lives. Americans are finding out that patchwork gun control doesn't work the only solution to spree killers is making spaces more prone to armed response. Gunfights it turns out have less dead civilians on average then mass shootings. When you look at it by the numbers
Lol you just mentioned that amendments change all the time, so I asked why not change the 2nd. Then you throw a tantrum because you're a good little boomer who cant dare think that maybe his theocratic political party is lying to him
You don't live in a theocracy, I mean you think someone on the street saying Jesus love you and the occasional I don't support gay marriage= I live in a oppressive theocracy. You live in a place where you have freedom. If you think America is too theocratic move to Canada I'll pitch in for the ticket. At least if you sperg you can unironically try to suck Justin Trudeau's cock.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
Every time I see you post bait like this, I wonder more and more if you are a 13 year old that understands fuck all.
Ironic coming from the guy who just parrots what he hears on Fox News like a good boomer

You probably still believe in "Trickle down economics" since Tucker Carlson told your boomer ass that it works

(of a business, military outfit, routine, etc) controlled or supervised to conform to rules, regulations, tradition, etc
a well-regulated militia

Wouldn't laws that prohibit you from training with guns, forming gun clubs, militas, and etc... Count as an infringement of the second amendment.

Because it says the right of the people not the government, not certain people, but people ie you and me to bear arms.

Wouldn't the patriot act which your side extended and Dubya pushed constantly is trying to make LARPers who wish to form militas in the defense of themselves from a corrupt government become more criminal.
It says a well regulated militia. Random people with guns aren't a well regulated militia.
 
Only a low IQ /pol/tard uses terms like "niggercattle", but then again, we know that's you given the fact you're proud of being an uneducated simpleton
You seethe about terms like niggercattle, while completely ignoring the point that the right to own a weapon was a defining feature of being a free person throughout history. Do you think slaves were allowed to own swords in the Roman Empire?
Lol no, it's literally right in the words. "Well regulated militia". That supports gun control.
Like I said before, militias were important to the founders because they'd be relied on for fighting off the English, French, Indians, etc. since we didn't have a standing army at the time. You latching on the the words 'well regulated militia' to support your argument for gun control in 2023 is embarrassing.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
You seethe about terms like niggercattle, while completely ignoring the point that the right to own a weapon was a defining feature of being a free person throughout history. Do you think slaves were allowed to own swords in the Roman Empire?
I can't help it that you're just a Fox News watching boomer who doesn't even know the wording of the amendment that Tucker Carlson told him to love so much.

Like I said before, militias were important to the founders because they'd be relied on for fighting off the English, French, Indians, etc. since we didn't have a standing army at the time. You latching on the the words 'well regulated militia' to support your argument for gun control in 2023 is embarrassing.
Except "well regulated militia" is literally in the part of the text. Back then they had to have weapons because those were the armies for defense. Today we don't have that need.

I get it, you have severe autism which has given you the worldview of a 75 year old man. You are upset that within a generation or two, your boomer worldview will be gone and forgotten because the vast majority of Republican lovers are boomers, and the rest are autists and religious zealots like yourself.
 
can't help it that you're just a Fox News watching boomer who doesn't even know the wording of the amendment that Tucker Carlson told him to love so much.
Do you think slaves were allowed to own swords in the Roman Empire?
Except "well regulated militia" is literally in the part of the text. Back then they had to have weapons because those were the armies for defense. Today we don't have that need.
Right, the militia part is antiquated now. But the other part - the right of the people to keep and bear arms - is not.
You are upset that within a generation or two, your boomer worldview will be gone and forgotten because the vast majority of Republican lovers are boomers, and the rest are autists and religious zealots like yourself.
You are pretty optimistic your homosexual worldview will prevail. But you shouldn't be, because it doesn't appeal to normal people. That's why Ivan Provorov's jersey has completely sold out after he stood up to you faggots. You seem to forget that outside of major metropolitan areas, 99% of people reject your gay ultra liberal ideology. That's gonna be a tough pill for you to swallow when you realize you were wrong.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
I think if we make mass shootings illegal people will stop doing them.

Moreover, if we implement ideological mass propaganda against school shootings in kindergarten through high school, children will understand how bad mass shootings are and stop committing them. EXAMPLE: Schools in south America bring former gang members to assemblies to speak to children about how being in a gang fucked up their life. Similarly, we should bring in former mass shooters, like Elliot Rodger, to come to elementary schools and explain how killing 13 people in an "incel rage event" fucked up their life.

This 2 step plan may still have some quirks in it, but generally it's a good idea, i think
 
It says a well regulated militia. Random people with guns aren't a well regulated militia.
Well regulated military means the ability to train. Ie the government shouldn't restrict the right of who can be milita. It's almost as if the founders wanted us to have firearms to defend against a tyrannical government.

In B4 you make some dumb statement like your ar-15 won't take out a tank or drone what do you think a bunch of herders with Kalashnikovs did you the US yet again.

Do you think slaves were allowed to own swords in the Roman Empire?
Nope
Right, the militia part is antiquated now. But the other part - the right of the people to keep and bear arms - is not.
The milita isn't outdated it means you have the right to form a milita and train. The right of the people to bear arms is essentially.
You are pretty optimistic your homosexual worldview will prevail. But you shouldn't be, because it doesn't appeal to normal people. That's why Ivan Provorov's jersey has completely sold out after he stood up to you faggots. You seem to forget that outside of major metropolitan areas, 99% of people reject your gay ultra liberal ideology. That's gonna be a tough pill for you to swallow when you realize you were wrong.
I mean I don't think he realizes he won like twenty years ago. He seems bitter that he can't just have everyone believe in his narrow DNC approved worldview.
 
Back