What should be done to stop mass shootings?

Lol, no... boomers are the ones who overwhelming vote for the theocratic political party you love so much. There's a reason so many of your fellow alt-right retards want to raise the voting age to 25... because young people overwhelmingly vote against theocracy. This upsets you boomers a lot, so you want to stop them from voting. Sorry that you have the worldview of a 75 year old bible thumper, but maybe if you stop acting like that I'll stop mocking you for it. I know it makes you autists super upset that people want change and your diseased brain can't handle change well, but that's reality, son. The future is now, old man.

tl;dr: Boomers like yourself overwhelmingly voted for Republican. Young people don't want to live in a theocracy like you do
You ignored all my points retard.
 
Give schools the same security that banks and statehouses have. Max sentences for all felonies nationwide, all felons go through a temporary parole period after time is served, impliment stop and frisk, allow police profiling of the 5% of areas responsible for 50% of all crime, mandatory 10 years for any parolee caught with a gun, issue free saturday night specials to all clean record or non-paroled citizens at the DMV when they renew their driver's license, nationwide constitutional carry.
Finally, a tax cut if at least 5 people can attest that you regularly carry a gun.
 
-De-stigmatize mass-murder, and normalize bloody corpses in public spaces.
-Make murderer-phobia a hatecrime, with lengthy mandatory prison sentences.
-Focus attention on the REAL issues; the unvaxxed, and people who don't wear masks; Mass-killings are just a normal part of life in vibrant hustle-bustle big-city with ethnicfood. But masks save LIVES!!!
-special hotline, for reporting dangerous mask non-compliance.
-???
-Profit!!
 
How so? The whole point of the guns was for the militias.
Even if that were true, I don't care. I'm going with the interpretation that all free people have the right to own weapons. Why do you keep ignoring my question about whether slaves could own swords in the ancient world?
Lol not true at all. You religious zealots tried to ban abortion in Kansas of all places and got BTFO. Your boomer worldview is dying, and the votes have shown that. If you left your theocratic boomer hugboxes now and then you'd see that.
You are more of a religious zealot than I am. Your religion is globohomo, you think children should troon out. You're a sick guy.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
You ignored all my points retard.
That's because you refuse to believe that "part of a well regulated militia" does not include random schizos with guns.

Even if that were true, I don't care. I'm going with the interpretation that all free people have the right to own weapons. Why do you keep ignoring my question about whether slaves could own swords in the ancient world?

You are more of a religious zealot than I am. Your religion is globohomo, you think children should troon out. You're a sick guy.
I don't think children should troon out, lol. And "globohomo" is not a religion, retard. you're a bible thumping religious zealot who wants to push a christian theocracy on us, which is why you love your boomer political party so much. You are just another A&H autistic boomer who gets his political views from Fox News.

The fact that younger people overwhelmingly hate Republicans has your diseased brain seething mad, which is typical of A&H religious zealots. The future is now, old man

Ban niggers and ban Democrat politicians and the rate of "mass shootings" in this country would drop like lead in air.
Most mass shooters are white, retard
 
Train everyone on firearm safety and usage and stop allowing the news to publicize all information about a killer. News should be about information only, not deep diving into the past of the person who committed the crime. I don’t think the news should be held responsible for mass shootings, but they definitely put way too much information out there about how and why, which can encourage someone with a “why” to find a “how”.
Switzerland seems to be doing well because almost everyone there owns a firearm and know how to use it, I would assume mass shooters are discouraged when they go in and see almost everyone with a pistol on their hip.
 
Mandatory gun ownership and open carry.

I give it about a week of extreme violence before everyone that might try to start shit get artificially selected out of existence.
 
That's because you refuse to believe that "part of a well regulated militia" does not include random schizos with guns.
"Well regulated militia" isn't actually relevant to the law or legal standard as it is applied or intended to be applied. "A well regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." There are two clauses in that sentence. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is the meat and bones of the sentence, the independent clause which can stand on its own, and is the legally applicable bit. "A well regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free state," is an entirely dependent clause which hinges upon the following part of the sentence, aka "the right to keep and bear arms...".

A more modern understanding using grammar and sentence structure as they apply today would probably just involve using the word "because" or at least a semicolon, to clarify for the retard class. The sentence would likely look a bit more like "because a well regulated militia is essential to national security, the peoples' right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" since this is the interpretation the courts and people with brains have been using for over two centuries now.

Also lol because "well regulated" doesn't mean the same shit you probably think it does, with training drills etc. "Well regulated" at the time meant more along lines of "well supplied" - militia by it's very essence at the time was not a permanent feature nor was participation some matter of a membership, it wasn't like the army where you'd get shot for desertion, and a lot of the militia came and went throughout the course of the war as many chose to join and many chose to leave to be with their families or because they hadn't even been fighting for the colony, just for their local area. Other than the public shame of being known as a coward if you didn't show up when summoned, or the real risk that if the Brits came through unopposed they might fuck your life up, there wasn't some overseeing authority which said "alright, you're in the militia, you must do X to stay in the militia".
 
"Well regulated militia" isn't actually relevant to the law or legal standard as it is applied or intended to be applied. "A well regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." There are two clauses in that sentence. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is the meat and bones of the sentence, the independent clause which can stand on its own, and is the legally applicable bit. "A well regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free state," is an entirely dependent clause which hinges upon the following part of the sentence, aka "the right to keep and bear arms...".

A more modern understanding using grammar and sentence structure as they apply today would probably just involve using the word "because" or at least a semicolon, to clarify for the retard class. The sentence would likely look a bit more like "because a well regulated militia is essential to national security, the peoples' right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" since this is the interpretation the courts and people with brains have been using for over two centuries now.

Also lol because "well regulated" doesn't mean the same shit you probably think it does, with training drills etc. "Well regulated" at the time meant more along lines of "well supplied" - militia by it's very essence at the time was not a permanent feature nor was participation some matter of a membership, it wasn't like the army where you'd get shot for desertion, and a lot of the militia came and went throughout the course of the war as many chose to join and many chose to leave to be with their families or because they hadn't even been fighting for the colony, just for their local area. Other than the public shame of being known as a coward if you didn't show up when summoned, or the real risk that if the Brits came through unopposed they might fuck your life up, there wasn't some overseeing authority which said "alright, you're in the militia, you must do X to stay in the militia".
Lol cope harder, boomer. Since the language is so out of date, maybe we should update the second amendment then? We aren't in any danger of England coming to take us over. Canada, maybe, I don't trust those guys up there...
 
Lol cope harder, boomer. Since the language is so out of date, maybe we should update the second amendment then? We aren't in any danger of England coming to take us over. Canada, maybe, I don't trust those guys up there...
Careful what you wish for lmao
A constitutional convention probably wouldn't work in CurrentYear and even if they managed to form one it might not go the way you expect, that applies to anything at the time. The leaf menace must be held at bay though, on that we can agree.
 
I don't think children should troon out, lol.
That's right, you said teenagers should troon out, not children. My mistake but you're still a sick freak for thinking that.
And "globohomo" is not a religion, retard.
It's the religion that makes you think it's acceptable for teenagers to troon out.
The fact that younger people overwhelmingly hate Republicans has your diseased brain seething mad
I don't care who younger people hate. Most of them are retarded niggercattle.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
Permitless carry everywhere with stand your ground protection solves the issue well enough.

Barring that, the two big things with most mass shootings are either gang/nog related or mental health related. Banning weapons themselves will do nothing to solve those issues. As pro 2A as I am there are absolutists that will oppose any and all efforts at restricting gun rights for individuals, especially with their history of being expanded upon and abused through creative interpretation. But the two biggest dents would be ownership bans for gang affiliated individuals and those who are actively seeking treatment for mental health issues or severe drug offenses. If Key'shaun is arrested in connection with a gang crime, felony or not, he's a massive risk for further violent crime. Likewise, if someone is actively seeking help for significant mental health issues and are taking medications to control it they have no business owning a firearm. They already ask you on the form if you've been committed or taking drugs since both are a bar for ownership so it's not a huge leap to go there.

These will never come to pass however - anti-2A people are generally progressive and will never target gangs since they are usually black and they will never, ever suggest psychology or pharma is to blame for any tragedy. Pro-2A will oppose them outright on the grounds that they will be expanded upon and be used to target people outside their scope, or just opposed on the grounds that it's a constitutional right and it can't be surrendered even in those extreme cases. Guns aren't going anywhere and there will always be people who want to hurt others so the only real solution is having a populace comfortable and familiar with defense to protect against them and deter people from even trying anything.
 
It still amuses me that an obese, QAnon believing troon (or just a dude who pretends to be a chick, but i repeat myself) is on here and loves Russia.
Careful what you wish for lmao
A constitutional convention probably wouldn't work in CurrentYear and even if they managed to form one it might not go the way you expect, that applies to anything at the time. The leaf menace must be held at bay though, on that we can agree.
i dunno, you're the one upset that I am actually reading what the amendment says.

That's right, you said teenagers should troon out, not children. My mistake but you're still a sick freak for thinking that.

It's the religion that makes you think it's acceptable for teenagers to troon out.

I don't care who younger people hate. Most of them are retarded niggercattle.
I never said they should troon out, retard. I said that if they were trans, they should be able to live as someone who is trans.

"Globohomo" isn't a religion, despite what Q told you. Your crippling autism and being terminally online has given you the worldview of a 75 year old man in the year 1950. It's not normal to be like that. If you stopped acting like a puritanical 75 year old religious zealot maybe you could meet a nice woman. Women aren't into men who act like their grandfather.

Seriously, spend less time on /pol/ and online. Go outside and turn off Fox News. You'll realize that what Q and Tucker Carlson told you isn't the truth.
 
It's funny that almost everything in this thread revolves around American politics because the mass shooting is a uniquely American phenomenon. Only Americans are deranged enough to have hapa children like Elliot Rodger. Hapa incels make up 99% of school shooting. The idea of a propositional nation, rejecting ethnicity and race, has given the lowest rungs of society free reign to interbreed and create gangster genetic freak monsters such as mulattos and hapas, EVEN La Monstrosity del Americanos (spics). As this site is dominated by Americans, I'm sure my ideas will be well received.

There is no irony in this post.
 
I never said they should troon out, retard. I said that if they were trans, they should be able to live as someone who is trans.
There's no such thing as trans, despite what your globohomo religion taught you in your gender studies class.
If you stopped acting like a puritanical 75 year old religious zealot maybe you could meet a nice woman. Women aren't into men who act like their grandfather.
I hate to break it to you but there's nothing an adult fan of professional wrestling can teach me about women. Maybe if you stopped watching oiled up men in tights, you'd meet a nice woman. Women aren't into men who are in a state of arrested development.
 
There's no such thing as trans, despite what your globohomo religion taught you in your gender studies class.
Then what are all of you boomer theocrats so upset about?
I hate to break it to you but there's nothing an adult fan of professional wrestling can teach me about women. Maybe if you stopped watching oiled up men in tights, you'd meet a nice woman. Women aren't into men who are in a state of arrested development.
Lol between us two, I am the one with a girlfriend. I don't even watch wrestling anymore, but you're the one who acts like an 80 year old religious zealot. Women aren't into guys who remind them of their grandpa. Get with the times, old man. Like I said, stop spending your entire existence inside of alt-right, boomer, theocratic hugboxes and you'll see why your worldview is retarded.
 
Then what are all of you boomer theocrats so upset about?
It sounds like your the one who is upset, see below
Lol between us two, I am the one with a girlfriend. I don't even watch wrestling anymore, but you're the one who acts like an 80 year old religious zealot. Women aren't into guys who remind them of their grandpa. Get with the times, old man. Like I said, stop spending your entire existence inside of alt-right, boomer, theocratic hugboxes and you'll see why your worldview is retarded.
Yeah, you sound pretty upset.

You may think that I act like an 80 year old boomer in these threads but don't worry, I'm good at hiding my power level irl. I live in an area where most women are liberal, so I've gotten pretty good at lying about my political beliefs until I get what I want out of them. You could probably learn a thing or two from me, son.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher
It sounds like your the one who is upset, see below

Yeah, you sound pretty upset.

You may think that I act like an 80 year old boomer in these threads but don't worry, I'm good at hiding my power level irl. I live in an area where most women are liberal, so I've gotten pretty good at lying about my political beliefs until I get what I want out of them. You could probably learn a thing or two from me, son.
I can't help it that you act like an 80 year old man. See, you even admit to it that women are repulsed by you unless you lie about your views. Like I said, women aren't into men who remind them of their grandpa.

Sorry the truth hurts you so much, boomer. The future is now, old man
 
Back